[Skip to Navigation]
Sign In
Observation
November 2003

Cerebral Cavernous Malformations With Dynamic and Progressive Course: Correlation Study With Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor

Author Affiliations

From the Department of Neurology and Clinical Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul (Drs Jung, Chu, Park, and Yoon), and Departments of Neurology, Eulji Medical Center, Seoul (Dr Bae), and Ilsan Paik Hospital, Inje University, Ilsan (Dr Jeong), South Korea.

Arch Neurol. 2003;60(11):1613-1618. doi:10.1001/archneur.60.11.1613
Abstract

Background  Cerebral cavernous malformations (CCMs) are reported to exhibit a wide range of dynamic patterns including growth, regression, and de novo formation, which generally show slow and steady courses. Although the pathogenesis of CCMs is not well known, vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) has been suggested as a possible mediating factor.

Objectives  To report CCMs showing rapid progression over a short period and to investigate these biological characteristics.

Design  Experimental study.

Setting  Tertiary referral center, neurology department.

Patient  A 40-year-old man was admitted because of a left-sided numbness, vertigo, and ataxia, which were attributed to a pontine hemorrhage. He had experienced a left-sided weakness 6 months before admission, and thereafter had complained of intermittent headache. Serial brain magnetic resonance images showed multiple intracerebral microhemorrhages throughout the cerebral hemispheres. A biopsy of the lesion confirmed the diagnosis of CCM.

Main Outcome Measures  We investigated the expression of VEGF by immunohistochemistry of the biopsy specimen. Dynamic patterns of CCMs, obtained with spin-echo magnetic resonance images with gradient-echo sequences, were compared with serial serum VEGF concentrations, determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

Results  Immunohistochemistry of the specimen displayed increased VEGF expression. Serial magnetic resonance images during 7 months showed dynamic signal changes of the preexisting lesions and 15 de novo formations in many cortices. The VEGF level in serum increased during this dynamic period and became normal during the steady and resolving stages.

Conclusions  Cerebral cavernous malformations can be progressively deteriorating. The endothelial proliferation induced by VEGF is likely to be an important aspect of the pathogenetic mechanisms of CCMs.

CEREBRAL CAVERNOUS malformations (CCMs) are well-circumscribed lesions that consist of closely packed, enlarged, capillarylike vessels, without intervening parenchyma.1 Although CCMs have been generally regarded as congenital lesions that arise as a result of disordered mesodermal differentiation during the early stages of embryogenesis,2,3 recent studies have documented the growth and de novo appearance of sporadic or familial CCMs.4-9

However, the molecular mechanisms underlying the genesis and maintenance of these abnormal vascular phenotypes are not well known. Several studies have supported the notion that 2 main systems of angiogenesis, vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGFs) and their endothelial cell–specific protein tyrosine kinase receptors (flk-1, flt-1), mediate various facets of blood vessel formation during vascular response to injury and disease.10,11

We studied an unusual sporadic case of multiple CCMs that showed an aggressive behavior, and we investigated the biological activities of these CCMs to elucidate the mechanisms underlying their growth and de novo genesis.

Report of a case

A 40-year-old man was admitted because of sudden vertigo, numbness, and left-sided ataxia. Six months before admission, he had suffered an intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) with left-sided weakness. Magnetic resonance (MR) imaging of the brain at the time of this previous admission showed multiple intracerebral microhemorrhages throughout the cerebral hemispheres, suggestive of CCMs, although he had no relevant family history. He had also complained of a general weakness and intermittent headache during the preceding 6 months. He had no history of hypertension, dyslipidemia, trauma, seizure, or diabetes mellitus.

Brain MR images on the second admission showed dynamic signal changes and 12 de novo lesions, including a newly developed right pontine hemorrhage (Figure 1 and Figure 2). On the 30th hospital day of the second admission, dysarthria, hoarseness, diplopia, and left-sided weakness developed, and follow-up MR images showed the enlarged pontine lesion and the presence of 3 de novo lesions. Investigations for coagulation abnormalities, systemic vasculitis, and cardioembolic sources showed no remarkable findings. The cerebral angiogram was also normal. The patient was treated with intravenous methylprednisolone acetate at 1 g/d for 5 days from the 30th hospital day, followed by oral prednisolone acetate (60 mg). His neurologic symptoms improved steadily, and the oral prednisolone was slowly tapered over 4 weeks.

