The COVID-19 pandemic has led to the rapid development of multiple vaccines, tested in clinical trials located in several countries.1 Low- and middle-income countries have experienced significant delays in vaccine access despite initiatives aiming to ensure fair distribution, such as COVID-19 Vaccines Global Access (COVAX).2 Because pharmaceuticals do not receive consistent and timely authorization for use in lower-income countries where they are tested,3 we examined authorization and delivery of COVID-19 vaccines recommended by the World Health Organization (WHO) in the countries where they were tested.
For this cross-sectional study, we examined COVID-19 vaccines listed by the WHO for emergency use as of September 7, 2021. We then identified all completed clinical trials for these vaccines as of this date using the WHO COVID-19 Vaccine Tracker and Landscape and the McGill University COVID-19 Vaccine Tracker. We extracted trial primary completion dates, phase, and country locations from ClinicalTrials.gov. Each country was classified by national income group using the World Bank historical classifications for the year 2021.4 This cross-sectional study did not undergo institutional review board review and informed consent was not needed or sought because the study was not human participants research, in accordance with 45 CFR §46. It also followed the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) reporting guideline.
Through regional and national regulatory agency websites, we determined whether countries hosting vaccine clinical trials also authorized their use. Additionally, for each country, we extracted data on doses procured and delivered from the UNICEF COVID-19 Vaccine Market Dashboard and the Airfinity COVID-19 platform as of September 7, 2021. For each income group and manufacturer, we calculated the proportion of countries hosting clinical trials authorizing any vaccine tested in their population and the vaccines’ delivery. Last, we determined the median proportion of people 15 years and older who were able to receive a full vaccination series of the tested vaccine using population data from the United Nations’ World Population Dashboard. We conducted descriptive statistical analyses using Excel spreadsheet software version 16.0 (Microsoft).
Six unique COVID-19 vaccines were listed for emergency use by the WHO and tested in a total of 25 countries (Table 1) by September 7, 2021. Among 11 high-income countries hosting completed clinical trials, 10 (90.9%) authorized the tested vaccine and received enough doses to vaccinate a median 51.7% (IQR, 39.4%-76.7%) of their populations aged 15 years and older. Lower middle– and upper middle–income countries had high rates of authorization (100% and 90.9%, respectively), and median vaccination rates of 31.0% (IQR, 18.1%-37.6%) and 14.9% (IQR, 7.2%-48.6%), respectively. Examining ongoing and completed trials, corresponding rates were higher for high-income countries, but lower for all other income groups (Table 1).
While Moderna completed clinical trials in 2 countries, AstraZeneca and Janssen completed trials in 14 and 10 countries, receiving authorization for their vaccines in 85.7% and 80.0% of these countries, respectively (Table 2). Across manufacturers, high-income countries received more doses to vaccinate larger median proportions of countries’ populations 15 years and older. COVAX delivered a median 15.4%, 48.8%, and 78.8% of procured doses of tested vaccines in low-, lower middle–, and upper middle–income countries that have hosted ongoing and completed trials, respectively.
While countries of varying incomes have largely authorized the COVID-19 vaccines they helped test, high-income countries have received proportionately more doses, enabling them to more fully vaccinate their populations. Including low- and middle-income countries in research can be an important goal; however, inclusion should correspond with fair access to research benefits, to help avoid exploitation. These wealth-based access inequities among countries hosting trials parallel general disparities in COVID-19 vaccine access, as high-income countries have successfully procured and administered doses ahead of low- and middle-income countries.5,6
Study limitations include inability to determine the number of enrolled trial participants per country, which was not systematically reported, and the impact of manufacturing errors and safety concerns on dosage delivery, particularly affecting AstraZeneca and Janssen. Further, we focused on vaccination rates with vaccines tested in clinical trials hosted by each country, not overall vaccination rates with any authorized COVID-19 vaccine.
Accepted for Publication: September 19, 2021.
Published: November 18, 2021. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.34233
Open Access: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License. © 2021 Ramachandran R et al. JAMA Network Open.
Corresponding Author: Reshma Ramachandran, MD, MPP, National Clinician Scholars Program, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, 333 Cedar St, SHM IE-61, New Haven, CT 06510 (reshma.ramachandran@yale.edu).
Author Contributions: Dr Ramachandran had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
Concept and design: All authors.
Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: All authors.
Drafting of the manuscript: Ramachandran, Miller.
Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: All authors.
Statistical analysis: Ramachandran.
Administrative, technical, or material support: Ramachandran.
Supervision: Miller.
Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Ramachandran reported serving as a board member for Universities Allied for Essential Medicines North America, which is a member organization in the People’s Vaccine Alliance and also cohosts the Free the Vaccine campaign, and being an employee of the Veterans Health Administration. Dr Ross reported receiving grants from the US Food and Drug Administration, Johnson & Johnson, the Medical Devices Innovation Consortium, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, the National Institutes of Health/National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, and the Laura and John Arnold Foundation and receiving research support through Yale University from Medtronic Inc and the Food and Drug Administration to develop methods for postmarket surveillance of medical devices and from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services to develop and maintain performance measures that are used for public reporting outside the submitted work. Dr Miller reported receiving grants from the Susan G. Komen Foundation, Arnold Ventures, the National Institutes of Health, and Faster Cures during the conduct of the study; receiving personal fees from Cambria Health and Alexion; and serving as a member of the board of directors for Bioethics International outside the submitted work.
Disclaimer: While Dr Ramachandran is an employee of the Veterans Health Administration, the views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect those of the US Department of Veteran Affairs or the US government.
Additional Contributions: We thank Anthony Kamande, BSc, and Max Lawson, MA, of Oxfam International for access to data from the Airfinity COVID-19 platform. No financial compensation was received by Messrs Kamande or Lawson or Oxfam International for these data. Oxfam International also serves as a member organization of the People’s Vaccine Alliance.