To the Editor.
—We read with interest the article by Oh and Danon (Archives 1983;40:147-150). We also think that uniform type 1 fiber typing is an extreme form of type 1 predominance. Brooke1 considers that type 1 fiber predominance can be implicated when these fibers make up more than 60% of the fibers in the biopsy sample. Moreover, it seems that some of these cases are familial.We examined two brothers and a sister, all less than 11 years old, who had the following features in common: delayed motor developmental milestones, mild proximal muscle weakness, hyporeflexia, normal serum muscle enzyme levels, substantial reduction in mean duration of motor unit potentials, and nonprogression of the disease. Deltoid muscle biopsy specimens showed only a clear predominance of type 1 fibers (78%, 74%, and 67% ). The distribution of type 1 fibers was thus nonuniform, although no other morphologic abnormalities were detected under
Vallat JM, Lagueny A, LUCHMAYA K, Dupont C, de Lumley L. Nonprogressive Congenital Neuromuscular Disease With Uniform Type 1 Fiber. Arch Neurol. 1983;40(13):828–829. doi:10.1001/archneur.1983.04050120078017
Coronavirus Resource Center
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: