[Skip to Navigation]
Sign In
Case Report/Case Series
January 2014

Long-term Clinical Outcome of Fetal Cell Transplantation for Parkinson Disease: Two Case Reports

Author Affiliations
  • 1Sobell Department of Motor Neuroscience, UCL Institute of Neurology, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London, England
  • 2Department of Medicine, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College London, London, England
  • 3Reta Lila Weston Laboratories and Department of Molecular Neuroscience, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, England
  • 4Division of Neurology, Department of Clinical Sciences, University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
  • 5Division of Neurosurgery, Department of Clinical Sciences, University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
  • 6Neuronal Survival Unit, Wallenberg Neuroscience Center, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
  • 7Neurobiology Unit, Wallenberg Neuroscience Center, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
JAMA Neurol. 2014;71(1):83-87. doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2013.4749

Importance  Recent advances in stem cell technologies have rekindled an interest in the use of cell replacement strategies for patients with Parkinson disease. This study reports the very long-term clinical outcomes of fetal cell transplantation in 2 patients with Parkinson disease. Such long-term follow-up data can usefully inform on the potential efficacy of this approach, as well as the design of trials for its further evaluation.

Observations  Two patients received intrastriatal grafts of human fetal ventral mesencephalic tissue, rich in dopaminergic neuroblasts, as restorative treatment for their Parkinson disease. To evaluate the very long-term efficacy of the grafts, clinical assessments were performed 18 and 15 years posttransplantation. Motor improvements gained gradually over the first postoperative years were sustained up to 18 years posttransplantation, while both patients have discontinued, and remained free of any, pharmacological dopaminergic therapy.

Conclusions and Relevance  The results from these 2 cases indicate that dopaminergic cell transplantation can offer very long-term symptomatic relief in patients with Parkinson disease and provide proof-of-concept support for future clinical trials using fetal or stem cell therapies.

Recent advances in stem cell technologies have rekindled an interest in the use of reparative strategies for patients with Parkinson disease (PD).1 The ethical concerns related to using human fetal dopaminergic cells and the problems of securing a reliable supply of standardized cells can now be more easily addressed, thus allowing cell transplantation to be reconsidered as a potential treatment option for well-selected patients in a trial setting. Nevertheless, the overall strategy of using dopaminergic cell replacement as a treatment for PD remains the subject of ongoing critical evaluation.2

The purpose of this study was to report the very long-term outcome of 2 patients with PD who received human fetal ventral mesencephalic neural grafts and thus demonstrate the magnitude and duration of the therapeutic effect that can occur using a cell replacement strategy. Such long-term follow-up data can usefully inform on the potential efficacy of this approach, as well as the design of trials for its further evaluation.

Report of Cases


We describe 2 patients (patients 7 and 15 in the Lund series) who received intrastriatal transplantations of human fetal ventral mesencephalic tissue, rich in dopaminergic neuroblasts, as an experimental treatment for their PD.3,4 Throughout their disease course, both patients experienced excellent responses to levodopa treatment. However, both subsequently developed disabling “on-off” fluctuations with accompanying severe levodopa-induced dyskinesias (LIDs). The patients were clinically followed up at the National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Queen Square, London, England. Transplantation was performed in Lund, Sweden. The grafts were placed bilaterally using the Rehncrona and Legradi transplantation instrument in a staged manner. A magnetic resonance imaging–guided stereotactic technique was used for targeting the putamen (patient 7) and the putamen and caudate nucleus (patient 15), at the ages of 49 and 54 years and after disease durations of 10 and 12 years, respectively. The patients’ characteristics prior to transplantation and grafting procedures are summarized in Table 1.

Table 1.  Patient Characteristics Prior to Transplantation and Grafting Procedure Details
Patient Characteristics Prior to Transplantation and Grafting Procedure Details

To evaluate the very long-term efficacy of the grafts, clinical assessments were performed 18 and 15 years posttransplantation for patients 7 and 15, respectively. Motor function was evaluated using the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) motor examination (part III) in the presence and absence of medication (neither patient was receiving dopaminergic replacement therapy) (Table 2). Dyskinesias and “on-off” fluctuations were assessed by UPDRS part IV. The Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale was further used to evaluate the severity of dyskinesias. The test battery also included Activities of Daily Living–UPDRS part II, the PD Non-Motor Symptoms Questionnaire, PDQ-39 questionnaire, and a neuropsychological assessment (Table 2).

Table 2.  Patient Characteristics and Clinical Evaluation Results at Latest Follow-up
Patient Characteristics and Clinical Evaluation Results at Latest Follow-up

Preoperative and postoperative clinical scores from assessments performed in our institution were compared with current scorings (Figure 1). Representative positron emission tomography scan images comparing preoperative and postoperative striatal 6-L-fluorodopa F 18 (18F-Dopa) uptake have been obtained from archival data (Figure 2).6

Figure 1.  Motor Scores Before and After Transplantation
Motor Scores Before and After Transplantation

Motor scores on the Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) during “off” phases for patients 7 (A) and 15 (B) pretransplantation (point 0) and at different follow-up times posttransplantation: “practically defined off”; morning motor evaluations after 12-hour withdrawal of Parkinson disease medication; and worst “off.” Motor evaluations to reflect severity of motor disability documented at other points during an inpatient admission.5

Figure 2.  6-L-Fluorodopa F 18 Positron Emission Tomography Images Before and After Transplantation
6-L-Fluorodopa F 18 Positron Emission Tomography Images Before and After Transplantation

Fetal mesencephalic grafts restored dopaminergic innervation in the striatum of 2 patients with Parkinson disease. The images portray striatal uptake before (A and C) and after (B and D) transplantation for patients 7 and 15.

Both patients had Sanger and/or next-generation sequencing of the coding exons of all known PD genes including Parkin, PINK-1, and DJ-1 as well as multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification analysis to exclude presence of the G2019S LRRK2 mutation or α-synuclein multiplication.


Following transplantation, patient 7 experienced significant motor benefits, which gradually emerged over the course of 4 years. He was able to stop levodopa treatment 26 months after the first transplantation, by which time the “on-off” phenomena had virtually disappeared and his practically defined “off” motor UPDRS score had decreased by 38% compared with baseline score. By the fifth postoperative year, all dopaminergic agents had been withdrawn while the patient’s motor status continued to improve. At his last assessment, 18 years postgrafting, the patient demonstrated sustained motor benefits, scoring 22 on the UPDRS motor examination, reported no fluctuations, and remained free of any pharmacological dopamine replacement therapy. The patient continues to be independent in all activities of daily living (Table 2 and Figure 1A). While his speech remains dysarthric and hypophonic, his swallowing is normal, and falls or freezing have not emerged as a problem.

Postoperatively, this patient reported dyskinesias during “off” medication phases (graft-induced dyskinesias [GIDs]).7 Levodopa-induced dyskinesias were still present following levodopa administration, prompting reduction in levodopa replacement therapy, which successfully led to their improvement. In the early postoperative years, GIDs persisted despite discontinuation of all dopaminergic agents, were mild to moderate in severity, and caused no distress or disability. Nonpainful dystonic posturing of his right foot also developed after transplantation. At the most recent follow-up, he had GIDs of moderate degree that he felt were to some extent helped by amantadine hydrochloride and buspirone hydrochloride.6 His GIDs were still less severe in comparison with his LIDs pretransplantation. His left foot dystonia partially interfered with his walking, which, nonetheless remained independent and safe, with good arm swing bilaterally.

During the first 2 years after transplantation, patient 15 showed no improvement in UPDRS motor scores in the “practically defined off” state. However, “on” periods were prolonged and the patient’s self-reported frequency and severity of motor fluctuations diminished, allowing a 66% reduction in his daily levodopa equivalent dose.8 Improvements in motor function became more evident from the fourth year postgrafting, by the end of which he was able to stop all dopaminergic medication, given that “on” and “off” conditions were almost indistinguishable. Assessment 15 years posttransplantation demonstrated preserved motor benefits (Figure 1B). During the motor examination, the patient had minor rigidity and bradykinesia, normal gait, and intact postural reflexes. He remained free of dopaminergic medication. He was aware of some diurnal variation of his motor function but remained independent in all activities of daily living (Table 2). Freezing and falls were frequent before grafting, even during the “on” condition, whereas the patient now reports very rare freezing episodes and no falls.

During the first postoperative year, his LIDs markedly decreased in severity and duration, but the patient noticed spontaneous dyskinesias independent of levodopa intake. These have persisted over the ensuing years but have had no functional impact. At the latest follow-up assessment, the patient’s GIDs mainly involved his legs and were of mild to moderate severity. The patient found that these were only modestly helped by amantadine. Graft-induced dyskinesias (despite being his major current concern) remained milder than the severe biphasic and peak-of-dose LIDs he experienced pregrafting, which sometimes forced him to lie on the floor.

The Non-Motor Symptoms Questionnaire revealed a number of nonmotor symptoms for both patients that did not require pharmacological treatment (Table 2). While nonmotor questionnaires were not used pretransplantation, so that direct comparison is not possible, most of the current nonmotor concerns had also been present prior to grafting. At latest neuropsychological assessment, patient 7 had evidence of some decline in executive function (semantic verbal fluency and Trail Making Test) and episodic memory and learning of words. Patient 15 had evidence of some decline in executive function (Wisconsin Card Sorting Test, phonemic verbal fluency, and Stroop Test), episodic memory and learning of words, and attention. Nevertheless, there was no indication of any clinically significant cognitive decline. At the time of the latest follow-up, the Mini-Mental State Examination score was 30 of 30 in both patients.

No coding mutations were identified in any of the extensive genetic tests performed for either patient (Table 2). In line with the clinical postoperative improvements, an increase in striatal 18F-Dopa uptake was observed after transplantation (Figure 2).


This study presents the very long-term clinical outcomes in 2 patients with PD treated with intrastriatal fetal ventral mesencephalic grafts. Clinical assessments 18 and 15 years posttransplantation demonstrate sustained benefits, with motor scores still lower than their preoperative baselines. Despite each patient having nearly 30 years of PD with troublesome fluctuations and dyskinesias prior to transplantation, both patients now present with very mild symptoms and have been independent of any pharmacological dopaminergic treatment for more than 10 years. Neither patient had axial impairment nor dementia despite the presence, in patient 15, of freezing and falls prior to transplantation, features that often herald a progressive decline in independent function.8,9 These data are of course uncontrolled; therefore, the very long-term clinical natural history of their disease in the absence of surgery cannot be reliably inferred. However, the sustained motor benefits agree well with the gradual, complete normalization of 18F-dopa uptake (as a measure of dopaminergic innervation) and carbon 11–labeled raclopride binding (as a measure of drug-induced dopamine release) in the grafted putamen of both patients.6 Moreover, the course of PD is generally relentlessly progressive, and the limited progression of disability in these 2 individuals since grafting is not usually achieved by other conventional therapeutic strategies.9 It is well recognized that, in some subjects with young-onset disease and recessively inherited parkinsonism due to Parkin mutations, disease may progress relatively slowly. However, our patients actually improved, as opposed to progressing slowly, and full testing for such mutations was negative in both of these patients (Table 2). Possible factors that may relate to the prolonged remarkable beneficial effects of transplantation seen in these patients are their young age at onset, preserved preoperative ventral striatal dopaminergic uptake, and preserved levodopa response.10-12

There are, however, a number of points to be made in relation to these observations. These patients represent 2 of a total of 18 patients (3 were cases with 1-methyl-4-phenyl-1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridine–induced parkinsonism) who received fetal cell transplantation in Lund, Sweden, on an open-label basis from the late 1980s to the mid-1990s. Short- to mid-term outcomes have been previously reported in detail.3,4 An overview analysis of the results of the whole cohort has been presented by Lindvall and Björklund13 and in a meta-analysis article by Barker et al,2 showing variable but overall favorable outcomes posttransplantation. In addition to the 2 individuals described in the current study, at least another 2 of this cohort (patient 4 and patient 13) were reported to have an equally favorable outcome 10 or more years posttransplantation.14,15 The remainder of the cohort have either died or been lost to long-term follow-up.

Graft-induced dyskinesias occurred in both patients but did not have a significant functional impact and their occurrence was outweighed by the beneficial effects on motor function gained over the years. Nevertheless, GIDs represent a serious adverse event that can be debilitating but seem to be helped by deep brain stimulation of the internal segment of the globus pallidus.7,11,12,14-17 Neither patient has been sufficiently troubled by their GIDs to consider pallidal deep brain stimulation as a treatment. Undoubtedly, understanding and finding ways to avoid GIDs remains of major importance for the future of dopaminergic cell therapies.6,7,15

Postmortem studies of brains from patients with PD receiving fetal neural grafts over a decade prior to death have shown that some of the grafted dopamine neurons exhibit Lewy bodies.18,19 Although the proportion of cells displaying Lewy bodies is only reported to be in the range of 2% to 8%, as many as 80% exhibit increased levels of soluble α-synuclein in the cell bodies, a change consistent with premature aging of the cells. More detailed follow-up studies suggest that over time some of the grafted neurons progressively express reduced levels of the dopamine transporter and tyrosine hydroxylase, which further supports the notion that the disease process directly impacts the grafted cells.20 It is likely that the 2 cases described in this report also have similar changes in their grafted neurons. In that context, it is particularly encouraging that the grafts still continue to exert positive functional effects.

The gradual emergence of clinical improvements in both patients, albeit anticipated given the nature of the intervention, is highly relevant with respect to future cell therapy trial designs, particularly in relation to the variable long-term natural history of PD. It may be that the major effects of dopaminergic cell replacement with respect to motor and nonmotor symptom control only become fully apparent with long-term follow-up. Whether future transplantation protocols should also target extrastriatal nondopaminergic systems to achieve more widespread benefits in motor and nonmotor features of PD not dopaminergic in origin remains a subject under consideration.21 In this report, we are aware that only 2 individuals are included and that these represent 2 particularly successful cases, and thus, any conclusions should be drawn with caution. Nevertheless, we would suggest that these patients, together with a few other cases exhibiting similarly long-term favorable outcomes, provide support that dopaminergic cell transplantation may offer a substantial and very long-lasting compensatory effect in PD.6,14,15 Our results provide encouragement for basic science and clinical studies that strive to develop a clinically competitive stem cell–based dopaminergic cell therapy for PD.

Back to top
Article Information

Corresponding Author: Zinovia Kefalopoulou, MD, PhD, UCL Institute of Neurology, National Hospital for Neurology and Neurosurgery, PO Box 146, Queen Square, WC1N 3BG London, England (z.kefalopoulou@ucl.ac.uk).

Accepted for Publication: August 12, 2013.

Published Online: November 11, 2013. doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2013.4749.

Author Contributions: Dr Foltynie had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.

Study concept and design: Kefalopoulou, Piccini, Quinn, Foltynie.

Acquisition of data: Kefalopoulou, Politis, Mencacci, Bhatia, Jahanshahi, Widner, Rehncrona, Brundin, Björklund, Lindvall, Limousin, Quinn, Foltynie.

Analysis and interpretation of data: All authors.

Drafting of the manuscript: Kefalopoulou.

Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: All authors.

Statistical analysis: Kefalopoulou, Brundin.

Study supervision: Quinn, Foltynie.

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr Brundin owns shares in the company Parkcell AB, which aims to develop a transplantation therapy for PD by using skin-derived cells. No other disclosures were reported.

Funding/Support: This work was supported in part by the European Commission under the Seventh Framework Programme, HEALTH, Collaborative Project TRANSEURO (contract 242003) (www.transeuro.org.uk) and by the Wellcome Trust/MRC Joint Call in Neurodegeneration award (WT089698) to the UK Parkinson's Disease Consortium, whose members are from the UCL Institute of Neurology, the University of Sheffield, and the MRC Protein Phosphorylation Unit at the University of Dundee. The original grafting was part funded by the UK Parkinson’s Disease Society (now Parkinson’s UK).

Role of the Sponsor: The funding organizations had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; and preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Additional Contributions: Other physicians and nurses at Queen Square involved in long-term clinical follow-up and assessments of these 2 patients include Gregor Wenning, MD, PhD, Anette Schrag, MD, PhD, and Lesley Crabb (now Swinn).

Lindvall  O, Kokaia  Z.  Stem cells in human neurodegenerative disorders: time for clinical translation?  J Clin Invest. 2010;120(1):29-40.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Barker  RA, Barrett  J, Mason  SL, Björklund  A.  Fetal dopaminergic transplantation trials and the future of neural grafting in Parkinson’s disease.  Lancet Neurol. 2013;12(1):84-91.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Hagell  P, Schrag  A, Piccini  P,  et al.  Sequential bilateral transplantation in Parkinson’s disease: effects of the second graft.  Brain. 1999;122(pt 6):1121-1132.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Brundin  P, Pogarell  O, Hagell  P,  et al.  Bilateral caudate and putamen grafts of embryonic mesencephalic tissue treated with lazaroids in Parkinson’s disease.  Brain. 2000;123(pt 7):1380-1390.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Langston  JW, Widner  H, Goetz  CG,  et al.  Core assessment program for intracerebral transplantations (CAPIT).  Mov Disord. 1992;7(1):2-13.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Politis  M, Wu  K, Loane  C,  et al.  Serotonergic neurons mediate dyskinesia side effects in Parkinson’s patients with neural transplants.  Sci Transl Med. 2010;2(38):38ra46.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Hagell  P, Piccini  P, Björklund  A,  et al.  Dyskinesias following neural transplantation in Parkinson’s disease.  Nat Neurosci. 2002;5(7):627-628.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Evans  JR, Mason  SL, Williams-Gray  CH,  et al.  The natural history of treated Parkinson’s disease in an incident, community based cohort.  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2011;82(10):1112-1118.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Hely  MA, Reid  WG, Adena  MA, Halliday  GM, Morris  JG.  The Sydney multicenter study of Parkinson’s disease: the inevitability of dementia at 20 years.  Mov Disord. 2008;23(6):837-844.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Piccini  P, Pavese  N, Hagell  P,  et al.  Factors affecting the clinical outcome after neural transplantation in Parkinson’s disease.  Brain. 2005;128(pt 12):2977-2986.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Freed  CR, Greene  PE, Breeze  RE,  et al.  Transplantation of embryonic dopamine neurons for severe Parkinson’s disease.  N Engl J Med. 2001;344(10):710-719.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Olanow  CW, Goetz  CG, Kordower  JH,  et al.  A double-blind controlled trial of bilateral fetal nigral transplantation in Parkinson’s disease.  Ann Neurol. 2003;54(3):403-414.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Lindvall  O, Björklund  A.  Cell therapy in Parkinson’s disease.  NeuroRx. 2004;1(4):382-393.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Piccini  P, Brooks  DJ, Björklund  A,  et al.  Dopamine release from nigral transplants visualized in vivo in a Parkinson’s patient.  Nat Neurosci. 1999;2(12):1137-1140.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Politis  M, Oertel  WH, Wu  K,  et al.  Graft-induced dyskinesias in Parkinson’s disease: high striatal serotonin/dopamine transporter ratio.  Mov Disord. 2011;26(11):1997-2003.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Graff-Radford  J, Foote  KD, Rodriguez  RL,  et al.  Deep brain stimulation of the internal segment of the globus pallidus in delayed runaway dyskinesia.  Arch Neurol. 2006;63(8):1181-1184.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Herzog  J, Pogarell  O, Pinsker  MO,  et al.  Deep brain stimulation in Parkinson’s disease following fetal nigral transplantation.  Mov Disord. 2008;23(9):1293-1296.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Li  JY, Englund  E, Holton  JL,  et al.  Lewy bodies in grafted neurons in subjects with Parkinson’s disease suggest host-to-graft disease propagation.  Nat Med. 2008;14(5):501-503.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Kordower  JH, Chu  Y, Hauser  RA, Freeman  TB, Olanow  CW.  Lewy body-like pathology in long-term embryonic nigral transplants in Parkinson’s disease.  Nat Med. 2008;14(5):504-506.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Brundin  P, Kordower  JH.  Neuropathology in transplants in Parkinson’s disease: implications for disease pathogenesis and the future of cell therapy.  Prog Brain Res. 2012;200:221-241.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Politis  M, Wu  K, Loane  C,  et al.  Serotonin neuron loss and nonmotor symptoms continue in Parkinson’s patients treated with dopamine grafts.  Sci Transl Med. 2012;4(128):28ra41.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref