[Skip to Navigation]
[Skip to Navigation Landing]
Article
September 1979

Brain-stem Auditory-Evoked Responses

Author Affiliations

Section of Electroencephalography Department of Neurology Mayo Clinic Rochester, MN 55901

Arch Neurol. 1979;36(9):598-597. doi:10.1001/archneur.1979.00500450091025
Abstract

To the Editor.—  Two articles in your journal about brain-stem auditoryevoked responses (BAERs) emphasized the importance of controlling technical variables in assessing BAER normal variability and defining BAER abnormalities. As shown in Fig 1, the intrasubject "waveform variations" reported by Chiappa et al1 can occur solely as a function of varying acoustic polarity (rarefaction vs condensation) of the click stimuli used. We agree with Chiappa et al that the morphologic variations they described are not clinically important, but suggest that other laboratories beginning to collect their normative BAER data control for the effects of click polarity, since it is a determinant of BAER interwave latency and relative amplitude norms2 (Fig 1), as well as of morphology. Our general findings and conclusions about normal BAER variability2 closely agree with those of Chiappa et al and, specifically, we have long concurred about the limited diagnostic value of waves VI

×