Figure 1. 
Representation of the dynamic signal changes of cerebral cavernous malformations (A-C, first event, initial magnetic resonance imaging; D-F, 6 months after the initial magnetic resonance imaging): Type III lesion (A) in the left anterior cerebellum changed to type I (D), and type I lesion (B) in the right frontal cortex changed to type III (E, arrow indicates the lesion studied by biopsy). Type II lesion (F) in the right pons had newly developed.

Representation of the dynamic signal changes of cerebral cavernous malformations (A-C, first event, initial magnetic resonance imaging; D-F, 6 months after the initial magnetic resonance imaging): Type III lesion (A) in the left anterior cerebellum changed to type I (D), and type I lesion (B) in the right frontal cortex changed to type III (E, arrow indicates the lesion studied by biopsy). Type II lesion (F) in the right pons had newly developed.

Figure 2. 
Representative de novo formations of cerebral cavernous malformations. A and D are images obtained at the time of the first event. Similar images were obtained 6 months (B and E) and 7 months (C and F) after the initial imaging.

Representative de novo formations of cerebral cavernous malformations. A and D are images obtained at the time of the first event. Similar images were obtained 6 months (B and E) and 7 months (C and F) after the initial imaging.

On the 50th hospital day, to clarify the cause of the highly dynamic, cerebral lesions, brain biopsy was performed stereotactically on the right frontal lesion. The patient was discharged in a much improved state on the 60th hospital day. One month after discharge, a follow-up brain MR image showed no signal changes or de novo formations. He remained free of recurrence of the disease during a 7-month follow-up period.

Methods

Mr imaging data acquisition and analysis

We performed MR imaging studies on a 1.5-T MR unit (Signa Horizon, Echospeed; General Electric Medical Systems, Waukesha, Wis) with echoplanar imaging, as described in previous studies from our group.12,13 The standardized MR imaging protocol consisted of fast spin-echo, T2-weighted images (repetition time/echo time, 4200/112 milliseconds; field of view, 21 × 21 cm; matrix, 256 × 192; and slice thickness, 5 mm with 1.5-mm gap) and T2*-weighted gradient-echo sequences (repetition time/echo time, 200-500/15 milliseconds; flip angle, 20°; number of excitations, 2; slice thickness, 1.4 mm; and gap width, 0.7 mm).

The lesions were classified as previously described14: type I: a high-signal core on T1-weighted images and a high- or low-signal core with a low-signal rim on T2-weighted images; type II: a reticular mixed-signal core on T1- and T2-weighted images and a low-signal rim on T2-weighted images; type III: homogeneously isointense or low-signal area on T1- and T2-weighted images; and type IV: seen poorly or not at all on spin-echo images and focally with a decreased signal on gradient-echo images. In the present study, we analyzed the dynamic changes of the different signal lesions and de novo CCM formation on serial brain MR images.

Histologic processing of the biopsy tissue

Tissue specimens were fixed in 4% formalin and embedded in paraffin blocks. Sequential 6-µm sections cut from paraffin blocks were deparaffinized in xylene, rehydrated, and prepared for routine histologic examination (hematoxylin-eosin staining), immunohistochemical studies for VEGF, and Congo red staining. After being rinsed in phosphate-buffered saline, the tissue on the slide was heated in 50mM L-glycine–hydrochloric acid buffer (pH 3.5) containing 0.01% wt/vol EDTA at 95°C for 5 minutes, as a pretreatment for VEGF. The specimen then was incubated with a 1:800 dilution of primary rabbit anti–VEGF polyclonal antibody (NeoMarkers; Lab Vision Corporation, Fremont, Calif) for 48 hours at 4°C. After washing with 0.5M Tris-buffered saline, the section was incubated with a 1:200 dilution of the secondary antibody, Cy3-conjugated goat anti–rabbit IgG (Jackson ImmunoResearch Laboratories, Inc, West Grove, Pa). Immunofluorescent labeling was analyzed with a laser confocal scanning microscope (Nikon PCM-2000; Nikon Inc, Melville, NY). Alternating sections were stained in a similar way but without primary antibody. Immunoreactivity to VEGF was not detected in these sections. Congo red staining was analyzed by means of a polarizing microscope.

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay

To determine VEGF concentrations in serum, we used a commercially available sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit, with elevated levels defined as greater than 55 pg/mg on the basis of normal population results (Quantikine Kit; R&D Systems Inc, Minneapolis, Minn). Among the isomers of VEGF, VEGF164 was selected because it is the main isomer expressed in cerebrovascular disorders.15-18 Ratios of VEGF protein to total protein concentration were calculated and expressed as picograms per milligram of total protein. Intra-assay and interassay variations were within the range provided by the manufacturer. The VEGF concentration in serum was determined repeatedly during the clinical deterioration and regression, ie, at onset (current admission), during the deterioration period, at steady state, and during improvement. The VEGF levels were also compared with those of age-matched, healthy controls (n = 20) and subjects with hypertensive pontine ICH (n = 8, 3 days after onset).

Results

Mr imaging analysis

By MR imaging analysis, the initial MR images at the first admission showed 13 lesions of various types (1 lesion of type I, 7 of type III, and 5 of type IV). Six months after the first admission, these lesions had changed dramatically and the total number of lesions had increased to 25. These newly developed lesions were composed of 2 of type II, 4 of type III, and 6 lesions of type IV. Seven months after the initial MR imaging, with clinical deterioration, the lesion number increased to 28 and all the newly developed lesions were of type IV. After prednisolone treatment (9 months after the initial MR imaging), no new lesion was detected and further morphologic changes were not observed. The timetable for these events is illustrated in Figure 3.

Figure 3. 
Timetable representing dynamic signal changes in serial follow-up magnetic resonance (MR) imaging (A) and changes in vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) concentration in serum (B) over 9 months (0 month, first event; 6 months, second event or current admission; 7 months, progression; 8 months, steady period; 9 months, improvement period).

Timetable representing dynamic signal changes in serial follow-up magnetic resonance (MR) imaging (A) and changes in vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) concentration in serum (B) over 9 months (0 month, first event; 6 months, second event or current admission; 7 months, progression; 8 months, steady period; 9 months, improvement period).

Pathological study

A biopsy was performed of the type III lesion in the right frontal area on the 50th hospital day (Figure 1E). On pathological examination, closely apposed dilated vascular channels with fibrotic walls were observed and little or no intervening brain parenchyma was seen. Some hemosiderin deposits were observed in the surrounding brain tissue (Figure 4A). The capillarylike vessel walls were lined by a single layer of endothelium and collagenous adventitia (Figure 4B). Routine pathological examination demonstrated the typical findings of CCMs. Immunohistochemical study showed significantly increased VEGF expression in the lesion (Figure 4C), in contrast to the rare expression in normal brain tissue (data not shown). There were no amorphous materials, which give apple-green birefringence on polarizing microscopy (data not shown).

Figure 4. 
A and B, A 1-cm lesion in the frontal lobe of a 40-year-old man, compatible with cerebral cavernous malformation, composed of thin-walled dilated vascular channels with fibrotic walls and with little or no intervening brain parenchyma (hematoxylin-eosin, original magnification ×40 [A]; ×200 [B]). C, Results of immunofluorescence labeling for vascular endothelial growth factor in the same section.

A and B, A 1-cm lesion in the frontal lobe of a 40-year-old man, compatible with cerebral cavernous malformation, composed of thin-walled dilated vascular channels with fibrotic walls and with little or no intervening brain parenchyma (hematoxylin-eosin, original magnification ×40 [A]; ×200 [B]). C, Results of immunofluorescence labeling for vascular endothelial growth factor in the same section.

Measurement of serum vegf levels

The VEGF concentration in serum was increased from 228.6 pg/mg (at admission) to 419.4 pg/mg (at 4 weeks) during the dynamic period (healthy control group [n = 20], 59.3 pg/mg; subjects with hypertensive pontine ICH, 3 days after onset [n = 8], 78.4 pg/mg). Despite this dramatic increase in the VEGF concentration, serum VEGF levels during the steady and improving phases became almost normal (8 weeks, 54.2 pg/mg; 12 weeks, 71.8 pg/mg). The timetable for these results is also illustrated in Figure 3.

Comment

Our patient had recurrent strokelike episodes and intermittent headaches without a relevant family history, and the diagnosis of CCMs in this patient was pathologically confirmed. Remarkably, serial examinations of brain MR images showed very dynamic changes in the signal intensities of multiple lesions, and 15 de novo lesions developed during 7 months. An immunohistochemical study showed significantly increased VEGF expression in the type III lesion studied by biopsy. The progression of CCMs on brain MR imaging correlated well with higher VEGF levels. Of note, elevated VEGF levels and disease progression were altered by the administration of prednisolone.

Clinical presentation of CCMs is characterized by ICH, seizures, and focal neurologic deficits, including nonspecific symptoms such as headache, vertigo, and tinnitus, but most of the lesions remain asymptomatic.19,20 The CCMs range in size from grossly invisible to the involvement of a large part of an entire hemisphere, and they may be single or multiple lesions and sporadic or familial.21 Traditionally, CCMs have been presumed to be congenital lesions that arise during the early embryonic stage, and that grow according to malformative mechanisms and blood-flow changes.22 More recently, however, dynamic activities including enlargement, regression, and de novo formation have been described in both the familial and sporadic forms of CCM (Table 1).1,14,23-31 The possibility that the number of lesions might increase with age has been also documented.20,32 Reportedly, the annual risk of hemorrhage in sporadic or familial CCMs has been estimated at 0.25% to 13% per patient-year, and de novo formations appear with an incidence of 0.2 to 0.4 lesion per year. Moreover, it might be expected that the rates of hemorrhage and of de novo formation of CCMs in the actual population lie between the lowest retrospective rates and the highest prospective rates. However, the CCMs in our patient showed dynamic features well beyond this type of estimation (Table 1).

Literature Review and Current Study on the Hemorrhage Rates and De Novo Formation of Cerebral Cavernous Malformations24,22,14,26-28,30,1,31
Literature Review and Current Study on the Hemorrhage Rates and De Novo Formation of Cerebral Cavernous Malformations

The underlying mechanisms inherent to the genesis and maintenance of these abnormal vascular phenotypes are not well understood. Although the appearance of new lesions can represent initial hemorrhage into an already existent but undetected lesion, another possible explanation is that a second hit in an area of genetically predisposed vasculature gives rise to the development of hemorrhages and the typical appearance of CCMs.25 Radiotherapy and dural sinus obstruction were found to be the predisposing factors for new lesions.7,10 The hypothesis that a neoplasticlike process might be involved in the genesis of new lesions was also supported by some reports of new lesions occurring under hormonal influence during pregnancy7 and the apparent seeding of a lesion along a biopsy track.33 Recent studies have clarified that 2 main angiogenic factors, ie, VEGFs and their endothelial cell–specific protein tyrosine kinase receptors, mediate various facets of blood vessel formation during vasculogenesis.17,34 The VEGFs and their receptors are usually down-regulated after birth, except under some physiologic or pathologic conditions.11 Some immunohistochemical studies have focused on the proliferation of cavernomas and the expression of angiogenic growth factors.35-37 The expression of proliferating cell nuclear antigen was detected in the endothelium of cavernomas, indicating growth potential in these lesions35; the expression of VEGF was diffusely increased, and this correlated with the recurrence of cerebrovascular malformations.11,36

In the present study, the expression of VEGF was much increased in type III lesions, without apparent recent hemorrhage, and serum VEGF level was higher than those of normal controls and subjects with hypertensive pontine ICH. Furthermore, VEGF level correlated well with the patterns of CCMs on brain MR images. Although it is not clear whether the expression of VEGF occurs as a result of a nonspecific pathologic response to intracranial hemorrhage or ischemia in various lesions, or whether it occurs in only truly proliferative lesions, our report demonstrates that CCMs can be progressive and highly dynamic because of the presence of as yet undetermined mediating factors, and VEGF may be one of these factors. Further research should assess serial serum VEGF levels in healthy control subjects, subjects with ICH of various causes, and subjects with ICH related to CCMs.

The clinical features, MR imaging patterns, and VEGF levels in our patient were stabilized by glucocorticoid treatment. Glucocorticoids have been found to have suppressive effects on the expression of VEGF or transforming growth factor.37,38 We assume that glucocorticoids might influence the behavior of CCMs through the down-regulation of VEGF. Surgical intervention is not practical in cases of familial CCMs with multiple lesions. Further research should lead to a greater understanding of the molecular mechanisms mediating abnormal vasculogenesis in CCMs, and such understanding might lead to novel strategies for the therapeutic alteration of CCMs.

Cerebral cavernous malformations can show a highly dynamic course, and their biological activities are likely to be correlated with VEGF. We speculate that endothelial proliferation induced by VEGF is an important element in the underlying developmental and pathogenetic mechanisms of CCMs.

Back to top
Article Information

Corresponding author and reprints: Byung-Woo Yoon, MD, PhD, Department of Neurology, Seoul National University Hospital, 28, Yongon-Dong, Chongro-Gu, 110-744, Seoul, South Korea (e-mail: bwyoon@snu.ac.kr).

Accepted for publication May 27, 2003.

Author contributions: Study concept and design (Drs Jung, Chu, Jeong, Bae, and Yoon); acquisition of data (Drs Jung, Park, and Yoon); analysis and interpretation of data (Drs Jung, Chu, and Yoon); drafting of the manuscript (Drs Jung, Jeong, and Park); critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content (Drs Jung, Chu, Jeong, Bae, and Yoon); statistical expertise (Drs Jung and Chu); study supervision (Dr Yoon).

Drs Jung and Chu contributed equally to this study.

References
1.
Labauge  PBrunereau  LLevy  CLaberge  SHoutteville  JP The natural history of familial cerebral cavernomas: a retrospective MRI study of 40 patients.  Neuroradiology.2000;42:327-332.PubMedGoogle Scholar
2.
Meixensberger  JHofmann  ERoosen  K Cerebral cavernomas: clinical aspects and therapy.  Wien Med Wochenschr.1997;147:194-198.PubMedGoogle Scholar
3.
Rigamonti  DHadley  MNDrayer  BP  et al Cerebral cavernous malformations: incidence and familial occurrence.  N Engl J Med.1988;319:343-347.PubMedGoogle Scholar
4.
Bertalanffy  HGilsbach  JMEggert  HRSeeger  W Microsurgery of deep-seated cavernous angiomas: report of 26 cases.  Acta Neurochir (Wien).1991;108:91-99.PubMedGoogle Scholar
5.
Siegel  AM Familial cavernous angioma: an unknown, known disease.  Acta Neurol Scand.1998;98:369-371.PubMedGoogle Scholar
6.
Spetzler  RFWilson  CB Enlargement of an arteriovenous malformation documented by angiography: case report.  J Neurosurg.1975;43:767-769.PubMedGoogle Scholar
7.
Pozzati  EAcciarri  NTognetti  FMarliani  FGiangaspero  F Growth, subsequent bleeding, and de novo appearance of cerebral cavernous angiomas.  Neurosurgery.1996;38:662-670.PubMedGoogle Scholar
8.
Houtteville  JP Brain cavernoma: a dynamic lesion.  Surg Neurol.1997;48:610-614.PubMedGoogle Scholar
9.
Detweiler  PWPorter  RWZabramski  JMSpetzler  RF De novo formation of a central nervous system cavernous malformation: implications for predicting risk of hemorrhage: case report and review of the literature.  J Neurosurg.1997;87:629-632.PubMedGoogle Scholar
10.
Challa  VRMoody  DMBrown  WR Vascular malformations of the central nervous system.  J Neuropathol Exp Neurol.1995;54:609-621.PubMedGoogle Scholar
11.
Uranishi  RBaev  NINg  PYKim  JHAwad  IA Expression of endothelial cell angiogenesis receptors in human cerebrovascular malformations.  Neurosurgery.2001;48:359-368.PubMedGoogle Scholar
12.
Kim  DEBae  HJLee  SHKim  HYoon  BWRoh  JK Gradient echo magnetic resonance imaging in the prediction of hemorrhagic vs ischemic stroke.  Arch Neurol.2002;59:425-429.PubMedGoogle Scholar
13.
Chu  KKang  DWKim  DEPark  SHRoh  JK Diffusion-weighted and gradient-echo MR findings of hemichorea-hemiballism associated with nonketotic hyperglycemia: a hyperviscosity syndrome?  Arch Neurol.2002;59:448-452.PubMedGoogle Scholar
14.
Zambramski  JMWascher  TMSpetzler  RF  et al The natural history of familial cavernous malformations: results of an ongoing study.  J Neurosurg.1994;80:422-432.PubMedGoogle Scholar
15.
Ferrara  N Role of vascular endothelial growth factor in the regulation of angiogenesis.  Kidney Int.1999;56:794-814.PubMedGoogle Scholar
16.
Zhang  ZGZhang  LJiang  Q  et al VEGF enhances angiogenesis and promotes blood-brain barrier leakage in the ischemic brain.  J Clin Invest.2000;106:829-838.PubMedGoogle Scholar
17.
Marti  HHRisau  W Systemic hypoxia changes the organ-specific distribution of vascular endothelial growth factor and its receptors.  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A.1998;95:15809-15814.PubMedGoogle Scholar
18.
Marti  HHBernaudin  MBellail  A  et al Hypoxia-induced vascular endothelial growth factor: expression precedes neovascularization after cerebral ischemia.  Am J Pathol.2000;156:965-976.PubMedGoogle Scholar
19.
Russell  DSRubenstein  LJ Pathology of Tumors of the Nervous System. 5th ed. Baltimore, Md: Williams & Wilkins; 1989:730-736.
20.
Kattapong  VJHart  BLDavis  LE Familial cerebral cavernous angiomas: clinical and radiologic studies.  Neurology.1995;45:492-497.PubMedGoogle Scholar
21.
Labauge  OEnjolras  OBonerandi  JJ  et al An association between autosomal dominant cerebral cavernomas and a distinctive hyperkeratotic cutaneous vascular malformation in 4 families.  Ann Neurol.1999;45:250-254.PubMedGoogle Scholar
22.
Robinson  JRAwad  IALittle  JR Natural history of the cavernous angioma.  J Neurosurg.1991;75:709-714.PubMedGoogle Scholar
23.
Sure  UButz  NSchlegel  J  et al Endothelial proliferation, neoangiogenesis, and potential de novo generation of cerebrovascular malformations.  J Neurosurg.2001;94:972-977.PubMedGoogle Scholar
24.
Del Curling Jr  OKelly Jr  DLElster  ADCraven  TE An analysis of the natural history of cavernous angiomas.  J Neurosurg.1991;75:702-708.PubMedGoogle Scholar
25.
Clatterbuck  REMoriarty  JLElmaci  ILee  RRBreiter  SNRigamonti  D Dynamic nature of cavernous malformations: a prospective magnetic resonance imaging study with volumetric analysis.  J Neurosurg.2000;93:981-986.PubMedGoogle Scholar
26.
Aiba  TTanaka  RKoike  TKameyama  STakeda  NKomata  T Natural history of intracranial cavernous malformations.  J Neurosurg.1995;83:56-59.PubMedGoogle Scholar
27.
Kondziolka  DLunsford  LDKestle  JRW The natural history of cerebral cavernous malformations.  J Neurosurg.1995;83:820-824.PubMedGoogle Scholar
28.
Kim  DSPark  YGChoi  JUChung  SSLee  KC An analysis of the natural history of cavernous malformations.  Surg Neurol.1997;48:9-17.PubMedGoogle Scholar
29.
Moriarty  JLClatterbuck  RERigamonti  D The natural history of cavernous malformations.  Neurosurg Clin N Am.1999;10:411-417.PubMedGoogle Scholar
30.
Porter  PJWillinsky  RAHarper  WWallace  MC Cerebral cavernous malformations: natural history and prognosis after clinical deterioration with or without hemorrhage.  J Neurosurg.1997;87:190-197.PubMedGoogle Scholar
31.
Labauge  PBrunereau  LLaberge  SHoutteville  JP Prospective follow-up of 33 asymptomatic patients with familial cerebral cavernous malformations.  Neurology.2001;57:1825-1828.PubMedGoogle Scholar
32.
Mason  IAase  JMOrrison  WWWicks  JDSeigel  RSBicknell  JM Familial cavernous angiomas of the brain in a Hispanic family.  Neurology.1988;38:324-326.PubMedGoogle Scholar
33.
Ogilvy  CSMoayeri  NGolden  JA Appearance of a cavernous hemangioma in the cerebral cortex after a biopsy of a deeper lesion.  Neurosurgery.1993;33:307-309.PubMedGoogle Scholar
34.
Monacci  WTMerrill  MJOldfield  EH Expression of vascular permeability factor/vascular endothelial growth factor in normal rat tissues.  Am J Physiol.1993;264(4, pt 1):C995-C1002.PubMedGoogle Scholar
35.
Notelet  LHouttenille  JPKhoury  SLechevalier  BChapon  F Proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) in cerebral cavernomas: an immunocytochemical study of 42 cases.  Surg Neurol.1997;47:364-370.PubMedGoogle Scholar
36.
Sonstein  WJKader  AMichelsen  WJLlena  JFHirano  ACasper  D Expression of vascular endothelial growth factor in pediatric and adult cerebral arteriovenous malformations: an immunocytochemical study.  J Neurosurg.1996;85:838-845.PubMedGoogle Scholar
37.
Machein  MRKullmer  JRonicke  V  et al Differential downregulation of vascular endothelial growth factor by dexamethasone in normoxic and hypoxic fat glioma cells.  Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol.1999;25:104-112.PubMedGoogle Scholar
38.
Nauck  MDarakiulakis  GPerruchoud  APPapakonstantinou  ERoth  M Corticosteroids inhibit the expression of the vascular endothelial growth factor gene in human vascular smooth muscle cells.  Eur J Pharmacol.1998;341:309-315.PubMedGoogle Scholar
×