AFTER three days of intensive discussion, it is clear that, to paraphrase Calvin Coolidge's terse remark about the sermon on sin, no one in this highly select company is "agin" neurology. There is no question about the immense value of ventilating the many troublesome and cogent problems represented by Dr. O'Leary's loaded questions, and I wish only to present a few reflections about the main problem that seems to me to emerge from our conference.
In all our discussions, no one felt it necessary to define a neurologist. Yet, upon this hangs a dilemma that cropped up at more than one point and which is germane to the original need for this conference. There is no question that the neurophysiologist, the neuroanatomist, the neuropathologist, and the neurosurgeon are neurologists. I would also maintain that the central object of our enquiry is the neurophysician. It has always seemed striking to
Denny-Brown DE. Closing Remarks. Arch Neurol. 1967;17(6):586–587. doi:10.1001/archneur.1967.00470300028006
Coronavirus Resource Center
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.