Having relocated to a new academic institution, I was certain that I would have to learn some new things but revising how I wrote the history and physical examinations of my patients was hardly anticipated. The template I used was largely unchanged in more than 4 decades and it had served me well.
While discussing a complex patient with one of my esteemed colleagues, he expressed his opinion that it was inappropriate to include terms describing the patient’s race/ethnicity or country of origin in the medical documents. He regarded it as antiquated and reflective of having practiced in the South. On the contrary, although I had practiced in Kentucky and the very far south—Miami, Florida—the template I had used for writing a history and physical examination was learned in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, the same city to which I had relocated.
Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.
Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.
Err on the side of full disclosure.
If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.
Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.
Berger JR. Political Correctness of Medical Documentation. JAMA Neurol. 2015;72(6):624–625. doi:https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2014.4535
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: