Background
Cerebral cavernous malformations (CCMs) are reported to exhibit a wide range of dynamic patterns including growth, regression, and de novo formation, which generally show slow and steady courses. Although the pathogenesis of CCMs is not well known, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) has been suggested as a possible mediating factor.
Objectives
To report CCMs showing rapid progression over a short period and to investigate these biological characteristics.
Design
Experimental study.
Setting
Tertiary referral center, neurology department.
Patient
A 40-year-old man was admitted because of a left-sided numbness, vertigo, and ataxia, which were attributed to a pontine hemorrhage. He had experienced a left-sided weakness 6 months before admission, and thereafter had complained of intermittent headache. Serial brain magnetic resonance images showed multiple intracerebral microhemorrhages throughout the cerebral hemispheres. A biopsy of the lesion confirmed the diagnosis of CCM.
Main Outcome Measures
We investigated the expression of VEGF by immunohistochemistry of the biopsy specimen. Dynamic patterns of CCMs, obtained with spin-echo magnetic resonance images with gradient-echo sequences, were compared with serial serum VEGF concentrations, determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.
Results
Immunohistochemistry of the specimen displayed increased VEGF expression. Serial magnetic resonance images during 7 months showed dynamic signal changes of the preexisting lesions and 15 de novo formations in many cortices. The VEGF level in serum increased during this dynamic period and became normal during the steady and resolving stages.
Conclusions
Cerebral cavernous malformations can be progressively deteriorating. The endothelial proliferation induced by VEGF is likely to be an important aspect of the pathogenetic mechanisms of CCMs.
CEREBRAL CAVERNOUS malformations (CCMs) are well-circumscribed lesions that consist of closely packed, enlarged, capillarylike vessels, without intervening parenchyma.1 Although CCMs have been generally regarded as congenital lesions that arise as a result of disordered mesodermal differentiation during the early stages of embryogenesis,2,3 recent studies have documented the growth and de novo appearance of sporadic or familial CCMs.4-9
However, the molecular mechanisms underlying the genesis and maintenance of these abnormal vascular phenotypes are not well known. Several studies have supported the notion that 2 main systems of angiogenesis, vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGFs) and their endothelial cell–specific protein tyrosine kinase receptors (flk-1, flt-1), mediate various facets of blood vessel formation during vascular response to injury and disease.10,11
We studied an unusual sporadic case of multiple CCMs that showed an aggressive behavior, and we investigated the biological activities of these CCMs to elucidate the mechanisms underlying their growth and de novo genesis.
A 40-year-old man was admitted because of sudden vertigo, numbness, and left-sided ataxia. Six months before admission, he had suffered an intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) with left-sided weakness. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of the brain at the time of this previous admission showed multiple intracerebral microhemorrhages throughout the cerebral hemispheres, suggestive of CCMs, although he had no relevant family history. He had also complained of a general weakness and intermittent headache during the preceding 6 months. He had no history of hypertension, dyslipidemia, trauma, seizure, or diabetes mellitus.
Brain MR images on the second admission showed dynamic signal changes and 12 de novo lesions, including a newly developed right pontine hemorrhage (Figure 1 and Figure 2). On the 30th hospital day of the second admission, dysarthria, hoarseness, diplopia, and left-sided weakness developed, and follow-up MR images showed the enlarged pontine lesion and the presence of 3 de novo lesions. Investigations for coagulation abnormalities, systemic vasculitis, and cardioembolic sources showed no remarkable findings. The cerebral angiogram was also normal. The patient was treated with intravenous methylprednisolone acetate at 1 g/d for 5 days from the 30th hospital day, followed by oral prednisolone acetate (60 mg). His neurologic symptoms improved steadily, and the oral prednisolone was slowly tapered over 4 weeks.
On the 50th hospital day, to clarify the cause of the highly dynamic, cerebral lesions, brain biopsy was performed stereotactically on the right frontal lesion. The patient was discharged in a much improved state on the 60th hospital day. One month after discharge, a follow-up brain MR image showed no signal changes or de novo formations. He remained free of recurrence of the disease during a 7-month follow-up period.
Mr imaging data acquisition and analysis
We performed MR imaging studies on a 1.5-T MR unit (Signa Horizon, Echospeed; General Electric Medical Systems, Waukesha, Wis) with echoplanar imaging, as described in previous studies from our group.12,13 The standardized MR imaging protocol consisted of fast spin-echo, T2-weighted images (repetition time/echo time, 4200/112 milliseconds; field of view, 21 × 21 cm; matrix, 256 × 192; and slice thickness, 5 mm with 1.5-mm gap) and T2*-weighted gradient-echo sequences (repetition time/echo time, 200-500/15 milliseconds; flip angle, 20°; number of excitations, 2; slice thickness, 1.4 mm; and gap width, 0.7 mm).
The lesions were classified as previously described14: type I: a high-signal core on T1-weighted images and a high- or low-signal core with a low-signal rim on T2-weighted images; type II: a reticular mixed-signal core on T1- and T2-weighted images and a low-signal rim on T2-weighted images; type III: homogeneously isointense or low-signal area on T1- and T2-weighted images; and type IV: seen poorly or not at all on spin-echo images and focally with a decreased signal on gradient-echo images. In the present study, we analyzed the dynamic changes of the different signal lesions and de novo CCM formation on serial brain MR images.
Histologic processing of the biopsy tissue
Tissue specimens were fixed in 4% formalin and embedded in paraffin blocks. Sequential 6-µm sections cut from paraffin blocks were deparaffinized in xylene, rehydrated, and prepared for routine histologic examination (hematoxylin-eosin staining), immunohistochemical studies for VEGF, and Congo red staining. After being rinsed in phosphate-buffered saline, the tissue on the slide was heated in 50mM L-glycine–hydrochloric acid buffer (pH 3.5) containing 0.01% wt/vol EDTA at 95°C for 5 minutes, as a pretreatment for VEGF. The specimen then was incubated with a 1:800 dilution of primary rabbit anti–VEGF polyclonal antibody (NeoMarkers; Lab Vision Corporation, Fremont, Calif) for 48 hours at 4°C. After washing with 0.5M Tris-buffered saline, the section was incubated with a 1:200 dilution of the secondary antibody, Cy3-conjugated goat anti–rabbit IgG (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, Inc, West Grove, Pa). Immunofluorescent labeling was analyzed with a laser confocal scanning microscope (Nikon PCM-2000; Nikon Inc, Melville, NY). Alternating sections were stained in a similar way but without primary antibody. Immunoreactivity to VEGF was not detected in these sections. Congo red staining was analyzed by means of a polarizing microscope.
Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay
To determine VEGF concentrations in serum, we used a commercially available sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit, with elevated levels defined as greater than 55 pg/mg on the basis of normal population results (Quantikine Kit; R&D Systems Inc, Minneapolis, Minn). Among the isomers of VEGF, VEGF164 was selected because it is the main isomer expressed in cerebrovascular disorders.15-18 Ratios of VEGF protein to total protein concentration were calculated and expressed as picograms per milligram of total protein. Intra-assay and interassay variations were within the range provided by the manufacturer. The VEGF concentration in serum was determined repeatedly during the clinical deterioration and regression, ie, at onset (current admission), during the deterioration period, at steady state, and during improvement. The VEGF levels were also compared with those of age-matched, healthy controls (n = 20) and subjects with hypertensive pontine ICH (n = 8, 3 days after onset).
By MR imaging analysis, the initial MR images at the first admission showed 13 lesions of various types (1 lesion of type I, 7 of type III, and 5 of type IV). Six months after the first admission, these lesions had changed dramatically and the total number of lesions had increased to 25. These newly developed lesions were composed of 2 of type II, 4 of type III, and 6 lesions of type IV. Seven months after the initial MR imaging, with clinical deterioration, the lesion number increased to 28 and all the newly developed lesions were of type IV. After prednisolone treatment (9 months after the initial MR imaging), no new lesion was detected and further morphologic changes were not observed. The timetable for these events is illustrated in Figure 3.
A biopsy was performed of the type III lesion in the right frontal area on the 50th hospital day (Figure 1E). On pathological examination, closely apposed dilated vascular channels with fibrotic walls were observed and little or no intervening brain parenchyma was seen. Some hemosiderin deposits were observed in the surrounding brain tissue (Figure 4A). The capillarylike vessel walls were lined by a single layer of endothelium and collagenous adventitia (Figure 4B). Routine pathological examination demonstrated the typical findings of CCMs. Immunohistochemical study showed significantly increased VEGF expression in the lesion (Figure 4C), in contrast to the rare expression in normal brain tissue (data not shown). There were no amorphous materials, which give apple-green birefringence on polarizing microscopy (data not shown).
Measurement of serum vegf levels
The VEGF concentration in serum was increased from 228.6 pg/mg (at admission) to 419.4 pg/mg (at 4 weeks) during the dynamic period (healthy control group [n = 20], 59.3 pg/mg; subjects with hypertensive pontine ICH, 3 days after onset [n = 8], 78.4 pg/mg). Despite this dramatic increase in the VEGF concentration, serum VEGF levels during the steady and improving phases became almost normal (8 weeks, 54.2 pg/mg; 12 weeks, 71.8 pg/mg). The timetable for these results is also illustrated in Figure 3.
Our patient had recurrent strokelike episodes and intermittent headaches without a relevant family history, and the diagnosis of CCMs in this patient was pathologically confirmed. Remarkably, serial examinations of brain MR images showed very dynamic changes in the signal intensities of multiple lesions, and 15 de novo lesions developed during 7 months. An immunohistochemical study showed significantly increased VEGF expression in the type III lesion studied by biopsy. The progression of CCMs on brain MR imaging correlated well with higher VEGF levels. Of note, elevated VEGF levels and disease progression were altered by the administration of prednisolone.
Clinical presentation of CCMs is characterized by ICH, seizures, and focal neurologic deficits, including nonspecific symptoms such as headache, vertigo, and tinnitus, but most of the lesions remain asymptomatic.19,20 The CCMs range in size from grossly invisible to the involvement of a large part of an entire hemisphere, and they may be single or multiple lesions and sporadic or familial.21 Traditionally, CCMs have been presumed to be congenital lesions that arise during the early embryonic stage, and that grow according to malformative mechanisms and blood-flow changes.22 More recently, however, dynamic activities including enlargement, regression, and de novo formation have been described in both the familial and sporadic forms of CCM (Table 1).1,14,23-31 The possibility that the number of lesions might increase with age has been also documented.20,32 Reportedly, the annual risk of hemorrhage in sporadic or familial CCMs has been estimated at 0.25% to 13% per patient-year, and de novo formations appear with an incidence of 0.2 to 0.4 lesion per year. Moreover, it might be expected that the rates of hemorrhage and of de novo formation of CCMs in the actual population lie between the lowest retrospective rates and the highest prospective rates. However, the CCMs in our patient showed dynamic features well beyond this type of estimation (Table 1).
The underlying mechanisms inherent to the genesis and maintenance of these abnormal vascular phenotypes are not well understood. Although the appearance of new lesions can represent initial hemorrhage into an already existent but undetected lesion, another possible explanation is that a second hit in an area of genetically predisposed vasculature gives rise to the development of hemorrhages and the typical appearance of CCMs.25 Radiotherapy and dural sinus obstruction were found to be the predisposing factors for new lesions.7,10 The hypothesis that a neoplasticlike process might be involved in the genesis of new lesions was also supported by some reports of new lesions occurring under hormonal influence during pregnancy7 and the apparent seeding of a lesion along a biopsy track.33 Recent studies have clarified that 2 main angiogenic factors, ie, VEGFs and their endothelial cell–specific protein tyrosine kinase receptors, mediate various facets of blood vessel formation during vasculogenesis.17,34 The VEGFs and their receptors are usually down-regulated after birth, except under some physiologic or pathologic conditions.11 Some immunohistochemical studies have focused on the proliferation of cavernomas and the expression of angiogenic growth factors.35-37 The expression of proliferating cell nuclear antigen was detected in the endothelium of cavernomas, indicating growth potential in these lesions35; the expression of VEGF was diffusely increased, and this correlated with the recurrence of cerebrovascular malformations.11,36
In the present study, the expression of VEGF was much increased in type III lesions, without apparent recent hemorrhage, and serum VEGF level was higher than those of normal controls and subjects with hypertensive pontine ICH. Furthermore, VEGF level correlated well with the patterns of CCMs on brain MR images. Although it is not clear whether the expression of VEGF occurs as a result of a nonspecific pathologic response to intracranial hemorrhage or ischemia in various lesions, or whether it occurs in only truly proliferative lesions, our report demonstrates that CCMs can be progressive and highly dynamic because of the presence of as yet undetermined mediating factors, and VEGF may be one of these factors. Further research should assess serial serum VEGF levels in healthy control subjects, subjects with ICH of various causes, and subjects with ICH related to CCMs.
The clinical features, MR imaging patterns, and VEGF levels in our patient were stabilized by glucocorticoid treatment. Glucocorticoids have been found to have suppressive effects on the expression of VEGF or transforming growth factor.37,38 We assume that glucocorticoids might influence the behavior of CCMs through the down-regulation of VEGF. Surgical intervention is not practical in cases of familial CCMs with multiple lesions. Further research should lead to a greater understanding of the molecular mechanisms mediating abnormal vasculogenesis in CCMs, and such understanding might lead to novel strategies for the therapeutic alteration of CCMs.
Cerebral cavernous malformations can show a highly dynamic course, and their biological activities are likely to be correlated with VEGF. We speculate that endothelial proliferation induced by VEGF is an important element in the underlying developmental and pathogenetic mechanisms of CCMs.
Corresponding author and reprints: Byung-Woo Yoon, MD, PhD, Department of Neurology, Seoul National University Hospital, 28, Yongon-Dong, Chongro-Gu, 110-744, Seoul, South Korea (e-mail: bwyoon@snu.ac.kr).
Accepted for publication May 27, 2003.
Author contributions: Study concept and design (Drs Jung, Chu, Jeong, Bae, and Yoon); acquisition of data (Drs Jung, Park, and Yoon); analysis and interpretation of data (Drs Jung, Chu, and Yoon); drafting of the manuscript (Drs Jung, Jeong, and Park); critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content (Drs Jung, Chu, Jeong, Bae, and Yoon); statistical expertise (Drs Jung and Chu); study supervision (Dr Yoon).
Drs Jung and Chu contributed equally to this study.
1.Labauge
PBrunereau
LLevy
CLaberge
SHoutteville
JP The natural history of familial cerebral cavernomas: a retrospective MRI study of 40 patients.
Neuroradiology.2000;42:327-332.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 2.Meixensberger
JHofmann
ERoosen
K Cerebral cavernomas: clinical aspects and therapy.
Wien Med Wochenschr.1997;147:194-198.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 3.Rigamonti
DHadley
MNDrayer
BP
et al Cerebral cavernous malformations: incidence and familial occurrence.
N Engl J Med.1988;319:343-347.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 4.Bertalanffy
HGilsbach
JMEggert
HRSeeger
W Microsurgery of deep-seated cavernous angiomas: report of 26 cases.
Acta Neurochir (Wien).1991;108:91-99.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 5.Siegel
AM Familial cavernous angioma: an unknown, known disease.
Acta Neurol Scand.1998;98:369-371.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 6.Spetzler
RFWilson
CB Enlargement of an arteriovenous malformation documented by angiography: case report.
J Neurosurg.1975;43:767-769.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 7.Pozzati
EAcciarri
NTognetti
FMarliani
FGiangaspero
F Growth, subsequent bleeding, and de novo appearance of cerebral cavernous angiomas.
Neurosurgery.1996;38:662-670.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 9.Detweiler
PWPorter
RWZabramski
JMSpetzler
RF De novo formation of a central nervous system cavernous malformation: implications for predicting risk of hemorrhage: case report and review of the literature.
J Neurosurg.1997;87:629-632.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 10.Challa
VRMoody
DMBrown
WR Vascular malformations of the central nervous system.
J Neuropathol Exp Neurol.1995;54:609-621.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 11.Uranishi
RBaev
NINg
PYKim
JHAwad
IA Expression of endothelial cell angiogenesis receptors in human cerebrovascular malformations.
Neurosurgery.2001;48:359-368.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 12.Kim
DEBae
HJLee
SHKim
HYoon
BWRoh
JK Gradient echo magnetic resonance imaging in the prediction of hemorrhagic vs ischemic stroke.
Arch Neurol.2002;59:425-429.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 13.Chu
KKang
DWKim
DEPark
SHRoh
JK Diffusion-weighted and gradient-echo MR findings of hemichorea-hemiballism associated with nonketotic hyperglycemia: a hyperviscosity syndrome?
Arch Neurol.2002;59:448-452.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 14.Zambramski
JMWascher
TMSpetzler
RF
et al The natural history of familial cavernous malformations: results of an ongoing study.
J Neurosurg.1994;80:422-432.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 15.Ferrara
N Role of vascular endothelial growth factor in the regulation of angiogenesis.
Kidney Int.1999;56:794-814.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 16.Zhang
ZGZhang
LJiang
Q
et al VEGF enhances angiogenesis and promotes blood-brain barrier leakage in the ischemic brain.
J Clin Invest.2000;106:829-838.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 17.Marti
HHRisau
W Systemic hypoxia changes the organ-specific distribution of vascular endothelial growth factor and its receptors.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.1998;95:15809-15814.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 18.Marti
HHBernaudin
MBellail
A
et al Hypoxia-induced vascular endothelial growth factor: expression precedes neovascularization after cerebral ischemia.
Am J Pathol.2000;156:965-976.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 19.Russell
DSRubenstein
LJ Pathology of Tumors of the Nervous System. 5th ed. Baltimore, Md: Williams & Wilkins; 1989:730-736.
20.Kattapong
VJHart
BLDavis
LE Familial cerebral cavernous angiomas: clinical and radiologic studies.
Neurology.1995;45:492-497.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 21.Labauge
OEnjolras
OBonerandi
JJ
et al An association between autosomal dominant cerebral cavernomas and a distinctive hyperkeratotic cutaneous vascular malformation in 4 families.
Ann Neurol.1999;45:250-254.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 22.Robinson
JRAwad
IALittle
JR Natural history of the cavernous angioma.
J Neurosurg.1991;75:709-714.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 23.Sure
UButz
NSchlegel
J
et al Endothelial proliferation, neoangiogenesis, and potential de novo generation of cerebrovascular malformations.
J Neurosurg.2001;94:972-977.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 24.Del Curling Jr
OKelly Jr
DLElster
ADCraven
TE An analysis of the natural history of cavernous angiomas.
J Neurosurg.1991;75:702-708.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 25.Clatterbuck
REMoriarty
JLElmaci
ILee
RRBreiter
SNRigamonti
D Dynamic nature of cavernous malformations: a prospective magnetic resonance imaging study with volumetric analysis.
J Neurosurg.2000;93:981-986.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 26.Aiba
TTanaka
RKoike
TKameyama
STakeda
NKomata
T Natural history of intracranial cavernous malformations.
J Neurosurg.1995;83:56-59.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 27.Kondziolka
DLunsford
LDKestle
JRW The natural history of cerebral cavernous malformations.
J Neurosurg.1995;83:820-824.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 28.Kim
DSPark
YGChoi
JUChung
SSLee
KC An analysis of the natural history of cavernous malformations.
Surg Neurol.1997;48:9-17.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 29.Moriarty
JLClatterbuck
RERigamonti
D The natural history of cavernous malformations.
Neurosurg Clin N Am.1999;10:411-417.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 30.Porter
PJWillinsky
RAHarper
WWallace
MC Cerebral cavernous malformations: natural history and prognosis after clinical deterioration with or without hemorrhage.
J Neurosurg.1997;87:190-197.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 31.Labauge
PBrunereau
LLaberge
SHoutteville
JP Prospective follow-up of 33 asymptomatic patients with familial cerebral cavernous malformations.
Neurology.2001;57:1825-1828.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 32.Mason
IAase
JMOrrison
WWWicks
JDSeigel
RSBicknell
JM Familial cavernous angiomas of the brain in a Hispanic family.
Neurology.1988;38:324-326.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 33.Ogilvy
CSMoayeri
NGolden
JA Appearance of a cavernous hemangioma in the cerebral cortex after a biopsy of a deeper lesion.
Neurosurgery.1993;33:307-309.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 34.Monacci
WTMerrill
MJOldfield
EH Expression of vascular permeability factor/vascular endothelial growth factor in normal rat tissues.
Am J Physiol.1993;264(4, pt 1):C995-C1002.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 35.Notelet
LHouttenille
JPKhoury
SLechevalier
BChapon
F Proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) in cerebral cavernomas: an immunocytochemical study of 42 cases.
Surg Neurol.1997;47:364-370.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 36.Sonstein
WJKader
AMichelsen
WJLlena
JFHirano
ACasper
D Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor in pediatric and adult cerebral arteriovenous malformations: an immunocytochemical study.
J Neurosurg.1996;85:838-845.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 37.Machein
MRKullmer
JRonicke
V
et al Differential downregulation of vascular endothelial growth factor by dexamethasone in normoxic and hypoxic fat glioma cells.
Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol.1999;25:104-112.
PubMedGoogle Scholar 38.Nauck
MDarakiulakis
GPerruchoud
APPapakonstantinou
ERoth
M Corticosteroids inhibit the expression of the vascular endothelial growth factor gene in human vascular smooth muscle cells.
Eur J Pharmacol.1998;341:309-315.
PubMedGoogle Scholar