Background
Several case reports of the onset or exacerbation of multiple sclerosis or other demyelinating conditions shortly after vaccination have suggested that vaccines may increase the risk of demyelinating diseases.
Objective
To evaluate the association between vaccination and onset of multiple sclerosis or optic neuritis.
Design
Case-control study involving cases of multiple sclerosis or optic neuritis among adults 18 to 49 years of age. Data on vaccinations and other risk factors were obtained from computerized and paper medical records and from telephone interviews.
Setting
Three health maintenance organizations.
Participants
Four hundred forty case subjects and 950 control subjects matched on health maintenance organization, sex, and date of birth.
Interventions
None.
Main Outcome Measures
Onset of first symptoms of demyelinating disease at any time after vaccination and during specified intervals after vaccination (<1 year, 1-5 years, and >5 years).
Results
Cases and controls had similar vaccination histories. The odds ratios (95% confidence intervals), adjusted for potential confounding variables, of the associations between ever having been vaccinated and risk of demyelinating disease (multiple sclerosis and optic neuritis combined) were 0.9 (0.6-1.5) for hepatitis B vaccine; 0.6 (0.4-0.8) for tetanus vaccination; 0.8 (0.6-1.2) for influenza vaccine; 0.8 (0.5-1.5) for measles, mumps, rubella vaccine; 0.9 (0.5-1.4) for measles vaccine; and 0.7 (0.4-1.0) for rubella vaccine. The results were similar when multiple sclerosis and optic neuritis were analyzed separately. There was no increased risk according to timing of vaccination.
Conclusion
Vaccination against hepatitis B, influenza, tetanus, measles, or rubella is not associated with an increased risk of multiple sclerosis or optic neuritis.
SEVERAL CASE reports of onset or recurrence of symptoms of demyelination after vaccination have raised concerns that vaccines may cause or exacerbate multiple sclerosis (MS) or other central nervous system (CNS) demyelinating disorders. Although the greatest concern has been with hepatitis B vaccine,1-11 there also have been several reports after influenza vaccination12-22 and other vaccines.23-31 It is difficult, however, to infer causality from individual case reports. The reported cases may simply represent coincidental temporal associations with vaccination.
Multiple sclerosis is generally believed to be an autoimmune disease that occurs in genetically susceptible people.32 Unknown environmental factors, including certain infections,33 are also suspected to be involved in its pathogenesis. Environmental factors, such as vaccines, could be involved in actually causing the disease, resulting in an overall excess of MS in the population, or as possible triggers for the clinical expression of MS in individuals with subclinical disease. For patients who already have MS, there may be theoretical reasons to be concerned that the immunologic stimulation from vaccination could trigger an exacerbation, as occurs after certain infections.34,35
Except for hepatitis B vaccine,36-38 there has been little published research on vaccines as risk factors for CNS demyelinating diseases. To more fully evaluate the association between hepatitis B and other vaccines and risk of CNS demyelinating diseases, we conducted a case-control study in 3 large health maintenance organizations (HMOs).
Cases and controls were selected from the membership of 3 HMOs that participate in the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Vaccine Safety Datalink project.39 The study was reviewed and approved by the institutional review board of each participating organization.
We identified potential cases by searching inpatient and outpatient computerized databases for diagnoses of MS (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification code 340) or optic neuritis (ON; code 377.3). Individuals who had diagnoses of both ON and MS were categorized as MS cases. We were not able to include patients with transverse myelitis as potential cases of demyelinating diseases because there is not a specific code for transverse myelitis. Cases were restricted to adults 18 to 49 years of age with a first diagnosis of MS or ON from January 1, 1995, through December 31, 1999, at 1 HMO or from January 1, 1996, through December 31, 1999, at the 2 other HMOs. Cases had to have been HMO members for at least 1 year before their first identified demyelinating disease diagnosis in the automated database. We reviewed the paper medical records to confirm case status and determine dates of clinical events.
For the main analyses, cases were defined as those that had a physician's diagnosis in the paper medical record of multiple sclerosis or optic neuritis (including retrobulbar neuritis). In secondary analyses, we also evaluated 2 alternative case definitions: (1) diagnosis of MS by a neurologist or of ON by a neurologist, ophthalmologist, or optometrist; and (2) the standard diagnostic criteria for clinically definite MS40,41—2 clinical demyelinating events separated in space and time (as documented in the medical record or reported in the telephone interview).
To determine the onset of symptoms of MS, we used the symptoms and criteria proposed by Poser.42 Symptoms were ascertained in both the chart abstraction and telephone interviews and must have lasted at least 24 hours.
Up to 3 controls were matched to each case. Controls had the same eligibility criteria as cases and were individually matched on date of birth (within 1 year) and sex. Controls had to have been members of the HMO for at least 1 year before the date of the first demyelinating disease diagnosis in the automated record of the matched case.
Information on vaccinations was ascertained from computerized vaccination records, review of paper medical records, and telephone interviews. We relied primarily on vaccination data recorded in the medical records or computer databases to define exposure. However, we accepted self-reported vaccination information if a vaccination was reported in the telephone interview to have been received outside the HMO or from an unspecified provider and the vaccination had not been already captured in the HMO records. From the medical records, we collected information on all vaccinations received from 10 years of age to the date of chart abstraction. In the telephone interview, for most vaccines we obtained dates of first and last vaccination; for tetanus vaccine we asked only about the date of most recent vaccination. For hepatitis B vaccine and influenza vaccine, we asked more detailed questions on source of vaccination that allowed us to compare self-reported vaccinations against vaccination records.
We used conditional logistic regression to estimate odds ratios (ORs). We defined the index date for demyelinating disease onset as the earliest reported date in the telephone interview or medical record of a demyelinating disease symptom. Matched controls were assigned a corresponding index date. In the main analysis, we evaluated vaccine exposure as ever or never before the index date. We also performed analyses of timing of vaccination relative to the index date.
We used matching and statistical adjustment to control for potential confounding. We matched for age, sex, and HMO. Variables that we evaluated for potential confounding included race and ethnicity, ancestry (northern European or Scandinavian), family history of demyelinating or other autoimmune diseases, education, marital status, occupation, residence history, cigarette smoking, pet ownership, and certain groups at high risk for hepatitis B infection (eg, health care workers and patients undergoing dialysis). We evaluated each variable individually for its association with case status, and all variables with a P value less than .20 were included in the regression model.43 We also evaluated interactions by sex. We defined a P value less than .05 as statistically significant. We present 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for the ORs. In general, if the CI does not overlap 1.0, the result is statistically significant.
Beginning with the computerized diagnoses files, we identified 1159 potential cases of MS or ON. On medical record review, 556 of the potential cases had a first diagnosis of MS or ON during 1995 through 1999 and were eligible for the study. Of the eligible cases, 106 were excluded for the following reasons: deceased (2), not able to locate or arrange interview (55), refused interview (46), and language or hearing impairment (3). Ten interviewed cases were excluded because we could not identify a suitable control or because subsequent chart review showed that the subject did not meet the eligibility criteria. Thus, 440 cases were included in the analysis.
We initially selected 2047 potential controls, but 162 were excluded because their matched cases did not meet study eligibility criteria or had incomplete data. Of the remaining controls, 935 were excluded for the following reasons: deceased (1), not able to locate or arrange interview (550, of whom 324 were from one HMO that oversampled controls and did not pursue the additional controls once 3 controls had been interviewed for a case), refused (360) or did not complete (2) interview, language or hearing impairment (19), and too ill to be interviewed (3). Thus, 950 controls were included in the analysis.
Of the 440 demyelinating diseases cases, 332 had MS and 108 had ON only. Because of matching, cases and controls had similar distributions of sex and age (Table 1). Cases and controls also had similar levels of education. Compared with controls, cases were more likely to be African American and less likely to be Hispanic, Asian, or Pacific Islander; less likely to have been born in the western region of the United States or a foreign country and more likely to have been born in another region of the United States; less likely to be widowed, separated, or divorced; slightly more likely to have ancestors from Scandinavia; more likely to have a family history of demyelinating diseases or other autoimmune diseases; equally likely to have worked in health care or some other potentially high-risk occupation for hepatitis B infection; and more likely to have ever smoked cigarettes. Only a few cases and controls had a history of hepatitis infection.
Vaccination against tetanus, which included tetanus toxoid and combined tetanus and diphtheria toxoids vaccines, was the most common vaccination among both cases and controls (Table 2). Tetanus also was the vaccination with the largest difference between cases and controls, with just more than one third of cases having been vaccinated before their index date compared with nearly one half of controls. Cases also tended to be somewhat less likely to have received rubella vaccine. For the other vaccines, cases and controls had similar vaccination histories. Few cases or controls had received hepatitis A or pneumococcal vaccines, and we were not able to include these 2 vaccines in any further analyses.
As noted previously, the vaccination histories included both vaccinations recorded in HMO records and those reported in the telephone interview. Among the vaccinated cases and controls, respectively, the proportion whose vaccinations were only from outside the HMO (and thus self-reported) were 0.51 and 0.50 for hepatitis B; 0.38 and 0.30 for tetanus; 0.32 and 0.39 for influenza; 0.64 and 0.65 for measles, mumps, and rubella (MMR); 0.51 and 0.50 for measles; and 0.53 and 0.44 for rubella. When we compared the reliability of the self-reported vaccinations against the HMO records, we found generally good agreement among both cases and controls. For example, hepatitis B vaccinations that were reported to have been received at an HMO facility could be verified in the HMO records for 76% reported by cases and 73% reported by controls. Reports of influenza vaccinations were verified for 83% of those reported by cases and 82% of control reports.
The results of the conditional logistic regression analyses indicated that ever having been vaccinated with any of the vaccines of interest did not increase the risk of MS or ON (Table 3). In these analyses, the case definition required a documented physician's diagnosis of MS or ON. For the 2 conditions combined, none of the ORs were greater than 1.0. When the 2 conditions were evaluated separately, the only OR greater than 1.0 was for the association between hepatitis B vaccine and ON, but the OR was only 1.2 and not statistically significant. The strongest association was found for tetanus vaccination, which had a consistently decreased OR of 0.6 for the 2 conditions individually and combined, and the 95% CI excluded 1.0 for the individual association with MS and the association with the combined demyelinating diseases category. Rubella vaccine also tended to have decreased ORs between 0.6 to 0.7, although none was statistically significant. There were no statistically significant interactions by sex for any of the associations between specific vaccines and demyelinating disease outcomes, indicating that the results were not different between men and women.
The 2 secondary analyses that we performed using different case definitions were consistent with the main analysis. In the analysis in which we required that MS or ON have been diagnosed by a specialist, there were 309 MS cases and 97 ON cases. The ORs using this more restrictive case definition were not materially different from those presented in Table 3. For example, the ORs (95% CIs) of the associations with the combined category of demyelinating diseases were 0.9 (0.6-1.5) for ever having been vaccinated with hepatitis B vaccine, 0.5 (0.4-0.7) for tetanus vaccination, 0.9 (0.6-1.3) for influenza vaccine, 0.8 (0.5-1.5) for MMR vaccine, 0.8 (0.5-1.3) for measles vaccine, and 0.7 (0.4-1.0) for rubella vaccine. With the use of the recommended diagnostic criteria40,41 to define MS cases, 276 cases met the case definition. The ORs (95% CIs) for the association with MS were 0.8 (0.4-1.4) for hepatitis B vaccine, 0.6 (0.4-0.8) for tetanus vaccination, 1.0 (0.6-1.4) for influenza vaccine, 0.8 (0.4-1.7) for MMR vaccine, 0.9 (0.5-1.7) for measles vaccine, and 0.7 (0.4-1.2) for rubella vaccine.
We repeated the analyses restricting vaccination exposures to those that had been documented in the HMOs' records. The results were consistent with the findings of the analyses that included self-reported vaccinations. The ORs (95% CIs) of the associations with any demyelinating disease were 0.9 (0.5-1.6) for hepatitis B vaccine, 0.6 (0.4-0.8) for tetanus vaccination, 0.9 (0.6-1.3) for influenza vaccine, 0.8 (0.5-1.5) for MMR vaccine, 0.9 (0.5-1.4) for measles vaccine, and 0.7 (0.4-1.0) for rubella vaccine.
In the analyses of timing of vaccination and risk of onset of demyelinating disease, we did not find any indications of an increased risk for any of the vaccines (Table 4). The only 2 statistically significant ORs were both less than 1.0: 0.5 for tetanus vaccination and 0.6 for rubella vaccination more than 5 years before the index date. The results were not materially different when we repeated the analyses of vaccination timing restricted to vaccinations that were documented in the HMOs' paper or electronic records (data not shown).
We found that hepatitis B vaccine and several other vaccines that are more commonly administered to adults are not associated with an increased risk of MS or ON. The only statistically significant finding was of a decreased risk associated with tetanus vaccination. Multiple sclerosis is a disease that can have a long subclinical phase. Environmental exposures that may be etiologically related could occur several months to years before initial clinical manifestations. On the other hand, exposures that occur shortly before initial clinical symptoms, as has been the situation in the case reports of demyelination after vaccination,1-31 would be most likely acting as triggers of clinical disease expression in individuals who already have an underlying disease process. We did not find any increased relative risks regardless of the timing of vaccination, indicating that vaccinations do not cause CNS demyelination, nor do they trigger its clinical manifestation in those with subclinical disease.
Hepatitis B has been the vaccine about which there has been the greatest controversy regarding a possible association with demyelinating diseases. The suggestion of a possible association stemmed from case reports of onset or recurrence of symptoms of demyelination within a few days to a few months of vaccination.1-11 Our results add to the accumulating evidence that hepatitis B vaccine is not causally associated with demyelinating diseases. A case-control study conducted within the US Nurses' Health Study did not find an association between hepatitis B vaccine and risk of MS.36 An analysis of a US pharmacy benefits management database did not find a statistically significant association between claims for hepatitis B vaccination and subsequent claims for treatment of CNS demyelinating disorders.37 A study of the occurrence of adolescent-onset cases of MS in British Columbia found no differences between periods before (1986-1992) and after (1992-1998) the initiation of an annual hepatitis B vaccination program of students in sixth grade (11 to 12 years of age).38 Two European case-control studies44,45 found relative risks around 1.5 that were not statistically significant for onset of demyelination within 2 months to 1 year of hepatitis B vaccination.
For the other adult vaccines, the only evidence of a possible association with demyelinating diseases is from individual case reports.12-31 It is difficult to interpret these case reports, however, because it is not possible to distinguish whether an observed event that follows shortly after a vaccination is causal or coincidental. Ours is the first epidemiologic study, to our knowledge, to evaluate several of the adult vaccines, and our results indicate that the observations in the published case reports probably represent coincidental temporal associations rather than causal associations.
Studies of vaccinations in patients who have MS also provide evidence that vaccines do not cause or exacerbate demyelination. A recent European study involving 643 patients with relapses of MS46 used a case-crossover design to compare the risk of relapse during the 2 months after vaccination with the risk during other time periods. No increased risk of relapse was found after tetanus, hepatitis B, or influenza vaccination. A randomized controlled trial of influenza vaccination of patients with MS did not find any statistically significant differences in attack rates or disease progression during 6 months between vaccinees and placebo recipients.47
Ours was a large population-based case-control study that included both men and women. It adds to existing knowledge by providing information on different types of demyelinating diseases and several adult vaccines that had not previously been studied. The results were stable and robust under different case definitions and exposure assumptions. The retrospective nature of the case-control design may be subject to recall bias, but we tried to minimize such bias by enrolling only recently diagnosed cases and relying on information documented in the medical records to the fullest extent possible. We did accept self-reported information on vaccines that were received outside of the HMO. Our comparisons of self-reports of vaccinations received in the HMO against HMO records indicated reasonably good agreement. Furthermore, when we restricted the analyses to vaccinations documented in the HMO records, the results were the same as the analyses in which we included self-reported vaccinations.
Another potential limitation of our study was the lower participation rate by controls compared with cases. Given that most of the ORs were less than 1.0, we have to consider the possibility that the controls who participated may have been more likely to have been vaccinated than the general population of HMO members. This concern would probably be greatest for tetanus toxoid, where we found significantly decreased risks of demyelinating diseases. We compared the self-reported tetanus vaccination histories of the controls in our study against similar self-reported vaccination data from a sample of US adults in the 1995 National Health Interview Survey.48 In the National Health Interview Survey, 65% of adults 18 to 49 years of age reported having received tetanus toxoid vaccine in the previous 10 years. Among the similar-aged controls in our study, 48% reported having received tetanus toxoid vaccine in the 10 years before the study. Thus, it does not seem that controls who participated in our study were more likely to be vaccinated than the general population.
In conclusion, our study adds to the weight of epidemiologic evidence that hepatitis B vaccine is not causally associated with MS. Our results also indicate that previous case reports of onset of demyelinating diseases shortly after receipt of several other vaccines probably represent coincidental temporal associations and not true causal associations.
Corresponding author and reprints: Frank DeStefano, MD, MPH, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 41600 Clifton Rd, Mailstop E61, Atlanta, GA 30333 (e-mail: fdestefano@cdc.gov).
Accepted for publication October 5, 2002.
Author contributions: Study concept and design (Drs DeStefano, Jackson, Black, Shinefield, Mullooly, and Chen); acquisition of data (Drs Jackson, Black, Shinefield, Mullooly, and Chen and Mss Okoro and Benson); analysis and interpretation of data (Drs DeStefano, Verstraeten, Jackson, Black, Shinefield, Mullooly, and Likosky and Ms Okoro); drafting of the manuscript (Drs DeStefano, Verstraeten, Jackson, Mullooly, and Likosky and Ms Okoro); critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content (Drs DeStefano, Verstraeten, Jackson, Black, Shinefield, Mullooly, and Chen and Mss Okoro and Benson);statistical expertise (Drs Verstraeten and Mullooly and Ms Okoro); obtained funding (Drs DeStefano and Chen); administrative, technical, or material support (Drs DeStefano, Jackson, Likosky, and Chen and Mss Okoro and Benson); study supervision (Drs DeStefano, Jackson, Mullooly, and Chen and Ms Okoro).
Members of the Vaccine Safety Datalink Project
National Immunization Program, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Ga: Frank DeStefano, MD, MPH, Robert T. Chen, MD, MA, John Glasser, PhD, MPH, Philip H. Rhodes, PhD, Piotr Kramarz, MD, Thomas Verstraeten, MD, David Walker, MPH, Catherine A. Okoro, MS. Group Health Cooperative, Seattle, Wash: Robert S. Thompson, MD, Lisa A. Jackson, MD, MPH, Robert L. Davis, MD, MPH, William E. Barlow, PhD, Kari Bohlke, ScD, Patti Benson, MPH, Barbara Carste, MPH, Jo Ann Habakangas, BA, Christi Hanson, BA, Paula Lee Poy, BA, Darren Malais, BS, Viviana Rebolledo, BS, Wendy Rogers, BA, David Rubanowice, BS, Dennis Sheeran, MS, Onchee Yu, MS, Ann Zavitkovsky, MPH, MPA. Kaiser Permanente Northwest Region, Portland, Ore: John P. Mullooly, PhD, Julie E. Maher, PhD, MS, Sheila Weinman, PhD, Lois Drew, BA, Jill Mesa, Kim Olson, Heather Houston, RN, Colleen Chun, MD, Steven Gancher, MD, John A. Pearson, MD, Jerry Slepak, MD, Alan Bauck, BS, Teresa Kimes, MS, Joseph Murphy, BA, Nadia Redmond, MSPH, Karen Riedlinger, BS, Roberleigh Schuler, MS, Carol Sullivan, Gayle Thomas-Monk. Kaiser Permanente of Northern California, Oakland: Steven B. Black, MD, Henry R. Shinefield, MD, Paula Ray, MPH, Edwin Lewis, MPH, Bruce H. Fireman, MA, Joan Schwalbe, Ajit De Silva, Patti Hallam. Center for Vaccine Research, Harbor-UCLA Medical Center, Torrance, Calif: Joel I. Ward, MD, Connie M. Vadheim, PhD, Hang Lee, PhD, Ken Zangwill, MD, Eileen Eriksen, MPH, Tracy Zhang, MS, Jennifer Lee, MS, Jennie Jing, MA, Nancy Goff, Jeffrey Perlman, MD. Southern California Kaiser Permanente, Los Angeles, Calif: S. Michael Marcy, MD, Marlene Lugg, DrPH. Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, Food and Drug Administration, Rockville, Md: M. Miles Braun, MD, MPH, Robert P. Wise, MD, MPH, Robert Ball, MD, MPH. Division of Vaccine Injury Compensation, Health Resources and Services Administration, Rockville, Md: Vito Caserta, MD, MPH, Geoffrey Evans, MD.
1.Albitar
SBourgeon
BGenin
R
et al Bilateral retrobulbar optic neuritis with hepatitis B vaccination.
Nephrol Dial Transplant.1997;12:2169-2170.
Google Scholar 2.Fledelius
HC Unilateral papilloedema after hepatitis B vaccination in a migraine patient: a case report including forensic aspects.
Acta Ophthalmol Scand.1999;77:722-724.
Google Scholar 3.Gout
OTheodorou
ILiblau
RLyon-Caen
O Central nervous system demyelination after recombinant hepatitis B vaccination: report of 25 cases [abstract].
Neurology.1997;48:A424.
Google Scholar 4.Hall
AKane
MRoure
CMeheus
A Multiple sclerosis and hepatitis B vaccine?
Vaccine.1999;17:2473-2475.
Google Scholar 5.Kaplanski
GRetornaz
FDurand
JSoubeyrand
J Central nervous system demyelination after vaccination against hepatitis B and HLA haplotype [letter].
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry.1995;58:758-759.
Google Scholar 6.Nadler
JP Multiple sclerosis and hepatitis B vaccination.
Clin Infect Dis.1993;17:928-929.
Google Scholar 7.Pirmohamed
MWinstanley
P Hepatitis B vaccine and neurotoxicity.
Postgrad Med J.1997;73:462-463.
Google Scholar 8.Tartaglino
LMHeiman-Patterson
TFriedman
DPFlanders
AE MR imaging in a case of postvaccination myelitis.
AJNR Am J Neuroradiol.1995;16:581-582.
Google Scholar 9.Trevisani
FGattinara
GCCaraceni
P
et al Transverse myelitis following hepatitis B vaccination [letter].
J Hepatol.1993;19:317-318.
Google Scholar 10.Herroelen
Lde Keyser
JEbinger
G Central-nervous-system demyelination after immunisation with recombinant hepatitis B vaccine.
Lancet.1991;338:1174-1175.
Google Scholar 11.Stewart
OChang
BBradbury
J Simultaneous administration of hepatitis B and polio vaccines associated with bilateral optic neuritis [letter].
Br J Ophthalmol.1999;83:1200-1201.
Google Scholar 12.de la Monte
SMRopper
AHDickersin
GRHarris
NLFerry
JARichardson Jr
EP Relapsing central and peripheral demyelinating diseases: unusual pathologic features.
Arch Neurol.1986;43:626-629.
Google Scholar 13.Poser
CM Neurological complications of swine influenza vaccination.
Acta Neurol Scand.1982;66:413-431.
Google Scholar 14.Bakshi
RMazziotta
JC Acute transverse myelitis after influenza vaccination: magnetic resonance imaging findings.
J Neuroimaging.1996;6:248-250.
Google Scholar 15.Bienfang
DCKantrowitz
FGNoble
JLRaynor
AM Ocular abnormalities after influenza immunization.
Arch Ophthalmol.1977;95:1649.
Google Scholar 16.Cangemi
FEBergen
RL Optic atrophy following swine flu vaccination.
Ann Ophthalmol.1980;12:857-863.
Google Scholar 17.Hull
TPBates
JH Optic neuritis after influenza vaccination.
Am J Ophthalmol.1997;124:703-704.
Google Scholar 18.Rabin
J Hazard of influenza vaccine in neurologic patients.
JAMA.1973;225:63-64.
Google Scholar 19.Ray
CLDreizin
IJ Bilateral optic neuropathy associated with influenza vaccination.
J Neuroophthalmol.1996;16:182-184.
Google Scholar 20.Rosenberg
GA Meningoencephalitis following an influenza vaccination.
N Engl J Med.1970;283:1209.
Google Scholar 21.Warren
WR Encephalopathy due to influenza vaccine.
Arch Intern Med.1956;97:803-805.
Google Scholar 22.Yahr
MDLobo-Antunes
J Relapsing encephalomyelitis following the use of influenza vaccine.
Arch Neurol.1972;27:182-183.
Google Scholar 23.Behan
PO Diffuse myelitis associated with rubella vaccination.
Br Med J.1977;1:166.
Google Scholar 24.Holt
SHudgins
DKrishnan
KRCritchley
EM Diffuse myelitis associated with rubella vaccination.
BMJ.1976;2:1037-1038.
Google Scholar 25.Huber
SKappos
LFuhr
PWetzel
SSteck
AJ Combined acute disseminated encephalomyelitis and acute motor axonal neuropathy after vaccination for hepatitis A and infection with
Campylobacter jejuni.
J Neurol.1999;246:1204-1206.
Google Scholar 26.Joyce
KARees
JE Transverse myelitis after measles, mumps, and rubella vaccine.
BMJ.1995;311:422.
Google Scholar 27.Kazarian
ELGager
WE Optic neuritis complicating measles, mumps, and rubella vaccination.
Am J Ophthalmol.1978;86:544-547.
Google Scholar 28.Kline
LBMargulies
SLOh
SJ Optic neuritis and myelitis following rubella vaccination.
Arch Neurol.1982;39:443-444.
Google Scholar 29.Mancini
JChabrol
BMoulene
EPinsard
N Relapsing acute encephalopathy: a complication of diphtheria-tetanus-poliomyelitis immunization in a young boy.
Eur J Pediatr.1996;155:136-138.
Google Scholar 30.Stevenson
VLAcheson
JFBall
JPlant
GT Optic neuritis following measles/rubella vaccination in two 13-year-old children.
Br J Ophthalmol.1996;80:1110-1111.
Google Scholar 31.Topaloglu
HBerker
MKansu
TSaatci
URenda
Y Optic neuritis and myelitis after booster tetanus toxoid vaccination.
Lancet.1992;339:178-179.
Google Scholar 32.Noseworthy
JHLucchinetti
CRodriguez
MWeinshenker
BG Multiple sclerosis.
N Engl J Med.2000;343:938-952.
Google Scholar 34.Owen
RLDau
PCJohnson
KPSpitler
LE Immunologic mechanisms in multiple sclerosis: exacerbation by type A hepatitis and skin test antigens.
JAMA.1980;244:2307-2309.
Google Scholar 35.Moriabadi
NFNiewiesk
SKruse
N
et al Influenza vaccination in MS: absence of T-cell response against white matter proteins.
Neurology.2001;56:938-943.
Google Scholar 36.Ascherio
AZhang
SMHernan
MA
et al Hepatitis B vaccination and the risk of multiple sclerosis.
N Engl J Med.2001;344:327-332.
Google Scholar 37.Zipp
FWeil
JGEinhaupl
KM No increase in demyelinating diseases after hepatitis B vaccination.
Nat Med.1999;5:964-965.
Google Scholar 38.Sadovnick
ADScheifele
DW School-based hepatitis B vaccination programme and adolescent multiple sclerosis.
Lancet.2000;355:549-550.
Google Scholar 39.Chen
RTDeStefano
FDavis
RL
et al The Vaccine Safety Datalink: immunization research in health maintenance organizations in the USA.
Bull World Health Organ.2000;78:186-194.
Google Scholar 40.Poser
CPaty
DScheinberg
L
et al New diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines for research protocols.
Ann Neurol.1983;13:227-231.
Google Scholar 41.MacDonald
WICompston
AEdan
G
et al Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: guidelines from the International Panel on the Diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis.
Ann Neurol.2001;50:121-127.
Google Scholar 42.Poser
CM The epidemiology of multiple sclerosis: a general overview.
Ann Neurol.1994;36(suppl 2):S180-S193.
Google Scholar 43.Maldonado
GGreenland
S Simulation study of confounder-selection strategies.
Am J Epidemiol.1993;138:923-936.
Google Scholar 44.Sturkenboom
MCJMAbenhaim
LWolfson
CRoulet
EHeinzelf
OGout
O Vaccinations, Demyelination, and Multiple Sclerosis Study (VDAMS).
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf.1999;8(suppl):S170-S171.
Google Scholar 45.Touze
EFourrier
ARue-Fenouche
C
et al Hepatitis B vaccination and first central nervous system demyelinating event: a case-control study.
Neuroepidemiology.2002;21(4):180-186.
Google Scholar 46.Confavreux
CSuissa
SSaddier
PBourdes
VVukusic
Sfor the Vaccines in Multiple Sclerosis Study Group Vaccination and the risk of relapse in multiple sclerosis.
N Engl J Med.2001;344:319-326.
Google Scholar 47.Miller
AEMorgante
LABuchwald
LY
et al A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of influenza immunization in multiple sclerosis.
Neurology.1997;48:312-314.
Google Scholar 48.Singleton
JAGreby
SMWooton
KGWalker
FJStrikas
R Influenza, pneumococcal, and tetanus toxoid vacination of adults—United States, 1993-7.
MMWR CDC Surveill Summ.2000;49(SS09):39-62.
Google Scholar