This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.
Dr Stoney's comments are interesting, given that he cites so many thoughtful neuroscientists. However, his comments are unrelated to the point of our article.Dr Stoney complains that we have not given "consciousness" the broad general definition it deserves. He is correct. We did not try to. We made specific clinical observations that we described and quantified. We agree that the concept of consciousness is difficult to define and difficult to explain in neurophysiologic terms. It seemed to us that quantitative data on "consciousness" or some of its elements might be useful to an understanding of integrated cerebral function.In addition, we believed that it was unwise to accept without question the notion that the cerebral hemispheres, which are functionally asymmetrical in so many other ways, were necessarily symmetrical with respect to attentional or alerting activity. Our data suggest that the hemispheres may not be functionally symmetrical for these particular
Albert ML. Cerebral Dominance-Reply. Arch Neurol. 1977;34(1):60. doi:10.1001/archneur.1977.00500130080025
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: