[Skip to Navigation]
Views 535
Citations 0
Viewpoint
November 8, 2021

Neuro-Advocacy—Professionalism in Action

Author Affiliations
  • 1Pacific Neuroscience Institute, Santa Monica, California
  • 2VoteTripling.org, Washington, DC
JAMA Neurol. Published online November 8, 2021. doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2021.4049
Add or change institution
Limit 200 characters
Limit 25 characters
Conflicts of Interest Disclosure

Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.

Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.

Err on the side of full disclosure.

If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.

Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.

Limit 140 characters
Limit 3600 characters or approximately 600 words
    1 Comment for this article
    EXPAND ALL
    A Unique Mechanism of Quality Care
    Sandro Tsang, PhD | People's Open Access Education Initiative
    Autonomy enables practitioners to act as effective patient advocates (1). The authors implicitly elaborate a crucial role of autonomy in achieving care excellency. Unlike other professions, “the patient[/client] cannot check to see if the actions of [the] physician[/professional] are as diligent as they could be” (2), because the skilled care is an act of applying complex knowledge (3). The “ethically understood restrictions on the activities of a physician are much more severe” than on other professions (3, p.949). For medical care, professional standards and autonomy are enforced by collegiality rather than the legally endorsed authorities (4). The authors point out that, when a patient's mental capacity is impaired, his/her receiving best possible humanistic care is more dependent on the physician's advocacy. Let us hope that this unique mechanism will not be lost in the climate of modernizing medicine through standardization.

    References
    1. Priester R. A values framework for health system reform. Health Affairs. 1992;11(1):84-107.
    2. Arrow K.J. Agency and the Market. In K.J. Arrow and M.D. Intriligator, eds., Handbook of Mathematical Economics, Vol. III. Amsterdam: Elsevier. 1986:p.1184.
    3. Arrow K.J. Uncertainty and the Welfare Economics of Medical Care. The American Economic Review. 1963 Dec;53(5):941-73.
    4. Starbuck WH. Learning by knowledge‐intensive firms. Journal of management Studies. 1992 Nov;29(6):713-40.
    CONFLICT OF INTEREST: None Reported
    READ MORE
    ×