[Skip to Navigation]
Sign In
Figure 1. 
Corpus callosum measurements in the midsagittal slice showing the subregions. C1 indicates the rostrum; C2, the anterior truncus; C3, the middle truncus; C4, the posterior truncus; and C5, the splenium (from Hampel et al).

Corpus callosum measurements in the midsagittal slice showing the subregions. C1 indicates the rostrum; C2, the anterior truncus; C3, the middle truncus; C4, the posterior truncus; and C5, the splenium (from Hampel et al18).

Figure 2. 
Correlation between parietal metabolic ratio and corpus callosum ratio in 12 patients with Alzheimer disease. Asterisk indicates a patient with the Balint syndrome.

Correlation between parietal metabolic ratio and corpus callosum ratio in 12 patients with Alzheimer disease. Asterisk indicates a patient with the Balint syndrome.

Figure 3. 
Correlation between occipital metabolic ratio and corpus callosum ratio in 12 patients with Alzheimer disease. Asterisk indicates a patient with Balint syndrome.

Correlation between occipital metabolic ratio and corpus callosum ratio in 12 patients with Alzheimer disease. Asterisk indicates a patient with Balint syndrome.

Figure 4. 
Correlation between normalized frontal lobe metabolism and normalized corpus callosum area C3 in 12 patients with Alzheimer disease.

Correlation between normalized frontal lobe metabolism and normalized corpus callosum area C3 in 12 patients with Alzheimer disease.

Figure 5. 
Correlation between normalized parietal lobe metabolism and normalized corpus callosum area C3 in 12 patients with Alzheimer disease.

Correlation between normalized parietal lobe metabolism and normalized corpus callosum area C3 in 12 patients with Alzheimer disease.

