[Skip to Navigation]
Sign In
Figure.  Age- and Sex-Specific Incidence Rates for Synucleinopathies and Tauopathies Manifesting With Parkinsonism
Age- and Sex-Specific Incidence Rates for Synucleinopathies and Tauopathies Manifesting With Parkinsonism

Incidence is calculated per 100 000 person-years. A, All parkinsonism. B, Parkinson disease (PD). C, Synucleinopathies. D, Tauopathies. The scale for incidence was reduced for tauopathies (the y-axis values range from 0 to 25 per 100 000 person-years).

Table 1.  Diagnostic Criteria for Specific Types of Parkinsonism and Proteinopathies
Diagnostic Criteria for Specific Types of Parkinsonism and Proteinopathies
Table 2.  Incidence Rates of Specific Types of Parkinsonism and Proteinopathies in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1991-2005
Incidence Rates of Specific Types of Parkinsonism and Proteinopathies in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1991-2005
Table 3.  Validation of Clinical Types of Parkinsonism and Presumed Proteinopathies vs Neuropathological Findings
Validation of Clinical Types of Parkinsonism and Presumed Proteinopathies vs Neuropathological Findings
1.
Bach  JP, Ziegler  U, Deuschl  G, Dodel  R, Doblhammer-Reiter  G.  Projected numbers of people with movement disorders in the years 2030 and 2050.  Mov Disord. 2011;26(12):2286-2290.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
2.
Twelves  D, Perkins  KS, Counsell  C.  Systematic review of incidence studies of Parkinson’s disease.  Mov Disord. 2003;18(1):19-31.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
3.
de Lau  LM, Breteler  MM.  Epidemiology of Parkinson’s disease.  Lancet Neurol. 2006;5(6):525-535.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
4.
Van Den Eeden  SK, Tanner  CM, Bernstein  AL,  et al.  Incidence of Parkinson’s disease: variation by age, gender, and race/ethnicity.  Am J Epidemiol. 2003;157(11):1015-1022.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
5.
Bower  JH, Maraganore  DM, McDonnell  SK, Rocca  WA.  Incidence of progressive supranuclear palsy and multiple system atrophy in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1976 to 1990.  Neurology. 1997;49(5):1284-1288.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
6.
Bower  JH, Maraganore  DM, McDonnell  SK, Rocca  WA.  Incidence and distribution of parkinsonism in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1976-1990.  Neurology. 1999;52(6):1214-1220.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
7.
Lee  HJ, Patel  S, Lee  SJ.  Intravesicular localization and exocytosis of α-synuclein and its aggregates.  J Neurosci. 2005;25(25):6016-6024.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
8.
Jellinger  KA.  Formation and development of Lewy pathology: a critical update.  J Neurol. 2009;256(suppl 3):270-279.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
9.
Williams  DR.  Tauopathies: classification and clinical update on neurodegenerative diseases associated with microtubule-associated protein tau.  Intern Med J. 2006;36(10):652-660.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
10.
St Sauver  JL, Grossardt  BR, Leibson  CL, Yawn  BP, Melton  LJ  III, Rocca  WA.  Generalizability of epidemiological findings and public health decisions: an illustration from the Rochester Epidemiology Project.  Mayo Clin Proc. 2012;87(2):151-160.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
11.
St Sauver  JL, Grossardt  BR, Yawn  BP, Melton  LJ  III, Rocca  WA.  Use of a medical records linkage system to enumerate a dynamic population over time: the Rochester Epidemiology Project.  Am J Epidemiol. 2011;173(9):1059-1068.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
12.
Rocca  WA, Yawn  BP, St Sauver  JL, Grossardt  BR, Melton  LJ  III.  History of the Rochester Epidemiology Project: half a century of medical records linkage in a US population.  Mayo Clin Proc.2012;87(12):1202-1213.Google ScholarCrossref
13.
St Sauver  JL, Grossardt  BR, Yawn  BP,  et al.  Data resource profile: the Rochester Epidemiology Project (REP) medical records-linkage system.  Int J Epidemiol. 2012;41(6):1614-1624.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
14.
Commission on Professional and Hospital Activities, National Center for Health Statistics.  H-ICDA: Hospital Adaptation of International Classification of Disease, Eighth Revision. 2nd ed. Ann Arbor, MI: Commission on Professional and Hospital Activities; 1973.
15.
World Health Organization.  International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 1977.
16.
McKeith  IG.  Consensus guidelines for the clinical and pathologic diagnosis of dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB): report of the Consortium on DLB International Workshop.  J Alzheimers Dis. 2006;9(3)(suppl):417-423.PubMedGoogle Scholar
17.
Gilman  S, Low  P, Quinn  N,  et al; American Autonomic Society and American Academy of Neurology.  Consensus statement on the diagnosis of multiple system atrophy.  Clin Auton Res. 1998;8(6):359-362.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
18.
Collins  SJ, Ahlskog  JE, Parisi  JE, Maraganore  DM.  Progressive supranuclear palsy: neuropathologically based diagnostic clinical criteria.  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1995;58(2):167-173.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
