[Skip to Navigation]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
February 1981

Hyperbaric Chamber Treatment

Author Affiliations

Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine University of Pittsburgh Pittsburgh, PA 15261

Arch Neurol. 1981;38(2):136. doi:10.1001/archneur.1981.00510020094019

This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.


To the Editor.—  I read with interest the report, "Hyperbaric Chamber Treatment for 'Locked-in' Syndrome" by Drs Newman and Manning (Archives 1980;37:529), which eloquently described the successful treatment of a potentially disastrous incident of cerebral air embolization after cardiac surgery. I would offer only one question or criticism. The authors stated that the patient "was placed in a hyperbaric chamber and maintained at 6.0 atm of oxygen." In our treatment of such patients in 1971, as referenced by the authors, we adhered to a US Navy table for decompression sequence that calls for initial compression to 6.0 atm of air, and I presume that that was the course followed by the authors. Maintaining patients at 6.0 atm of 100% oxygen would be likely to cause their death of CNS oxygen toxicity.

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview