Clinical Imaging Factors Associated With Infarct Progression in Patients With Ischemic Stroke During Transfer for Mechanical Thrombectomy | Cerebrovascular Disease | JAMA Neurology | JAMA Network
[Skip to Navigation]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 18.207.129.82. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
1.
Berkhemer  OA, Fransen  PSS, Beumer  D,  et al; MR CLEAN Investigators.  A randomized trial of intraarterial treatment for acute ischemic stroke.  N Engl J Med. 2015;372(1):11-20.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
2.
Campbell  BCV, Mitchell  PJ, Kleinig  TJ,  et al; EXTEND-IA Investigators.  Endovascular therapy for ischemic stroke with perfusion-imaging selection.  N Engl J Med. 2015;372(11):1009-1018.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
3.
Jovin  TG, Chamorro  A, Cobo  E,  et al; REVASCAT Trial Investigators.  Thrombectomy within 8 hours after symptom onset in ischemic stroke.  N Engl J Med. 2015;372(24):2296-2306.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
4.
Goyal  M, Demchuk  AM, Menon  BK,  et al; ESCAPE Trial Investigators.  Randomized assessment of rapid endovascular treatment of ischemic stroke.  N Engl J Med. 2015;372(11):1019-1030.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
5.
Saver  JL, Goyal  M, Bonafe  A,  et al; SWIFT PRIME Investigators.  Stent-retriever thrombectomy after intravenous t-PA vs. t-PA alone in stroke.  N Engl J Med. 2015;372(24):2285-2295.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
6.
Bracard  S, Ducrocq  X, Mas  JL,  et al; THRACE investigators.  Mechanical thrombectomy after intravenous alteplase versus alteplase alone after stroke (THRACE): a randomised controlled trial.  Lancet Neurol. 2016;15(11):1138-1147.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
7.
Pexman  JHW, Barber  PA, Hill  MD,  et al.  Use of the Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (ASPECTS) for assessing CT scans in patients with acute stroke.  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2001;22(8):1534-1542.PubMedGoogle Scholar
8.
Powers  WJ, Derdeyn  CP, Biller  J,  et al; American Heart Association Stroke Council.  2015 American Heart Association/American Stroke Association focused update of the 2013 guidelines for the early management of patients with acute ischemic stroke regarding endovascular treatment: a guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association.  Stroke. 2015;46(10):3020-3035.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
9.
Smith  EE, Schwamm  LH.  Endovascular clot retrieval therapy: implications for the organization of stroke systems of care in North America.  Stroke. 2015;46(6):1462-1467.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
10.
Mokin  M, Gupta  R, Guerrero  WR, Rose  DZ, Burgin  WS, Sivakanthan  S.  ASPECTS decay during inter-facility transfer in patients with large vessel occlusion strokes.  J Neurointerv Surg. 2017;9(5):442-444.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
11.
Fiorelli  M, Bastianello  S, von Kummer  R,  et al.  Hemorrhagic transformation within 36 hours of a cerebral infarct: relationships with early clinical deterioration and 3-month outcome in the European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study I (ECASS I) cohort.  Stroke. 1999;30(11):2280-2284.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
12.
Maas  MB, Lev  MH, Ay  H,  et al.  Collateral vessels on CT angiography predict outcome in acute ischemic stroke.  Stroke. 2009;40(9):3001-3005.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
13.
Tang  W, Hu  J, Zhang  H, Wu  P, He  H.  κ Coefficient: a popular measure of rater agreement.  Shanghai Arch Psychiatry. 2015;27(1):62-67.PubMedGoogle Scholar
14.
von Elm  E, Altman  DG, Egger  M, Pocock  SJ, Gøtzsche  PC, Vandenbroucke  JP; STROBE Initiative.  The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies.  Lancet. 2007;370(9596):1453-1457.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
15.
Shuaib  A, Butcher  K, Mohammad  AA, Saqqur  M, Liebeskind  DS.  Collateral blood vessels in acute ischaemic stroke: a potential therapeutic target.  Lancet Neurol. 2011;10(10):909-921.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
16.
Miteff  F, Levi  CR, Bateman  GA, Spratt  N, McElduff  P, Parsons  MW.  The independent predictive utility of computed tomography angiographic collateral status in acute ischaemic stroke.  Brain. 2009;132(pt 8):2231-2238.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
17.
Leslie-Mazwi  TM, Hirsch  JA, Falcone  GJ,  et al.  Endovascular stroke treatment outcomes after patient selection based on magnetic resonance imaging and clinical criteria.  JAMA Neurol. 2016;73(1):43-49.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
18.
Desilles  J-P, Consoli  A, Redjem  H,  et al; ETIS (Endovascular Treatment in Ischemic Stroke) Research Investigators.  Successful reperfusion with mechanical thrombectomy is associated with reduced disability and mortality in patients with pretreatment diffusion-weighted imaging–Alberta Stroke Program Early Computed Tomography Score ≤6.  Stroke. 2017;48(4):963-969.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
19.
Gilgen  MD, Klimek  D, Liesirova  KT,  et al.  Younger stroke patients with large pretreatment diffusion-weighted imaging lesions may benefit from endovascular treatment.  Stroke. 2015;46(9):2510-2516.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
20.
Sun  C-HJ, Connelly  K, Nogueira  RG,  et al.  ASPECTS decay during inter-facility transfer predicts patient outcomes in endovascular reperfusion for ischemic stroke: a unique assessment of dynamic physiologic change over time.  J Neurointerv Surg. 2015;7(1):22-26.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
21.
Fuentes  B, Alonso de Leciñana  M, Ximénez-Carrillo  A,  et al; Madrid Stroke Network.  Futile interhospital transfer for endovascular treatment in acute ischemic stroke: the Madrid Stroke Network experience.  Stroke. 2015;46(8):2156-2161.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
22.
Oppenheim  C, Samson  Y, Manaï  R,  et al.  Prediction of malignant middle cerebral artery infarction by diffusion-weighted imaging.  Stroke. 2000;31(9):2175-2181.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
23.
Olivot  JM, Mlynash  M, Inoue  M,  et al; DEFUSE 2 Investigators.  Hypoperfusion intensity ratio predicts infarct progression and functional outcome in the DEFUSE 2 cohort.  Stroke. 2014;45(4):1018-1023.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
24.
Kamalian  S, Morais  LT, Pomerantz  SR,  et al.  Clot length distribution and predictors in anterior circulation stroke: implications for intra-arterial therapy.  Stroke. 2013;44(12):3553-3556.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
25.
Riedel  CH, Zimmermann  P, Jensen-Kondering  U, Stingele  R, Deuschl  G, Jansen  O.  The importance of size: successful recanalization by intravenous thrombolysis in acute anterior stroke depends on thrombus length.  Stroke. 2011;42(6):1775-1777.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
26.
Campbell  BCV, Christensen  S, Tress  BM,  et al; EPITHET Investigators.  Failure of collateral blood flow is associated with infarct growth in ischemic stroke.  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2013;33(8):1168-1172.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
27.
Man  S, Aoki  J, Hussain  MS,  et al.  Predictors of infarct growth after endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke.  J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2015;24(2):401-407.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
28.
de Havenon  A, Haynor  DR, Tirschwell  DL,  et al.  Association of collateral blood vessels detected by arterial spin labeling magnetic resonance imaging with neurological outcome after ischemic stroke.  JAMA Neurol. 2017;74(4):453-458.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
29.
Liebeskind  DS, Jahan  R, Nogueira  RG, Jovin  TG, Lutsep  HL, Saver  JL; SWIFT Investigators.  Early arrival at the emergency department is associated with better collaterals, smaller established infarcts and better clinical outcomes with endovascular stroke therapy: SWIFT study.  J Neurointerv Surg. 2016;8(6):553-558.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
30.
Cheng-Ching  E, Frontera  JA, Man  S,  et al.  Degree of collaterals and not time is the determining factor of core infarct volume within 6 hours of stroke onset.  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2015;36(7):1272-1276.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
31.
Woitzik  J, Pinczolits  A, Hecht  N,  et al.  Excitotoxicity and metabolic changes in association with infarct progression.  Stroke. 2014;45(4):1183-1185.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
32.
Garcia  JH, Yoshida  Y, Chen  H,  et al.  Progression from ischemic injury to infarct following middle cerebral artery occlusion in the rat.  Am J Pathol. 1993;142(2):623-635.PubMedGoogle Scholar
33.
Hakimelahi  R, Vachha  BA, Copen  WA,  et al.  Time and diffusion lesion size in major anterior circulation ischemic strokes.  Stroke. 2014;45(10):2936-2941.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
34.
Lansberg  MG, Cereda  CW, Mlynash  M,  et al; Diffusion and Perfusion Imaging Evaluation for Understanding Stroke Evolution 2 (DEFUSE 2) Study Investigators.  Response to endovascular reperfusion is not time-dependent in patients with salvageable tissue.  Neurology. 2015;85(8):708-714.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
35.
Abou-Chebl  A.  Endovascular treatment of acute ischemic stroke may be safely performed with no time window limit in appropriately selected patients.  Stroke. 2010;41(9):1996-2000.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
36.
Bang  OY, Saver  JL, Kim  SJ,  et al; UCLA-Samsung Stroke Collaborators.  Collateral flow averts hemorrhagic transformation after endovascular therapy for acute ischemic stroke.  Stroke. 2011;42(8):2235-2239.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
37.
Goyal  M, Menon  BK, Coutts  SB, Hill  MD, Demchuk  AM; Penumbra Pivotal Stroke Trial Investigators, Calgary Stroke Program, and the Seaman MR Research Center.  Effect of baseline CT scan appearance and time to recanalization on clinical outcomes in endovascular thrombectomy of acute ischemic strokes.  Stroke. 2011;42(1):93-97.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
38.
Minnerup  J, Wersching  H, Teuber  A,  et al; REVASK Investigators.  Outcome after thrombectomy and intravenous thrombolysis in patients with acute ischemic stroke: a prospective observational study.  Stroke. 2016;47(6):1584-1592.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
39.
Menon  BK, Sajobi  TT, Zhang  Y,  et al.  Analysis of workflow and time to treatment on thrombectomy outcome in the ESCAPE randomized controlled trial.  Circulation. 2016;133(23):2279-2286.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
40.
Liang  JW, Stein  L, Wilson  N, Fifi  JT, Tuhrim  S, Dhamoon  MS.  Timing of vessel imaging for suspected large vessel occlusions does not affect groin puncture time in transfer patients with stroke.  [published online January 24, 2017].  J Neurointerv Surg. 2017;neurintsurg-2016-012854. doi:10.1136/neurintsurg-2016-012854PubMedGoogle Scholar
41.
McTaggart  RA, Yaghi  S, Cutting  SM,  et al.  Association of a primary stroke center protocol for suspected stroke by large-vessel occlusion with efficiency of care and patient outcomes.  JAMA Neurol. 2017;74(7):793-800. doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.0477PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
42.
Khoury  N, Fahed  R, Guilbert  F,  et al.  Early CT changes in patients admitted for thrombectomy: intra- and interrater agreement and systematic review of the literature.  Neurology. 2016;86(16 suppl):S47.001.Google Scholar
Original Investigation
November 2017

Clinical Imaging Factors Associated With Infarct Progression in Patients With Ischemic Stroke During Transfer for Mechanical Thrombectomy

Author Affiliations
  • 1Stroke Research Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston
  • 2Department of Neuroradiology, Université Paris-Descartes, INSERM U894, Centre Hospitalier Sainte-Anne, Paris, France
  • 3Department of Neuroradiology, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany
  • 4Stroke Service, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston
  • 5Neuroendovascular Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston
JAMA Neurol. 2017;74(11):1361-1367. doi:10.1001/jamaneurol.2017.2149
Key Points

Question  Among patients with ischemic stroke transferred for mechanical thrombectomy, what baseline clinical imaging factors portend an unfavorable evolution to a point at which the patient may not derive clinical benefit from mechanical thrombectomy at arrival?

Findings  This cohort study of prospectively collected data found that, along with initial clinical severity, poor collateral blood vessel status was the most determinant factor of evolution to an unfavorable imaging profile during transfer.

Meaning  In certain subgroups of patients with ischemic stroke, vascular imaging at the referring hospitals may play a critical role in determining the benefits of transfer for thrombectomy.

Abstract

Importance  When transferred from a referring hospital (RH) to a thrombectomy-capable stroke center (TCSC), patients with initially favorable imaging profiles (Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score [ASPECTS] ≥6) often demonstrate infarct progression significant enough to make them ineligible for mechanical thrombectomy at arrival. In rapidly evolving stroke care networks, the question of the need for vascular imaging at the RHs remains unsolved, resulting in an important amount of futile transfers for thrombectomy.

Objective  To examine the clinical imaging factors associated with unfavorable imaging profile evolution for thrombectomy in patients with ischemic stroke initially transferred to non-TCSCs.

Design, Setting, and Participants  Data from patients transferred from 1 of 30 RHs in our regional stroke network and presenting at our TCSC from January 1, 2010, to January 1, 2016, were retrospectively analyzed. Consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke initially admitted to a non–thrombectomy-capable RH and transferred to our center for which a RH computed tomography (CT) and a CT angiography (CTA) at arrival were available for review.

Main Outcomes and Measures  ASPECTS were evaluated. The adequacy of leptomeningeal collateral blood flow was rated as no or poor, decreased, adequate, or augmented per the adapted Maas scale. The main outcome was an ASPECTS decay, defined as an initial ASPECTS of 6 or higher worsening between RH and TCSC CTs to a score of less than 6 (making the patient less likely to derive clinical benefit from thrombectomy at arrival).

Results  A total of 316 patients were included in the analysis (mean [SD] age, 70.3 [14.2] years; 137 [43.4%] female). In multivariable models, higher National Institutes of Health Stroke Score, lower baseline ASPECTSs, and no or poor collateral blood vessel status were associated with ASPECTS decay, with collateral blood vessel status demonstrating the highest adjusted odds ratio of 5.14 (95% CI, 2.20-12.70; P < .001). Similar results were found after stratification by vessel occlusion level.

Conclusions and Relevance  In patients with ischemic stroke transferred for thrombectomy, poor collateral blood flow and stroke clinical severity are the main determinants of ASPECTS decay. Our findings suggest that in certain subgroups vascular imaging, including collateral assessment, can play a crucial role in determining the benefits of transfer for thrombectomy.

×