HCW indicates health care worker; PCR, polymerase chain reaction.
Localized and systemic symptoms that occurred after the first (A) and second (B) doses of the vaccine.
eTable 1. Comparison of Rates of SARS-CoV-2 IgG Anti-Spike and Anti-RBD Seroconversion in Hemodialysis Patients Receiving 1 Versus 2 Doses of BNT162b2 and HCW Receiving 2 Doses After Including and Excluding Individuals with Baseline Anti-NP Seroconversion
eTable 2. Rates of Attaining Convalescent Serum Levels for SARS-CoV-2 IgG Anti-Spike and Anti-RBD in Hemodialysis Patients Receiving 1 Versus 2 Doses of BNT162b2 and HCW Receiving 2 Doses After Including and Excluding Individuals with Baseline Anti-NP Seroconversion
eFigure. SARS-CoV-2 IgG spike, RBD, and NP Antibody Response Following 1 Versus 2 Dose BNT162b2 Vaccine in Hemodialysis Patients Excluding Baseline Anti-NP Seroconversion
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.
Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.
Err on the side of full disclosure.
If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.
Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.
Yau K, Abe KT, Naimark D, et al. Evaluation of the SARS-CoV-2 Antibody Response to the BNT162b2 Vaccine in Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(9):e2123622. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.23622
What is the serologic response to the BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine in patients undergoing hemodialysis?
In this cohort study of 142 patients receiving hemodialysis, humoral response was compared in 66 patients sampled 28 days after receipt of 1 dose of vaccine with 76 patients who received 2 doses of vaccine sampled 14 days after the second dose. Among those receiving 1 dose, 6% had antireceptor binding domain response above the median level of convalescent serum vs 41% of those who received 2 doses at 1 week, increasing to 60% by 2 weeks.
The findings of this study suggest that, given that patients receiving hemodialysis appeared to exhibit a poor humoral response to a single dose of BNT162b2 vaccine, the second dose should not be delayed.
Patients undergoing hemodialysis have a high mortality rate associated with COVID-19, and this patient population often has a poor response to vaccinations. Randomized clinical trials for COVID-19 vaccines included few patients with kidney disease; therefore, vaccine immunogenicity is uncertain in this population.
To evaluate the SARS-CoV-2 antibody response in patients undergoing chronic hemodialysis following 1 vs 2 doses of BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccination compared with health care workers serving as controls and convalescent serum.
Design, Setting, and Participants
A prospective, single-center cohort study was conducted between February 2 and April 17, 2021, in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Participants included 142 patients receiving in-center hemodialysis and 35 health care worker controls.
BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) COVID-19 vaccine.
Main Outcomes and Measures
SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies to the spike protein (anti-spike), receptor binding domain (anti-RBD), and nucleocapsid protein (anti-NP).
Among the 142 participants undergoing maintenance hemodialysis, 94 (66%) were men; median age was 72 (interquartile range, 62-79) years. SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies were measured in 66 patients receiving 1 vaccine dose following a public health policy change, 76 patients receiving 2 vaccine doses, and 35 health care workers receiving 2 vaccine doses. Detectable anti-NP suggestive of natural SARS-CoV-2 infection was detected in 15 of 142 (11%) patients at baseline, and only 3 patients had prior COVID-19 confirmed by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction testing. Two additional patients contracted COVID-19 after receiving 2 doses of vaccine. In 66 patients receiving a single BNT162b2 dose, seroconversion occurred in 53 (80%) for anti-spike and 36 (55%) for anti-RBD by 28 days postdose, but a robust response, defined by reaching the median levels of antibodies in convalescent serum from COVID-19 survivors, was noted in only 15 patients (23%) for anti-spike and 4 (6%) for anti-RBD in convalescent serum from COVID-19 survivors. In patients receiving 2 doses of BNT162b2 vaccine, seroconversion occurred in 69 of 72 (96%) for anti-spike and 63 of 72 (88%) for anti-RBD by 2 weeks following the second dose and median convalescent serum levels were reached in 52 of 72 patients (72%) for anti-spike and 43 of 72 (60%) for anti-RBD. In contrast, all 35 health care workers exceeded the median level of anti-spike and anti-RBD found in convalescent serum 2 to 4 weeks after the second dose.
Conclusions and Relevance
This study suggests poor immunogenicity 28 days following a single dose of BNT162b2 vaccine in the hemodialysis population, supporting adherence to recommended vaccination schedules and avoiding delay of the second dose in these at-risk individuals.
SARS-CoV-2 with resultant COVID-19 has resulted in a global pandemic. Among those most severely affected are patients receiving maintenance hemodialysis who must visit facilities at least thrice weekly for life-sustaining treatment resulting in a 5 times greater risk for infection than the general population.1 Despite adherence to public health guidance, outbreaks have occurred in dialysis units.2 Furthermore, patients receiving hemodialysis are at greater risk for severe COVID-19, with 63% of patients receiving chronic hemodialysis who contract COVID-19 requiring hospitalization and a case fatality rate of 29% in Ontario, Canada.1 Confirmatory data from the US Renal Data System found mortality among patients receiving hemodialysis in early 2020 was 16% to 37% higher than in 2017-2019.3
Patients receiving hemodialysis frequently have a diminished immune response to vaccination compared with the general population, as observed during hepatitis B vaccination.4 Studies of natural COVID-19 infection in patients receiving hemodialysis found waning antibody concentrations by 3 months, raising the possibility that patients receiving hemodialysis may not develop an adequate vaccination response.5 In addition, randomized clinical trials for the BNT162b2 vaccine included few patients with kidney disease.6 Therefore, data on vaccine immunogenicity are lacking in this high-risk population.
Two doses of BNT162b2 vaccine were administered 21 days apart in randomized clinical trials. However, owing to vaccine shortages, some countries, including the UK and Canada, have prioritized first-dose vaccination of the general population7 while delaying the second dose for up to 3 to 4 months, offering a natural experiment for comparison of 1 vs 2 doses. To investigate the humoral response conferred by COVID-19 vaccination in the hemodialysis population, we conducted a prospective observational cohort study measuring SARS-CoV-2 immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody levels following 1 vs 2 doses of the vaccine.
In-center patients aged 18 years or older receiving hemodialysis, including those with prior COVID-19, were eligible for this single-center, prospective cohort study to evaluate SARS-CoV-2 antibody response to the BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine (Pfizer-BioNTech). Recruitment of 142 participants occurred between February 2 and March 3, 2021, at Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, and the study was completed on April 17, 2021. A subset of patients (n = 76) received 2 doses of vaccine, with the second dose a mean of 21 days (range, 19-28) following the first dose, and 66 patients received a single vaccine dose due to a public health policy change. In the 2-dose group, baseline was prior to the second dose and antibody levels were determined weekly until 14 days after the second vaccine dose. In those receiving a single vaccine dose, antibody levels were measured at baseline before vaccination and 28 days following the first dose. A written questionnaire captured vaccination-related adverse events. Health care worker (HCW) controls received 2 doses of BNT162b2 vaccine with antibodies measured 2 to 4 weeks following the second dose. This study was approved by the Sunnybrook Health Sciences and Mount Sinai Hospital Research Ethics Board. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. This study followed the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) reporting guideline for cohort studies.
Antibodies targeting the full-length spike protein (anti-spike) and its receptor binding domain (anti-RBD) measured humoral response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and/or natural infection; antibodies to the nucleocapsid protein (anti-NP) detected natural SARS-CoV-2 infection because this antigen is not targeted by the BNT162b2 vaccine. SARS-CoV-2 IgG antibodies were measured on a custom automated enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay platform; the sensitivity and specificity of each assay were determined by precision-recall analysis from pre-COVID-19–negative and convalescent controls.8,9 Antibody levels are reported as relative ratios to a synthetic standard included as a calibration curve on each assay plate. Thresholds for positivity (seroconversion) were determined by aggregating data from negative controls and calculating the mean ±3 SDs. Relative antibody levels were also compared with the median levels of convalescent serum obtained 21 to 115 days after symptom onset in patients with COVID-19; expression of vaccination-induced antibody levels to convalescent individuals helps to define correlates of protection.10
Baseline characteristics were compared using a t test for continuous variables and χ2 or Fisher exact test for categorical variables. The association between reactogenicity following the second vaccine dose and anti-spike or anti-RBD seroconversion was assessed by a χ2 test. Antibody relative ratios between patients undergoing hemodialysis receiving 2 doses of vaccine and HCWs were compared using the Mann-Whitney test. Given the nonnormal distribution of relative ratios, which was not mitigated by log transformation, we set ratios with seroconversion above or below the median convalescent level as binary outcomes and used logistic regression to assess age, sex, and vaccine reactogenicity. Vaccine reactogenicity was binary in the model based on the presence of any of the following symptoms within 14 days after the second vaccine dose: pain, redness, swelling, fever, chills, fatigue, nausea or vomiting, diarrhea, myalgia, and joint pain. Simple imputation with the mean value across participants was used to address missing covariate data. With 2-sided testing, P < .05 was considered significant for all statistical findings. All analyses were performed using SPSS, version 17 (IBM Corp), and the multivariate logistic regression was performed using R, version 4.0.4 (R Project for Statistical Computing).
Among 142 of 157 consenting patients (90%) receiving in-center hemodialysis, the median age was 72 (interquartile range, 62-79) years. Of these, 94 were men (66%) and 48 were women (34%) (Table 1). At baseline, 15 patients (11%) had detectable anti-NP and 3 patients (2%) had reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction–confirmed COVID-19, indicating asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic infection in 12 of 15 patients (80%), which was unexpected given the unit’s extensive screening protocols. Clinical characteristics of patients receiving 1 vs 2 vaccine doses were similar, but those with 1 dose were slightly younger (10 [15%] vs 9 [12%] aged ≤55 years) and less likely to have diabetes (26 [39%] vs 37 [49%]) or ischemic nephropathy (8 [12%] vs 19 [25%]) as the cause of kidney failure. This finding is not surprising because Canada prioritized 2-dose vaccination of older individuals in aggregate living settings. The HCW controls had a median age of 46 (interquartile range, 44-69) years, 33 of 35 (94%) were women, and 3 of 35 (9%) had prior COVID-19. Of 211 patients with convalescent serum, median age was 59 (interquartile range, 34-55) years, 115 were men (55%), and the sample included patients with mild (defined as not requiring hospitalization), moderate, and severe disease.
In 66 patients receiving 1 vaccine dose 4 weeks following the first vaccination, 53 (80%) seroconverted, but only 15 (23%) had anti-spike antibodies exceeding the median relative ratio of convalescent individuals (Table 2). In the 76 patients receiving 2 vaccine doses, the first dose similarly elicited anti-spike seroconversion in 65 patients (86%), with 19 (25%) reaching convalescent levels 28 days postdose. The second vaccine dose, however, induced a more robust response increase, with 43 of 76 patients (57%) reaching convalescent levels by 1 week, further increasing to 52 of 72 patients (72%) by 2 weeks and 69 of 72 patients (96%) reaching seroconversion (Figure 1).
The same overall changes were more pronounced for antibodies to RBD, which are well correlated with neutralizing antibodies.9,11 The first vaccine dose elicited a poor anti-RBD response, with seroconversion in 36 of 66 patients (55%) in the 1-dose group and 31 of 76 (41%) in the 2-dose group. After 1 dose, only 4 patients (6%) in the 1-dose group and 10 patients (13%) in the 2-dose group reached convalescent serum levels. However, 1 week after the second dose of vaccine, 58 of 76 (76%) individuals had seroconverted, with 31 of 76 (41%) having antibody levels above the median of convalescent serum. Two weeks after the second dose of vaccine, 63 of 72 patients (88%) seroconverted and 43 of 72 (60%) were above the convalescent serum level. In HCW controls, 100% reached the convalescent levels for both anti-spike and anti-RBD 2 to 4 weeks after 2 doses, and antibody levels in HCWs were significantly higher than in patients receiving hemodialysis at both 1 and 2 weeks after the second dose (anti-spike: 1 week, 53.0; P < .001; 2 weeks, 124.0; P < .001; anti-RBD: 1 week, 17.0; P < .001; 2 weeks, 32.0; P < .001; with Mann-Whitney test). Results were similar when individuals with baseline anti-NP seroconversion were excluded (eTable 1, eTable 2, and eFigure in the Supplement).
The vaccine was generally well tolerated after both the first and second doses (Figure 2). The most common reactions included pain at the injection site, fatigue, and myalgias. The presence of reactogenicity after the second dose was associated with anti-RBD seroconversion (χ2 = 12.42; P < .001)2 but not anti-spike seroconversion. Similarly, multivariate logistic regression found an association between vaccine reactogenicity and anti-RBD seroconversion (odds ratio, 22.90; 95% CI, 2.46-212.83; P = .01) but not age or sex (Table 3). Two patients contracted COVID-19 following 2 doses of vaccine despite both having an anti-RBD antibody response above convalescent serum levels before anti-NP seroconversion. Both patients were hospitalized but did not experience severe disease.
This prospective serologic study found that, although high rates of seroconversion were observed, consistent with other studies in patients receiving hemodialysis,12 a robust anti-RBD response defined as reaching convalescent serum levels was seen in less than 10% of patients 28 days after a single vaccine dose. In contrast, 2 weeks after the second dose, 60% of patients receiving hemodialysis had anti-RBD antibody levels comparable with those achieved by patients with COVID-19 infection. Anti-RBD response was lower than anti-spike response, which is of importance because anti-RBD may better associate with viral neutralization.9 Comparison of antibody levels with convalescent serum standards from patients with previous COVID-19 infection have been useful comparators for vaccine immunogenicity.10 The rationale for using the median convalescent level is that individuals who are vaccinated should at least be expected to reach the antibody levels obtained by individuals with prior COVID-19. We also found that symptoms following the second vaccine dose were associated with anti-RBD seroconversion and may help identify patients who develop some protection.
The response to the second dose, however, was notably weaker than in the HCW controls, all of whom generated robust anti-RBD antibodies. This finding is similar to other high-risk populations. In Canada, patients with cancer and solid organ transplant received 2 doses per manufacturer guidelines because studies demonstrating poor humoral response to 1-dose vaccination led to policy changes.13,14 With widespread global vaccine shortages, it is necessary to identify these groups.
This study has limitations. This was a small, single-center study, limiting our ability to fully assess all factors associated with immune response. Follow-up was limited but is ongoing in a larger patient cohort. In addition, the HCW reference population was younger and primarily female. Although our study did not evaluate cell-mediated immunity directly, a good anti-RBD response is required for adequate cell-mediated response.15 However, we recognize that longitudinal studies will be required to confirm the clinical significance of comparison with convalescent levels and correlate this outcome with vaccine effectiveness.
The findings of this study suggest a poor humoral response following a single dose of BNT162b2 COVID-19 vaccine in patients receiving hemodialysis. The second dose should not be delayed in this population.
Accepted for Publication: June 27, 2021.
Published: September 2, 2021. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.23622
Open Access: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License. © 2021 Yau K et al. JAMA Network Open.
Corresponding Author: Michelle A. Hladunewich, MD, MSc, Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Ave, D4 Room 474, Toronto, ON M4N 3M5, Canada (email@example.com).
Author Contributions: Dr Hladunewich had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. These authors contributed equally: Dr Yau and Mr Abe. These authors contributed equally: Drs Gingras and Hladunewich.
Concept and design: Yau, Naimark, Oliver, Perl, Leis, Bolotin, Tran, Straus, Gonzalez, McGeer, Chan, Gingras, Hladunewich.
Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Yau, Abe, Mullin, Shadowitz, Sukovic, Garnham-Takaoka, Quinn de Launay, Takaoka, Chan, Colwill, Gingras, Hladunewich.
Drafting of the manuscript: Yau, Oliver, Gonzalez, Sukovic, Colwill, Gingras, Hladunewich.
Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Yau, Abe, Naimark, Perl, Leis, Bolotin, Tran, Mullin, Shadowitz, Garnham-Takaoka, Quinn de Launay, Takaoka, Straus, McGeer, Chan, Hladunewich.
Statistical analysis: Yau, Abe, Oliver, Hladunewich.
Obtained funding: Chan, Hladunewich.
Administrative, technical, or material support: Yau, Leis, Bolotin, Mullin, Shadowitz, Gonzalez, Sukovic, Garnham-Takaoka, Quinn de Launay, Takaoka, McGeer, Chan, Colwill, Gingras.
Supervision: Perl, Gonzalez, Straus, Gingras, Hladunewich.
Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Oliver reported receiving fees from the Ontario Renal Network as a contracted regional medical lead outside the submitted work. Dr Perl reported receiving speaking honoraria and consultancy fees from Baxter Healthcare; grants from Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality grant support; speaking honoraria from Fresenius Medical Care, AstraZeneca, Davita Healthcare, and US Renal Care; and consultancy fees from LiberDi Dialysis outside the submitted work. Dr Tran reported that Public Health Ontario received funding from the Public Health Agency of Canada and test kits from the Canadian Immunity Task Force for COVID-19 serosurveillance studies. Public Health Ontario is also involved in a COVID-19 mix-and-match vaccine clinical trial examining safety and immunogenicity. Dr McGeer reported receiving an investigator-initiated grant from Pfizer; collaborative grant to the institution from Pfizer; investigator-initiated grant to the institution from Merck; and advisory board fees from Pfizer, Merck, Medicago Moderna, Janssen, GSK, and AstraZeneca outside the submitted work. Dr Colwill reported receiving funding from Medivolve Inc for initial development of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay at Sinai Health System outside the submitted work. Dr Gingras participates in the working party (testing) and working party (immunology) of the CITF, chairs the CIHR Institute of Genetics Advisory Board, and is a member of the SAB of the National Research Council of Canada Human Health Therapeutics Board. Dr Hladunewich reported receiving grants from Pfizer for a focal segmental glomerulosclerosis study, Ionis for a immunoglobulin A study, Chemocentryx for a focal segmental glomerulosclerosis study, Calliditas for an immunoglobulin A study, Roche for a preeclampsia study, and consultant fees from an Alynylam pregnancy study outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.
Funding/Support: This project was funded by the COVID-19 Immunity Task Force (grant 2122-HQ-000071). The equipment used is housed in the Network Biology Collaborative Centre at the Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, a facility supported by Canada Foundation for Innovation funding (grant CFI 33474), the Ontarian Government, and Genome Canada and Ontario Genomics (grant OGI-139). Dr Gingras is supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (FDN 143301) and a Canada Research Chair, Tier 1, in Functional Proteomics. Mr Abe is a recipient of an Ontario Graduate Scholarship from the Ministry of Training, Colleges and Universities Ontario.
Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The funding organizations had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
Additional Contributions: We thank lead study coordinators Anny Gonzalez, BSc, and Tatjana Sukovic, BSc (Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre), for coordinating this study and the Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre hemodialysis staff for assisting with sample collection. We also thank Shiva Barati, MD, Darlene Cann, BSc, Gary Chao, PhD, Karen Green, RN, MSc, Lois Gilbert, BSc, Nazrana Haq, MD, MSc, Angel Xin Liu, MSc, Mohammad Mozafarihashjin, MSc, Aimee Paterson, BSc (Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute at Mount Sinai Hospital), Nimitha Paul, MPH (Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael’s Hospital, Unity Health Toronto), and Philip Samaan, BSc, and Salma Sheikh Mohamed, MSc (Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto), who assisted in data collection and management of samples from health care worker controls. We thank Sharmistha Mishra, MD, PhD, Stefan Baral, MD, Christine Fahim, PhD, Mario Ostrowski, MD (Li Ka Shing Knowledge Institute, St Michael’s Hospital, Unity Health Toronto), Adrienne Chan, MD, MPH (Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre), and Jennifer Gommerman, PhD (Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, University of Toronto), for sharing health worker data from the Wellness Hub initiative (#20-0339-E, Mount Sinai Hospital). The antibody measurements and initial data analysis were performed by Bhavisha Rathod, BSc, Mahya Fazel-Zarandi, Jenny Wang, BSc, and Adrian Pasculescu, PhD (Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Mount Sinai Hospital). The individuals acknowledged did not receive compensation specifically for their assistance with the study.
Additional Information: Convalescent serum data were obtained from the Toronto Invasive Bacterial Diseases Network (REB studies #20-044 Unity Health, #02-0118-U/05-0016-C, Mount Sinai Hospital).
Create a personal account or sign in to: