At one time in the not-too-distant past, young-onset dementia (YOD) was considered a disease, whereas later-onset dementia (LOD) was considered the inevitable consequence of aging. We now reject such a formulation, but within that misguided dichotomy is a recognition of the dramatic differences in prevalence and incidence of YOD compared with LOD. In this issue of JAMA Neurology, Hendriks et al1 quantitate dementia prevalence in persons aged 30 to 64 years through a meta-analysis of 74 individual studies.
Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.
Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.
Err on the side of full disclosure.
If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.
Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.
Knopman DS. Young-Onset Dementia—New Insights for an Underappreciated Problem. JAMA Neurol. 2021;78(9):1055–1056. doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2021.1760
Coronavirus Resource Center
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: