This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.
Now that the gene lies prostrate, it seems that the new frontier of biological science will be the explanation of the workings of the central nervous system. Most scientists and clinicians believe that this will be achieved by the painstaking correlation of individual discoveries, such as the function of the various neurotransmitters or different neuroanatomic structures. Others hope that the truth will shine upon us by the enunciation of some large unitary concept, later to be verified by humble academic experimenters.
Dr. Stanley-Jones is clearly of the second school of thought, and places his faith in kybernetics. It may well be that Wiener's explanation of cerebellar dysfunction in terms of feedback was provocatively useful; but one need not therefore seek in such a concept the explanation of all human ills (whether neurological, psychological, or even political).
The history of science would appear to show that where large and revolutionary concepts,
Charlton MH. Kybernetics of Mind and Brain. Arch Neurol. 1971;24(4):380. doi:10.1001/archneur.1971.00480340112015
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: