[Skip to Navigation]
Sign In
Figure 1.  Cumulative Probability of Clostridioides difficile Infection According to Solid Organ Transplant Type
Cumulative Probability of Clostridioides difficile Infection According to Solid Organ Transplant Type
Figure 2.  Trend of 1-Year Clostridioides difficile infection Incidence in Annual Cohorts of Solid Organ Transplant Recipients
Trend of 1-Year Clostridioides difficile infection Incidence in Annual Cohorts of Solid Organ Transplant Recipients
Table 1.  Baseline Characteristics of Patients Who Received Solid Organ Transplant in Ontario
Baseline Characteristics of Patients Who Received Solid Organ Transplant in Ontario
Table 2.  CDI Incidence Rate, Cumulative Incidence, and Interval Between Transplant Date and CDI
CDI Incidence Rate, Cumulative Incidence, and Interval Between Transplant Date and CDI
Table 3.  Risk Factors for Short-term vs Long-term Mortalitya
Risk Factors for Short-term vs Long-term Mortalitya
1.
Mullane  KM, Dubberke  ER; AST ID Community of Practice.  Management of Clostridioides (formerly Clostridium) difficile infection (CDI) in solid organ transplant recipients: guidelines from the American Society of Transplantation Community of Practice.   Clin Transplant. 2019;33(9):e13564. doi:10.1111/ctr.13564 PubMedGoogle Scholar
2.
Neofytos  D, Kobayashi  K, Alonso  CD,  et al.  Epidemiology, risk factors, and outcomes of Clostridium difficile infection in kidney transplant recipients.   Transpl Infect Dis. 2013;15(2):134-141. doi:10.1111/tid.12030 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
3.
Li  GJ, Trac  J, Husain  S, Famure  O, Li  Y, Kim  SJ.  Incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of Clostridium difficile infections in kidney transplant recipients.   Transplantation. 2018;102(9):1576-1581. doi:10.1097/TP.0000000000002199 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
4.
Bruminhent  J, Cawcutt  KA, Thongprayoon  C, Petterson  TM, Kremers  WK, Razonable  RR.  Epidemiology, risk factors, and outcome of Clostridium difficile infection in heart and heart-lung transplant recipients.   Clin Transplant. 2017;31(6). doi:10.1111/ctr.12968 PubMedGoogle Scholar
5.
Lee  JT, Kelly  RF, Hertz  MI, Dunitz  JM, Shumway  SJ.  Clostridium difficile infection increases mortality risk in lung transplant recipients.   J Heart Lung Transplant. 2013;32(10):1020-1026. doi:10.1016/j.healun.2013.06.012 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
6.
Cusini  A, Béguelin  C, Stampf  S,  et al; Swiss Transplant Cohort Study.  Clostridium difficile infection is associated with graft loss in solid organ transplant recipients.   Am J Transplant. 2018;18(7):1745-1754. doi:10.1111/ajt.14640 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
7.
Albright  JB, Bonatti  H, Mendez  J,  et al.  Early and late onset Clostridium difficile–associated colitis following liver transplantation.   Transpl Int. 2007;20(10):856-866. doi:10.1111/j.1432-2277.2007.00530.x PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
8.
Herrera  S, Davoudi  S, Farooq  A,  et al.  Late onset invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in lung transplant recipients in the setting of a targeted prophylaxis/preemptive antifungal therapy strategy.   Transplantation. 2020;104(12):2575-2581. doi:10.1097/TP.0000000000003187 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
9.
Rahimishahmirzadi  M, Jevnikar  AM, House  AA,  et al.  Late-onset allograft rejection, cytomegalovirus infection, and renal allograft loss: is anti-CMV prophylaxis required following late-onset allograft rejection?   Clin Transplant. 2021;35(6):e14285. doi:10.1111/ctr.14285 PubMedGoogle Scholar
10.
Madden  GR, Sifri  CD.  Reduced Clostridioides difficile tests among solid organ transplant recipients through a diagnostic stewardship bundled intervention.   Ann Transplant. 2019;24:304-311. doi:10.12659/AOT.915168 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
11.
Paudel  S, Zacharioudakis  IM, Zervou  FN, Ziakas  PD, Mylonakis  E. Prevalence of Clostridium difficile infection among solid organ transplant recipients: a meta-analysis of published studies. PLoS One. 2015;10(4):e0124483. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0124483
12.
Carlson  TJ, Gonzales-Luna  AJ, Nebo  K,  et al.  Assessment of kidney injury as a severity criteria for Clostridioides difficile infection.   Open Forum Infect Dis. 2020;7(11):a476. doi:10.1093/ofid/ofaa476 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
13.
Nankivell  BJ, PʼNg  CH, OʼConnell  PJ, Chapman  JR.  Calcineurin inhibitor nephrotoxicity through the lens of longitudinal histology: comparison of cyclosporine and tacrolimus eras.   Transplantation. 2016;100(8):1723-1731. doi:10.1097/TP.0000000000001243 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
14.
IC/ES. Accessed October 1, 2021. http://www.ices.on.ca
15.
Benchimol  EI, Smeeth  L, Guttmann  A,  et al; RECORD Working Committee.  The Reporting of Studies Conducted Using Observational Routinely-Collected Health Data (RECORD) statement.   PLoS Med. 2015;12(10):e1001885. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001885 PubMedGoogle Scholar
16.
Canadian Institute on Health Information. e-Statistics report on transplant, waiting list and donor statistics, 2014. 2014. Accessed September 17, 2017. https://www.cihi.ca/en/access-data-and-reports
17.
Negrón  ME, Rezaie  A, Barkema  HW,  et al.  Ulcerative colitis patients with Clostridium difficile are at increased risk of death, colectomy, and postoperative complications: a population-based inception cohort study.   Am J Gastroenterol. 2016;111(5):691-704. doi:10.1038/ajg.2016.106 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
18.
Ilett  EE, Helleberg  M, Reekie  J,  et al.  Incidence rates and risk factors of Clostridioides difficile infection in solid organ and hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients.   Open Forum Infect Dis. 2019;6(4):ofz086. doi:10.1093/ofid/ofz086 PubMedGoogle Scholar
19.
Whiddon  AR, Dawson  KL, Fuentes  A, Perez  KK, Peterson  LE, Kaleekal  T.  Postoperative antimicrobials after lung transplantation and the development of multidrug-resistant bacterial and Clostridium difficile infections: an analysis of 500 non-cystic fibrosis lung transplant patients.   Clin Transplant. 2016;30(7):767-773. doi:10.1111/ctr.12746 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
20.
Guh  AY, Mu  Y, Winston  LG,  et al; Emerging Infections Program Clostridioides difficile Infection Working Group.  Trends in US burden of Clostridioides difficile infection and outcomes.   N Engl J Med. 2020;382(14):1320-1330. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1910215 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
21.
Gould  CV, Edwards  JR, Cohen  J,  et al; Clostridium difficile Infection Surveillance Investigators, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.  Effect of nucleic acid amplification testing on population-based incidence rates of Clostridium difficile infection.   Clin Infect Dis. 2013;57(9):1304-1307. doi:10.1093/cid/cit492 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
22.
LifeLabs. New molecular test for diagnosis of C difficile Infection—LifeLabs. 2013. Accessed March 28, 2020. https://www.lifelabs.com/hcps-newsletter/new-molecular-test-for-diagnosis-of-c-difficile-infection/..
23.
Provincial Infectious Diseases Advisory Committee (PIDAC). Annex C: testing, surveillance and management of Clostridium difficile. January 2013. Accessed March 28, 2020. https://www.publichealthontario.ca/-/media/documents/C/2013/cdiff-testing-surveillance-management.pdf
24.
Pereira  JA, McGeer  A, Tomovici  A, Selmani  A, Chit  A.  Incidence and economic burden of Clostridioides difficile infection in Ontario: a retrospective population-based study.   CMAJ Open. 2020;8(1):E16-E25. doi:10.9778/cmajo.20190018PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
25.
Jocher  BM, Schilling  JD, Fischer  I,  et al.  Acute kidney injury post-heart transplant: an analysis of peri-operative risk factors.   Clin Transplant. 2021;35(6):e14296. doi:10.1111/ctr.14296 PubMedGoogle Scholar
26.
Khanna  S, Keddis  MT, Noheria  A, Baddour  LM, Pardi  DS.  Acute kidney injury is an independent marker of severity in Clostridium difficile infection: a nationwide survey.   J Clin Gastroenterol. 2013;47(6):481-484. doi:10.1097/MCG.0b013e31826af6fd PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
27.
Charilaou  P, Devani  K, John  F,  et al.  Acute kidney injury impact on inpatient mortality in Clostridium difficile infection: a national propensity-matched study.   J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;33(6):1227-1233. doi:10.1111/jgh.14064 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
28.
Cimolai  N.  Are Clostridium difficile toxins nephrotoxic?   Med Hypotheses. 2019;126:4-8. doi:10.1016/j.mehy.2019.03.002 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
29.
Rybolt  AH, Bennett  RG, Laughon  BE, Thomas  DR, Greenough  WB  III, Bartlett  JG.  Protein-losing enteropathy associated with Clostridium difficile infection.   Lancet. 1989;1(8651):1353-1355. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(89)92803-1 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
30.
Gaughan  WJ, Hassan  MH, McCue  PA, Burke  JF, Sharma  K.  Association of IgA nephropathy with Clostridium difficile colitis.   Am J Kidney Dis. 1999;34(4):e16. doi:10.1016/S0272-6386(99)70410-5 PubMedGoogle Scholar
31.
Liu  M, Liang  Y, Chigurupati  S,  et al.  Acute kidney injury leads to inflammation and functional changes in the brain.   J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008;19(7):1360-1370. doi:10.1681/ASN.2007080901 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
32.
Kelly  KJ.  Distant effects of experimental renal ischemia/reperfusion injury.   J Am Soc Nephrol. 2003;14(6):1549-1558. doi:10.1097/01.ASN.0000064946.94590.46 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
33.
Odutayo  A, Wong  CX, Farkouh  M,  et al.  AKI and long-term risk for cardiovascular events and mortality.   J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017;28(1):377-387. doi:10.1681/ASN.2016010105 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
34.
Gellad  ZF, Alexander  BD, Liu  JK,  et al.  Severity of Clostridium difficile–associated diarrhea in solid organ transplant patients.   Transpl Infect Dis. 2007;9(4):276-280. doi:10.1111/j.1399-3062.2007.00255.x PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
35.
Pennefather  PM, Tin  W, Clarke  MP, Dutton  J, Fritz  S, Hey  EN.  Bias due to incomplete follow up in a cohort study.   Br J Ophthalmol. 1999;83(6):643-645. doi:10.1136/bjo.83.6.643 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
36.
Levine  MA, Schuler  T, Gourishankar  S.  Complications in the 90-day postoperative period following kidney transplant and the relationship of the Charlson Comorbidity Index.   Can Urol Assoc J. 2017;11(12):388-393. doi:10.5489/cuaj.4378 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
37.
Silkensen  JR.  Long-term complications in renal transplantation.   J Am Soc Nephrol. 2000;11(3):582-588. doi:10.1681/ASN.V113582 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
38.
Dallal  RM, Harbrecht  BG, Boujoukas  AJ,  et al.  Fulminant Clostridium difficile: an underappreciated and increasing cause of death and complications.   Ann Surg. 2002;235(3):363-372. doi:10.1097/00000658-200203000-00008 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
39.
Stewart  DB, Hollenbeak  CS, Wilson  MZ.  Is colectomy for fulminant Clostridium difficile colitis life saving? a systematic review.   Colorectal Dis. 2013;15(7):798-804. doi:10.1111/codi.12134 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
40.
Ahmed  N, Kuo  Y-H.  Early colectomy saves lives in toxic megacolon due to Clostridium difficile infection.   South Med J. 2020;113(7):345-349. doi:10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001118 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
41.
Wijarnpreecha  K, Aby  ES, Kim  D,  et al.  The burden of Clostridioides difficile infection in patients with history of liver transplant and during index admission.   Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021;33(6):894-898. doi:10.1097/MEG.0000000000001812 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Original Investigation
Infectious Diseases
December 29, 2021

Incidence and Outcomes Associated With Clostridioides difficile Infection in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients

Author Affiliations
  • 1ICES, Ontario, Canada
  • 2Multiorgan Transplant Program, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • 3Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
  • 4Sunnybrook Health Sciences Center, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • 5Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • 6Public Health Ontario, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • 7Dalla Lana School of Public Health, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
  • 8Department of Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(12):e2141089. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.41089
Key Points

Question  What are the incidence and outcomes associated with posttransplant Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) in people who have undergone solid organ transplant?

Findings  In this cohort study including 10 724 patients, posttransplant CDI was associated with a 90-day mortality incidence of 17%. Late-onset CDI was associated with a greater risk of short- and long-term mortality compared with early-onset CDI.

Meaning  The findings of this large cohort of organ transplant recipients suggest a trend toward increasing risk of CDI over time.

Abstract

Importance  Little is known about the incidence and outcomes of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients.

Objective  To estimate the CDI incidence and outcomes in SOT recipients.

Design, Setting, and Participants  A population-based cohort study was conducted using administrative health care data for all Ontario, Canada, residents who received organ allografts from April 1, 2003, to December 31, 2017; March 31, 2020, was the end of the study period.

Main Outcomes and Measures  The primary outcome was hospital admission with CDI diagnosis. The secondary outcomes included all-cause death, intensive care unit admission, acute kidney injury requiring dialysis, and fulminant CDI comprising any of the following: toxic megacolon, ileus, perforation, or colectomy. The association between short- vs long-term mortality (ie, death occurring within or after 90 days post-CDI) and the following variables was evaluated: age, sex, Deyo-Charlson Comorbidity Index, SOT type, early- vs late-onset CDI, fulminant CDI, intensive care unit admission, and acute kidney injury requiring acute dialysis.

Results  Overall, 10 724 SOT recipients (6901 [64.4%] men; median age, 54 [IQR, 44-62] years) were eligible. Kidney transplant was the most common SOT type (6453 [60.2%]). The median follow-up time was 5.0 (IQR, 2.3-8.8) years, resulting in 61 987 person-years of follow-up. A total of 726 patients (6.8%) were hospitalized with CDI. The 1-year CDI incidence significantly increased in annual cohorts (ie, from 23.1; 95% CI, 12.8-41.8 per 1000 person-years in 2004 to 46.7; 95% CI, 35.0-62.3 per 1000 person-years in 2017; P = .001). Clostridioides difficile was associated with a 16.8% rate (n = 122) of 90-day mortality. In patients who underwent kidney transplant, CDI was typically late-onset (median interval, 2.2; IQR, 0.4-6.0 years) compared with recipients of other organs. Acute kidney injury requiring dialysis was significantly associated with short-term (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.86; 95% CI, 1.07-3.26) and long-term (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.89; 95% CI, 1.29-2.78) mortality, and late-onset CDI was also significantly associated with a greater risk of short-term (aOR, 4.26; 95% CI, 2.51-7.22) and long-term (aHR, 2.49; 95% CI, 1.78-3.49) mortality.

Conclusions and Relevance  In this study, increasing CDI trends in annual cohorts of SOT recipients were observed. Posttransplant CDI was associated with mortality, and late-onset CDI was associated with a greater risk of death than early-onset CDI. These findings suggest that preventive strategies should not be limited to the initial months following transplantation. Comprehensive therapeutic approaches targeting acute kidney injury risk factors in SOT recipients may reduce short- and long-term post-CDI mortality.

Introduction

Patients who have undergone solid organ transplant (SOT) are at risk of Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI), which is associated with significant morbidity and mortality.1-3 A wide range of the cumulative CDI incidence has been reported in single-center studies4,5; however, SOT-related CDI incidence has been rarely estimated at the population level.6

Most studies have investigated early-onset CDI occurring within 90 days following transplant.4-7 However, the outcome of late-onset CDI has been rarely investigated.4,5 Although early-onset infectious complications may affect allograft function, late-onset infectious diseases may be associated with allograft loss and death.8,9 To our knowledge, post-CDI mortality has not been compared between patients who underwent SOT developing early- vs late-onset CDI.

SOT recipients are at risk of CDI complications.10 The frequency of colectomy in patients with SOT who develop CDI is more than 3 times higher than the rate of post-CDI colectomy in the general population.11 Complications of CDI are not limited to fulminant colitis. A recent study showed CDI considerably increases the risk of acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients without SOT.12 SOT recipients are at risk of AKI following infectious complications due to continuous exposure to nephrotoxic drugs, allograft rejection, and comorbidities.13 However, to our knowledge, the incidence and outcomes of AKI have not been investigated in patients with posttransplant CDI.

In this 15-year, population-based cohort study, we investigated the incidence and outcomes associated with posttransplant CDI among recipients of different organ allografts. Our findings may have implications for preventive strategies targeting SOT recipients who are at risk of CDI-associated complications and mortality.

Methods
Study Design

We undertook a population-based cohort study using Ontario administrative health care data held at ICES, a not-for-profit research institute in Ontario, Canada (eAppendix, eTable 1, and eTable 2 in the Supplement).14 Use of the data without informed consent was authorized under section 45 of Ontario’s Personal Health Information Protection Act and did not require research ethics board approval. Ontario has a universal, publicly funded, single-payer health insurance system that is administered by the provincial government. Data are reported herein in accordance with the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guideline.15

We conducted this population-based study in Ontario, Canada’s most populous province (14.7 million in 2020). Approximately half of Canadian organ transplant procedures are performed in Ontario.16

Study Population

We included all adults who received an SOT in Ontario between April 1, 2003, and December 31, 2017, with a maximum follow-up date of March 31, 2020. We excluded non-Ontario residents, individuals younger than 18 years, patients with no recorded date of birth or sex, those with a date of death on or before the date of organ transplant (the study cohort entry and index date), and those with a prior SOT (eFigure 1 in the Supplement). For each person, we studied the first organ transplant during the accrual period, allowing individuals to contribute multiple SOT events.

We considered the date of transplantation to be the cohort entry and index date for characterizing patient conditions and evaluating outcomes. Baseline characteristics included donor and recipient demographic characteristics, neighborhood income quintile, rural vs urban residence, comorbidities, and whether the organ was from a deceased vs living donor. We used a 365-day look-back window to determine the presence of pretransplant CDI, prior hospitalizations, emergency department visits, major abdominal procedures, nasogastric tube placement, and mechanical ventilation. We used a 5-year look-back period to identify comorbidities, including diabetes, cancer, inflammatory bowel diseases, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, chronic kidney disease, and the Deyo-Charlson Comorbidity Index (eTable 3 in the Supplement).

The exposure comprised SOT categorized according to allograft type (ie, kidney, liver, kidney-pancreas, heart, lung, and multiorgan transplant). Owing to the small number of individuals in some subgroups, we created 3 transplant categories in some analyses: abdominal (ie, kidney, liver, and kidney-pancreas allografts), thoracic (ie, lung and heart allografts), and multiorgan transplant. Multiorgan transplant recipients included patients who received at least 2 organ allografts during the same hospitalization other than those who received a kidney-pancreas transplant.

Study Outcomes

The primary outcome was hospital admission with a diagnosis of C difficile infection (International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Canadian code A04.7), which has been reported to have high sensitivity (82.1%) and specificity (99.4%).17 We defined early-onset CDI as C difficile infections occurring during the index hospitalization or within 90 days of discharge. Episodes of CDI that occurred beyond this point were considered as late-onset CDI. Patients were censored on the date of death, loss of insurance coverage, or the end of the study period (March 31, 2020), whichever occurred first.

The secondary outcomes included all-cause death, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, AKI requiring dialysis, and fulminant CDI comprising any of the following: toxic megacolon, ileus, perforation, and colectomy. We determined the risk of short- vs long-term death. We defined short-term mortality as all-cause death occurring from the CDI hospitalization to 90 days postdischarge. Death occurring after this point was considered long-term mortality. For the outcome of AKI requiring dialysis, patients receiving long-term dialysis following transplant were excluded.

Statistical Analysis

We determined baseline characteristics at the time of transplant as frequencies (percentages) for categorical variables and medians (IQRs) for continuous variables. We express incidence per 1000 person-years of observation (ie, patients with SOT and then recipients of different allografts).18 To evaluate trends in CDI incidence, we estimated the incidence for each annual SOT cohort using 1- and 3-year follow-up periods. We used the Cochran-Armitage test to compare trends in CDI incidence.

We estimated the cumulative probability of CDI (1- Kaplan-Meier) and 95% CI) overall and for each SOT type, using the Kaplan-Meier estimator, and compared the probability among SOT types, using the log rank test. We used Cox proportional hazards regression to identify patient characteristics independently associated with posttransplant CDI.

Next, we restricted the cohort to SOT recipients who developed CDI and determined the frequency of fulminant illness, AKI requiring acute dialysis, ICU admission, and mortality. Subgroup comparisons were conducted with χ2 tests.

We used logistic regression to quantify the association between short-term mortality and age, sex, Deyo-Charlson Comorbidity Index, SOT type (ie, thoracic vs abdominal transplant), early- vs late-onset CDI, fulminant CDI, ICU admission, and AKI requiring acute dialysis. We then used a Cox proportional hazards regression model to quantify the association between the same variables and long-term mortality, with patients censored on transplant of any organ type after the index hospitalization and the end of the study period (March 31, 2020). Statistical tests were 2-sided with the level of significance set at α = .05. All analyses were performed at ICES using SAS, version 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc).

Results
Patient Characteristics

A total of 12 192 patients received organ allografts in Ontario from April 1, 2003, to December 31, 2017. After exclusions, 10 724 patients were eligible for the study (mean [SD] age, 52.33 (12.94) years; 6901 [64.4%] men; 3823 [35.6%] women) (eAppendix, eTable 2, and eFigure 1 in the Supplement). Kidney transplant was the most common SOT type (6453 [60.2%]); multiorgan transplant was the least frequent (57 [0.5%]). The characteristics of SOT recipients varied according to allograft types (Table 1).

CDI Incidence

The median follow-up time was 5.0 (IQR, 2.3-8.8) years, resulting in 61 987 person-years of follow-up. Overall, we identified 726 CDI hospitalizations (6.8%), with 275 early-onset (37.9%) occurring within 90 days of transplantation and 451 late-onset (62.1%) occurring thereafter. The overall CDI incidence rate was 11.7 (95% CI, 10.9-12.6) per 1000 person-years. Table 2 provides the CDI incidence by SOT type. Although CDI frequently occurred within the first year after transplant, recipients of SOT other than the kidney (median interval since transplant, 0.9; IQR, 0.0-4.6 years), CDI was typically a late-onset complication in kidney allograft recipients (median interval since transplant, 2.2; IQR, 0.4-6.0 years). The highest incidence rate was in patients who underwent multiorgan transplant (45.3; 95% CI, 23.6-87.1 per 1000 person-years) followed by lung transplant (20.6; 95% CI, 16.8-25.2 per 1000 person-years). Kidney allograft recipients had the lowest CDI incidence (9.6; 95% CI, 8.7-10.6 per 1000 person-years). Development of CDI in patients who received kidney transplant was typically late-onset (median interval between transplant and CDI, 2.2; IQR, 0.4-6.0 years). Figure 1 shows the cumulative probability of CDI (1-KM) was considerably different in recipients of different allografts. Although CDI probability continuously increased in all SOT types (eAppendix, eFigure 2 in the Supplement), the risk of CDI differed among SOT types (P<.001).

Trends in CDI Incidence

Figure 2 and eTable 4 in the Supplement provide the CDI incidence in annual cohorts of SOT recipients at 1- and 3-year follow-up. After an abrupt increase of incidence from 34.0 per 1000 person-years (95% CI, 22.2-52.1 per 1000 person-years) in 2010 to 68.2 per 1000 person-years (95% CI, 50.9-91.4 per 1000 person-years) in 2011, the CDI incidence remained elevated and did not return to the range observed during 2003-2010 (P<.001). eTable 5 in the Supplement provides the 1-year posttransplant CDI incidence in annual cohorts of kidney, liver, and thoracic organ allograft recipients from 2011 to 2017. A Cochran-Armitage test showed the 3-year CDI incidence among patients who received transplants in 2011-2015 was greater than among those who received transplants in 2003-2010 (P<.001).

Patient Characteristics Associated With CDI

We used a series of Cox proportional hazards regression models to investigate the association between potential baseline contributing factors and posttransplant CDI (eAppendix; eTable 6 in the Supplement). We found an association between age at the time of transplant and posttransplant CDI (hazard ratio [HR], 1.14 for each 10-year increase in age; 95% CI, 1.07-1.22; P < .001). Patients who received an SOT other than kidney were at a significantly higher risk of CDI compared with those who received a kidney transplant. However, in kidney allograft recipients, delayed graft function was associated with a greater risk of CDI (HR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.3-2.0). Comorbidities, such as diabetes (HR, 1.6; 95% CI, 1.4-1.9), inflammatory bowel disease (HR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.1-2.5), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (HR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.2-1.8), and cancer (HR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.2-1.6), were significantly associated with a higher risk of CDI.

Factors Associated With Mortality

Overall, 43 patients (5.9%) developed fulminant CDI (ie, ileus, toxic megacolon, and intestinal perforation). Of these, 26 patients (60.4%) required colectomy. In multivariable analysis, the association between fulminant CDI (5.9%) and mortality was not significant (aOR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.51-2.55). The frequency of fulminant CDI was not significantly different in recipients of thoracic vs abdominal organs (9 of 136 [6.6%] vs 34 of 581 [5.9%]; P = .73). Post-CDI colectomy was not associated with a risk for short-term mortality (7 of 26 [26.9%]) vs patients who did not undergo colectomy (115 of 700 [16.4%]) (P = .16).

Overall, 368 of 726 patients (50.7%) who had undergone SOT and developed CDI were admitted to the ICU during the CDI hospitalization. Patients who were admitted to the ICU were at a greater risk of post-CDI short-term mortality compared with patients who did not require ICU admission (84 of 368 [22.8%] vs 38 of 358 [10.6%]; P = .001). Intensive care unit admission was more frequent among thoracic (92 of 136 [67.6%]) than among abdominal (267 of 581 [46.0%]) SOT recipients with CDI vs (P = .001].

In total, 97 patients with CDI (13.4%) developed AKI requiring acute dialysis. The frequency of acute dialysis in thoracic SOT recipients was significantly greater than in abdominal allograft recipients (31 of 136 [22.8%] vs 66 of 581 [11.4%]; P = .001). Patients who received a heart transplant had the highest frequency of dialysis-requiring AKI (25.6%) followed by lung allograft recipients (21.5%). In contrast, the frequency of acute dialysis was considerably lower in all patients who received abdominal organ transplants, including liver (9.9%), kidney (11.9%), and kidney-pancreas (12.1%). There was an association between patients with vs without the need for acute dialysis and short-term mortality (28 of 97 [28.9%] vs 94 of 629 [14.9%]; P = .001). Acute dialysis was associated with a greater risk of short-term mortality in both abdominal (18 of 66 [27.3%] vs 76 of 515 [14.8%]; P = .009) and thoracic (10 of 31 [32.3%] vs 16 of 105 [15.2]; P = .03) SOT recipients.

Short-term Mortality Following CDI

The short-term (90-day) mortality rate was 16.8% (122 of 726). Patients who received lung transplants had the largest short-term mortality rate compared with recipients of other SOT with CDI (21 of 93 [22.6%] vs 101 of 633 [15.9%]; P = .11). Short-term mortality was not significantly different between abdominal and thoracic transplant recipients (94 of 581 [16.2%] vs 26 of 136 [19.1%]; P = .41).

Late-onset CDI was associated with a significantly greater short-term mortality than early-onset CDI (97 of 451 [21.5%] vs 25 of 275 [9.1%]; P = .001). In a logistic regression model, age (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 1.02; 95% CI, 1.01-1.04), Deyo-Charlson comorbidity index (aOR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.00-1.22), AKI requiring dialysis (aOR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.07-3.26), and ICU admission (aOR, 3.77; 95% CI, 2.33-6.07) were associated with an increased risk of 90-day mortality. Late-onset CDI was associated with a higher odds of 90-day mortality following CDI hospitalization (aOR, 4.26; 95% CI, 2.51-7.22) (Table 3).

Long-term Mortality Following CDI

In Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, thoracic vs abdominal SOT (aHR, 2.18; 95% CI, 1.55-3.06), age (aHR, 1.03; 95% CI, 1.02-1.05), Deyo-Charlson comorbidity index at the time of CDI (aHR, 1.18; 95% CI, 1.10-1.26), and AKI requiring dialysis (aHR, 1.90; 95% CI, 1.29-2.78) were associated with an increased risk of longer-term mortality following CDI (Table 3). As with short-term mortality, late-onset CDI was associated with a relatively greater risk of longer-term death following CDI (aHR, 2.49; 95% CI, 1.78-3.49).

Discussion

In the absence of population-based studies, estimation of posttransplant CDI incidence has been limited to single-center studies providing wide variation in cumulative CDI incidence.2,19 Our study, which is, to our knowledge, the largest cohort of SOT recipients including 10 724 patients and 61 987 person-years of follow-up, estimated a CDI incidence of 11.7 (95% CI, 10.9-12.6) per 1000 person-years. We observed a trend toward increasing risk of posttransplant CDI over time. Recent surveillance data showed an increasing CDI incidence trend in the US general population in 2011 followed by a relative plateau in 2012 and thereafter.20The increasing CDI incidence in 2011-2012 could have been due to the fact that 52% of microbiology laboratories used nucleic acid amplification testing, which is more sensitive than other test types.20 Nucleic acid amplification tests, compared with toxin enzyme immunoassay, could increase the CDI diagnosis by as much as 67% owing to greater sensitivity.21 A relatively greater incidence of CDI in Ontario in 2011 may have been associated with use of nucleic acid amplification testing, although the Provincial Infectious Diseases Advisory Committee in Ontario recommended using the nucleic acid amplification test in 2013.22,23 Pereira et al24 has recently reported on an increasing CDI trend in the general population of Ontario, but this pattern did not continue beyond 2012. Thus, the increasing trend of CDI in patients who undergo SOT requires focused attention on preventive strategies.

In this population-based cohort, SOT recipients were at considerable risk of post-CDI mortality. Overall, short-term mortality was 19.1% in thoracic SOT recipients and 16.2% in abdominal SOT recipients. The greatest short-term mortality was in patients who received a lung transplant (22.6%), which supports previous single-center data.5 Acute kidney injury requiring dialysis was associated with a significant risk of mortality (aOR, 1.86; 95% CI, 1.07-3.26). Generally, patients who undergo SOT are susceptible to AKI because of several factors, such as continuous exposure to nephrotoxic drugs, infectious complications, allograft rejection, and comorbidities.13,25 Acute kidney injury is an independent predictor of CDI severity26 and may occur regardless of fulminant CDI.27 Patients with CDI may develop AKI because of intrinsic kidney insult; direct toxin-associated kidney disease; and factors that occur before AKI, such as decreased organ perfusion,28 protein-losing enteropathy leading to reduced oncotic pressure,29 and immunoglobulin A nephropathy.30 We noted that dialysis-requiring AKI is an independent risk factor for short-term mortality. The association between AKI and long-term mortality remained significant in Cox proportional hazards regression analysis. Experimental data noted an association between AKI and tissue injury in different organs, such as inflammatory and functional changes in the brain, pulmonary vascular integrity loss, cardiac tissue apoptosis, and severe fibrotic changes in the kidneys.31,32 Acute kidney injury has been reported to increase the long-term risk of cardiovascular events.33 Thus, the longstanding association between AKI and mortality appears to be biologically plausible.

Recipients of SOT with CDI are more likely to be admitted to the ICU compared with patients who have not received an SOT.34 Patients who were admitted to the ICU were at greater risk of short-term mortality. However, this risk did not remain significant in patients who survived 90 days following the CDI hospitalization.

Timing of the onset of CDI was an important factor in CDI outcome. Most studies only investigated early-onset CDI and their findings were likely affected by incomplete follow-up.6,7,35 In our study, over 60% of CDI hospitalizations following transplant were late onset. Although CDI frequently occurred within the first year after transplant, recipients of SOT other than the kidney (median interval since transplant, 0.9; IQR, 0.0-4.6 years), CDI was typically a late-onset complication in kidney allograft recipients (median interval since transplant, 2.2; IQR, 0.4-6.0 years). Late- vs early-onset CDI was associated with a significantly greater risk of short- and long-term mortality. In the first 3 months after transplant, infectious complications are more likely secondary to transplant procedure.36 However, infectious complications occurring beyond 3 months following transplant may be associated with graft dysfunction, late-onset allograft rejection, and cumulative immunosuppression.9,37 To our knowledge, ours is the first study to quantify the risk of death in patients who have undergone SOT and developed CDI early vs later after transplant.

The frequency of fulminant CDI in our cohort was considerably greater than previous estimates in the general population.38 In multivariable analysis, the association between fulminant CDI (5.9%) and mortality was not significant (aOR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.51-2.55). This finding may be associated with 60% of the patients with fulminant CDI undergoing colectomy. Our finding is consistent with previous studies showing colectomy may be life-saving in patients with fulminant CDI.39-41 Prospective studies are required to estimate postcolectomy mortality.

Limitations

This study has limitations. We did not have access to information on immunosuppressive regimens and antibiotic therapies at an individual level. The present study was conducted with a primary focus on CDI outcomes rather than risk factors. The outcomes of interest did not include mild CDI episodes that were managed in outpatient settings. This cohort was restricted to transplant centers across Ontario, which may affect the generalizability of our findings. However, within the accrual window of this cohort, 40% to 50% of SOT operations in Canada have been done in Ontario.16

Conclusions

In this study, we observed increasing CDI trends in annual cohorts of SOT recipients. Posttransplant CDI was associated with considerable mortality. Although CDI was an early-onset disease in non–kidney allograft recipients, patients who underwent kidney transplant typically experienced late-onset CDI. Late- vs early-onset CDI was associated with a greater risk of death. Acute kidney injury was also associated with an increased risk of short- and long-term mortality following CDI. Acute kidney injury preventive measures, such as adequate fluid repletion, avoidance of hypotension in critically ill SOT recipients, readjustment of nephrotoxic medications based on drug levels, and close kidney function monitoring, should be considered in the management of CDI. Clostridioides difficile infection is potentially preventable through risk reduction strategies. Further studies are required to reduce CDI incidence and related complications in SOT recipients.

Back to top
Article Information

Accepted for Publication: November 3, 2021.

Published: December 29, 2021. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.41089

Open Access: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License. © 2021 Hosseini-Moghaddam SM et al. JAMA Network Open.

Corresponding Author: Seyed M. Hosseini-Moghaddam, MD, MPH, MSc, Associate Professor of Medicine, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, University of Toronto, 200 Elizabeth St, Toronto, ON M5G 2C4, Canada (sasan.hosseini@uhn.ca).

Author Contributions: Dr Hosseini-Moghaddam had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Concept and design: Hosseini-Moghaddam, Bota, Husain, Silverman, Daneman, Brown, Paterson.

Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Hosseini-Moghaddam, Luo, Brown, Paterson.

Drafting of the manuscript: Hosseini-Moghaddam, Silverman.

Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: All authors.

Statistical analysis: Hosseini-Moghaddam, Luo, Bota.

Obtained funding: Hosseini-Moghaddam, Silverman.

Administrative, technical, or material support: Hosseini-Moghaddam, Luo, Bota, Daneman.

Supervision: Hosseini-Moghaddam, Husain, Silverman, Paterson.

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Husain reported receiving grants from Gilead and PSI outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.

Funding/Support: Funding for the study was provided by the Department of Medicine, Western University, Ontario, Canada. This study was also supported by ICES, which is funded by an annual grant from the Ontario Ministry of Health and the Ministry of Long-term Care. The study was completed at the ICES Western site, where core funding is provided by the Academic Medical Organization of Southwestern Ontario, the Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry, Western University, and the Lawson Health Research Institute.

Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The funding organization had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Disclaimer: The analyses, conclusions, opinions, and statements expressed herein are solely those of the authors and do not reflect those of the funding or data sources; no endorsement is intended or should be inferred.

Additional Information: Parts of this material are based on data compiled and provided by the Ministry of Health and the Canadian Institute for Health Information.

References
1.
Mullane  KM, Dubberke  ER; AST ID Community of Practice.  Management of Clostridioides (formerly Clostridium) difficile infection (CDI) in solid organ transplant recipients: guidelines from the American Society of Transplantation Community of Practice.   Clin Transplant. 2019;33(9):e13564. doi:10.1111/ctr.13564 PubMedGoogle Scholar
2.
Neofytos  D, Kobayashi  K, Alonso  CD,  et al.  Epidemiology, risk factors, and outcomes of Clostridium difficile infection in kidney transplant recipients.   Transpl Infect Dis. 2013;15(2):134-141. doi:10.1111/tid.12030 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
3.
Li  GJ, Trac  J, Husain  S, Famure  O, Li  Y, Kim  SJ.  Incidence, risk factors, and outcomes of Clostridium difficile infections in kidney transplant recipients.   Transplantation. 2018;102(9):1576-1581. doi:10.1097/TP.0000000000002199 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
4.
Bruminhent  J, Cawcutt  KA, Thongprayoon  C, Petterson  TM, Kremers  WK, Razonable  RR.  Epidemiology, risk factors, and outcome of Clostridium difficile infection in heart and heart-lung transplant recipients.   Clin Transplant. 2017;31(6). doi:10.1111/ctr.12968 PubMedGoogle Scholar
5.
Lee  JT, Kelly  RF, Hertz  MI, Dunitz  JM, Shumway  SJ.  Clostridium difficile infection increases mortality risk in lung transplant recipients.   J Heart Lung Transplant. 2013;32(10):1020-1026. doi:10.1016/j.healun.2013.06.012 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
6.
Cusini  A, Béguelin  C, Stampf  S,  et al; Swiss Transplant Cohort Study.  Clostridium difficile infection is associated with graft loss in solid organ transplant recipients.   Am J Transplant. 2018;18(7):1745-1754. doi:10.1111/ajt.14640 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
7.
Albright  JB, Bonatti  H, Mendez  J,  et al.  Early and late onset Clostridium difficile–associated colitis following liver transplantation.   Transpl Int. 2007;20(10):856-866. doi:10.1111/j.1432-2277.2007.00530.x PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
8.
Herrera  S, Davoudi  S, Farooq  A,  et al.  Late onset invasive pulmonary aspergillosis in lung transplant recipients in the setting of a targeted prophylaxis/preemptive antifungal therapy strategy.   Transplantation. 2020;104(12):2575-2581. doi:10.1097/TP.0000000000003187 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
9.
Rahimishahmirzadi  M, Jevnikar  AM, House  AA,  et al.  Late-onset allograft rejection, cytomegalovirus infection, and renal allograft loss: is anti-CMV prophylaxis required following late-onset allograft rejection?   Clin Transplant. 2021;35(6):e14285. doi:10.1111/ctr.14285 PubMedGoogle Scholar
10.
Madden  GR, Sifri  CD.  Reduced Clostridioides difficile tests among solid organ transplant recipients through a diagnostic stewardship bundled intervention.   Ann Transplant. 2019;24:304-311. doi:10.12659/AOT.915168 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
11.
Paudel  S, Zacharioudakis  IM, Zervou  FN, Ziakas  PD, Mylonakis  E. Prevalence of Clostridium difficile infection among solid organ transplant recipients: a meta-analysis of published studies. PLoS One. 2015;10(4):e0124483. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0124483
12.
Carlson  TJ, Gonzales-Luna  AJ, Nebo  K,  et al.  Assessment of kidney injury as a severity criteria for Clostridioides difficile infection.   Open Forum Infect Dis. 2020;7(11):a476. doi:10.1093/ofid/ofaa476 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
13.
Nankivell  BJ, PʼNg  CH, OʼConnell  PJ, Chapman  JR.  Calcineurin inhibitor nephrotoxicity through the lens of longitudinal histology: comparison of cyclosporine and tacrolimus eras.   Transplantation. 2016;100(8):1723-1731. doi:10.1097/TP.0000000000001243 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
14.
IC/ES. Accessed October 1, 2021. http://www.ices.on.ca
15.
Benchimol  EI, Smeeth  L, Guttmann  A,  et al; RECORD Working Committee.  The Reporting of Studies Conducted Using Observational Routinely-Collected Health Data (RECORD) statement.   PLoS Med. 2015;12(10):e1001885. doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001885 PubMedGoogle Scholar
16.
Canadian Institute on Health Information. e-Statistics report on transplant, waiting list and donor statistics, 2014. 2014. Accessed September 17, 2017. https://www.cihi.ca/en/access-data-and-reports
17.
Negrón  ME, Rezaie  A, Barkema  HW,  et al.  Ulcerative colitis patients with Clostridium difficile are at increased risk of death, colectomy, and postoperative complications: a population-based inception cohort study.   Am J Gastroenterol. 2016;111(5):691-704. doi:10.1038/ajg.2016.106 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
18.
Ilett  EE, Helleberg  M, Reekie  J,  et al.  Incidence rates and risk factors of Clostridioides difficile infection in solid organ and hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients.   Open Forum Infect Dis. 2019;6(4):ofz086. doi:10.1093/ofid/ofz086 PubMedGoogle Scholar
19.
Whiddon  AR, Dawson  KL, Fuentes  A, Perez  KK, Peterson  LE, Kaleekal  T.  Postoperative antimicrobials after lung transplantation and the development of multidrug-resistant bacterial and Clostridium difficile infections: an analysis of 500 non-cystic fibrosis lung transplant patients.   Clin Transplant. 2016;30(7):767-773. doi:10.1111/ctr.12746 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
20.
Guh  AY, Mu  Y, Winston  LG,  et al; Emerging Infections Program Clostridioides difficile Infection Working Group.  Trends in US burden of Clostridioides difficile infection and outcomes.   N Engl J Med. 2020;382(14):1320-1330. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1910215 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
21.
Gould  CV, Edwards  JR, Cohen  J,  et al; Clostridium difficile Infection Surveillance Investigators, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.  Effect of nucleic acid amplification testing on population-based incidence rates of Clostridium difficile infection.   Clin Infect Dis. 2013;57(9):1304-1307. doi:10.1093/cid/cit492 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
22.
LifeLabs. New molecular test for diagnosis of C difficile Infection—LifeLabs. 2013. Accessed March 28, 2020. https://www.lifelabs.com/hcps-newsletter/new-molecular-test-for-diagnosis-of-c-difficile-infection/..
23.
Provincial Infectious Diseases Advisory Committee (PIDAC). Annex C: testing, surveillance and management of Clostridium difficile. January 2013. Accessed March 28, 2020. https://www.publichealthontario.ca/-/media/documents/C/2013/cdiff-testing-surveillance-management.pdf
24.
Pereira  JA, McGeer  A, Tomovici  A, Selmani  A, Chit  A.  Incidence and economic burden of Clostridioides difficile infection in Ontario: a retrospective population-based study.   CMAJ Open. 2020;8(1):E16-E25. doi:10.9778/cmajo.20190018PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
25.
Jocher  BM, Schilling  JD, Fischer  I,  et al.  Acute kidney injury post-heart transplant: an analysis of peri-operative risk factors.   Clin Transplant. 2021;35(6):e14296. doi:10.1111/ctr.14296 PubMedGoogle Scholar
26.
Khanna  S, Keddis  MT, Noheria  A, Baddour  LM, Pardi  DS.  Acute kidney injury is an independent marker of severity in Clostridium difficile infection: a nationwide survey.   J Clin Gastroenterol. 2013;47(6):481-484. doi:10.1097/MCG.0b013e31826af6fd PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
27.
Charilaou  P, Devani  K, John  F,  et al.  Acute kidney injury impact on inpatient mortality in Clostridium difficile infection: a national propensity-matched study.   J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;33(6):1227-1233. doi:10.1111/jgh.14064 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
28.
Cimolai  N.  Are Clostridium difficile toxins nephrotoxic?   Med Hypotheses. 2019;126:4-8. doi:10.1016/j.mehy.2019.03.002 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
29.
Rybolt  AH, Bennett  RG, Laughon  BE, Thomas  DR, Greenough  WB  III, Bartlett  JG.  Protein-losing enteropathy associated with Clostridium difficile infection.   Lancet. 1989;1(8651):1353-1355. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(89)92803-1 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
30.
Gaughan  WJ, Hassan  MH, McCue  PA, Burke  JF, Sharma  K.  Association of IgA nephropathy with Clostridium difficile colitis.   Am J Kidney Dis. 1999;34(4):e16. doi:10.1016/S0272-6386(99)70410-5 PubMedGoogle Scholar
31.
Liu  M, Liang  Y, Chigurupati  S,  et al.  Acute kidney injury leads to inflammation and functional changes in the brain.   J Am Soc Nephrol. 2008;19(7):1360-1370. doi:10.1681/ASN.2007080901 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
32.
Kelly  KJ.  Distant effects of experimental renal ischemia/reperfusion injury.   J Am Soc Nephrol. 2003;14(6):1549-1558. doi:10.1097/01.ASN.0000064946.94590.46 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
33.
Odutayo  A, Wong  CX, Farkouh  M,  et al.  AKI and long-term risk for cardiovascular events and mortality.   J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017;28(1):377-387. doi:10.1681/ASN.2016010105 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
34.
Gellad  ZF, Alexander  BD, Liu  JK,  et al.  Severity of Clostridium difficile–associated diarrhea in solid organ transplant patients.   Transpl Infect Dis. 2007;9(4):276-280. doi:10.1111/j.1399-3062.2007.00255.x PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
35.
Pennefather  PM, Tin  W, Clarke  MP, Dutton  J, Fritz  S, Hey  EN.  Bias due to incomplete follow up in a cohort study.   Br J Ophthalmol. 1999;83(6):643-645. doi:10.1136/bjo.83.6.643 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
36.
Levine  MA, Schuler  T, Gourishankar  S.  Complications in the 90-day postoperative period following kidney transplant and the relationship of the Charlson Comorbidity Index.   Can Urol Assoc J. 2017;11(12):388-393. doi:10.5489/cuaj.4378 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
37.
Silkensen  JR.  Long-term complications in renal transplantation.   J Am Soc Nephrol. 2000;11(3):582-588. doi:10.1681/ASN.V113582 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
38.
Dallal  RM, Harbrecht  BG, Boujoukas  AJ,  et al.  Fulminant Clostridium difficile: an underappreciated and increasing cause of death and complications.   Ann Surg. 2002;235(3):363-372. doi:10.1097/00000658-200203000-00008 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
39.
Stewart  DB, Hollenbeak  CS, Wilson  MZ.  Is colectomy for fulminant Clostridium difficile colitis life saving? a systematic review.   Colorectal Dis. 2013;15(7):798-804. doi:10.1111/codi.12134 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
40.
Ahmed  N, Kuo  Y-H.  Early colectomy saves lives in toxic megacolon due to Clostridium difficile infection.   South Med J. 2020;113(7):345-349. doi:10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001118 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
41.
Wijarnpreecha  K, Aby  ES, Kim  D,  et al.  The burden of Clostridioides difficile infection in patients with history of liver transplant and during index admission.   Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021;33(6):894-898. doi:10.1097/MEG.0000000000001812 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
×