Table 1. 
White Matter Hyperintensity (WMH) Ratings in Patients With Alzheimer Disease (AD) and Controls*
White Matter Hyperintensity (WMH) Ratings in Patients With Alzheimer Disease (AD) and Controls*
Table 2. 
Cross-sectional Areas of Corpus Callosum and Its Subregions (in Square Millimeters)*
Cross-sectional Areas of Corpus Callosum and Its Subregions (in Square Millimeters)*
Table 3. 
Normalized Cross-sectional Areas (in Square Millimeters) of Corpus Callosum and Its Subregions*
Normalized Cross-sectional Areas (in Square Millimeters) of Corpus Callosum and Its Subregions*
1.
van Hoesen  GW The dissection by Alzheimer's disease of cortical and limbic neural systems relevant to memory. McGaugh  JWeinberger  Neds. Brain Organization and Memory Cells, Systems and Circuits. New York, NY Oxford University Press1990;234- 261Google Scholar
2.
Armstrong  RA The spatial pattern of discrete β-amyloid deposits in Alzheimer's disease reflects synaptic disconnection.  Dementia. 1996;786- 90Google Scholar
3.
Morrison  JHScherr  SLewis  DACampbell  MJBloom  FE The laminar and regional distribution of neocortical somatostatin and neuritic plaques: implications for Alzheimer's disease as a global neocortical disconnection syndrome. Scheibel  ABWeschler  AFeds. The Biological Substrates of Alzheimer's Disease. New York, NY Academic Press, Inc1986;115- 131Google Scholar
4.
Pearson  RCAEsiri  MMHiorns  RWWilcock  GKPowell  TPS Anatomical correlates of the distribution of the pathological changes in the neocortex in Alzheimer's disease.  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985;824531- 4534Google ScholarCrossref
5.
Lewis  DACampbell  MJTerry  RDMorrison  JH Laminar and regional distributions of neurofibrillary tangles and neuritic plaques in Alzheimer's disease: a quantitative study of visual and auditory cortices.  J Neurosci. 1987;71799- 1808Google Scholar
6.
Rogers  JMorrison  JH Quantitative morphology and regional and laminar distributions of senile plaques in Alzheimer's disease.  J Neurosci. 1985;52801- 2808Google Scholar
7.
Jones  EG Laminar distribution of cortical efferent cells. Peters  AJones  EGeds. Cerebral Cortex Cellular Components of the Cerebral Cortex. Vol 1 New York, NY Plenum Publishing Corp1984;521- 553Google Scholar
8.
Glickstein  MWhitteridge  D Degeneration of layer III pyramidal cells in area 18 following destruction of callosal input.  Brain Res. 1976;104148- 151Google ScholarCrossref
9.
Tigges  JTigges  MAnschel  SCross  NALetbetter  WDMcBride  RL Areal and laminar distribution of neurons interconnecting the central visual cortical areas 17, 18, 19 and MT in squirrel monkey (Saimiri).  J Comp Neurol. 1981;202539- 560Google ScholarCrossref
10.
Hiorns  RWNeal  JWPearson  RCAPowell  TPS Clustering of ipsilateral cortico-cortical projection neurons to area 7 in the rhesus monkey.  Proc R Soc Lond. 1991;2461- 9Google ScholarCrossref
11.
Conti  FManzoni  T The neurotransmitters and postsynaptic actions of callosally projecting neurons.  Behav Brain Res. 1994;6437- 53Google ScholarCrossref
12.
Innocenti  GM General organization of callosal connections in the cerebral cortex. Jones  EGPeters  Aeds. Cerebral Cortex Sensory Motor Areas and Aspects of Cortical Connectivity. Vol 5 New York, NY Plenum Publishing Corp1986;291- 353Google Scholar
13.
Vermersch  PRoche  JHamon  M  et al.  White matter magnetic resonance imaging hyperintensity in Alzheimer's disease: correlations with corpus callosum atrophy.  J Neurol. 1996;243231- 234Google ScholarCrossref
14.
Yamauchi  HFukuyama  HHarada  K  et al.  Callosal atrophy parallels decreased cortical oxygen metabolism and neuropsychological impairment in Alzheimer's disease.  Arch Neurol. 1993;501070- 1074Google ScholarCrossref
15.
Janowsky  JSKaye  JACarper  RA Atrophy of the corpus callosum in Alzheimer's disease versus healthy aging.  J Am Geriatr Soc. 1996;44798- 803Google Scholar
16.
Biegon  AEberling  JLRichardson  BC  et al.  Human corpus callosum in aging and Alzheimer's disease: a magnetic resonance imaging study.  Neurobiol Aging. 1994;15393- 397Google ScholarCrossref
17.
Cuénod  CADenys  AMichot  JL  et al.  Amygdala atrophy in Alzheimer's disease: an in vivo magnetic resonance imaging study.  Arch Neurol. 1993;50941- 945Google ScholarCrossref
18.
Hampel  HTeipel  SJAlexander  GE  et al.  Corpus callosum atrophy is a possible indicator for region- and cell type–specific neuronal degeneration in Alzheimer disease: a magnetic resonance imaging analysis.  Arch Neurol. 1998;55193- 198Google ScholarCrossref
19.
Grady  CLRapoport  SI Cerebral metabolism imaging and dementia. Birren  JESloane  RBeds. Handbook of Mental Health and Aging. New York, NY Academic Press, Inc1992;201- 223Google Scholar
20.
Duara  RGrady  CHaxby  J  et al.  Positron emission tomography in Alzheimer's disease.  Neurology. 1986;36879- 887Google ScholarCrossref
21.
Kumar  ASchapiro  MBGrady  CL  et al.  High resolution PET studies in Alzheimer's disease.  Neuropsychopharmacology. 1991;435- 46Google Scholar
22.
Foster  NLChase  TNFedio  PPatronas  NJBrooks  RADi Chiro  G Alzheimer's disease: focal cortical changes shown by positron emission tomography.  Neurology. 1983;33961- 965Google ScholarCrossref
23.
Frackowiak  RSJPozzilli  CLegg  NJ  et al.  Regional cerebral oxygen supply and utilization in dementia: a clinical and physiological study with oxygen-15 and positron tomography.  Brain. 1981;104 ((pt 4)) 753- 778Google ScholarCrossref
24.
Friedland  RPBrun  ABudinger  TF Pathological and positron emission tomographic correlations in Alzheimer's disease [letter].  Lancet. 1985;1228Google ScholarCrossref
25.
Haxby  JVGrady  CLKoss  E  et al.  Longitudinal study of cerebral metabolic asymmetries and associated neuropsychological patterns in early dementia of the Alzheimer type.  Arch Neurol. 1990;47753- 760Google ScholarCrossref
26.
Rapoport  SIHorwitz  BHaxby  JVGrady  CL Alzheimer's disease: metabolic uncoupling of associative brain regions.  Can J Neurol Sci. 1986;13(suppl 4)540- 545Google Scholar
27.
Horwitz  BGrady  CLSchlageter  NLDuara  RRapoport  SI Intercorrelations of regional cerebral glucose metabolic rates in Alzheimer's disease.  Brain Res. 1987;407294- 306Google ScholarCrossref
28.
Azari  NPRapoport  SIGrady  CL  et al.  Patterns of interregional correlations of cerebral glucose metabolic rates in patients with dementia of the Alzheimer type.  Neurodegeneration. 1992;1101- 111Google Scholar
29.
Haxby  JVDuara  RGrady  CLCutler  NRRapoport  SI Relations between neuropsychological and cerebral metabolic asymmetries in early Alzheimer's disease.  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1985;5193- 200Google ScholarCrossref
30.
Azari  NPPettigrew  KDSchapiro  MB  et al.  Early detection of Alzheimer's disease: a statistical approach using positron emission tomographic data.  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1993;13438- 447Google ScholarCrossref
31.
Haxby  JVGrady  CLKoss  E  et al.  Heterogeneous anterior-posterior metabolic patterns in dementia of the Alzheimer type.  Neurology. 1988;381853- 1863Google ScholarCrossref
32.
Scheltens  PBarkhof  FLeys  D  et al.  A semiquantitative rating scale for the assessment of signal hyperintensities on magnetic resonance imaging.  J Neurol Sci. 1993;1147- 12Google ScholarCrossref
33.
McKhann  GDrachman  DFolstein  MKatzman  RPrice  DStadlan  EM Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: report of the NINCDS-ADRDA work group under the auspices of the Department of Health and Human Services Task Force on Alzheimer's Disease.  Neurology. 1984;34939- 944Google ScholarCrossref
34.
Folstein  MFFolstein  SEMcHugh  PR "Mini-mental-state": a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician.  J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12189- 198Google ScholarCrossref
35.
Pietrini  PDani  AFurey  ML  et al.  Low glucose metabolism during brain stimulation in older Down's syndrome subjects at risk for Alzheimer's disease prior to dementia.  Am J Psychiatry. 1997;1541063- 1069Google Scholar
36.
Mattis  S Mental status examination for organic mental syndrome in the elderly patient. Bellak  LKarasu  TBeds. Geriatric Psychiatry. New York, NY Grune & Stratton Inc1976;Google Scholar
37.
Bartko  JJCarpenter  WT On the methods and theory of reliability.  J Nerv Ment Dis. 1976;163307- 317Google ScholarCrossref
38.
Eycleshymer  ACShoemaker  DM A Cross-section Anatomy.  New York, NY Appleton1911;
39.
Minoshima  SFrey  KAKoeppe  RAFoster  NLKuhl  DE A diagnostic approach in Alzheimer's disease using three-dimensional stereotactic surface projections of fluorine-18-FDG PET.  J Nucl Med. 1995;361238- 1248Google Scholar
40.
Pandya  DNSeltzer  B The topography of commissural fibres. Lepre  FPtito  MJasper  HHeds. Two Hemispheres—One Brain Functions of the Corpus Callosum. New York, NY Alan R Liss Inc1986;47- 73Google Scholar
41.
de Lacoste  MCKirkpatrick  JBRoss  ED Topography of the human corpus callosum.  J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 1985;44578- 591Google ScholarCrossref
42.
Levine  DNLee  JMFisher  CM The visual variant of Alzheimer's disease: a clinicopathologic case study.  Neurology. 1993;43305- 313Google ScholarCrossref
43.
Scheltens  PBarkhof  FValk  J  et al.  White matter lesions on magnetic resonance imaging in clinically diagnosed Alzheimer's disease.  Brain. 1992;115735- 748Google ScholarCrossref
44.
Demeter  SRosene  DLvan Hoesen  GW Interhemispheric pathways of the hippocampal formation, presubiculum, and entorhinal and posterior parahippocampal cortices in the rhesus monkey: the structure and organization of the hippocampal commissures.  J Comp Neurol. 1985;23330- 47Google ScholarCrossref
45.
Demeter  SRingo  JLDoty  RW Morphometric analysis of the human corpus callosum and anterior commissure.  Hum Neurobiol. 1988;6219- 226Google Scholar
46.
Pandya  DNKarol  EAHeilbronn  D The topographical distribution of interhemispheric projections in the corpus callosum of the rhesus monkey.  Brain Res. 1971;3231- 43Google ScholarCrossref
47.
Yu-ling  TBing-huan  CJiong-da  Y  et al.  Localization of functional projections from corpus callosum to cerebral cortex.  Chin Med J (Engl). 1991;104851- 857Google Scholar
Original Contribution
April 1999

Region-Specific Corpus Callosum Atrophy Correlates With the Regional Pattern of Cortical Glucose Metabolism in Alzheimer Disease

Author Affiliations

From the Laboratory of Neurosciences, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Md (Drs Teipel, Hampel, Pietrini, Alexander, Horwitz, Schapiro, and Rapoport and Ms Daley); and Department of Psychiatry, Dementia and Neuroimaging Research Group, Ludwig-Maximilian-University, Munich, Germany (Drs Teipel, Hampel, and Möller).

Arch Neurol. 1999;56(4):467-473. doi:10.1001/archneur.56.4.467
Abstract

Background  Positron emission tomographic studies of patients with Alzheimer disease (AD) suggest a loss of metabolic functional interactions between different cortical regions. Atrophy of the corpus callosum as the major tract of intracortical connective fibers may reflect decreased cortical functional integration in AD.

Objectives  To investigate whether regional atrophy of the corpus callosum is correlated with regional reductions of cortical glucose metabolism, as shown by positron emission tomography, and whether primary white matter degeneration is a possible cofactor of corpus callosum atrophy in AD.

Patients and Methods  We measured total and regional cross-sectional areas of the corpus callosum on midsagittal magnetic resonance imaging scans from 12 patients with AD and 15 age-matched control subjects. Regional cerebral metabolic rates for glucose in cortical lobes were measured by positron emission tomography using fludeoxyglucose F 18. White matter hyperintensities were rated in T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging scans.

Results  The total cross-sectional area of corpus callosum was significantly reduced in patients with AD, with the most prominent changes in the rostrum and splenium and relative sparing of the body of the corpus callosum. Frontal and parietal lobe metabolism was correlated with the truncal area of the corpus callosum in AD. The ratios of frontal to parietal and of frontal to occipital metabolism were correlated with the ratio of anterior to posterior corpus callosum area in the group with AD. White matter hyperintensities did not correlate with corpus callosum atrophy in the patients with AD.

Conclusion  The regional pattern of corpus callosum atrophy correlated with reduced regional glucose metabolism independently of primary white matter degeneration in the patients with AD.

THREE LINES of evidence support the notion of Alzheimer disease (AD) as a progressive neocortical disconnection syndrome.1-3 Neuropathological investigations3-6 find neurofibrillary tangles, a marker for cellular degeneration in AD, predominantly in large pyramidal neurons in cortical layers 3 and 5. These neurons give rise to long corticocortical connections within and between the hemispheres.7-9 They are detected in a clustered organization within the cortex of the primate brain.10 There is evidence2 for a similar clustered pattern of β-amyloid deposits in AD that would specifically connect these hallmarks of pathology with the corticocortical projecting neurons.

The corpus callosum is the major commissure connecting both cerebral hemispheres. Its fibers arise from a subset of the large pyramidal neurons in cortical layer 3.11,12 Several magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies13-18 report substantial atrophy of the midsagittal cross-sectional area of the corpus callosum in patients with AD. Primary white matter degeneration has been proposed13 to contribute to corpus callosum atrophy in subjects with AD who have a high prevalence of white matter hyperintensities on T2-weighted MRI scans.

Positron emission tomographic (PET) studies19-24 using fludeoxyglucose F 18 show reductions in the regional cerebral metabolic rates for glucose in AD in association neocortex, with a relative sparing of primary neocortex and subcortical areas. In addition, left-right asymmetries of regional cerebral metabolic rates for glucose and intrahemispheric metabolic uncoupling, evidenced by fewer statistically significant correlations between regional metabolic rates, have been reported in several studies.25-30 Haxby et al31 also demonstrate a significantly greater variance of anterior-posterior metabolic ratios in mildly demented patients with AD than in healthy controls. In a recent study, Yamauchi et al14 report a significantly positive correlation between the oxygen metabolism measured by PET using oxygen 15 and the cross-sectional area of the corpus callosum in AD.

In this study, we measured the degree of corpus callosum atrophy in 12 patients with AD and in 15 age-matched healthy controls using a new MRI-based method to measure cross-sectional areas of corpus callosum, and we correlated the measures with regional patterns of cortical glucose metabolism obtained with PET studies using fludeoxyglucose F 18. We also evaluated the white matter hyperintensity load32 in patients with AD and controls to see if primary white matter degeneration might correlate with corpus callosum atrophy in AD. A correlation between the regional cortical metabolic pattern and corpus callosum atrophy in AD would indicate that the corpus callosum cross-sectional area may serve as an indirect marker of cortical disconnection in AD.

Patients and methods
Patient selection

Twelve patients having clinically diagnosed AD (3 women and 9 men; mean±SD age, 67.3±8.2 years [range, 55-81 years]) were investigated. Nine patients were diagnosed as having probable and 2 patients as having possible AD, according to the criteria of the National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke (now the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke) and the Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders Association.33 One patient had biopsy-proven AD. Three patients exhibited predominantly visuospatial impairment. The degree of cognitive impairment was assessed using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE).34 Four patients with an MMSE score of less than 10 were classified as having severe dementia, 5 patients with an MMSE score between 10 and 20 had moderate dementia, and 3 patients with a score of 20 or higher had mild dementia. The mean±SD MMSE score was 12.5±10.0. Eight patients had early-onset AD, and 4 patients had late-onset AD (cutoff, 65 years).

For comparison, 15 healthy volunteers (7 women and 8 men; mean±SD age, 70.0±8.7 years [range, 53-84 years]) were studied. All control subjects scored 29 or above on the MMSE (mean±SD score, 29.7±0.5). Magnetic resonance imaging and neuropsychological data from a subset of 15 subjects, 7 patients with AD and 8 controls, had already been included in a previous study18 on corpus callosum atrophy in AD.

Substantial comorbidity in the patients with AD and in controls was excluded by history and the results of physical and neurological examinations, psychiatric evaluation, chest x-ray film, electrocardiography, electroencephalography, brain MRI scans, and laboratory tests (complete blood count, sedimentation rate, serum electrolytes, glucose, urea nitrogen, creatinine, liver-associated enzymes, cholesterol, high-density-lipoprotein cholesterol, triglyceride, antinuclear antibody, rheumatoid factor, VDRL, human immunodeficiency virus, vitamin B12, folate, and thyroid function test levels and urinalysis). Intracerebral disease, such as cerebral infarction, neoplasms, and chronic cerebrovascular lesions, was excluded for all subjects by normal results on an MRI scan, except for overall brain atrophy in the patients with AD. No subject had a history of diabetes mellitus, stroke, or head trauma. Four subjects, however, 2 patients with AD and 2 controls, showed mild systolic hypertension with a systolic blood pressure not above 165 mm Hg and a diastolic blood pressure below 90 mm Hg during the clinical examination.

The maximum period between MRI and PET measurement was 4 months in the patients with AD and 38 months in the controls. After a complete description of the study to the subjects, written informed consent was obtained from all subjects or the holders of their durable power of attorney to undergo MRI and PET examinations and neuropsychological assessment for clinical investigation and research. The protocol was approved by the National Institute on Aging's Institutional Review Board.

Magnetic resonance imaging

Eighteen T2-weighted and 18 proton-weighted axial slices (slice thickness, 6 mm; repetition time [TR]/echo time [TE], 2000/80 milliseconds and 2000/20 milliseconds, respectively), 32 proton-weighted coronal slices (slice thickness, 6 mm, and TR/TE, 2000/20 milliseconds) were obtained on a 0.5-T tomograph (Picker Instruments, Cleveland, Ohio). Furthermore, 1 patient with AD was administered a 64-slice, T1-weighted, and sagittally oriented volumetric sequence (slice thickness, 2.50 mm in plane resolution 1×1 mm; TR/TE, 36/6 milliseconds; and flip angle, 30°). All remaining 25 subjects were investigated with a 90-slice, T1-weighted, and sagittally oriented volumetric sequence (slice thickness, 2 mm; TR/TE, 20/6 milliseconds; and flip angle, 45°).

Positron emission tomography

Fifteen images were obtained parallel to the inferior orbitomeatal line using a PET scanner (model PC2048-15B; Scanditronix, Uppsala, Sweden) with reconstructed transverse and axial resolutions of 6.5 mm each. Subjects were placed in the scanner under resting conditions with eyes covered, the ears occluded, and the head fixed in a thermoplastic mask to minimize movement. Further details of the procedure are described elsewhere.35

Psychometric testing

Each subject was administered the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale36 by trained psychometricians to obtain an overall assessment of cognitive function.

Data analysis
Callosal Areas

Areas of the total corpus callosum and 5 callosal subregions were measured by one investigator (S.J.T.) blind to the subject's diagnosis in the sagittal T1-weighted MRI slice that best represented the midsagittal section according to a previously described method18 and using commercial software for measuring region of interest (Analyze; Biomedical Imaging Resource, Mayo Foundation, Rochester, Minn) on a Sun workstation (Sun Microsystems, Mountain View, Calif). Interrater and intrarater reliability of this method, assessed with the intraclass correlation coefficient,37 has been previously reported.18 The number of pixels within each region was added automatically and multiplied by the pixel area to obtain absolute values (square millimeters) for the areas of total corpus callosum and of 5 subregions (labeled C1 to C5 in the rostral-occipital direction) (Figure 1).

The values of the 2 most anterior regions of the corpus callosum (C1 and C2) were added to obtain the frontal callosal area, and the values of the areas C3 to C5 were added to obtain the posterior callosal area. The corpus callosum ratio was calculated as the frontal callosal area divided by the posterior callosal area. Each of the absolute values was divided by the total intracranial volume to normalize callosal measurements for head size.

Total Intracranial Volume

The total intracranial volume was measured on the proton-weighted coronal slices using locally developed software (Quantas; Laboratory of Neurosciences, National Institute on Aging, National Institutes of Health, Baltimore, Md) for manual tracing and volumetry of intracranial structures. The total intracranial volume was traced at the inner edge of the dura. Each pixel represents a volume element (voxel) of 1×1 mm in the coronal plane and 6 mm in the rostral-occipital axis. An approximation of the total intracranial volume can be obtained by automatically adding the voxels belonging to the traced regions of interest over all slices.

PET Analysis

A template of circular regions of interest, 8 mm in diameter and encompassing 12 pixels, was constructed for all 15 horizontal PET slices. The regions of interest were evenly spaced throughout the cortex and subcortical and thalamic nuclei according to anatomical sections, parallel to the inferior orbitomeatal line, of an atlas of the human brain.38 This template was adjusted to the individual brain. The template was selected that best corresponded to the individual PET slice by visual inspection. Regions of interest of the template then were manually adjusted to the individual slice.

Metabolic values of regions of interest in the frontal, temporal, parietal, and occipital lobes were averaged to obtain lobar mean values of regional cerebral metabolic rates for glucose. Regions of interest covering the precentral and postcentral areas and the primary visual cortex (Brodmann area 17) were excluded. Values obtained for the regions of interest of both thalami were added separately to obtain mean metabolic rates for the left and right thalamus.

All lobar metabolic values were normalized to the metabolic rate of the thalamus as an internal reference region that is relatively preserved in AD.39 Because functional deactivation from the more severely affected hemisphere could decrease metabolic activity in the ipsilateral thalamus, the side with the higher mean metabolic value was used for normalization. Thalamic normalization was done by dividing each lobar metabolic value by this thalamic value.

The values for all regions of interest belonging to parietal, temporal, and occipital cortical areas were added to obtain a mean parietotemporo-occipital cortical metabolic rate,14 which then was normalized to the thalamic metabolism.

Metabolic ratios were defined as the frontal lobe metabolism divided by the temporal, parietal, and occipital metabolic rates.31

White Matter Hyperintensity Rating

Periventricular and deep white matter hyperintensities were graded by one investigator (S.J.T.) on the T2- and proton-weighted axial MRI slices using a modification of a reported rating scale.32 Signal changes on the corpus callosum were added as an extra item to this scale. Regional periventricular and deep white matter hyperintensity subscores were added to obtain a total periventricular and total deep white matter hyperintensity score.

Statistical Methods

Patient and control groups were compared in age using the Student t test and for the extent of periventricular and deep white matter hyperintensity scores using the Mann-Whitney U test. The sex ratio was compared between groups using the χ2 test. Differences in absolute and normalized total callosal areas between patients with AD and controls were assessed with the Student t test. Group differences in the distribution of callosal areas were tested using repeated-measures analysis of variance with groups as the between-subjects factor and the 5 callosal subregions as the within-subject factor. A significant group-by-subregion interaction was followed up by pairwise single-effect analysis using the Student t test.

Further analyses were performed on the normalized corpus callosum areas. In a multiple regression model, we predicted the normalized total corpus callosum area as a dependent variable by periventricular and deep white matter hyperintensity scores, age, and in the group with AD, by the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale score as an overall assessment of dementia severity. Four stepwise multiple regression models were performed separately for patient and control groups using the 5 normalized callosal subregions as predictors for each normalized lobar regional cerebral metabolic rate for glucose.

Correlations between metabolic and corpus callosum ratios, between frontal corpus callosum and frontal lobe metabolism, and between posterior corpus callosum and posterior cortical metabolism were assessed using the Pearson product moment correlation. The homogeneity of variance of the metabolic ratios between groups was tested using the Fisher F test. A value of P<.05 was considered significant.

Results

The group with AD and the control group were matched for age (P≤.43), but the ratio of women to men was significantly higher in the control group (P≤.01). Patients with AD and controls did not differ in deep white matter or periventricular hyperintensity scores (P≤.98 and P≤.13, respectively) (Table 1).

Absolute and normalized mean total corpus callosum areas were significantly smaller in the group with AD compared with controls (P≤.05 and P≤.005, respectively). Furthermore, a repeated-measures analysis of variance revealed a significant difference (P≤.001) in the distribution of callosal area between patients with AD and controls. To further elucidate the regional pattern of corpus callosum atrophy, areas of the 5 callosal subregions were compared separately between groups. The most severe changes were seen in the splenium area, C5. The C1 area, the most rostral subregion, showed a trend toward atrophy (P≤.06). After normalization, the decrease in the mean areas of regions C1 and C2 reached significance (P≤.05). On the other hand, areas of the 2 callosal subregions that represented the posterior part of the callosal body (C3 and C4) did not differ significantly between patients with AD and controls (Table 2 and Table 3). Normalized total callosal areas were not correlated with age, deep white matter and periventricular hyperintensity scores, and in the group with AD, the Mattis Dementia Rating Scale score.

In the group with AD, the correlation of the values between rostral corpus callosum and normalized frontal lobe metabolism was not significant (r=0.45; P≤.15); similarly, the correlation between posterior corpus callosum and normalized posterior metabolism was not significant (r=0.52; P≤.08). The corresponding correlations in the control group also did not reach significance.

The anterior-posterior corpus callosum ratio in the group with AD was correlated significantly (r=0.64; P≤.03) with the frontal-to-parietal metabolic ratio and with the frontal-to-occipital metabolic ratio (r=0.72; P≤.01) (Figure 2 and Figure 3). The frontal-to-temporal metabolic ratio was not correlated with the corpus callosum ratio.

In controls, there was no significant correlation between any of the metabolic ratios and the corpus callosum ratio. The variance of all 3 metabolic ratios was significantly greater in subjects with AD than in controls (P≤.01).

In the group with AD, a normalized area of callosal region C3 explained a significant (P≤.03) proportion of variance of normalized frontal lobe and normalized parietal lobe metabolism (Figure 4 and Figure 5). No other corpus callosum subregion contributed to the predictive power of the multiple regression model. Neither normalized occipital lobe metabolism nor temporal lobe metabolism was correlated with the area of any corpus callosum region.

In controls, the multiple regression explained no significant proportion of variance of any normalized lobar metabolic value predicted by any corpus callosum subregion.

Comment

We investigated whether regional corpus callosum atrophy in AD was correlated with cortical glucose metabolism, to evaluate the use of corpus callosum area as an indirect marker of cortical disconnection in AD. We found atrophy of the corpus callosum, predominantly in the callosal rostrum and splenium, in patients with AD with a relatively wide range of white matter hyperintensities. This pattern remained stable after normalization to total intracranial volume to control for a possible effect of different sex ratios between groups. The frequency of white matter hyperintensities did not differ between patients with AD and controls, and white matter hyperintensities did not contribute to corpus callosum atrophy in patients with AD. This is generally consistent with our previously published report18 of corpus callosum atrophy in patients with AD with only minimal white matter changes. Because parietal and occipital cortical areas project mainly through the posterior corpus callosum,40,41 the inclusion of 3 patients with AD with Balint syndrome who exhibited predominantly occipitoparietal cortical disease42 may account for the predominance of posterior corpus callosum atrophy in our sample with AD. In contrast to our findings, Vermersch et al13 reported more white matter changes in their group with AD than in healthy controls and a significant correlation between corpus callosum atrophy and white matter hyperintensities. The mean±SD age in their sample with AD, however, was higher than in ours (75.6±9.5 years vs 67.3±8.2 years) (P≤.04)). Because there is evidence43 of specific white matter changes in late-onset AD, a greater contribution of primary white matter degeneration to corpus callosum atrophy might occur in late-onset than in early-onset AD.

We found a significant correlation between the anterior-posterior corpus callosum ratio in patients with AD and the frontal-to-occipital and frontal-to-parietal metabolic ratios but not the frontal-to-temporal metabolic ratio. Reduced metabolism in occipital and parietal relative to frontal association cortical areas was accompanied by an analogous pattern of reduced posterior corpus callosum relative to frontal corpus callosum area. The anterior-posterior metabolic pattern has previously been established31 as a sensitive marker of cortical disconnection in AD. Thus, the significant correlation between the corpus callosum and metabolic ratios supports our notion that corpus callosum atrophy in AD may indicate a loss of intracortical connective neurons due to primary cortical disease rather than primary subcortical fiber loss. The anterior two thirds of the temporal lobe, including the allocortical areas of its mesial aspect, have no direct contralateral projections through the corpus callosum, which may account for the lack of a significant correlation between the temporal metabolic and corpus callosum ratio.44,45 The inclusion of 3 subjects with AD with primary visuospatial impairment who were diagnosed as having the Balint syndrome increased the variance of the data, without introducing a statistically distinct subgroup (Figure 1 and Figure 2). By visual inspection, the subjects with the Balint syndrome exhibited both parieto-occipital hypometabolism and posterior corpus callosum atrophy. The sample, however, was too small to allow for statistical testing of this pattern.

In controls, we did not find any correlation between metabolic and corpus callosum ratios. This likely reflects the narrow range of the metabolic ratio data in the control group.

The normalized frontal callosal cross-sectional area in our group with AD was not correlated significantly with normalized frontal metabolism, and the normalized posterior corpus callosum area did not correlate with normalized parietotemporo-occipital cortical metabolism. In contrast, Yamauchi et al14 reported a correlation between frontal and parietotemporo-occipital cortical metabolism and frontal and posterior corpus callosum areas in AD. Significant correlations, however, between 2 large regions in PET studies and the corpus callosum may reflect a global reduction of cortical glucose metabolism parallel to overall brain atrophy, rather than a specific correlation between a regional pattern of cortical hypometabolism and corpus callosum atrophy. Looking at smaller cortical and corpus callosum regions, we did find a significant correlation of the frontal and parietal lobes cortical metabolic rates with region C3, representing the middle truncus of the corpus callosum. This finding is surprising. Both cortical regions may send a small proportion of their interhemispheric fibers through this callosal region, but the major part of projections runs through callosal areas whose atrophy was not related to metabolism in both lobes.40,41,46,47

Conclusions

A significant correlation between metabolic and corpus callosum ratios suggests a region-specific loss of interhemispheric projecting neurons in neocortex as the main cause of corpus callosum atrophy in AD, independent of primary white matter pathology. Metabolic impairment in PET cannot be explained only by damage to callosally projecting neurons. However, because these neurons form a subgroup of the intracortical projecting large pyramidal neurons in cortical layers 3 and 5,7,8,10,11 the correlation between corpus callosum atrophy and the anterior-posterior metabolic pattern in PET studies may be representative for the temporal course and regional distribution of AD pathology to corticocortical projecting neurons.

To establish the corpus callosum as a possible in vivo marker for the progress and regional distribution of neocortical degeneration in AD, future studies on a larger AD sample are warranted to allow the further investigation of the strength of correlations between corpus callosum atrophy and the pattern of cortical metabolic impairment in the dependency of disease progression.

Accepted for publication August 6, 1998.

This work was supported in part by the Ernst Jung Foundation, Hamburg, Germany (Dr Hampel).

