[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 35.172.195.82. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Article
April 1995

In Search of a Safe Apnea Test in Brain Death: Is the Procedure Really More Dangerous Than We Think?-Reply

Author Affiliations

371 Merrick Rd, Suite 401 Rockville Centre, NY 11570
Brooklyn, NY

Arch Neurol. 1995;52(4):338-339. doi:10.1001/archneur.1995.00540280018006
Abstract

In reply  We thank Wijdicks for finding our study1 "very well done" and containing "important data," but it is not "more important than the authors realized themselves." The legal implications, eg, need for informed consent, are being explored (C. D. Zwiebel, Esq, oral communication). The moral implications of performing a potentially dangerous diagnostic test with no therapeutic implications for the patient2 are also being addressed (Abraham S. Abraham, MD, written communications, January, 21, 1990, and October 21, 1991, and J. David Bleich, PhD, a rabbi, written communication, December 24, 1992). The State University of New York institutional apnea testing protocol has also been modified. The medical implications and dire need to meticulously monitor patients during apnea testing are apparent from our study.We undertook our study because although the fact that "hypotension develops during apnea testing... is well recognized, " formal studies other than anecdotal reports were conspicuously lacking.

×