19.
Boeve BF. Corticobasal degeneration: the syndrome and the disease. In: Litvan I, ed. Current Clinical Neurology: Atypical Pakinsonian Disorders. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press Inc; 2005:309-333.
20.
Maraganore  DM, Ahlskog  JE, Peterson  RT.  Progressive asymmetric rigidity with apraxia: a distinct clinical entity [abstract].  Mov Disord. 1992;7:80.Google ScholarCrossref
21.
Fleiss  JL.  Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions.2nd ed. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons Inc; 1981.
22.
de Rijk  MC, Tzourio  C, Breteler  MM,  et al; EUROPARKINSON Study Group.  Prevalence of parkinsonism and Parkinson’s disease in Europe: the EUROPARKINSON Collaborative Study.  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1997;62(1):10-15.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
23.
Anderson  DW, Mantel  N.  On epidemiologic surveys.  Am J Epidemiol. 1983;118(5):613-619.PubMedGoogle Scholar
24.
Boeve  BF, Boylan  KB, Graff-Radford  NR,  et al.  Characterization of frontotemporal dementia and/or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis associated with the GGGGCC repeat expansion in C9ORF72.  Brain. 2012;135(pt 3):765-783.Google ScholarCrossref
25.
Mayeux  R, Marder  K, Cote  LJ,  et al.  The frequency of idiopathic Parkinson’s disease by age, ethnic group, and sex in northern Manhattan, 1988-1993.  Am J Epidemiol. 1995;142(8):820-827.PubMedGoogle Scholar
26.
Haaxma  CA, Bloem  BR, Borm  GF,  et al.  Gender differences in Parkinson's disease.  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2007;78(8):819-824.Google ScholarCrossref
27.
Rajput  AH, Offord  KP, Beard  CM, Kurland  LT.  Epidemiology of parkinsonism: incidence, classification, and mortality.  Ann Neurol. 1984;16(3):278-282.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
28.
Baldereschi  M, Di Carlo  A, Rocca  WA,  et al; ILSA Working Group. Italian Longitudinal Study on Aging.  Parkinson’s disease and parkinsonism in a longitudinal study: two-fold higher incidence in men.  Neurology. 2000;55(9):1358-1363.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
29.
Wooten  GF, Currie  LJ, Bovbjerg  VE, Lee  JK, Patrie  J.  Are men at greater risk for Parkinson’s disease than women?  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2004;75(4):637-639.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
30.
Taylor  KSM, Cook  JA, Counsell  CE.  Heterogeneity in male to female risk for Parkinson's disease.  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2007;78(8):905-906.Google ScholarCrossref
31.
Scott  B, Borgman  A, Engler  H, Johnels  B, Aquilonius  SM.  Gender differences in Parkinson’s disease symptom profile.  Acta Neurol Scand. 2000;102(1):37-43.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
32.
Savica  R, Grossardt  BR, Bower  JH, Ahlskog  JE, Rocca  WA.  Risk factors for Parkinson’s disease may differ in men and women: an exploratory study [published online June 8, 2012].  Horm Behav. doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2012.05.013.Google Scholar
33.
Saunders-Pullman  R, Stanley  K, San Luciano  M,  et al.  Gender differences in the risk of familial parkinsonism: beyond LRRK2?  Neurosci Lett. 2011;496(2):125-128.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
34.
Chung  SJ, Armasu  SM, Biernacka  JM,  et al.  Variants in estrogen-related genes and risk of Parkinson's disease.  Mov Disord. 2011;26(7):1234-1242.Google ScholarCrossref
35.
Frigerio  R, Sanft  KR, Grossardt  BR,  et al.  Chemical exposures and Parkinson’s disease: a population-based case-control study.  Mov Disord. 2006;21(10):1688-1692.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
36.
Bower  JH, Maraganore  DM, McDonnell  SK, Rocca  WA.  Influence of strict, intermediate, and broad diagnostic criteria on the age- and sex-specific incidence of Parkinson’s disease.  Mov Disord. 2000;15(5):819-825.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
37.
Rocca  WA, Bower  JH, McDonnell  SK, Peterson  BJ, Maraganore  DM.  Time trends in the incidence of parkinsonism in Olmsted County, Minnesota.  Neurology. 2001;57(3):462-467.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
38.
Elbaz  A, Bower  JH, Maraganore  DM,  et al.  Risk tables for parkinsonism and Parkinson’s disease.  J Clin Epidemiol. 2002;55(1):25-31.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
39.
Bower  JH, Dickson  DW, Taylor  L, Maraganore  DM, Rocca  WA.  Clinical correlates of the pathology underlying parkinsonism: a population perspective.  Mov Disord. 2002;17(5):910-916.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
40.
Hughes  AJ, Daniel  SE, Blankson  S, Lees  AJ.  A clinicopathologic study of 100 cases of Parkinson’s disease.  Arch Neurol. 1993;50(2):140-148.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
41.
Fotuhi  M, Hachinski  V, Whitehouse  PJ.  Changing perspectives regarding late-life dementia.  Nat Rev Neurol. 2009;5(12):649-658.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
42.
Oinas  M, Sulkava  R, Polvikoski  T, Kalimo  H, Paetau  A.  Reappraisal of a consecutive autopsy series of patients with primary degenerative dementia: Lewy-related pathology.  APMIS. 2007;115(7):820-827.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Original Investigation
July 2013

Incidence and Pathology of Synucleinopathies and Tauopathies Related to Parkinsonism

Author Affiliations
  • 1Division of Epidemiology, Department of Health Science Research, College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
  • 2Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Department of Health Science Research College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
  • 3Department of Neurology, College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
  • 4Department of Pharmacology, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
JAMA Neurol. 2013;70(7):859-866. doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2013.114
Abstract

Importance  The frequency and distribution of synucleinopathies and tauopathies manifesting with parkinsonism in the general population are poorly understood, thus affecting health care planning and research.

Objective  To investigate the incidence and distribution of specific types of parkinsonism and related proteinopathies.

Design  We used the medical records–linkage system of the Rochester Epidemiology Project to identify all subjects who received a screening diagnostic code related to parkinsonism in Olmsted County, Minnesota, from January 1, 1991, through December 31, 2005 (15 years). A movement disorders specialist reviewed the complete medical records of each subject who screened positive to determine the type of parkinsonism and the presumed proteinopathy using specified criteria.

Setting  Geographically defined population.

Participants  All residents of Olmsted County who provided authorization to use their data for medical records research (population-based sample).

Main Outcome and Measures  Incidence of parkinsonism and specific proteinopathies.

Results  Among 542 incident cases of parkinsonism, 409 (75.5%) were classified as proteinopathies. Of the 389 patients with presumed synucleinopathies (71.8%), 264 had Parkinson disease (48.7% of all cases). The incidence rate of synucleinopathies was 21.0 per 100 000 person-years overall and increased steeply with age. The incidence rate of tauopathies was 1.1 overall (20 cases), and the most common tauopathy was progressive supranuclear palsy (16 cases). Thirty-six subjects had drug-induced parkinsonism (6.6%), 11 had vascular parkinsonism (2.0%), 1 had amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in parkinsonism (0.2%), 1 had parkinsonism secondary to surgery (0.2%), and 84 remained unspecified (15.5%). Men had a higher incidence than women for most types of parkinsonism. Findings at brain autopsy confirmed the clinical diagnosis in 53 of 65 patients who underwent autopsy (81.5%).

Conclusions and Relevance  The incidence of proteinopathies related to parkinsonism increases steeply with age and is consistently higher in men than women. Clinically diagnosed synucleinopathies are much more common than tauopathies. Findings at autopsy confirm the clinical diagnosis of presumed proteinopathy. Our findings may guide health care planning and prompt new research directions.

In the United States, as in many countries worldwide, life expectancy has increased dramatically in the past century. With the proportionately older population, more persons are expected to develop neurodegenerative disorders. A recent study estimated that the prevalence of Parkinson disease (PD) and related disorders will increase dramatically in the next few decades.1

Several studies assessed the incidence of PD and other parkinsonisms.2-4 Although all the studies confirmed that PD is the most common,2 the data regarding other types of parkinsonism remain limited because the diagnosis is difficult and the diseases are relatively rare.5,6 Neurodegenerative conditions have now been classified on the basis of the presumed underlying protein substrates. Because α-synuclein is the predominant protein associated with PD, other Lewy body disorders, and multiple system atrophy (MSA), these conditions have been termed synucleinopathies.7,8 Similarly, parkinsonisms thought to be related to microtubule-associated tau protein have been termed tauopathies.9 This group includes progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) and many cases of corticobasal syndrome (CBS). In this study, we investigated the incidence and the distribution by age and sex of clinically diagnosed proteinopathies related to parkinsonism in a well-defined population during a 15-year period. For a subsample of our patients, we were able to validate our clinical diagnosis at autopsy.

Methods
Study Population

We studied the geographically defined population of Olmsted County, located in southeastern Minnesota, from January 1, 1991, through December 31, 2005 (incidence study period of 15 years). Extensive details about the Olmsted County population have been reported elsewhere.10-13 This study was approved by the institutional review boards of the Mayo Clinic and Olmsted Medical Center, Rochester, Minnesota. Written informed consent was not required for passive medical record review.11

Case Ascertainment

We ascertained cases of parkinsonism through the records-linkage system of the Rochester Epidemiology Project. This system provides the infrastructure for indexing and linking essentially all medical information of the county population.10-13 All medical diagnoses, surgical interventions, and other procedures are entered into computerized indexes using codes from the Hospital Adaptation of the International Classification of Diseases, Eighth Revision,14 or the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision.15

We ascertained potential cases of parkinsonism in 2 phases, including computerized screening and clinical confirmation. In phase 1, we searched the indexes for 38 diagnostic codes, including 5 for PD, 14 for parkinsonism, 7 for tremor, 2 for extrapyramidal disorders, 5 for nonspecific neurodegenerative diseases, 2 for MSA, and 3 for PSP. These 38 codes were the smallest subset that completely captured all cases of parkinsonism in a previous study of the incidence of parkinsonism performed in the same population from 1976 to 19906 (the list is given in the eTable in Supplement). This list of 38 codes was designed to yield maximum sensitivity at the cost of low specificity because the clinical confirmation phase was relatively rapid and did not involve the participants (no burden to study subjects).

In phase 2, a movement disorders specialist (R.S.) reviewed the complete records of all persons who received at least 1 of these diagnostic codes during the 15-year incidence study period or during the following 5 years using a specifically designed data abstraction form that was computerized for direct data entry (clinical confirmation phase). We extended the search for incident cases of parkinsonism for 5 years after the incidence study period (January 1, 2006, through December 31, 2010) to ensure that persons with a delayed diagnosis could be counted correctly. The movement disorders specialist defined the approximate date of onset and the type of parkinsonism using specified diagnostic criteria and following a manual of instructions (Table 1).6,16-20 Onset of parkinsonism was defined as the approximate date on which 1 of the 4 cardinal signs of parkinsonism was first noted by the patient, by family members, or by a care provider (as documented in the medical record).

Diagnostic Criteria for Parkinsonism and Proteinopathies

Our diagnostic criteria included the definition of parkinsonism as a syndrome and the definition of types of parkinsonism within the syndrome. Parkinsonism was defined as the presence of at least 2 of the following 4 cardinal signs: rest tremor, bradykinesia, rigidity, and impaired postural reflexes. Among the persons who fulfilled the criteria for parkinsonism, we applied the diagnostic criteria listed in Table 1 to classify the type of parkinsonism. In addition, we used clinical characteristics to group patients with parkinsonism into those with presumed synucleinopathies or presumed tauopathies.7-9 Synucleinopathies included PD, parkinsonism with dementia, and MSA.7,8 Tauopathies included PSP and CBS.9

Patients with uncertain underlying proteinopathy were included in the category “other types of parkinsonism.” This category included patients who did not have enough clinical information to fulfill the criteria for a particular type of parkinsonism (ie, parkinsonism unspecified) and patients with types of parkinsonism not associated with a specific pathological hallmark (eg, drug-induced parkinsonism, vascular parkinsonism, and secondary parkinsonism).

Reliability and Validity of Diagnosis and Classification

To study the reliability of our case-finding procedure, 40 records reviewed by the primary movement disorders specialist (R.S.) were independently reviewed by a second movement disorders specialist (J.H.B.) who was kept unaware of the initial diagnosis. The 40 records were selected randomly among those classified by the primary neurologist as parkinsonism (15 records), PD (15 records), and parkinsonism excluded after screening positive (10 records). Agreement on the presence of parkinsonism or PD was 90.0% (27 of 30 records). The 3 disagreements involved cases diagnosed as PD, drug-induced parkinsonism, or vascular parkinsonism by the primary neurologist and excluded by the second neurologist. Agreement on the exclusion of parkinsonism in subjects who screened positive was 70.0% (7 of 10). The 3 disagreements involved cases found to be PD, drug-induced parkinsonism, and parkinsonism unspecified by the second neurologist.

For the 27 subjects found to be affected by parkinsonism by both neurologists, the agreement was 74.1% (20 of 27) for PD vs other type of parkinsonism and 85.2% (23 of 27) for synucleinopathy vs other type. Finally, for the subjects found to be affected by parkinsonism by both neurologists, the agreement on year of onset of symptoms was within 1 year in 21 subjects (77.8%) and within 3 years for 26 of the 27 subjects (96.3%). In general, the agreement regarding the year of onset was high (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.77-0.92]).21

To validate the classification in presumed synucleinopathies and tauopathies, we reviewed the autopsy reports for all the patients who died during the study and for whom an autopsy was available. Detailed results of the validation study are reported in the Results section.

Statistical Analysis

We excluded subjects who denied authorization to use their medical records for research.11 All individuals who met criteria for parkinsonism with symptom onset from January 1, 1991, through December 31, 2005, and who were residents of Olmsted County at the time of symptom onset were included as incident cases. We calculated incidence rates using incident cases as the numerator and population counts from the Rochester Epidemiology Project Census as the denominator.11 The denominator was corrected by removing prevalent cases of parkinsonism estimated using prevalence figures from several European populations.22 Details about this correction were published elsewhere.6

We computed age- and sex-specific incidence rates for parkinsonism overall, for specific types of parkinsonism, and for specific proteinopathies. Because our study was descriptive and involved the entire Olmsted County population, no sampling procedures were involved and statistical tests were not necessary for the interpretation of the data.23

Results

We identified 5505 individuals with at least 1 screening code of interest from 1991 through 2010. We excluded 400 individuals because they were not residents of Olmsted County at the time of symptom onset and 136 persons because they did not give permission to use their medical records for research. Of the 4969 remaining persons, 3877 were found to be not affected by parkinsonism at record review, 12 lacked sufficient clinical documentation to determine their parkinsonism status, 374 had onset of parkinsonism before January 1, 1991, and 164 persons had onset after December 31, 2005. In summary, we included 542 incident cases of parkinsonism with onset from January 1, 1991, through December 31, 2005. Only 35 persons (6.5%; 18 with PD) received a first screening diagnostic code after December 31, 2005, but had the onset of parkinsonism retrodated to within the study period (1991-2005).

Table 2 shows the age- and sex-specific incidence rates for presumed synucleinopathies, presumed tauopathies, and other types of parkinsonism. The Figure shows the age- and sex-specific incidence rates of all parkinsonisms, PD, synucleinopathies, and tauopathies. Of the 542 patients identified, 389 (71.8%) had clinically presumed synucleinopathies, 20 (3.7%) had clinically presumed tauopathies, and 133 (24.5%) had other types of parkinsonism (Table 2). The overall incidence rate for parkinsonism of all types was 29.3 cases per 100 000 person-years. Incidence rates increased sharply with age from 97.9 at 60 to 69 years to 304.8 at 80 to 99 years (Figure).

Synucleinopathies

The incidence rate of synucleinopathies was 21.0 (per 100 000 person-years) overall, was higher in men (27.0) than in women (15.4), and increased steeply with age. We identified 264 patients with PD, 110 with parkinsonism with dementia, and 15 with MSA. Parkinson disease was the most common type of synucleinopathy and was more frequent in men than in women (62.9% of PD cases were men). The incidence rate was higher in men than in women for all synucleinopathies (Figure).

Tauopathies

Presumed tauopathies manifesting as parkinsonism were uncommon, with a total of 20 patients (11 men and 9 women) and an overall incidence of 1.1 cases per 100 000 person-years. All patients with presumed tauopathies had onset of symptoms at 60 years or older. The most common tauopathy was PSP, with incidence higher in men than in women (1.1 vs 0.6). Corticobasal syndrome was more frequent in women (3 cases) than in men (1 case) and had an overall incidence of 0.2 per 100 000 person-years (0.1 in men and 0.3 in women) (Figure).

Other Parkinsonism

We identified 36 patients with drug-induced parkinsonism, 11 with vascular parkinsonism, 1 with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in parkinsonism (the patient carried a repeat expansion in the noncoding region of chromosome 9),24 1 with parkinsonism secondary to cingulotomy, and 84 with unspecified parkinsonism. The overall incidence of other types of parkinsonism was higher in men than in women (7.8 vs 6.6). Unspecified parkinsonism and vascular parkinsonism were more common in men, whereas drug-induced parkinsonism was more common in women (Table 2).

Pathological Validation of Clinical Diagnoses

Of the 542 incident cases of parkinsonism, 343 (63.3%) had died by December 31, 2011, and 65 (19.0% of deceased patients) had a brain autopsy available for review (Table 3). The pathology observed at autopsy was consistent with the type of proteinopathy that was presumed clinically in 53 patients (81.5%). The concordance was 80.4% for synucleinopathies (45 of 56 cases), 100.0% for tauopathies (2 cases with CBS), and 85.7% for other parkinsonisms (6 of 7). Of the remaining 11 patients presumed to have a synucleinopathy at clinical diagnosis, 3 had tau pathology and 8 had nonspecific age-related changes (6 of these 8 cases had incontinence of the substantia nigra without evidence of Lewy bodies or tau pathology). Of the 7 patients with other parkinsonisms, 1 had Lewy body pathology. None of the brains exhibited comorbid Lewy body pathology and tau pathology.

Discussion

Our study suggests that clinically presumed synucleinopathies are the most common type of parkinsonism, and PD is the most common synucleinopathy. The second most common synucleinopathy is parkinsonism with dementia, followed by MSA. The incidence of all synucleinopathies increases steeply with age and is higher in men than women. The incidence of all tauopathies increases after 60 years of age, and men have higher incidence than women, except at the ages of 80 to 99 years. Progressive supranuclear palsy is the most common tauopathy, followed by CBS. For a subsample of our patients, we were able to validate our clinical diagnosis at autopsy (65 incident cases; 12.0% of all cases and 19.0% of deceased cases).

Several studies of the incidence of parkinsonism or PD have been published; however, to our knowledge, no population-based studies have examined the incidence of clinically presumed proteinopathies.3,4 Previous studies have found that PD is the most common type of parkinsonism.6,22 Age- and sex-standardized incidence rates for PD have been reported in the range of approximately 10 to 18 cases per 100 000 person-years (rates adjusted to the 1990 US Census population).4 Onset of PD is uncommon before 60 years of age, and the incidence of PD and other types of parkinsonism increases steeply after 60 years of age.3,4,25

In our study, PD and most other types of parkinsonism were more common in men than in women. This pattern is consistent with a number of studies that showed a higher incidence of PD in men than women.4,6,26-30 In addition, some studies reported sex differences in clinical and preclinical characteristics and in risk factors for PD.27,31,32 Genetic, endocrinologic, environmental, or social and cultural differences may explain the differences in the risk of PD between men and women.32-35

Findings from this investigation were consistent with results from a previous study in the same Olmsted County population.5,6,36-39 The overall age- and sex-adjusted incidence rate for PD was 16.5 in the current study and 14.2 in 1976 through 1990 (both rates adjusted to the 1990 US Census population). In addition, we found consistent patterns of incidence by age and sex.6 However, we also found small differences. For example, Bower et al6 reported no cases of CBS in the 1976-1990 study, probably because CBS was not adequately recognized at the time.

Our study has a number of strengths. First, taking advantage of the records-linkage system of the Rochester Epidemiology Project, we studied a large and well-defined population (1 852 762 person-years overall).10-13 Second, because our study included 542 incident cases of parkinsonism, we were able to explore the distribution of clinical types of parkinsonism by age and sex. In addition, we were able to group incidence cases by presumed proteinopathy. Third, 63.3% of cases were followed up from the onset of parkinsonism to the time of death, and 94.3% were followed up through death or for at least 5 years after onset. This long follow-up provided information on the natural history of the disease and strengthened the classification by type of parkinsonism.

Fourth, all cases were adjudicated by a movement disorders specialist at the time of medical records abstraction to reduce differences in the diagnostic criteria over time or across the different care professionals (nurses, generalists, or specialists). Fifth, all medical facilities in Olmsted County are included in the Rochester Epidemiology Project,10-13 and a patient living in the county is unlikely to have been seen for parkinsonism only at a medical facility outside the system. In addition, the Olmsted County population is stable, especially for subjects 65 years or older.11,13 Finally, the agreement of autopsy findings with the clinical diagnosis of proteinopathy was high, suggesting that a clinical classification of patients with parkinsonism in synucleinopathies and tauopathies is valid.

Our study also has a number of limitations. First, some of the subjects with parkinsonism may have been unaware of their symptoms and may not have received a diagnosis within the incidence period. However, our data collection spanned 20 years, and we collected data for an additional 5 years after the incidence period (2006-2010). This additional collection period allowed us to retrodate the time of onset of symptoms appropriately when needed. Second, the diagnoses obtained through review of historical medical records may be unreliable. The documents available in the records-linkage system were a combination of paper and electronic medical records from multiple health care professionals and multiple institutions. Most patients with parkinsonism had been seen by a neurologist at least once; however, the clinical findings were recorded as part of routine clinical practice and were not standardized for research (eg, standard research scales for parkinsonism or for dementia were not used). Our small reliability study showed an agreement of 90.0% between the 2 neurologists for parkinsonism. However, the agreement by type of parkinsonism was less complete (74.1%). Third, because neurological practices and diagnostic criteria changed over time, some patients had more complete diagnostic information available in their records than others. In fact, the discordant diagnoses observed in our reliability study involved patients with multiple and atypical parkinsonian features. The classification of patients in a single clinical type involved clinical judgment (eg, parkinsonism with concurrent use of neuroleptics, autonomic dysfunction, and cognitive disorders). The adjudication of all patients by a single movement disorders specialist should have attenuated these possible differences; however, 15.5% of the patients with parkinsonism remained unspecified.

Fourth, the clinical diagnosis might not have corresponded with pathological findings in some cases. The agreement between clinically presumed proteinopathy and autopsy was 81.5% in our population-based sample. Clinicopathological concordance of greater than 90% has been described when cases were selected using strict clinical criteria.40 On the other hand, a patient may have more than 1 pathological finding at autopsy41,42; thus, the clinical diagnosis of a single presumed proteinopathy may be incomplete. None of the brains exhibited comorbid Lewy body pathology and tau pathology in our study. Fifth, we found only 20 patients with a presumed tauopathy manifesting with parkinsonism. Therefore, the results for tauopathy and its subtypes should be interpreted cautiously.

In conclusion, our study provides new data on the incidence of clinically presumed proteinopathies related to parkinsonism in men and women. Synucleinopathies are the most common type of proteinopathies; among them, PD is the most common subtype, followed by parkinsonism with dementia and MSA. Tauopathies manifesting with parkinsonism are rare disorders, and PSP is more common than CBS. The incidence of proteinopathies increases with age, and most types of proteinopathies occur more frequently in men than women.

Back to top
Article Information

Corresponding Author: Walter A. Rocca, MD, MPH, Division of Epidemiology, Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905 (rocca@mayo.edu).

Accepted for Publication: January 11, 2013.

Published Online: May 20, 2013. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2013.114

Author Contributions: Dr Rocca had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Study concept and design: Savica and Rocca.

Acquisition of data: Savica and Bower.

Analysis and interpretation of data: Grossardt, Bower, Ahlskog, and Rocca.

Drafting of the manuscript: Savica, Ahlskog, and Rocca.

Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Grossardt, Bower, Ahlskog, and Rocca.

Statistical analysis: Grossardt.

Obtained funding: Rocca.

Administrative, technical, or material support: Savica and Rocca.

Study supervision: Bower and Rocca.

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.

Funding/Support: This study was supported by award R01AG034676 from the National Institute on Aging of the National Institutes of Health and by the Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research.

Disclaimer: The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

References
1.
Bach  JP, Ziegler  U, Deuschl  G, Dodel  R, Doblhammer-Reiter  G.  Projected numbers of people with movement disorders in the years 2030 and 2050.  Mov Disord. 2011;26(12):2286-2290.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
2.
Twelves  D, Perkins  KS, Counsell  C.  Systematic review of incidence studies of Parkinson’s disease.  Mov Disord. 2003;18(1):19-31.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
3.
de Lau  LM, Breteler  MM.  Epidemiology of Parkinson’s disease.  Lancet Neurol. 2006;5(6):525-535.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
4.
Van Den Eeden  SK, Tanner  CM, Bernstein  AL,  et al.  Incidence of Parkinson’s disease: variation by age, gender, and race/ethnicity.  Am J Epidemiol. 2003;157(11):1015-1022.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
5.
Bower  JH, Maraganore  DM, McDonnell  SK, Rocca  WA.  Incidence of progressive supranuclear palsy and multiple system atrophy in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1976 to 1990.  Neurology. 1997;49(5):1284-1288.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
6.
Bower  JH, Maraganore  DM, McDonnell  SK, Rocca  WA.  Incidence and distribution of parkinsonism in Olmsted County, Minnesota, 1976-1990.  Neurology. 1999;52(6):1214-1220.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
7.
Lee  HJ, Patel  S, Lee  SJ.  Intravesicular localization and exocytosis of α-synuclein and its aggregates.  J Neurosci. 2005;25(25):6016-6024.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
8.
Jellinger  KA.  Formation and development of Lewy pathology: a critical update.  J Neurol. 2009;256(suppl 3):270-279.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
9.
Williams  DR.  Tauopathies: classification and clinical update on neurodegenerative diseases associated with microtubule-associated protein tau.  Intern Med J. 2006;36(10):652-660.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
10.
St Sauver  JL, Grossardt  BR, Leibson  CL, Yawn  BP, Melton  LJ  III, Rocca  WA.  Generalizability of epidemiological findings and public health decisions: an illustration from the Rochester Epidemiology Project.  Mayo Clin Proc. 2012;87(2):151-160.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
11.
St Sauver  JL, Grossardt  BR, Yawn  BP, Melton  LJ  III, Rocca  WA.  Use of a medical records linkage system to enumerate a dynamic population over time: the Rochester Epidemiology Project.  Am J Epidemiol. 2011;173(9):1059-1068.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
12.
Rocca  WA, Yawn  BP, St Sauver  JL, Grossardt  BR, Melton  LJ  III.  History of the Rochester Epidemiology Project: half a century of medical records linkage in a US population.  Mayo Clin Proc.2012;87(12):1202-1213.Google ScholarCrossref
13.
St Sauver  JL, Grossardt  BR, Yawn  BP,  et al.  Data resource profile: the Rochester Epidemiology Project (REP) medical records-linkage system.  Int J Epidemiol. 2012;41(6):1614-1624.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
14.
Commission on Professional and Hospital Activities, National Center for Health Statistics.  H-ICDA: Hospital Adaptation of International Classification of Disease, Eighth Revision. 2nd ed. Ann Arbor, MI: Commission on Professional and Hospital Activities; 1973.
15.
World Health Organization.  International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 1977.
16.
McKeith  IG.  Consensus guidelines for the clinical and pathologic diagnosis of dementia with Lewy bodies (DLB): report of the Consortium on DLB International Workshop.  J Alzheimers Dis. 2006;9(3)(suppl):417-423.PubMedGoogle Scholar
17.
Gilman  S, Low  P, Quinn  N,  et al; American Autonomic Society and American Academy of Neurology.  Consensus statement on the diagnosis of multiple system atrophy.  Clin Auton Res. 1998;8(6):359-362.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
18.
Collins  SJ, Ahlskog  JE, Parisi  JE, Maraganore  DM.  Progressive supranuclear palsy: neuropathologically based diagnostic clinical criteria.  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1995;58(2):167-173.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
19.
Boeve BF. Corticobasal degeneration: the syndrome and the disease. In: Litvan I, ed. Current Clinical Neurology: Atypical Pakinsonian Disorders. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press Inc; 2005:309-333.
20.
Maraganore  DM, Ahlskog  JE, Peterson  RT.  Progressive asymmetric rigidity with apraxia: a distinct clinical entity [abstract].  Mov Disord. 1992;7:80.Google ScholarCrossref
21.
Fleiss  JL.  Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions.2nd ed. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons Inc; 1981.
22.
de Rijk  MC, Tzourio  C, Breteler  MM,  et al; EUROPARKINSON Study Group.  Prevalence of parkinsonism and Parkinson’s disease in Europe: the EUROPARKINSON Collaborative Study.  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1997;62(1):10-15.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
23.
Anderson  DW, Mantel  N.  On epidemiologic surveys.  Am J Epidemiol. 1983;118(5):613-619.PubMedGoogle Scholar
24.
Boeve  BF, Boylan  KB, Graff-Radford  NR,  et al.  Characterization of frontotemporal dementia and/or amyotrophic lateral sclerosis associated with the GGGGCC repeat expansion in C9ORF72.  Brain. 2012;135(pt 3):765-783.Google ScholarCrossref
25.
Mayeux  R, Marder  K, Cote  LJ,  et al.  The frequency of idiopathic Parkinson’s disease by age, ethnic group, and sex in northern Manhattan, 1988-1993.  Am J Epidemiol. 1995;142(8):820-827.PubMedGoogle Scholar
26.
Haaxma  CA, Bloem  BR, Borm  GF,  et al.  Gender differences in Parkinson's disease.  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2007;78(8):819-824.Google ScholarCrossref
27.
Rajput  AH, Offord  KP, Beard  CM, Kurland  LT.  Epidemiology of parkinsonism: incidence, classification, and mortality.  Ann Neurol. 1984;16(3):278-282.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
28.
Baldereschi  M, Di Carlo  A, Rocca  WA,  et al; ILSA Working Group. Italian Longitudinal Study on Aging.  Parkinson’s disease and parkinsonism in a longitudinal study: two-fold higher incidence in men.  Neurology. 2000;55(9):1358-1363.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
29.
Wooten  GF, Currie  LJ, Bovbjerg  VE, Lee  JK, Patrie  J.  Are men at greater risk for Parkinson’s disease than women?  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2004;75(4):637-639.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
30.
Taylor  KSM, Cook  JA, Counsell  CE.  Heterogeneity in male to female risk for Parkinson's disease.  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2007;78(8):905-906.Google ScholarCrossref
31.
Scott  B, Borgman  A, Engler  H, Johnels  B, Aquilonius  SM.  Gender differences in Parkinson’s disease symptom profile.  Acta Neurol Scand. 2000;102(1):37-43.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
32.
Savica  R, Grossardt  BR, Bower  JH, Ahlskog  JE, Rocca  WA.  Risk factors for Parkinson’s disease may differ in men and women: an exploratory study [published online June 8, 2012].  Horm Behav. doi:10.1016/j.yhbeh.2012.05.013.Google Scholar
33.
Saunders-Pullman  R, Stanley  K, San Luciano  M,  et al.  Gender differences in the risk of familial parkinsonism: beyond LRRK2?  Neurosci Lett. 2011;496(2):125-128.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
34.
Chung  SJ, Armasu  SM, Biernacka  JM,  et al.  Variants in estrogen-related genes and risk of Parkinson's disease.  Mov Disord. 2011;26(7):1234-1242.Google ScholarCrossref
35.
Frigerio  R, Sanft  KR, Grossardt  BR,  et al.  Chemical exposures and Parkinson’s disease: a population-based case-control study.  Mov Disord. 2006;21(10):1688-1692.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
36.
Bower  JH, Maraganore  DM, McDonnell  SK, Rocca  WA.  Influence of strict, intermediate, and broad diagnostic criteria on the age- and sex-specific incidence of Parkinson’s disease.  Mov Disord. 2000;15(5):819-825.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
37.
Rocca  WA, Bower  JH, McDonnell  SK, Peterson  BJ, Maraganore  DM.  Time trends in the incidence of parkinsonism in Olmsted County, Minnesota.  Neurology. 2001;57(3):462-467.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
38.
Elbaz  A, Bower  JH, Maraganore  DM,  et al.  Risk tables for parkinsonism and Parkinson’s disease.  J Clin Epidemiol. 2002;55(1):25-31.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
39.
Bower  JH, Dickson  DW, Taylor  L, Maraganore  DM, Rocca  WA.  Clinical correlates of the pathology underlying parkinsonism: a population perspective.  Mov Disord. 2002;17(5):910-916.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
40.
Hughes  AJ, Daniel  SE, Blankson  S, Lees  AJ.  A clinicopathologic study of 100 cases of Parkinson’s disease.  Arch Neurol. 1993;50(2):140-148.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
41.
Fotuhi  M, Hachinski  V, Whitehouse  PJ.  Changing perspectives regarding late-life dementia.  Nat Rev Neurol. 2009;5(12):649-658.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
42.
Oinas  M, Sulkava  R, Polvikoski  T, Kalimo  H, Paetau  A.  Reappraisal of a consecutive autopsy series of patients with primary degenerative dementia: Lewy-related pathology.  APMIS. 2007;115(7):820-827.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
×