We can rail against managed care for many reasons, but the health maintenance organizations (HMOs) have come so fast and so powerfully that physicians just have to adapt. The central problem of health care "reform" is this: the goal is to reduce expenses, not to make anything better. Not patient care, and surely not teaching or research.
In the current "market-driven" economy of medicine, they tell us that neurologists are expensive and superfluous; the excess (perhaps half of us), they say, should be retrained for primary care or some other occupation. In the meantime, we are hassled in patient care—forced to argue with intermediaries on behalf of patients. Money is diverted from health care to pay for administrative costs, bloated executive salaries, and dividends for the shareholders of for-profit managed care companies. We spend huge amounts of time on defensive maneuvers—hospital mergers, development of hospital networks, formation of gigantic practice
Rowland LP. The Quality of Neurological Care, 1997. Arch Neurol. 1997;54(11):1327–1328. doi:10.1001/archneur.1997.00550230008006
Coronavirus Resource Center
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: