THE FUNCTIONAL significance of the pyramidal tract and the central cortical area in the role of movement has been a subject of controversy since the latter part of the 19th century. Electrophysiological studies in the form of recording from or stimulating these structures have been done under the tacit assumption that the patterned responses so obtained may represent "true units of function, not materially changed from the normal despite the abnormality of the method."1
Leyton and Sherrington2 and Brown and Sherrington3 studied the character of muscular responses obtained by stimulating the motor (precentral) cortex of the higher apes. They described what they saw as "fractional movements," which were "local items of movement, perfect within themselves." In addition they reported three characteristic aberrations in cortical responsiveness which depended upon a number of spatial and temporal factors relating to the manner of stimulation. They related these phenomena to
HARDIN WB. Spontaneous Activity in the Pyramidal Tract of Chronic Cats and Monkeys: Recorded with Indwelling Electrodes. Arch Neurol. 1965;13(5):501–512. doi:10.1001/archneur.1965.00470050049006
Coronavirus Resource Center
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: