This article is only available in the PDF format. Download the PDF to view the article, as well as its associated figures and tables.
Nothing evokes more painful empathy than an impaired infant, inspiring feelings of innocence, unfairness, and helplessness. It is natural that caring physicians should emphasize the comfort and practical guidance that infant stimulation programs provide to parents and child; both of the contributors to this controversy do so. However, they also acknowledge, to different degrees, that scant data sustain the objective value of these programs as neurologic therapy.
While caring, support, and practical advice should be part of the management of all infants, a stimulation program should not become a ritualistic substitute for scientific evaluation. The magnitude of the problem is such that properly controlled studies, where a specific stimulation program is the only variable, are not only desirable but feasible.
The widespread and well-intentioned, but unproven, use of stimulation programs can only delay the time when more effective therapies can be found through a systematic search; or if no
Hachinski V. Infant Stimulation Programs. Arch Neurol. 1986;43(3):283. doi:https://doi.org/10.1001/archneur.1986.00520030069019
Browse and subscribe to JAMA Network podcasts!
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: