Key PointsQuestion
What factors are associated with body mass index (BMI) in the first 36 months of life among infants born at gestational age less than 28 weeks?
Findings
In this cohort study of 8838 infants born extremely preterm, intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) was associated with decreased BMI and BMI z score and older gestational age was associated with increased BMI and BMI z score at ages 18 months and 36 months among infants born in single pregnancies. In multiple pregnancies, IUGR was associated with decreased BMI z score at age 36 months, but the difference in scores was smaller.
Meaning
This study found that among infants born extremely preterm, gestational age and the presence of IUGR were associated with subsequent BMI.
Importance
The development of neonatology has been associated with improved survival among infants born extremely preterm, and understanding their long-term outcomes is becoming increasingly important. However, there is little information on body mass index (BMI) among these children.
Objective
To determine factors associated with BMI at ages 18 months and 36 months among infants born extremely preterm.
Design, Setting, and Participants
This retrospective, multicenter cohort study was conducted using data from the Neonatal Research Network Japan database for 8838 infants born at gestational ages 23 to 28 weeks with data on BMI at 18 months and 36 months. Data were analyzed from April 2018 through June 2021.
Exposures
BMI and BMI z score at ages 18 months and 36 months were regressed with gestational age, intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) status, and complications during pregnancy and the neonatal period separately by presence of multiple pregnancy and sex.
Main Outcomes and Measures
BMI and BMI z score at ages 18 months and 36 months.
Results
Among 16 791 eligible infants born extremely preterm, 8838 infants were included in the analysis. There were 7089 infants born from single pregnancies (mean [SD] gestational age, 26.0 [1.6] weeks; 3769 [53.2%] boys; mean [SD] birth weight, 847 [228] g) and 1749 infants born from multiple pregnancies (mean [SD] gestational age, 26.3 [1.5] weeks; 903 [51.6%] boys; mean [SD] birth weight, 860 [217] g). In single pregnancies, every week of increased gestational age was associated with an increase in BMI of 0.21 (95% CI, 0.17-0.25) among boys and 0.20 (95% CI, 0.15-0.25) among girls at age 18 months and 0.21 (95% CI, 0.18-0.24) among boys and 0.21 (95% CI, 0.18-0.24) among girls at age 36 months. There was an interaction association between gestational age and IUGR among boys at age 36 months, with a decrease in the change associated with gestational age of 0.12 (95% CI, 0.05-0.19). Every week of increased gestational age in single pregnancies was associated with an increase in BMI z score of 0.14 (95% CI, 0.17-0.21) among boys and 0.17 (95% CI, 0.13-0.21) among girls at age 18 months and 0.19 (95% CI, 0.16-0.22) among boys and 0.17 (95% CI, 0.15-0.20) among girls at age 36 months. Among single pregnancies, IUGR was associated with a decrease in BMI among boys (0.59 [95% CI, 0.23-0.95]) and girls (0.75 [95% CI, 0.39-1.11]) and BMI z score among boys 0.85 [95% CI, 0.25-0.95)] and girls (0.67 [95% CI, 0.36-0.97] at age 18 months and BMI among boys (0.44 [95% CI, 0.17-0.18]) and girls (0.84 [95% CI, 0.55-1.12]) and BMI z score among boys (0.46 [95% CI, 0.21-0.71]) and girls (0.77 [95% CI, 0.53-1.01]) at age 36 months. In multiple pregnancies, IUGR was associated with a decrease in BMI z score at age 36 months among boys (0.26 [95% CI, 0.42-0.89]) and girls (0.29 [95% CI, 0.22-0.79]). In single pregnancies intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) was associated with a decrease in BMI of 0.47 (95% CI, 0.21-0.73) among boys and 0.42 (95% CI, 0.13-0.71) among girls at age 18 months and 0.53 (95% CI, 0.32-0.74) among boys and 0.31 (95% CI, 0.07-0.54) among girls at age 36 months. IVH was associated with a decrease in BMI z score in single pregnancies of 0.63 (95% CI, 0.20-0.41) among boys and 0.35 (95% CI, 0.12-0.60) among girls at age 18 months and 0.53 (95% CI, 0.34-0.71) among boys and 0.30 (95% CI, 0.11-0.50) among girls at age 36 months. Similar associations were seen in multiple pregnancies.
Conclusions and Relevance
This study found that gestational age, the presence of IUGR and multiple pregnancy, and IVH complications were associated with infant BMI at ages 18 months and 36 months. These findings suggest that these complicating factors should be considered when setting growth targets and nutrition strategies for infants born extremely preterm.
The survival rate of infants born preterm has improved dramatically during recent decades as neonatology has developed.1 The most notable change was in the 1980s with the development of pulmonary surfactant, which was associated with increased survival among infants born preterm with respiratory distress,2 and its clinical use was associated with a change in their clinical course.3 Other therapies, like ventilation techniques,4 antenatal glucocorticoid therapy, aggressive nutrition policies,1 and appropriate oxygen supplementation,5 are also still used. These developments were associated with improvements in the survival rate of infants born preterm6; from 1993 to 1980, the survival rate of infants in the US born weighing from 500 g to 550 g improved from 0% to 50% among Black male infants and from 35% to 70% among White female infants.7 In 2010, 90% of infants born very preterm (ie, birth weight <1500 g) in Germany survived.8 In Japan, one of the leading countries in neonatology, mortality rates among infants with very low birth weight at discharge improved from 2003 to 2008, with mortality decreasing from 10.8% to 8.7% among infants born with weights from 501 g to 750 g9 and decreases in mortality seen even among infants weighing less than 400 g.10
These developments in neonatology were associated with increased numbers of infants with short gestational age surviving their neonatal period,5 and their long-term health outcomes have become a matter of much concern. Understanding these outcomes is becomingly increasingly urgent.11 Studies among children born preterm have found different body shapes compared with children born at term,12,13 and differences in growth trajectories may be associated with various areas of cognitive function.14,15 However, the sample size of previous studies was small,16-18 with the largest a uniform sample size of 1320 infants.19 The mean gestational age of all samples in previous studies was at least 28 weeks,20 and there was little information about infants born at a gestational age of less than 30 weeks. Moreover, infants with intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR) were not separately analyzed in some studies.21-26 This condition results from uteroplacental insufficiency and is associated with chronic hypoxia and changes in all aspects of the growth process27 and pathological profile.28 Infants with IUGR are a high-risk population not only during their hospital stay,29 but also in their later lives, with increased risk of a wide range of health problems.30,31 It is important to include information about IUGR in studies of subsequent body shape, but to date this has not been done, to our knowledge. Moreover, given that many of the studies to date have been single-center studies, unmeasured center-specific factors may be associated with changes in the results.32 We conducted a large multicenter study of infants born extremely preterm (ie, at gestational age <28 weeks) to evaluate factors associated with body mass index (BMI; calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared) at ages 18 months and 36 months.
This cohort study was approved by the institutional review board of Tokyo Women's Medical University and registered as a prospective observational study with the University Hospital Medical Information Network. Written informed consent to the research and publication of the results was obtained from the parents or guardians of all infants. This study followed Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) reporting guideline.
Data on extremely preterm births from January 1, 2003, to December 31, 2012, were extracted from the Neonatal Research Network of Japan (NRNJ) database. The NRNJ database was established in 2003 for clinical study by the Japan Society for Neonatal Health and Development, publicly released by NRNJ in 2016, and analyzed by us in 2018. The NRNJ database covers level 2 and level 3 newborn intensive care units (NICUs). A level 3 NICU is capable of caring for infants who are very small or very sick, and a level 2 NICU provides care to infants who weigh from 1200 g to 1800 g or were born from gestational age 30 weeks to 34 weeks. Every infant born alive and whose birth weight was less than 1500 g or who was born before gestational age 32 weeks was registered, and each participating NICU filled in a common questionnaire.
All infants born from gestational age 23 weeks to 28 weeks were eligible for this study. Infants were excluded from the study if they died during the hospital stay or follow up period, had unknown sex (ie, no information or unable to determine sex), or were born with a congenital anomaly. Measures of BMI were taken at corrected ages 18 months and 36 months. Body length or height and weight were measured using a scale for children without any clothing or shoes. Body length was measured with the child lying down until age 18 months, and at age 36 months, it was measured with the child standing.
Information about birth weight, gestational age, death, parity, maternal complications during pregnancy (ie, multiple pregnancy and hypertension), complications during the infant’s hospital stay (ie, congenital anomaly, chronic lung disease [CLD], late circulatory collapse [LCC], intraventricular hemorrhage [IVH], necrotizing enterocolitis [NEC]), and body weight and height at ages 18 months and 36 months were extracted. The variables were selected using previous reports of factors associated with subsequent body composition.33-40 LCC is a form of hypotension that occurs after the early neonatal period with unclear underlying pathology that is common in Japan but not widely known in North America or Europe.41
We calculated BMI at ages 18 months and 36 months using weight and height. Then, using the LMS method and functions developed in previous research for Japanese infants,42 we calculated BMI z score. Until recently, there has been debate about the best tools for measuring body shape among infants. Recently, BMI has been reported to be a useful measurement among infants born preterm, and it is also reported to be a useful predictor associated with subsequent overweight status43 that is better associated with metabolic health outcomes.44,45 Furthermore, BMI curves among infants born preterm were published recently, and the reliability of BMI has been established in this field.46 Therefore, we presented BMI as a good score to inform long-term metabolic health outcomes among infants born very preterm. This score is also useful because it is easy to measure, which is an important consideration in health checkups.
First, to compare the characteristics of samples, we used t tests to compare BMI by the presence of IUGR. Then, we compared infant characteristics by the presence of multiple pregnancy. We used t tests for gestational age, birth weight, body length at birth, maternal age, and BMI. For proportion of sex, presence of IUGR, and parity more than 1, we used χ2 tests. We used the same procedure to examine differences between infants with data and those without data. Then, to understand features of complications during pregnancy and the neonatal period, we calculated the percentage of infants with complications, including pregnancy-induced hypertension, CLD, LCC, IVH, and NEC, separately by sex and presence of multiple pregnancy. Statistical tests were 1-sided, and results were considered statistically significant at P < .05 or when 95% CIs did not cross 0.
We analyzed single pregnancy and multiple pregnancy separately because in multiple pregnancy there is uterine overcrowding and growth rates and growth restriction patterns differ from single pregnancy.47 Additionally, we regressed BMI and BMI z score calculated at ages 18 months and 36 months against gestational age in weeks, with an interaction term for gestational age and IUGR because IUGR often leads to interventions of caesarian delivery or induced delivery.48 In this regression, non-IUGR status was set as the reference category. Gestational age was rescaled so that a value of 0 corresponded to gestational age 23 weeks so that the intercept term measured the BMI for an infant born without IUGR at gestational age 23 weeks. Parity, complications during pregnancy, and hospital stay, which were reported in previous studies33-40 to be associated with subsequent outcomes, were included as covariates. A backward stepwise model–building method was used to remove nonsignificant covariates.49 The analysis was performed using R statistical software version 4.0.3 (R Project for Statistical Computing). Data were analyzed from April 2018 through June 2021.
Among 40 806 infants included in the NRNJ database, 19 510 infants born from gestational age 23 weeks to 28 weeks were eligible for this study. Among these, 2719 infants were excluded owing to unknown sex, death during the study period, or congenital anomaly, leaving 16 791 infants included in this study.
Among these infants, there were 7089 infants born from single pregnancies and 1749 infants born from multiple pregnancies available with data at least at ages 18 months or at 36 months in this study. Among these infants, 3783 infants from single pregnancies and 888 infants from multiple pregnancies had data at age 18 months, and 6258 infants from single pregnancies and 1554 infants from multiple pregnancies had data at age 36 months, including 2952 infants from single pregnancies and 693 infants from multiple pregnancies with data at both ages. Finally, 8838 infants (52.6%) were included in the sample, including 7089 infants from single pregnancies (80.2% of the study sample) and 1749 infants from multiple pregnancies (19.7% of the study sample).
Table 1 shows characteristics among infants born from single pregnancies compared with those born from multiple pregnancies. The mean (SD) gestational age was 26.0 (1.6) weeks among infants born from single pregnancies and 26.3 (1.5) weeks among children born from multiple pregnancies. The mean (SD) birth weight was 847 (228) g among single pregnancies and 860 (217) g among multiple pregnancies. There were 3769 [53.2%] boys born from single pregnancies and 903 [51.6%] boys born from multiple pregnancies. There were 1538 infants with IUGR (21.6%) among single pregnancies and 416 infants with IUGR (24.0%) among multiple pregnancies. In single pregnancies, gestational age, birth weight, and body length were lower. There were no differences in infant characteristics by sex or presence of IUGR. Mean (SD) BMI was increased among single pregnancies vs multiple pregnancies at ages 18 months (boys: 15.5 [1.4] vs 15.6 [1.3]; P < .001; girls: 15.2 [1.4] vs 15.1 [1.3]; P < .001) and 36 months (boys: 15.1 [1.3] vs 15.1 [1.4]; P < .001; girls: 14.9 [1.4] vs 14.8 [1.3]; P < .001). Mean (SD) BMI was increased among infants without IUGR vs infants with IUGR at ages 18 months (boys: 15.6 [1.3] vs 15.0 [1.3]; P < .001; girls: 15.4 [1.4] vs 14.6 [1.3]; P < .001) and 36 months (boys: 15.2 [1.3] vs 14.5 [1.2]; P < .001; girls: 15.1 [1.3] vs 14.3 [1.4]; P < .001) (Table 2). Prevalence of complications during pregnancy and the neonatal period ranged from a low for IVH, which occurred among 170 boys (4.5%) and 141 girls (4.3%) from single pregnancies and 56 boys (6.6%) and 42 girls (5.0%) from multiple pregnancies, to a high for CLD, which occurred among 2399 boys (64.0%) and 1960 girls (59.3%) from single pregnancies and 539 boys (60.0%) and 459 girls (54.3%) from multiple pregnancies (Table 3). In the eTable in the Supplement, characteristics among children with data and 7952 children without data are compared. We found no difference in the characteristics among infants with data vs those without data; the P values less than .05 were associated with the large the sample size, and there was little difference in the exact value of their characteristics. For example, mean (SD) gestational age was 26.1 (1.58) weeks among infants with data and 26.2 (1.59) weeks among infants without data (P = .04), while IUGR occurred among 1956 infants with data (22.1%) and 1607 (20.8%) infants without data (P = .01).
Mean BMI was plotted for each gestational age with 95% CIs separately for boys and girls at ages 18 months and 36 months (Figure). At ages 18 months and 36 months, the mean BMI of infants with IUGR was decreased compared with those without IUGR at all gestational ages, with an increasing trend by gestational age in single pregnancies. However, this tendency was not present in multiple pregnancies. At age 18 months in single pregnancies, mean BMI was 14.5 (95% CI, 13.7-15.2) among boys with IUGR and 15.0 (95% CI, 14.8-15.2) among boys without IUGR and 13.9 (95% CI, 13.2-14.6) among girls with IUGR and 14.8 (95% CI, 14.5-15.0) among girls without IUGR born at gestational age 23 weeks; it was 15.2 (95% CI, 15.0-15.5) among boys with IUGR and 16.1 (95% CI, 15.9-16.2) among boys without IUGR and 14.9 (95% CI, 14.7-15.1) among girls with IUGR and 15.8 (95% CI, 15.7-16.0) among girls without IUGR born at gestational age 28 weeks. At age 36 months in single pregnancies, mean BMI was 14.2 (95% CI, 13.7-14.6) among boys with IUGR and 14.6 (95% CI, 14.4-14.7) among boys without IUGR and 13.6 (95% CI, 12.8-14.5) among girls with IUGR and 14.4 (95% CI, 14.2-14.6) among girls without IUGR born at gestational age 23 weeks; it was 14.7 (95% CI, 14.5-14.8) among boys with IUGR and 15.6 (95% CI, 15.1-15.8) among boys without IUGR and 14.6 (95% CI, 14.4-14.7) among girls with IUGR and 15.6 (95% CI, 15.5-15.8) among girls without IUGR born at gestational age 28 weeks.
We regressed BMI and BMI z score against gestational age in weeks with an interaction term for gestational age and IUGR, separately by sex and single vs multiple pregnancy. The coefficients and their 95% CIs are shown in Table 4.
Among single pregnancies, gestational age and IUGR were associated with BMI at age 18 months among boys (gestational age: coefficient, 0.21 [95% CI, 0.17 to 0.25]; IUGR: coefficient, −0.59 [95% CI, −0.95 to −0.23]) and girls (gestational age: coefficient, 0.20 [95% CI, 0.15 to 0.25]; IUGR: coefficient, −0.75 [95% CI, −1.11 to −0.39]). Gestational age and IUGR were also associated with BMI at age 36 months in single pregnancies among boys (gestational age: coefficient, 0.21 [95% CI, 0.18 to 0.24]; IUGR: coefficient, −0.44 [95% CI, −0.18 to −0.17]) and girls (gestational age: coefficient, 0.21 [95% CI, 0.18 to 0.24]; IUGR: coefficient, −0.84 [95% CI, −1.12 to −0.55]), and there was an interaction association between gestational age and IUGR among boys (coefficient, −0.12 [95% CI, −0.19 to −0.05]) at age 36 months. In multiple pregnancies, IUGR was not associated with BMI, except among girls at age 36 months (coeffecient, −0.75 [95% CI, −0.95 to −0.22). Gestational age in multiple pregnancies was associated with BMI at age 18 months among boys (coefficient, 0.17 [95% CI, 0.08 to 0.26]) and girls (coefficient, 0.12 [95% CI, 0.03 to 0.22]) and at age 36 months among boys (coefficient, 0.18 [95% CI, 0.11 to 0.25]) and girls (coefficient, 0.21 [95% CI, 0.14 to 0.27).
Gestational age and IUGR were also associated with BMI z score in single pregnancies at age 18 months among boys (gestational age: coefficient, 0.14 [95% CI, 0.17 to 0.21]; IUGR: coefficient, −0.85 [95% CI, −0.95 to −0.25)]) and girls (gestational age: coefficient, 0.17 [95% CI, 0.13 to 0.21]; IUGR: coefficient, −0.67 [95% CI, −0.97 to −0.36]) and age 36 months among boys (gestational age: coefficient, 0.19 [95% CI, 0.16 to 0.22]; IUGR: coefficient, −0.46 [95% CI, −0.71 to −0.21]) and girls (gestational age: coefficient, 0.17 [95% CI, 0.15 to 0.20]; IUGR: coefficient, −0.77 [95% CI, −1.01 to −0.53]). However, in multiple pregnancies, gestational age was associated with BMI z score at age 18 months among boys (coefficient, 0.14 [95% CI, 0.07 to 0.22]) and girls (coefficient, 0.10 [95% CI, 0.02 to 0.18]), while IUGR was associated with BMI z score at age 36 months among boys (coefficient, −0.26 [95% CI, −0.89 to −0.42]) and girls (coefficient, −0.29 [95% CI, −0.79 to −0.22]).
Birth complications associated with BMI in single pregnancies included IVH among boys at age 18 months (coefficient, −0.47 [95% CI, −0.73 to −0.21]) and 36 months (coefficient, −0.53 [95% CI, −0.74 to −0.32]), LCC among girls at age 18 months (coefficient, −0.24 [95% CI, −0.42 to −0.06]) and 36 months (coefficient, −0.23 [95% CI, −0.38 to −0.09]), and IVH among girls at age 18 months (coefficient, −0.42 [95% CI, −0.71 to −0.13]) and 36 months (coefficient, −0.31 [95% CI, −0.54 to −0.07]). Among single pregnancies, IVH was associated with BMI z score among boys (coefficient, −0.63 [95% CI, −0.20 to −0.41) and girls (−0.35 [95% CI, −0.60 to −0.12) at age 18 months and among boys (−0.53 [95% CI, −0.71 to −0.34) and girls (−0.30 [95% CI, −0.50 to −0.11) among girls at age 36 months. Among multiple pregnancies, birth complications associated with BMI included IVH among boys (coefficient, −0.97 [95% CI, −1.44 to −0.50]) and girls (coefficient, −0.71 [95% CI, −1.26 to −0.15]) at age 18 months; LCC (coefficient, −0.42 [95% CI, −0.69 to −0.15]), IVH (coefficient, −1.02 [95% CI, −1.40 to −0.64]), and NEC (coefficient, −0.97 [95% CI, −1.72 to −0.22]) among boys at age 36 months; and LCC (coefficient, −0.24 [95% CI, −0.55 to −0.02]) and IVH (coefficient, −0.42 [95% CI, −0.85 to −0.02]) among girls at age 36 months.
In this cohort study, we collected data on infants born very preterm from the NRNJ database. This is the largest database of infants hospitalized in NICUs in Japan that is suitable for research. We found that gestational age and the presence of IUGR at birth were associated with BMI and BMI z score at ages 18 months and 36 months.
To the best of our knowledge, this was the first study of BMI among infants born very preterm to simultaneously consider gestational age, IUGR, and multiple pregnancy in a large, multicenter sample. Our findings suggest that it is no longer reasonable to discuss BMI without considering gestational age and IUGR information among infants born very preterm. Previous studies of infant and childhood BMI among individuals born extremely preterm had small sample sizes,19,20 nonuniform samples,21 or more mature samples with analysis by categories of gestational age.17,18,24 Moreover, while infants born with IUGR should be analyzed separately because this condition is associated with delays in all aspects of the growth process,20,27 many complications,28 and increased risk of long-term health problems,29-31 many previous studies did not account for this condition.21,24,25 Similarly, in our study, we analyzed singleton and multiple pregnancies given that multiple pregnancies are associated with a different prognosis,50-52 pathology, and cause of prematurity,53,54 while this was not done in previous studies, to our knowledge.
Because of the large sample size and hospital coverage in this study, we could adjust for confounding factors from pregnancy complications, finding that children experiencing IVH had decreased BMI at ages 18 months and 36 months compared with those not experiencing IVH. This condition may be associated with growth outcomes55 through cerebral palsy, disability, cognitive impairment,40 and feeding disorders.56,57 Nutritional interventions have been studied among infants born preterm with IVH,58 and our study findings support the importance of these outcomes for long-term development among these children.
Most previous studies of preterm birth11,59-61 have focused on neurological or developmental outcomes, and there are few guidelines on body weight measurement or tools for understanding growth patterns among infants born extremely preterm. Our results may be a useful guide for caregivers.
Our study found decreased BMI at ages 18 months and 36 months among infants born preterm. Although extrauterine growth restriction is a well-known complication at discharge among infants born preterm that is associated with cardiometabolic outcomes and neurodevelopmental outcomes,62 the causes are unknown.63 However, infants born preterm are already small at discharge. So far, studies have suggested that gastroesophageal reflux,64 eating disorders,65 sleeping disorders,66 and abnormal fat distribution26 are associated with growth among infants born preterm. However, infants born preterm grow in a different environment than the uterus, and epigenetic factors are reported to be associated with growth outcomes,67,68 but further investigation is required from this perspective.
This study has several limitations. The first limitation was the large number of infants with no data. This could be because caretakers of infants who had good prognoses stopped bringing them to the hospital for health checkups. However, we found no difference in the characteristics among infants with data vs those without data. The second limitation was the lack of information on nutritional status, which prevented us from adjusting for the confounding interaction of nutritional interventions with growth. The third limitation was that there was a small number of infants with decreased gestational age, especially in multiple pregnancies, that may be associated with survivor bias. However, despite this small number, ours is the first study, to our knowledge, to assess growth outcomes among these infants born very preterm and may offer important first insights into their subsequent growth curve. The fourth limitation was that we did not determine severity of IUGR, just presence or absence of this condition. However, in our clinical practice, we use the presence of IUGR rather than severity as a clinical marker, so understanding the long-term outcomes associated with IUGR may be more important clinically than assessing the associations between severity of growth restriction and BMI.
Given that more infants born preterm are surviving their perinatal period and their survival rate continues to improve,9 it is important to know their long-term outcomes. Japan is at the forefront of neonatology,10 and revealing the subsequent features of infants born preterm in this country may contribute to neonatology in other countries. This study found that among infants born before gestational age 28 weeks, gestational age was associated with increased subsequent BMI and the presence of IUGR was associated with decreased BMI among infants born from single pregnancies. These findings suggest that when we follow up with these infants, we should be aware of their baseline characteristics and be conscious of the difficulty in gaining weight in this high-risk population. As more infants survive at younger gestational ages, policy developed using the findings of this study may help ensure they are able to thrive to adulthood and enjoy the full benefits of their survival.
Accepted for Publication: August 6, 2021.
Published: October 14, 2021. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.28555
Open Access: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License. © 2021 Murano Y et al. JAMA Network Open.
Corresponding Author: Hiromichi Shoji, MD, PhD, Department of Pediatrics, Juntendo University Faculty of Medicine, 2-1-1 Hongo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-8421, Japan (hshoji@juntendo.ac.jp).
Author Contributions: Dr Shoji had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
Concept and design: Murano, Shoji, Okawa, Kantake, Morisaki, Shimizu, Gilmour.
Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Murano, Ikeda, Hayashi, Kantake, Morisaki, Shimizu, Gilmour.
Drafting of the manuscript: Murano, Ikeda, Okawa, Kantake, Shimizu, Gilmour.
Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Murano, Shoji, Hayashi, Kantake, Morisaki, Shimizu, Gilmour.
Statistical analysis: Murano, Hayashi, Gilmour.
Obtained funding: Ikeda.
Administrative, technical, or material support: Kantake, Morisaki, Gilmour.
Supervision: Shoji, Okawa, Kantake, Morisaki, Shimizu, Gilmour.
Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Morisaki reported receiving grants from the Japanese Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare during the conduct of the study. No other disclosures were reported.
Additional Information: Institutions enrolled in the database for the Neonatal Research Network of Japan were as follows: Sapporo City General Hospital, Asahikawa Kosei General Hospital, Engaru-Kosei General Hospital, Kushiro Red Cross Hospital, Obihiro-Kosei General Hospital, Tenshi Hospital, NTT Higashinihon Sapporo Hospital, Nikko Memorial Hospital, Nayoro City General Hospital, Sapporo Medical University, Asahikawa Medical University, Aomori Prefectural Central Hospital, Iwate Medical University, Iwate Prefectural Ofunato Hospital, Iwate Prefectural Kuji Hospital, Iwate Prefectural Ninohe Hospital, Sendai Red Cross Hospital, Akita Red Cross Hospital, Tsuruoka Municipal Shonai Hospital, Yamagata University, Yamagata Prefectural Central Hospital, Fukushima Medical University, Takeda General Hospital, Fukushima National Hospital, Tsukuba University, Tsuchiura Kyodo Hospital, Ibaraki Children's Hospital, Dokkyo Medical University, Jichi Medical University, Ashikaga Red Cross Hospital, Gunma Children's Medical Center, Kiryu Kosei General Hospital, Fuji Heavy Industries Health Insurance Society Ota Memorial Hospital, Gunma University, Saitama Children's Medical Center, Nishisaitama-chuo National Hospital, Saitama Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Kawaguchi Municipal Medical Center, Jichi Medical University Saitama Medical Center, Asahi General Hospital, Chiba Kaihin Municipal Hospital, Kameda Medical Center, Tokyo Women's Medical University Yachiyo Medical Center, Juntendo University Urayasu Hospital, Tokyo Metropolitan Children's Medical Center, Tokyo Women's Medical University, Aiiku Hospital, Nihon University Itabashi Hospital, National Center for Global Health and Medicine, Tokyo Medical University, Teikyo University, Showa University, Japan Red Cross Medical Center, National Center for Child Health and Development, Tokyo Metropolitan Otsuka Hospital, Toho University, Tokyo Metropolitan Bokuto Hospital, Tokyo Jikei Medical University, Tokyo Medical and Dental University, Saint Luku’s International Hospital, Juntendo University, Sanikukai Hospital, Katsushika Red Cross Hospital, Yokohama Rosai Hospital, Yokohama City University Medical Center, St. Marianna University School of Medicine Hospital, Kanagawa Children's Medical Center, Tokai University, Kitazato University, Odawara Municipal Hospital, Nippon Medical School Musashi Kosugi Hospital, Saiseikai Yokohamashi Tobu Hospital, National Hospital Organization Yokohama Medical Center, Yamanashi Prefectural Central Hospital, Nagano Children's Hospital, Shinshu University, Iida Municipal Hospital, National Hospital Organization Shinshu Ueda Medical Center, Saku General Hospital, Niigata University, Niigata Prefectural Central Hospital, Niigata Municipal Hospital, Nagaoka Red Cross Hospital, Koseiren Takaoka Hospital, Toyama Prefectural Central Hospital, Toyama University, Ishikawa Medical Center for Maternal and Child Health, Kanazawa Medical University, Kanazawa Medical Center, Fukui Prefectural Hospital, Fukui University, Gifu Prefectural General Medical Center, National Hospital Organization Nagara Medical Center, Takayama Red Cross Hospital, Seirei Hamamatsu Hospital, Shizuoka Saiseikai Hospital, Shizuoka Children's Hospital, Hamamatsu Medical University, Numazu Municipal Hospital, Yaizu City Hospital, Fujieda Municipal General Hospital, Nagoya Red Cross Daini Hospital, Nagoya University, Nagoya Red Cross Daiichi Hospital, Toyohashi Municipal Hospital, Nagoya City West Medical Center, Anjo kosei Hospital, Tosei General Hospital, Komaki Municipal Hospital, Toyota Memorial Hospital, Okazaki Municipal Hospital, Konan Kosei Hospital, National Mie Central Medical Center, Ise Red Cross Hospital, Yokkaichi Municipal Hospital, Otsu Red Cross Hospital, Shiga University of Medical Science Hospital, Nagahama Red Cross Hospital, Uji Tokushukai Hospital, The Japan Baptist Hospital, Kyoto University, Kyoto Red Cross Daiichi Hospital, National Maizuru Medical Center, Fukuchiyama City Hospital, Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine Hospital, Kyoto City Hospital, Mitsubishi Kyoto Hospital, Yodogawa Christian Hospital, Osaka Medical Center and Research Institute for Maternal and Child Health, Osaka University, Takatsuki General Hospital, Kansai Medical University, Osaka City General Hospital, Osaka City Sumiyoshi Hospital, Aizenbashi Hospital, Toyonaka Municipal Hospital, National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center, Kitano Hospital, Saiseikai Suita Hospital, Chifune Hospital, Bellland General Hospital, Rinku General Medical Center, Osaka Red Cross Hospital, Yao Municipal Hospital, Osaka General Medical Center, Osaka City University, Hyogo Prefectural Kobe Children's Hospital, Kobe University, Kakogawa West City Hospital, Saiseikai Hyogoken Hospital, Kobe City Medical Center General Hospital, Hyogo College of Medicine Hospital, Himeji Red Cross Hospital, Toyooka Public Hospital, Hyogo Prefectural Awaji Medical Center, Nara Medical University, Wakayama Medical University, Tottori Prefectural Central Hospital, Tottori University, Shimane Prefectural Central Hospital, Matsue Red Cross Hospital, Kurashiki Central Hospital, Tsuyama Central Hospital, Kawasaki Medical School Hospital, National Hospital Organization Okayama Medical Center, Okayama Red Cross Hospital, Hiroshima City Hiroshima Citizens Hospital, Hiroshima Prefectural Hospital, Hiroshima University, Tsuchiya General Hospital, National Hospital Organization Kure Medical Center, Yamaguchi University, Yamaguchi Grand Medical Center, Tokushima University, Tokushima Municipal Hospital, Kagawa University, National Hospital Organization Kagawa Children's Hospital, Matsuyama Red Cross Hospital, Ehime Prefectural Central Hospital, Kochi Health Science Center, St.Mary's Hospital, National Kyushu Medical Center, Kurume University, Kitakyushu Municipal Medical Center, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Fukuoka University, Kyushu University, Iizuka Hospital, National Hospital Organization Kokura Medical Center, National Hospital Organization Saga Hospital, National Hospital Organization Nagasaki Medical Center, Kumamoto City Hospital, Kumamoto University, Oita Prefectural Hospital, Almeida Memorial Hospital, Nakatsu Municipal Hospital, Miyazaki University, National Hospital Organization Miyakonojo Medical Center, Kagoshima City Hospital, Imakiire General Hospital, Okinawa Prefectural Nanbu Medical Center and Children’s Medical Center, Okinawa Prefectural Chubu Hospital, Naha City Hospital, Okinawa Red Cross Hospital.