Part of the presented material originates from a doctoral thesis (Dr Teipel, Ludwig-Maximilian-University, Munich, Germany; in preparation).

We thank H. Hippius, MD, Department of Psychiatry, Ludwig-Maximilian-University, for his generous support and Ms Marion Teipel for technical support.

Reprints: Stefan J. Teipel, MD, Geriatric Psychiatry Branch, Research Unit D2, Department of Psychiatry, Ludwig-Maximilian-University, School of Medicine, Nussbaumstr 7, 80336 Munich, Germany (e-mail: stt@psy.med.uni-muenchen.de).

References
1.
van Hoesen  GW The dissection by Alzheimer's disease of cortical and limbic neural systems relevant to memory. McGaugh  JWeinberger  Neds. Brain Organization and Memory Cells, Systems and Circuits. New York, NY Oxford University Press1990;234- 261Google Scholar
2.
Armstrong  RA The spatial pattern of discrete β-amyloid deposits in Alzheimer's disease reflects synaptic disconnection.  Dementia. 1996;786- 90Google Scholar
3.
Morrison  JHScherr  SLewis  DACampbell  MJBloom  FE The laminar and regional distribution of neocortical somatostatin and neuritic plaques: implications for Alzheimer's disease as a global neocortical disconnection syndrome. Scheibel  ABWeschler  AFeds. The Biological Substrates of Alzheimer's Disease. New York, NY Academic Press, Inc1986;115- 131Google Scholar
4.
Pearson  RCAEsiri  MMHiorns  RWWilcock  GKPowell  TPS Anatomical correlates of the distribution of the pathological changes in the neocortex in Alzheimer's disease.  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1985;824531- 4534Google ScholarCrossref
5.
Lewis  DACampbell  MJTerry  RDMorrison  JH Laminar and regional distributions of neurofibrillary tangles and neuritic plaques in Alzheimer's disease: a quantitative study of visual and auditory cortices.  J Neurosci. 1987;71799- 1808Google Scholar
6.
Rogers  JMorrison  JH Quantitative morphology and regional and laminar distributions of senile plaques in Alzheimer's disease.  J Neurosci. 1985;52801- 2808Google Scholar
7.
Jones  EG Laminar distribution of cortical efferent cells. Peters  AJones  EGeds. Cerebral Cortex Cellular Components of the Cerebral Cortex. Vol 1 New York, NY Plenum Publishing Corp1984;521- 553Google Scholar
8.
Glickstein  MWhitteridge  D Degeneration of layer III pyramidal cells in area 18 following destruction of callosal input.  Brain Res. 1976;104148- 151Google ScholarCrossref
9.
Tigges  JTigges  MAnschel  SCross  NALetbetter  WDMcBride  RL Areal and laminar distribution of neurons interconnecting the central visual cortical areas 17, 18, 19 and MT in squirrel monkey (Saimiri).  J Comp Neurol. 1981;202539- 560Google ScholarCrossref
10.
Hiorns  RWNeal  JWPearson  RCAPowell  TPS Clustering of ipsilateral cortico-cortical projection neurons to area 7 in the rhesus monkey.  Proc R Soc Lond. 1991;2461- 9Google ScholarCrossref
11.
Conti  FManzoni  T The neurotransmitters and postsynaptic actions of callosally projecting neurons.  Behav Brain Res. 1994;6437- 53Google ScholarCrossref
12.
Innocenti  GM General organization of callosal connections in the cerebral cortex. Jones  EGPeters  Aeds. Cerebral Cortex Sensory Motor Areas and Aspects of Cortical Connectivity. Vol 5 New York, NY Plenum Publishing Corp1986;291- 353Google Scholar
13.
Vermersch  PRoche  JHamon  M  et al.  White matter magnetic resonance imaging hyperintensity in Alzheimer's disease: correlations with corpus callosum atrophy.  J Neurol. 1996;243231- 234Google ScholarCrossref
14.
Yamauchi  HFukuyama  HHarada  K  et al.  Callosal atrophy parallels decreased cortical oxygen metabolism and neuropsychological impairment in Alzheimer's disease.  Arch Neurol. 1993;501070- 1074Google ScholarCrossref
15.
Janowsky  JSKaye  JACarper  RA Atrophy of the corpus callosum in Alzheimer's disease versus healthy aging.  J Am Geriatr Soc. 1996;44798- 803Google Scholar
16.
Biegon  AEberling  JLRichardson  BC  et al.  Human corpus callosum in aging and Alzheimer's disease: a magnetic resonance imaging study.  Neurobiol Aging. 1994;15393- 397Google ScholarCrossref
17.
Cuénod  CADenys  AMichot  JL  et al.  Amygdala atrophy in Alzheimer's disease: an in vivo magnetic resonance imaging study.  Arch Neurol. 1993;50941- 945Google ScholarCrossref
18.
Hampel  HTeipel  SJAlexander  GE  et al.  Corpus callosum atrophy is a possible indicator for region- and cell type–specific neuronal degeneration in Alzheimer disease: a magnetic resonance imaging analysis.  Arch Neurol. 1998;55193- 198Google ScholarCrossref
19.
Grady  CLRapoport  SI Cerebral metabolism imaging and dementia. Birren  JESloane  RBeds. Handbook of Mental Health and Aging. New York, NY Academic Press, Inc1992;201- 223Google Scholar
20.
Duara  RGrady  CHaxby  J  et al.  Positron emission tomography in Alzheimer's disease.  Neurology. 1986;36879- 887Google ScholarCrossref
21.
Kumar  ASchapiro  MBGrady  CL  et al.  High resolution PET studies in Alzheimer's disease.  Neuropsychopharmacology. 1991;435- 46Google Scholar
22.
Foster  NLChase  TNFedio  PPatronas  NJBrooks  RADi Chiro  G Alzheimer's disease: focal cortical changes shown by positron emission tomography.  Neurology. 1983;33961- 965Google ScholarCrossref
23.
Frackowiak  RSJPozzilli  CLegg  NJ  et al.  Regional cerebral oxygen supply and utilization in dementia: a clinical and physiological study with oxygen-15 and positron tomography.  Brain. 1981;104 ((pt 4)) 753- 778Google ScholarCrossref
24.
Friedland  RPBrun  ABudinger  TF Pathological and positron emission tomographic correlations in Alzheimer's disease [letter].  Lancet. 1985;1228Google ScholarCrossref
25.
Haxby  JVGrady  CLKoss  E  et al.  Longitudinal study of cerebral metabolic asymmetries and associated neuropsychological patterns in early dementia of the Alzheimer type.  Arch Neurol. 1990;47753- 760Google ScholarCrossref
26.
Rapoport  SIHorwitz  BHaxby  JVGrady  CL Alzheimer's disease: metabolic uncoupling of associative brain regions.  Can J Neurol Sci. 1986;13(suppl 4)540- 545Google Scholar
27.
Horwitz  BGrady  CLSchlageter  NLDuara  RRapoport  SI Intercorrelations of regional cerebral glucose metabolic rates in Alzheimer's disease.  Brain Res. 1987;407294- 306Google ScholarCrossref
28.
Azari  NPRapoport  SIGrady  CL  et al.  Patterns of interregional correlations of cerebral glucose metabolic rates in patients with dementia of the Alzheimer type.  Neurodegeneration. 1992;1101- 111Google Scholar
29.
Haxby  JVDuara  RGrady  CLCutler  NRRapoport  SI Relations between neuropsychological and cerebral metabolic asymmetries in early Alzheimer's disease.  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1985;5193- 200Google ScholarCrossref
30.
Azari  NPPettigrew  KDSchapiro  MB  et al.  Early detection of Alzheimer's disease: a statistical approach using positron emission tomographic data.  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 1993;13438- 447Google ScholarCrossref
31.
Haxby  JVGrady  CLKoss  E  et al.  Heterogeneous anterior-posterior metabolic patterns in dementia of the Alzheimer type.  Neurology. 1988;381853- 1863Google ScholarCrossref
32.
Scheltens  PBarkhof  FLeys  D  et al.  A semiquantitative rating scale for the assessment of signal hyperintensities on magnetic resonance imaging.  J Neurol Sci. 1993;1147- 12Google ScholarCrossref
33.
McKhann  GDrachman  DFolstein  MKatzman  RPrice  DStadlan  EM Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: report of the NINCDS-ADRDA work group under the auspices of the Department of Health and Human Services Task Force on Alzheimer's Disease.  Neurology. 1984;34939- 944Google ScholarCrossref
34.
Folstein  MFFolstein  SEMcHugh  PR "Mini-mental-state": a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician.  J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12189- 198Google ScholarCrossref
35.
Pietrini  PDani  AFurey  ML  et al.  Low glucose metabolism during brain stimulation in older Down's syndrome subjects at risk for Alzheimer's disease prior to dementia.  Am J Psychiatry. 1997;1541063- 1069Google Scholar
36.
Mattis  S Mental status examination for organic mental syndrome in the elderly patient. Bellak  LKarasu  TBeds. Geriatric Psychiatry. New York, NY Grune & Stratton Inc1976;Google Scholar
37.
Bartko  JJCarpenter  WT On the methods and theory of reliability.  J Nerv Ment Dis. 1976;163307- 317Google ScholarCrossref
38.
Eycleshymer  ACShoemaker  DM A Cross-section Anatomy.  New York, NY Appleton1911;
39.
Minoshima  SFrey  KAKoeppe  RAFoster  NLKuhl  DE A diagnostic approach in Alzheimer's disease using three-dimensional stereotactic surface projections of fluorine-18-FDG PET.  J Nucl Med. 1995;361238- 1248Google Scholar
40.
Pandya  DNSeltzer  B The topography of commissural fibres. Lepre  FPtito  MJasper  HHeds. Two Hemispheres—One Brain Functions of the Corpus Callosum. New York, NY Alan R Liss Inc1986;47- 73Google Scholar
41.
de Lacoste  MCKirkpatrick  JBRoss  ED Topography of the human corpus callosum.  J Neuropathol Exp Neurol. 1985;44578- 591Google ScholarCrossref
42.
Levine  DNLee  JMFisher  CM The visual variant of Alzheimer's disease: a clinicopathologic case study.  Neurology. 1993;43305- 313Google ScholarCrossref
43.
Scheltens  PBarkhof  FValk  J  et al.  White matter lesions on magnetic resonance imaging in clinically diagnosed Alzheimer's disease.  Brain. 1992;115735- 748Google ScholarCrossref
44.
Demeter  SRosene  DLvan Hoesen  GW Interhemispheric pathways of the hippocampal formation, presubiculum, and entorhinal and posterior parahippocampal cortices in the rhesus monkey: the structure and organization of the hippocampal commissures.  J Comp Neurol. 1985;23330- 47Google ScholarCrossref
45.
Demeter  SRingo  JLDoty  RW Morphometric analysis of the human corpus callosum and anterior commissure.  Hum Neurobiol. 1988;6219- 226Google Scholar
46.
Pandya  DNKarol  EAHeilbronn  D The topographical distribution of interhemispheric projections in the corpus callosum of the rhesus monkey.  Brain Res. 1971;3231- 43Google ScholarCrossref
47.
Yu-ling  TBing-huan  CJiong-da  Y  et al.  Localization of functional projections from corpus callosum to cerebral cortex.  Chin Med J (Engl). 1991;104851- 857Google Scholar
×