[Skip to Navigation]
Sign In
Figure. Incidence of painful tonic spasm (PTS) in patients with neuromyelitis optica (NMO), patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), and patients with idiopathic acute transverse myelitis without anti–AQP4 antibody (iATM). The incidence of PTS was significantly higher in the NMO group than in the MS group or in the iATM group (P = .001).

Figure. Incidence of painful tonic spasm (PTS) in patients with neuromyelitis optica (NMO), patients with multiple sclerosis (MS), and patients with idiopathic acute transverse myelitis without anti–AQP4 antibody (iATM). The incidence of PTS was significantly higher in the NMO group than in the MS group or in the iATM group (P = .001).

Table 1. Demographic Characteristics of Patients in the NMO, MS, and iATM Groups
Table 1. Demographic Characteristics of Patients in the NMO, MS, and iATM Groups
Table 2. Summary of the Clinical and Radiological Characteristics of Patients With PTS in the NMO, MS, and iATM Groupsa
Table 2. Summary of the Clinical and Radiological Characteristics of Patients With PTS in the NMO, MS, and iATM Groupsa
Table 3. Acute Treatment Response and Long-term Prognosis of PTS in the NMO, MS, and iATM Groupsa
Table 3. Acute Treatment Response and Long-term Prognosis of PTS in the NMO, MS, and iATM Groupsa
Table 4. Predictors of Painful Tonic Spasm in Patients With Neuromyelitis Optica
Table 4. Predictors of Painful Tonic Spasm in Patients With Neuromyelitis Optica

The patient's thumb is adducted and all fingers are flexed during 120 attacks of painful tonic spasm in neuromyelitis optica.

1.
Matthews WB. Tonic seizures in disseminated sclerosis.  Brain. 1958;81(2):193-20613572690PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
2.
Yücesan C, Tuncel D, Akbostanci MC, Yücemen N, Mutluer N. Hemidystonia secondary to cervical demyelinating lesions.  Eur J Neurol. 2000;7(5):563-56611054144PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
3.
Wingerchuk DM, Hogancamp WF, O’Brien PC, Weinshenker BG. The clinical course of neuromyelitis optica (Devic's syndrome).  Neurology. 1999;53(5):1107-111410496275PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
4.
Tüzün E, Akman-Demir G, Eraksoy M. Paroxysmal attacks in multiple sclerosis.  Mult Scler. 2001;7(6):402-40411795462PubMedGoogle Scholar
5.
Solaro C, Brichetto G, Amato MP,  et al; PaIMS Study Group.  The prevalence of pain in multiple sclerosis: a multicenter cross-sectional study.  Neurology. 2004;63(5):919-92115365151PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
6.
Shibasaki H, Kuroiwa Y. Painful tonic seizure in multiple sclerosis.  Arch Neurol. 1974;30(1):47-514586026PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
7.
Bonev VI, Gledhill RF. Paroxysmal kinesigenic choreoathetosis because of cryptogenic myelitis: remission with carbamazepine and the pathogenetic role of altered sodium channels.  Eur J Neurol. 2002;9(5):517-52012220384PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
8.
Wingerchuk DM, Lennon VA, Pittock SJ, Lucchinetti CF, Weinshenker BG. Revised diagnostic criteria for neuromyelitis optica.  Neurology. 2006;66(10):1485-148916717206PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
9.
Wingerchuk DM, Lennon VA, Lucchinetti CF, Pittock SJ, Weinshenker BG. The spectrum of neuromyelitis optica.  Lancet Neurol. 2007;6(9):805-81517706564PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
10.
Waters P, Jarius S, Littleton E,  et al.  Aquaporin-4 antibodies in neuromyelitis optica and longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis.  Arch Neurol. 2008;65(7):913-91918625857PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
11.
Polman CH, Reingold SC, Banwell B,  et al.  Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 revisions to the McDonald criteria.  Ann Neurol. 2011;69(2):292-30221387374PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
12.
Polman CH, Reingold SC, Edan G,  et al.  Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2005 revisions to the “McDonald Criteria.”  Ann Neurol. 2005;58(6):840-84616283615PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
13.
Transverse Myelitis Consortium Working Group.  Proposed diagnostic criteria and nosology of acute transverse myelitis.  Neurology. 2002;59(4):499-50512236201PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
14.
Kim JE, Kim SM, Ahn SW,  et al.  Brain abnormalities in neuromyelitis optica.  J Neurol Sci. 2011;302(1-2):43-4821236446PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
15.
Kim SM, Waters P, Vincent A,  et al.  Sjogren's syndrome myelopathy: spinal cord involvement in Sjogren's syndrome might be a manifestation of neuromyelitis optica.  Mult Scler. 2009;15(9):1062-106819692434PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
16.
Kim W, Kim SH, Kim HJ. New insights into neuromyelitis optica.  J Clin Neurol. 2011;7(3):115-12722087205PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
17.
Pittock SJ, Lennon VA, Krecke K, Wingerchuk DM, Lucchinetti CF, Weinshenker BG. Brain abnormalities in neuromyelitis optica.  Arch Neurol. 2006;63(3):390-39616533966PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
18.
Kurtzke JF. Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: an expanded disability status scale (EDSS).  Neurology. 1983;33(11):1444-14526685237PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
19.
Spissu A, Cannas A, Ferrigno P, Pelaghi AE, Spissu M. Anatomic correlates of painful tonic spasms in multiple sclerosis.  Mov Disord. 1999;14(2):331-33510091629PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
20.
Ostermann PO, Westerberg CE. Paroxysmal attacks in multiple sclerosis.  Brain. 1975;98(2):189-2021148814PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
21.
Matthews WB. Paroxysmal symptoms in multiple sclerosis.  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1975;38(6):617-6231151430PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
22.
Lucchinetti CF, Mandler RN, McGavern D,  et al.  A role for humoral mechanisms in the pathogenesis of Devic's neuromyelitis optica.  Brain. 2002;125(pt 7):1450-146112076996PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
23.
Roemer SF, Parisi JE, Lennon VA,  et al.  Pattern-specific loss of aquaporin-4 immunoreactivity distinguishes neuromyelitis optica from multiple sclerosis.  Brain. 2007;130(pt 5):1194-120517282996PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
24.
Espir ML, Millac P. Treatment of paroxysmal disorders in multiple sclerosis with carbamazepine (Tegretol).  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1970;33(4):528-5315505682PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
25.
Kira J. Multiple sclerosis in the Japanese population.  Lancet Neurol. 2003;2(2):117-12712849268PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
26.
Lennon VA, Wingerchuk DM, Kryzer TJ,  et al.  A serum autoantibody marker of neuromyelitis optica: distinction from multiple sclerosis.  Lancet. 2004;364(9451):2106-211215589308PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
27.
Merchut MP, Brumlik J. Painful tonic spasms caused by putaminal infarction.  Stroke. 1986;17(6):1319-13213810737PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
28.
Prashantha DK, Pal PK, Bharath RD. Hyperventilation-induced painful tonic spasms secondary to a structural lesion of the pons.  Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2010;16(9):618-61920685149PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Original Contribution
Aug 2012

Painful Tonic Spasm in Neuromyelitis Optica: Incidence, Diagnostic Utility, and Clinical Characteristics

Author Affiliations

Author Affiliations: Department of Neurology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, and Department of Neurology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Gyeonggi (Drs Kim, Sung, Park, and Lee), and Center for Genome Science, Korea National Institute of Health, Osong (Ms Go), Korea.

Arch Neurol. 2012;69(8):1026-1031. doi:10.1001/archneurol.2012.112
Abstract

Objectives To evaluate the diagnostic utility and clinical characteristics of painful tonic spasm (PTS) in neuromyelitis optica (NMO).

Design Retrospective study.

Setting Two referral hospitals.

Patients Forty patients who had NMO spectrum disorder with anti–aquaporin 4 autoantibody or met the revised diagnostic criteria for definite NMO; 35 patients with multiple sclerosis; and 41 patients with idiopathic acute transverse myelitis without anti–aquaporin 4 antibody.

Main Outcome Measures The incidence and clinical characteristics of PTS in the different groups, diagnostic value of PTS in identifying patients with NMO, and predictors of PTS in NMO.

Results The incidence of PTS was significantly higher in the patients with NMO (10 patients [25.0%]) than in those with multiple sclerosis (1 patient [2.9%]) or idiopathic acute transverse myelitis without anti–aquaporin 4 antibody (1 patient [2.4%]). Most PTS episodes (in 8 of 10 patients [80.0%]) in the NMO group occurred after a mean interval of 48.13 days from the onset of the first myelitis episode and were not accompanied by another demyelinating episode with its onset. Painful tonic spasm associated with myelitis had a specificity of 98.7% for identifying the NMO group. Myelitis at disease onset was a predictor of PTS in the NMO group (odds ratio = 6.545, presence vs absence).

Conclusions Painful tonic spasm is a common symptom in NMO. When associated with myelitis, it is relatively specific to patients with NMO and is most commonly observed during recovery from the first myelitis episode. Patients with NMO presenting with myelitis at disease onset appear to be at higher risk for developing PTS compared with other patients with NMO.

Painful tonic spasm (PTS) presents as painful localized muscle spasms that usually last for a few seconds. It can affect the quality of life, limit activities of daily living, and impair rehabilitation after acute relapse.1 It is frequently found in patients with neuromyelitis optica (NMO), multiple sclerosis (MS), and demyelinating myelopathy of undetermined etiology, with an incidence varying from 3% to 33% according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, diagnostic criteria, and ethnicity.1-7

This study evaluates the incidence and clinical characteristics of PTS in patients with NMO and other demyelinating diseases of the central nervous system, assesses the diagnostic value of PTS in identifying patients with NMO, and describes the clinical characteristics of PTS in patients with NMO.

Methods

The study population (NMO group) consisted of patients with NMO who met the revised diagnostic criteria for definite NMO8 and patients with NMO spectrum disorder9 who had a positive anti–aquaporin 4 (AQP4) autoantibody test result.10 The patients visited Seoul National University Hospital or Seoul National University Bundang Hospital between January 1, 2006, and April 30, 2011. Patients who had only optic neuritis without myelitis or brain lesions or who had a follow-up period of less than 6 months were excluded from the study group.

The 2 control groups were the MS group, comprising patients with MS who met the revised diagnostic criteria,11,12 and the idiopathic acute transverse myelitis (iATM) group, comprising patients who met the proposed diagnostic criteria for iATM13; the control patients had a negative anti-AQP4 autoantibody test result. Patients who met the revised diagnostic criteria for definite NMO,8 had a positive anti-AQP4 autoantibody test result,10 had bilateral diencephalic lesions, extensive brain lesions, lesion extension from the cervical cord to the brainstem, or cloudlike enhancement on brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI),14-17 or were followed up for less than 6 months were excluded from the control groups.

Painful tonic spasm was defined as a paroxysmal episode of intense pain that accompanied tonic postures of the limbs with or without being precipitated by abrupt movement or sensory stimulation, according to the original description.1 It was classified as either associated with myelitis or associated with brain lesions depending on the MRI findings, neurological examination findings, and symptoms that preceded or accompanied the PTS episode. We assessed the demographic characteristics, MRI findings, accompanying lesions, duration of the PTS,4 score on the Kurtzke Expanded Disability Status Scale measured at the disease nadir of the first NMO episode,18 and the organs involved (spinal cord, optic nerve, or brain). An acute response of PTS was assessed 2 weeks after treatment. Patients were tested for the presence of anti-AQP4 antibodies at the Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, England, using cell-based assays as previously described.10

The study was approved by the institutional review boards of Seoul National University Hospital and Seoul National University Bundang Hospital.

Fisher exact test was used to compare the incidence of PTS between groups, and logistic regression analysis was used to identify predictors of developing PTS in NMO. The significance level was set at P < .05. Analyses were performed using SPSS software version 17 (SPSS Inc).

Results
Patients

There were 40 patients in the NMO group. Among the control groups, 35 patients were in the MS group and 41 were in the iATM group (Table 1).

INCIDENCE OF PTS IN THE NMO, MS, AND iATM GROUPS

Ten patients in the NMO group (25.0%) experienced PTS, compared with 1 patient in the MS group (2.9%) and 1 patient in the iATM group (2.4%). The incidence of PTS was significantly higher in the NMO group than in the MS and iATM groups (P = .001) (Figure).

Clinical characteristics of pts in nmo

As shown in Table 2, 9 of the PTS cases in the NMO group were associated with spinal cord lesions; in 1 case (NMO case 2), the exact structure associated with PTS was not identified. In contrast, the case of PTS in the MS group was classified as being associated with a brain lesion based on the observation of a contralateral thalamocapsular lesion on brain MRI, as in previous reports.4,19

Although all of the PTS episodes in NMO showed a paroxysmal episode of intense pain that accompanied tonic postures of the limbs,1 the detailed manifestations of PTS varied among the patients. One patient (NMO case 4) had PTS that involved only her right hand, repeated every 3 minutes, and lasted for 1 minute. Her thumb was adducted and all fingers were flexed during the episodes. These episodes were preceded by brief paresthesia of the right arm, but no precipitating factors of tactile stimulus or voluntary movements were observed20 (video). In contrast, another patient (NMO case 7) had PTS that involved all of his extremities simultaneously. His PTS was precipitated by an abrupt movement of the arms or legs,21 lasted several minutes, and occurred up to 6 times a day. During individual PTS episodes, his elbows and knees were involuntarily semiflexed and he could rarely move his extremities voluntarily owing to the increased tonicities of his muscles.

The majority of PTS episodes in the NMO group (8 of 10 cases; case 1 and cases 4-10) occurred during recovery from the first myelitis episode, with a mean interval of 48.13 days between the onset of myelitis and PTS. They were not accompanied by new neurological symptoms or new lesions on MRI performed after the onset of PTS (Table 2).

In the NMO group, PTS responded well to treatment with phenytoin sodium, carbamazepine, or gabapentin. However, 1 patient treated with low-dose gabapentin (NMO case 2) still had PTS that impaired his daily activity. Another patient (NMO case 8) reported the recurrence of mild PTS after her phenytoin treatment had been changed to gabapentin.

Most patients with NMO and PTS reported the disappearance of symptoms after long-term follow-up. However, 1 patient (NMO case 3) experienced recurrence of PTS with discontinuation of carbamazepine after 7 years of PTS onset, which persisted with decreased frequency for 11.17 years (Table 3).

Diagnostic value of pts in identifying patients with nmo

Because the incidence of PTS in NMO was high (10 of 40 patients [25.0%]) and most cases were associated with myelitis (Table 2), we evaluated the diagnostic value of PTS associated with myelitis in identifying patients with NMO. Among our 116 study and control patients (with NMO, MS, and iATM), the specificity and sensitivity of PTS associated with myelitis for identifying the NMO group were 98.7% and 22.5%, respectively.

Predictors of pts in the nmo group

Myelitis at disease onset was a significant predictor of PTS in the NMO group (odds ratio = 6.545, presence vs absence), with a sensitivity of 80.0% and specificity of 63.3%. Age at disease onset, sex, mean annual relapse rate, optic neuritis at disease onset, Expanded Disability Status Scale score at disease onset, length of the spinal cord lesion, and presence of lesions on brain MRI were not significantly associated with PTS (Table 4).

Comment

In this study, PTS occurred in 10 of 40 patients in the NMO group (25.0%), in contrast to fewer than 5% of the patients in the MS group (1 of 35 patients [2.9%]) or iATM group (1 of 41 patients [2.4%]). Most PTS symptoms in the NMO group (in 8 of 10 patients [80.0%]) followed the first myelitis episode, with a mean interval of 48.13 days, and were not accompanied by another demyelinating attack with onset of PTS. Painful tonic spasm associated with myelitis was another specific symptom for patients with NMO. Myelitis at disease onset was a significant predictor (odds ratio = 6.545, presence vs absence) of PTS in the NMO group.

The incidence of PTS was significantly higher in the NMO group than in the MS or iATM groups in this study. In general, typical features of NMO, compared with MS or iATM, include a severe acute attack, a high mean annual relapse rate, and longitudinally extensive myelitis.3,9 However, because these phenotypical characteristics were not associated with the presence of PTS in the NMO group (Table 4), we speculate that the distinct pathophysiology of the spinal cord lesions of NMO, ie, severe demyelination, the early loss of AQP4 expression, and astrocyte damage,22,23 is responsible for PTS. Further studies are needed to determine the exact cause.

Despite earlier studies of MS in the Western population reporting a low incidence of PTS (<2.1%),20,24 studies performed in the Japanese population reported an incidence as high as 17.2%.6 However, most Japanese patients with MS and PTS had severe opticospinal involvement,25,26 which may reflect a manifestation of NMO.9,10,26 These results1,6,20,21,24 also support our findings in that PTS is common in NMO but not in MS.

Painful tonic spasm–associated myelitis was another specific symptom in the NMO group in this study (specificity, 98.7%). Therefore, patients with these symptoms can benefit from anti-AQP4 antibody tests for their exact diagnosis.10

In our NMO group, most PTS occurred during recovery from a first myelitis episode. This finding suggests that the partial remyelination of the spinal cord22 may play a more important role in the development of PTS in patients with NMO than the demyelination itself.

The presence of myelitis at disease onset was significantly associated with the development of PTS in the NMO group (odds ratio = 6.545). A previous study proposed that the ephaptic transmission of centripetal signals to corticospinal fibers could be the cause of PTS.20 We hypothesized that the early disruption of the centripetal fibers in the spinal cord when the corticospinal fibers were relatively intact or showed less damage may contribute to the risk of PTS development in patients with NMO, as previously reported in patients with MS.4

In contrast to other PTS cases that displayed a favorable treatment response with carbamazepine or phenytoin, a patient treated with gabapentin (NMO case 2) showed an insufficient response to treatment, while another patient (NMO case 8) experienced the recurrence of PTS after switching her medication from phenytoin to gabapentin (Table 3). These findings imply that phenytoin or carbamazepine may possess a higher efficiency than gabapentin in PTS treatment; however, additional studies investigating a larger number of cases will be necessary for exact evaluation.

Despite the majority of patients with PTS reporting a disappearance of symptoms with long-term follow-up, PTS reappeared in 1 patient (NMO case 3) following medication withdrawal and persisted after 11.17 years of follow-up (Table 3). This implies that some patients with NMO who have PTS require long-term treatment.

One patient in the MS group (MS case 11) showed PTS (Table 2). Although this patient had PTS, which is a common symptom of NMO,3 she had no spinal cord lesion and had negative results on anti-AQP4 autoantibody testing with a cell-based assay. Therefore, it seems unlikely that this patient had NMO.

Our study has several limitations. First, it was a retrospective study, although the incidences of PTS in our NMO and MS groups were similar to those reported previously.20,24 Second, the follow-up period of the iATM group was shorter than that of the NMO group. However, given that 90.0% of the PTS episodes occurred within 80 days from the first myelitis episode and that the mean and minimum follow-up periods of the iATM group were 34.24 and 6 months, respectively, we believe that this limitation did not significantly affect our finding that the incidence of PTS was higher in the NMO group than in the iATM group. Third, although we showed the clinical characteristics and importance of PTS in patients with NMO, we could not clearly define the underlying pathophysiological mechanism. Additionally, we could not explain the cause of the high incidence of PTS in NMO or the cause of myelitis at disease onset as a risk factor because the study was designed as a retrospective observational study. Finally, only 1 patient in the NMO group (NMO case 2) developed PTS 4490 days after both disease onset and the initial myelitis episode. This differed from other NMO cases. Diverse medical conditions such as metabolic abnormalities and ischemic lesions of the putamen or pons,27,28 which may be related to PTS, should have been excluded in this patient.

In summary, PTS was common in patients with NMO but not in patients with MS or iATM. The PTS associated with myelitis was specific and relatively common to NMO. Our finding may have importance for identifying patients with NMO with limited manifestations who do not meet the diagnostic criteria of definite NMO.8,9 In addition, the majority of PTS in NMO is not associated with a new demyelinating NMO episode but appears during recovery from the initial myelitis episode. Patients with NMO who present with myelitis at disease onset appear to be at higher risk for developing PTS compared with other patients with NMO who present with optic neuritis or brain lesions.

Back to top
Article Information

Correspondence: Kyung Seok Park, MD, PhD, Department of Neurology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, 166 Gumi-Ro, Bundang-Gu, Seongnam-Si, Geonggi-Do, Korea (pks1126@chol.com).

Accepted for Publication: January 20, 2012.

Published Online: April 2, 2012. doi:10.1001/archneurol.2012.112

Author Contributions: Drs Sung and Park contributed equally to this article. Study concept and design: Kim and Park. Acquisition of data: Kim, Sung, Park, and Lee. Analysis and interpretation of data: Kim and Go. Drafting of the manuscript: Kim and Lee. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Kim, Go, Sung, and Park. Statistical analysis: Kim and Go. Obtained funding: Kim and Park. Administrative, technical, and material support: Kim, Sung, and Park. Study supervision: Park.

Financial Disclosure: None reported.

Funding/Support: This work was supported by grants 2010-0024457 from the National Research Foundation of Korea and 800-20110047 from the Seoul National University College of Medicine Research Fund.

Online-Only Material: The video are available here.

Additional Contributions: Angela Vincent, PhD, FRS, and Patrick Waters, PhD, Neuroscience Group, Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Oxford, Oxford, England, performed the anti-AQP4 antibody testing.

References
1.
Matthews WB. Tonic seizures in disseminated sclerosis.  Brain. 1958;81(2):193-20613572690PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
2.
Yücesan C, Tuncel D, Akbostanci MC, Yücemen N, Mutluer N. Hemidystonia secondary to cervical demyelinating lesions.  Eur J Neurol. 2000;7(5):563-56611054144PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
3.
Wingerchuk DM, Hogancamp WF, O’Brien PC, Weinshenker BG. The clinical course of neuromyelitis optica (Devic's syndrome).  Neurology. 1999;53(5):1107-111410496275PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
4.
Tüzün E, Akman-Demir G, Eraksoy M. Paroxysmal attacks in multiple sclerosis.  Mult Scler. 2001;7(6):402-40411795462PubMedGoogle Scholar
5.
Solaro C, Brichetto G, Amato MP,  et al; PaIMS Study Group.  The prevalence of pain in multiple sclerosis: a multicenter cross-sectional study.  Neurology. 2004;63(5):919-92115365151PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
6.
Shibasaki H, Kuroiwa Y. Painful tonic seizure in multiple sclerosis.  Arch Neurol. 1974;30(1):47-514586026PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
7.
Bonev VI, Gledhill RF. Paroxysmal kinesigenic choreoathetosis because of cryptogenic myelitis: remission with carbamazepine and the pathogenetic role of altered sodium channels.  Eur J Neurol. 2002;9(5):517-52012220384PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
8.
Wingerchuk DM, Lennon VA, Pittock SJ, Lucchinetti CF, Weinshenker BG. Revised diagnostic criteria for neuromyelitis optica.  Neurology. 2006;66(10):1485-148916717206PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
9.
Wingerchuk DM, Lennon VA, Lucchinetti CF, Pittock SJ, Weinshenker BG. The spectrum of neuromyelitis optica.  Lancet Neurol. 2007;6(9):805-81517706564PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
10.
Waters P, Jarius S, Littleton E,  et al.  Aquaporin-4 antibodies in neuromyelitis optica and longitudinally extensive transverse myelitis.  Arch Neurol. 2008;65(7):913-91918625857PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
11.
Polman CH, Reingold SC, Banwell B,  et al.  Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 revisions to the McDonald criteria.  Ann Neurol. 2011;69(2):292-30221387374PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
12.
Polman CH, Reingold SC, Edan G,  et al.  Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2005 revisions to the “McDonald Criteria.”  Ann Neurol. 2005;58(6):840-84616283615PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
13.
Transverse Myelitis Consortium Working Group.  Proposed diagnostic criteria and nosology of acute transverse myelitis.  Neurology. 2002;59(4):499-50512236201PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
14.
Kim JE, Kim SM, Ahn SW,  et al.  Brain abnormalities in neuromyelitis optica.  J Neurol Sci. 2011;302(1-2):43-4821236446PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
15.
Kim SM, Waters P, Vincent A,  et al.  Sjogren's syndrome myelopathy: spinal cord involvement in Sjogren's syndrome might be a manifestation of neuromyelitis optica.  Mult Scler. 2009;15(9):1062-106819692434PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
16.
Kim W, Kim SH, Kim HJ. New insights into neuromyelitis optica.  J Clin Neurol. 2011;7(3):115-12722087205PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
17.
Pittock SJ, Lennon VA, Krecke K, Wingerchuk DM, Lucchinetti CF, Weinshenker BG. Brain abnormalities in neuromyelitis optica.  Arch Neurol. 2006;63(3):390-39616533966PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
18.
Kurtzke JF. Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: an expanded disability status scale (EDSS).  Neurology. 1983;33(11):1444-14526685237PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
19.
Spissu A, Cannas A, Ferrigno P, Pelaghi AE, Spissu M. Anatomic correlates of painful tonic spasms in multiple sclerosis.  Mov Disord. 1999;14(2):331-33510091629PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
20.
Ostermann PO, Westerberg CE. Paroxysmal attacks in multiple sclerosis.  Brain. 1975;98(2):189-2021148814PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
21.
Matthews WB. Paroxysmal symptoms in multiple sclerosis.  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1975;38(6):617-6231151430PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
22.
Lucchinetti CF, Mandler RN, McGavern D,  et al.  A role for humoral mechanisms in the pathogenesis of Devic's neuromyelitis optica.  Brain. 2002;125(pt 7):1450-146112076996PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
23.
Roemer SF, Parisi JE, Lennon VA,  et al.  Pattern-specific loss of aquaporin-4 immunoreactivity distinguishes neuromyelitis optica from multiple sclerosis.  Brain. 2007;130(pt 5):1194-120517282996PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
24.
Espir ML, Millac P. Treatment of paroxysmal disorders in multiple sclerosis with carbamazepine (Tegretol).  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1970;33(4):528-5315505682PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
25.
Kira J. Multiple sclerosis in the Japanese population.  Lancet Neurol. 2003;2(2):117-12712849268PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
26.
Lennon VA, Wingerchuk DM, Kryzer TJ,  et al.  A serum autoantibody marker of neuromyelitis optica: distinction from multiple sclerosis.  Lancet. 2004;364(9451):2106-211215589308PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
27.
Merchut MP, Brumlik J. Painful tonic spasms caused by putaminal infarction.  Stroke. 1986;17(6):1319-13213810737PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
28.
Prashantha DK, Pal PK, Bharath RD. Hyperventilation-induced painful tonic spasms secondary to a structural lesion of the pons.  Parkinsonism Relat Disord. 2010;16(9):618-61920685149PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
×