1.Hollanders
JJ, van der Pal
SM, van Dommelen
P, Rotteveel
J, Finken
MJJ. Growth pattern and final height of very preterm vs. very low birth weight infants.
Pediatr Res. 2017;82(2):317-323. doi:
10.1038/pr.2017.63
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 3.Robertson
B. Neonatal respiratory distress syndrome and surfactant therapy; a brief review.
Eur Respir J Suppl. 1989;3:73s-76s.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 4.Reiterer
F, Schwaberger
B, Freidl
T, Schmölzer
G, Pichler
G, Urlesberger
B. Lung-protective ventilatory strategies in intubated preterm neonates with RDS.
Paediatr Respir Rev. 2017;23:89-96. doi:
10.1016/j.prrv.2016.10.007
PubMedGoogle Scholar 6.Zeitlin
J, Mortensen
L, Cuttini
M,
et al; Euro-Peristat Scientific Committee. Declines in stillbirth and neonatal mortality rates in Europe between 2004 and 2010: results from the Euro-Peristat project.
J Epidemiol Community Health. 2016;70(6):609-615. doi:
10.1136/jech-2015-207013
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 8.Stichtenoth
G, Demmert
M, Bohnhorst
B,
et al. Major contributors to hospital mortality in very-low-birth-weight infants: data of the birth year 2010 cohort of the German Neonatal Network.
Klin Padiatr. 2012;224(4):276-281. doi:
10.1055/s-0032-1306344
PubMedGoogle Scholar 9.Kusuda
S, Fujimura
M, Uchiyama
A, Totsu
S, Matsunami
K; Neonatal Research Network, Japan. Trends in morbidity and mortality among very-low-birth-weight infants from 2003 to 2008 in Japan.
Pediatr Res. 2012;72(5):531-538. doi:
10.1038/pr.2012.114
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 13.Williamson
AL, Derado
J, Barney
BJ,
et al. Longitudinal BMI growth curves for surviving preterm NICU infants based on a large US sample.
Pediatrics. 2018;142(3):e20174169. doi:
10.1542/peds.2017-4169
PubMedGoogle Scholar 14.Scheurer
JM, Zhang
L, Plummer
EA, Hultgren
SA, Demerath
EW, Ramel
SE. Body composition changes from infancy to 4 years and associations with early childhood cognition in preterm and full-term children.
Neonatology. 2018;114(2):169-176. doi:
10.1159/000487915
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 15.Ramel
SE, Gray
HL, Christiansen
E, Boys
C, Georgieff
MK, Demerath
EW. Greater early gains in fat-free mass, but not fat mass, are associated with improved neurodevelopment at 1 year corrected age for prematurity in very low birth weight preterm infants.
J Pediatr. 2016;173:108-115. doi:
10.1016/j.jpeds.2016.03.003
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 16.Ranke
MB, Schweizer
R, Rodemann
SM,
et al. Schoolchildren born VLBW or VLGA show height-related changes in body composition and muscle function but no evidence of metabolic syndrome risk factors: results from the NEOLONG study.
J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2016;29(2):163-172. doi:
10.1515/jpem-2015-0266
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 18.Euser
AM, Finken
MJ, Keijzer-Veen
MG, Hille
ET, Wit
JM, Dekker
FW; Dutch POPS-19 Collaborative Study Group. Associations between prenatal and infancy weight gain and BMI, fat mass, and fat distribution in young adulthood: a prospective cohort study in males and females born very preterm.
Am J Clin Nutr. 2005;81(2):480-487. doi:
10.1093/ajcn.81.2.480
PubMedGoogle Scholar 19.Trebar
B, Traunecker
R, Selbmann
HK, Ranke
MB. Growth during the first two years predicts pre-school height in children born with very low birth weight (VLBW): results of a study of 1,320 children in Germany.
Pediatr Res. 2007;62(2):209-214. doi:
10.1203/PDR.0b013e3180ca7c5b
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 21.Simon
L, Nusinovici
S, Flamant
C,
et al. Post-term growth and cognitive development at 5 years of age in preterm children: evidence from a prospective population-based cohort.
PLoS One. 2017;12(3):e0174645. doi:
10.1371/journal.pone.0174645
PubMedGoogle Scholar 22.Stutte
S, Gohlke
B, Peiler
A,
et al. Impact of early nutrition on body composition in children aged 9.5 years born with extremely low birth weight.
Nutrients. 2017;9(2):E124. doi:
10.3390/nu9020124
PubMedGoogle Scholar 23.Giannì
ML, Roggero
P, Piemontese
P,
et al. Boys who are born preterm show a relative lack of fat-free mass at 5 years of age compared to their peers.
Acta Paediatr. 2015;104(3):e119-e123. doi:
10.1111/apa.12856PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 29.Reiss
I, Landmann
E, Heckmann
M, Misselwitz
B, Gortner
L. Increased risk of bronchopulmonary dysplasia and increased mortality in very preterm infants being small for gestational age.
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2003;269(1):40-44. doi:
10.1007/s00404-003-0486-9
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 30.Lees
CC, Marlow
N, van Wassenaer-Leemhuis
A,
et al; TRUFFLE study group. 2 year neurodevelopmental and intermediate perinatal outcomes in infants with very preterm fetal growth restriction (TRUFFLE): a randomised trial.
Lancet. 2015;385(9983):2162-2172. doi:
10.1016/S0140-6736(14)62049-3
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 35.Le Roy
C, Larios
G, Clavería
C, Springmüller
D. Short stature among children undergoing cardiac surgery for congenital heart defects. Talla baja en niños con defectos cardíacos congénitos sometidos a cirugía cardíaca.
Arch Argent Pediatr. 2019;117(3):e211-e217. doi:
10.5546/aap.2019.eng.e211PubMedGoogle Scholar 40.Radic
JA, Vincer
M, McNeely
PD. Outcomes of intraventricular hemorrhage and posthemorrhagic hydrocephalus in a population-based cohort of very preterm infants born to residents of Nova Scotia from 1993 to 2010.
J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2015;15(6):580-588. doi:
10.3171/2014.11.PEDS14364
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 48.Monier
I, Lelong
N, Ancel
PY,
et al. Indications leading to termination of pregnancy between 22
+0 and 31
+6 weeks of gestational age in France: a population-based cohort study.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2019;233:12-18. doi:
10.1016/j.ejogrb.2018.11.021
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 49.Armitage
P, Berry
G, Matthews
JNS. Statistical methods in medical research. John Wiley & Sons; 2008.
54.Eriksen
W, Tambs
K. Is the twin-singleton difference in BMI related to the difference in birth weight? a register-based birth cohort study of Norwegian males.
Am J Hum Biol. 2016;28(4):566-573. doi:
10.1002/ajhb.22835
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 55.Diwakar
K, Hader
WJ, Soraisham
A,
et al. Long-term neurodevelopmental and growth outcomes of premature infants born at <29 week gestational age with post-hemorrhagic hydrocephalus treated with ventriculo-peritoneal shunt.
Indian J Pediatr. 2017;84(9):662-669. doi:
10.1007/s12098-017-2319-z
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 56.Asgarshirazi
M, Farokhzadeh-Soltani
M, Keihanidost
Z, Shariat
M. Evaluation of feeding disorders including gastro-esophageal reflux and oropharyngeal dysfunction in children with cerebral palsy.
J Family Reprod Health. 2017;11(4):197-201.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 58.Andrew
MJ, Parr
JR, Montague-Johnson
C,
et al. Neurodevelopmental outcome of nutritional intervention in newborn infants at risk of neurodevelopmental impairment: the Dolphin neonatal double-blind randomized controlled trial.
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2018;60(9):897-905. doi:
10.1111/dmcn.13914
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 59.Lodha
A, Entz
R, Synnes
A,
et al; investigators of the Canadian Neonatal Network (CNN) and the Canadian Neonatal Follow-up Network (CNFUN). Early caffeine administration and neurodevelopmental outcomes in preterm infants.
Pediatrics. 2019;143(1):e20181348. doi:
10.1542/peds.2018-1348
PubMedGoogle Scholar 62.Martínez-Jiménez
MD, Gómez-García
FJ, Gil-Campos
M, Pérez-Navero
JL. Comorbidities in childhood associated with extrauterine growth restriction in preterm infants: a scoping review.
Eur J Pediatr. 2020;179(8):1255-1265. doi:
10.1007/s00431-020-03613-8
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 66.Sadras
I, Reiter
J, Fuchs
N, Erlichman
I, Gozal
D, Gileles-Hillel
A. Prematurity as a risk factor of sleep-disordered breathing in children younger than two years: a retrospective case-control study.
J Clin Sleep Med. 2019;15(12):1731-1736. doi:
10.5664/jcsm.8072PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 69.Ferguson
AN, Grabich
SC, Olsen
IE,
et al. BMI is a better body proportionality measure than the ponderal index and weight-for-length for preterm infants.
Neonatology. 2018;113(2):108-116. doi:
10.1159/000480118
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref