[Skip to Navigation]
Views 317
Citations 0
Comment & Response
October 14, 2019

Cautious Interpretation of Observational Data—Reply

Author Affiliations
  • 1School of Medicine, Institute of Psychological Medicine and Clinical Neuroscience, Heath Park, Cardiff University, Cardiff, Wales
  • 2Helen Durham Centre for Neuroinflammatory Disease, Heath Park, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, Wales
  • 3Department of Neurology, Royal Gwent Hospital, Newport, England
JAMA Neurol. 2019;76(12):1519-1520. doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2019.3459

In Reply We thank Soares-dos-Reis and Messina for their comments on our article.1 We agree that clinical observational data are often limited and require cautious interpretation. For this reason, we have used our preliminary observational data to collaborate with other centers and establish a prospective trial to address this important question (NCT03535298).

Add or change institution
Limit 200 characters
Limit 25 characters
Conflicts of Interest Disclosure

Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.

Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.

Err on the side of full disclosure.

If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.

Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.

Limit 140 characters
Limit 3600 characters or approximately 600 words