[Skip to Navigation]
Sign In
Views 275
Citations 0
Correction
July 23, 2021

Error in Description of Limitations

JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(7):e2123159. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.23159

In the Invited Commentary titled “Surfactant Treatment—a National, Population-Based Study of Adherence to Best Practice, Off-Label Use, and Associations With Outcomes,”1 published May 5, 2021, it was incorrectly stated that the study by Challis et al2 did not report data on oxygen requirement at 36 weeks postmenstrual age. This article has been corrected.1

References
1.
Ramanathan  R.  Surfactant treatment—a national, population-based study of adherence to best practice, off-label use, and associations with outcomes.   JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(5):e217848. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.7848PubMedGoogle Scholar
2.
Challis  P, Nydert  P, Håkansson  S, Norman  M.  Association of adherence to surfactant best practice uses with clinical outcomes among neonates in Sweden.   JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(5):e217269. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.7269PubMedGoogle Scholar
×