[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 35.172.195.49. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
February 1981

Hyperbaric Chamber Treatment

Author Affiliations

Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh, PA 15261

Arch Neurol. 1981;38(2):136. doi:10.1001/archneur.1981.00510020094019

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.

Abstract

To the Editor.—  I read with interest the report, "Hyperbaric Chamber Treatment for 'Locked-in' Syndrome" by Drs Newman and Manning (Archives 1980;37:529), which eloquently described the successful treatment of a potentially disastrous incident of cerebral air embolization after cardiac surgery. I would offer only one question or criticism. The authors stated that the patient "was placed in a hyperbaric chamber and maintained at 6.0 atm of oxygen." In our treatment of such patients in 1971, as referenced by the authors, we adhered to a US Navy table for decompression sequence that calls for initial compression to 6.0 atm of air, and I presume that that was the course followed by the authors. Maintaining patients at 6.0 atm of 100% oxygen would be likely to cause their death of CNS oxygen toxicity.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×