Data from reported clinical trials have the potential to misguide clinical practice. Misinformation may be generated when the interpretation of trial data occurs in the absence of clinical or pathophysiologic context. Therapeutic mythology thus generated becomes entrenched given its ostensible evidence-based origins. Three examples related to levodopa use in Parkinson disease (PD) are highlighted.
This is the easiest to accept because it seems self-evident in daily practice. Dyskinesia, a hyperkinetic motor complication, is linearly correlated with levodopa dose.1 However, levodopa is necessary but not sufficient to induce dyskinesia. Two additional variables are required for dyskinesia to develop: the disease (PD) and a pulsatile drug delivery (short half-life). As for the former, levodopa does not usually induce dyskinesia in parkinsonisms with postsynaptic involvement, such as progressive supranuclear palsy, or in regularly treated dopa-responsive dystonia. Regarding drug delivery, levodopa continuously administered via intestinal infusion reduces preexisting dyskinesia, even at higher doses.2 This may be owing to favorable pharmacodynamic effects from more tonic stimulation of dopamine receptors. Thus, it is more appropriate to consider dyskinesia an artifact of the method of administration of levodopa rather than an intrinsic molecular effect of levodopa itself. A more accurate designation for this treatment complication is levodopa-related (rather than induced) dyskinesia.
Espay AJ, Lang AE. Common Myths in the Use of Levodopa in Parkinson Disease: When Clinical Trials Misinform Clinical Practice. JAMA Neurol. 2017;74(6):633–634. doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.0348
Coronavirus Resource Center
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: