[Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]
Views 2,035
Citations 0
Original Investigation
August 10, 2020

Clinical Predictors of Neurotoxicity After Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-Cell Therapy

Author Affiliations
  • 1Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston
  • 2Department of Neurology, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
  • 3Department of Medical Oncology, Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
JAMA Neurol. Published online August 10, 2020. doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2020.2703
Key Points

Question  Which patients are at risk for delayed neurotoxicity after treatment with chimeric antigen receptor T cells?

Findings  In this diagnostic/prognostic study of 204 adults receiving axicabtagene ciloleucel for relapsed or refractory lymphoma, clinical and laboratory markers identified as risk factors for the subsequent development of neurotoxicity were used to create a prognostic model that had a sensitivity of 82% and a specificity of 70% when tested on an internal validation cohort for predicting which patients develop neurologic toxicity.

Meaning  Early identification of risk of neurotoxicity may allow for more appropriate triage and anticipatory care of patients receiving chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy.

Abstract

Importance  Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy for relapsed or refractory hematologic malignant neoplasm causes severe neurologic adverse events ranging from encephalopathy and aphasia to cerebral edema and death. The cause of neurotoxicity is incompletely understood, and its unpredictability is a reason for prolonged hospitalization after CAR T-cell infusion.

Objective  To identify clinical and laboratory parameters predictive of neurotoxicity and to develop a prognostic score associated with its risk.

Design, Setting, and Participants  This single-center diagnostic/prognostic accuracy study was conducted at Brigham and Women’s Hospital/Dana Farber Cancer Institute from April 2015 to February 2020. A consecutive sample of all patients undergoing CAR T-cell therapy with axicabtagene ciloleucel for relapsed or refractory lymphoma were assessed for inclusion (n = 213). Patients who had previously received CAR T cells or who were treated for mantle cell lymphoma were excluded (n = 9). Patients were followed up for a minimum of 30 days from the date of CAR T-cell infusion.

Main Outcomes and Measures  The primary outcomes were measures of performance (accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, area under the curve) of a diagnostic tool to predict the occurrence of CAR-associated neurotoxicity, as graded by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events criteria.

Results  Two hundred four patients (127 men [62.2%]; mean [SD] age, 60.0 [12.1] years) were included in the analysis, of which 126 (61.8%) comprised a derivation cohort and 78 (38.2%), an internal validation cohort. Seventy-three patients (57.9%) in the derivation cohort and 45 patients (57.7%) in the validation cohort experienced neurotoxicity. Clinical and laboratory values obtained early in admission were used to develop a multivariable score that can predict the subsequent development of neurotoxicity; when tested on an internal validation cohort, this score had an area under the curve of 74%, an accuracy of 77%, a sensitivity of 82%, and a specificity of 70% (positive:negative likelihood ratio, 2.71:0.26).

Conclusions and Relevance  The score developed in this study may help predict which patients are likely to experience CAR T-cell–associated neurotoxicity. The score can be used for triaging and resource allocation and may allow a large proportion of patients to be discharged from the hospital early.

Limit 200 characters
Limit 25 characters
Conflicts of Interest Disclosure

Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.

Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.

Err on the side of full disclosure.

If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.

Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.

Limit 140 characters
Limit 3600 characters or approximately 600 words
    ×