[Skip to Navigation]
Sign In
Observation
October 2005

Impairment of Trk-Neurotrophin Receptor by the Serum of a Patient With Subacute Sensory Neuropathy

Author Affiliations

Author Affiliations: Department of Neurology, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, Aichi, Japan.

Arch Neurol. 2005;62(10):1612-1615. doi:10.1001/archneur.62.10.1612
Abstract

Background  Paraneoplastic peripheral neuropathy is sometimes associated with unidentified neuronal autoantibodies.

Objective  To examine the effects of serum from a patient with subacute sensory axonopathy on the function of the Trk high-affinity nerve growth factor receptor.

Patient  An 86-year-old man with sensory neuropathy exhibiting an autoantibody to Trk.

Methods  Immunoblot analyses of the brain homogenates and immunoprecipitation were performed with human sera. We further examined the effect of sera on nerve growth factor–induced neurite outgrowth and Trk autophosphorylation.

Results  The patient showed sensory nerve axonopathy without well-known paraneoplastic autoantibodies. His serum inhibited nerve growth factor–induced neurite outgrowth and Trk autophosphorylation in PCtrk cells. Moreover, the patient’s serum, but not control serum, immunoprecipitated Trk and recognized Trk in brain homogenates as well as in Trk immunoprecipitates.

Conclusion  These data strongly suggest that an anti-Trk autoantibody might cause subacute sensory neuropathy.

Trk is a high-affinity nerve growth factor (NGF) receptor, 1 of the cardinal growth factors of the neurotrophin family that support neuronal survival and differentiation.1 Following ligand binding, the Trk receptor is activated by homodimerization.2 The degree of tyrosine autophosphorylation correlates well with the biological effects in responsive cells.2

Paraneoplastic neurological syndromes include a wide variety of disorders that affect the central and peripheral nervous systems. They appear to have an autoimmune pathogenesis, as suggested by the presence of autoantibodies directed against antigens shared by both neurons and cancers.3,4 To date, a role for paraneoplastic autoantibodies in the development of neuronal dysfunction has not been established in the majority of cases. The involvement of antigen-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes has been discussed,5 but further investigation is still required to identify the mechanisms of cytotoxic T-lymphocyte–induced neuronal dysfunction.

We now describe an anti-Trk autoantibody that was found in a male patient with sensory neuropathy. His serum provoked functional disturbances of NGF-dependent molecular events in PCtrk cells. This sheds light on the possibility of anti-Trk autoantibody-positive sensory neuropathy.

Methods

Patient

An 86-year-old man complained of numbness and burning pain in the extremities. He had a history of non-Hodgkin lymphoma on the stomach 5 years previously, and he had been in complete remission since. Five months before admission, he developed sensory disturbance in the lower limbs. On admission, neurological examination revealed nonspecific findings aside from the decreased deep tendon reflexes and sensory disturbances. Nerve conduction examination revealed sensory nerve axonopathy (Table). He had coarse and dry skin as well as bladder dysfunction. Cerebrospinal fluid examination revealed an increased protein content (60 mg/dL whereas the normal level is <40 mg/dL) without pleocytosis. Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain revealed minimal lacunar infarctions. Results were normal in extensive hematological evaluations and negative in bone scintigraphy, positron emission tomography with [18F]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose, and gastrointestinal fiberscopic examinations. Examination results of complete blood cell count, coagulation profiles, C-reactive protein, antinuclear antibodies, antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies, rheumatoid factor, complement levels for C3 and C4, serum protein electrophoresis, cryoglobulins, quantitative serum immunoglobulins, vitamins B1, B2, and B12, and folic acid were all normal without anti-Hu and anti-Yo antibodies. The patient was given a large dose of intravenous human immunoglobulin, with an improvement of sensory symptoms and skin manifestations after treatment, and some improvement in sensory nerve action potential (Table).

Table. Nerve Conduction Examination of Patient
Nerve Conduction Examination of Patient

Cell culture and immunoprecipitation

Rat pheochromocytoma-derived PC12 cells and their stable transfectants of human trk complimentary DNA (PCtrk cells) were cultured as described.6,7 Trk was immunoprecipitated with an anti-Trk antibody (α-Trk; Santa Cruz Biotech Inc, Santa Cruz, Calif).6,7 To test whether sera can immunoprecipitate Trk, the sera were used for immunoprecipitation as the first antibody with recovery by L-agarose protein. To examine the effect of sera on NGF-induced morphological differentiation, PCtrk cells were cultured in 24-well dishes with serum-free Dulbecco modified Eagle medium (Nissui Pharmaceutical Co Ltd, Tokyo, Japan).6 Photographs of each representative area were taken.6,7

Effect of the patient’s serum on ngf-induced trk autophosphorylation

Cells were preincubated with serum-free medium containing human sera (0.2% final concentration) for 1 hour at 37°C, and they were stimulated with 50 ng/mL of NGF for 5 minutes. After stimulation, the cells were collected with chilled phosphate-buffered saline and lysed with lysis buffer.6,7 The cell-free lysates were normalized for protein (1 mg/mL) and immunoprecipitated with α-Trk.6,7 The Trk immunoprecipitates were subjected to electrophoresis on sodium dodecyl sulfate–10% acrylamide gels, which was followed by blotting on polyvinylidene difluoride membranes. Tyrosine phosphorylation of Trk was detected with an antiphosphotyrosine antibody (α-PY; Upstate Biotechnology Inc, Waltham, Mass).6,7

Western blot analysis

Human brain samples obtained at autopsy by informed consent were suspended in 25 mM Tris-HCl buffer (pH 7.4) containing 100 mM ethyleneglycoltetracetic acid, 1 mg/mL of leupeptin, and 1 mM phenylmethylsulfonyl fluoride, and then homogenized with a blender (Waring, Torrington, Conn). Equal amounts of protein determined by the method by Bradford8 were subjected to sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis followed by immunoblot analysis, and they were probed with diluted serum (0.1% final concentration) in blocking buffer containing 0.1% Nonidet P-40 (Nakatarai Teque Inc, Kyoto, Japan) and 1% nonfat milk with appropriate secondary antibody. The positive bands were detected with chemiluminescence (PerkinElmer Inc, Boston, Mass).6,7

Results

Biological effects of the patient’s serum on the trk-mediated signaling cascade in pctrk cells

Nerve growth factor clearly induced morphological differentiation in the presence or absence of control sera within 2 days, whereas the patient’s serum inhibited NGF-induced neurite outgrowth (Figure 1B). We examined the effect of the patient’s serum on NGF-induced Trk autophosphorylation and found that the patient’s serum inhibited NGF-induced Trk autophosphorylation (Figure 1E, compare lanes 2, 3, and 4).

Figure 1. 
Biological effects of the patient’s serum on the Trk-mediated signaling cascade in PCtrk cells. PCtrk cells were cultured on coverslips with the presence of 50 ng/mL of nerve growth factor for 2 days (A), with the presence of 50 ng/mL of nerve growth factor for 2 days in conjunction with the patient’s serum (B), with the presence of 50 ng/mL of nerve growth factor for 2 days in conjunction with control sera (n = 6) (C), and in the absence of nerve growth factor (D). E, Untreated cells appear in lane 1; after pretreatment of the cells with the patient’s serum at the final dilution of 500 times (lane 2) and 1000 times (lane 3) and with controls (n = 6) (lane 4) for 1 hour, cells were stimulated with 50 ng/mL of nerve growth factor (lanes 2-5) and 75 ng/mL of nerve growth factor (lane 6) for 5 minutes. Trk immunoprecipitates were immunoblotted with antiphosphotyrosine antibody (upper panel) and anti-Trk antibody (lower panel). These were performed at least 3 times for the patient, and 6 different control serum samples showed identical results. Arrows indicate position of the Trk protein.

Biological effects of the patient’s serum on the Trk-mediated signaling cascade in PCtrk cells. PCtrk cells were cultured on coverslips with the presence of 50 ng/mL of nerve growth factor for 2 days (A), with the presence of 50 ng/mL of nerve growth factor for 2 days in conjunction with the patient’s serum (B), with the presence of 50 ng/mL of nerve growth factor for 2 days in conjunction with control sera (n = 6) (C), and in the absence of nerve growth factor (D). E, Untreated cells appear in lane 1; after pretreatment of the cells with the patient’s serum at the final dilution of 500 times (lane 2) and 1000 times (lane 3) and with controls (n = 6) (lane 4) for 1 hour, cells were stimulated with 50 ng/mL of nerve growth factor (lanes 2-5) and 75 ng/mL of nerve growth factor (lane 6) for 5 minutes. Trk immunoprecipitates were immunoblotted with antiphosphotyrosine antibody (upper panel) and anti-Trk antibody (lower panel). These were performed at least 3 times for the patient, and 6 different control serum samples showed identical results. Arrows indicate position of the Trk protein.

Immunoblot analysis

Although there was some nonspecific reaction between the proteins, a specific 140-kilodalton band against brain homogenates was only present when probed with the patient’s serum (compare lanes 2 and 3 of Figure 2A with lanes 2 and 3 of Figure 2B). Taken together, we hypothesized that this band corresponds to Trk. To test this hypothesis, Trk was immunoprecipitated with α-Trk and subjected to immunoblot using the patient’s serum. The patient’s serum clearly detected the presence of Trk (Figure 3A, lane 2), and no reaction was observed with control sera (Figure 3A, lane 1). Then, we performed an immunoprecipitation using the patient’s serum, and we followed this with an immunoblot analysis with α-Trk. The serum from the patient clearly immunoprecipitated Trk (Figure 3B, lanes 1 and 2) whereas all of the control sera failed to recognize Trk (Figure 3B, lane 3). Moreover, the serum taken after the treatment with intravenous immunoglobulin immunoprecipitated much less protein than did the serum taken before the treatment (compare lanes 1 and 2 of Figure 3B). The patient’s serum did not recognize TrkB or TrkC prepared from NIH3T3 cells expressing trkB or trkC complimentary DNA (data not shown).

Figure 2. 
Immunoblot analysis. Human brain homogenates were prepared and immunoblotted with serum samples from the present patient (A) and with normal control serum samples (n = 6) (B). 1 indicates frontal lobe; 2, root; 3, basal ganglia; 4, spleen; arrowhead, position of Trk; horizontal lines, positions of molecular weight markers; and asterisks, position of 140-kDa specific band. These immunoblot analyses were performed at least 3 times for the patient, and 6 different controls showed identical results.

Immunoblot analysis. Human brain homogenates were prepared and immunoblotted with serum samples from the present patient (A) and with normal control serum samples (n = 6) (B). 1 indicates frontal lobe; 2, root; 3, basal ganglia; 4, spleen; arrowhead, position of Trk; horizontal lines, positions of molecular weight markers; and asterisks, position of 140-kDa specific band. These immunoblot analyses were performed at least 3 times for the patient, and 6 different controls showed identical results.

Figure 3. 
The patient’s serum recognizes Trk. A, Trk immunoprecipitates were subjected to the immunoblot analysis with serum samples from normal controls (n = 6) (lane 1) and the patient’s serum (lane 2). B, Trk was immunoprecipitated with serum samples from the present patient before treatment (lane 1) and after treatment (lane 2), with normal controls (n = 6) (lane 3), and with anti-Trk antibody (lane 4), and it was subjected to probing with anti-Trk antibody. Arrowhead indicates position of Trk; and horizontal lines, positions of molecular weight markers.

The patient’s serum recognizes Trk. A, Trk immunoprecipitates were subjected to the immunoblot analysis with serum samples from normal controls (n = 6) (lane 1) and the patient’s serum (lane 2). B, Trk was immunoprecipitated with serum samples from the present patient before treatment (lane 1) and after treatment (lane 2), with normal controls (n = 6) (lane 3), and with anti-Trk antibody (lane 4), and it was subjected to probing with anti-Trk antibody. Arrowhead indicates position of Trk; and horizontal lines, positions of molecular weight markers.

Comment

Survival and differentiation of the sensory neurons of the dorsal root ganglia are dependent on the neurotrophin receptor–mediated signaling cascade.9 Pain and temperature afferents depend on NGF.10 Therefore, loss of inputs from or inhibition of the neurotrophin-dependent signaling pathway might result in a significant functional disturbance in sensory neurons. In fact, mutation of the trk protooncogene causes congenital insensitivity to the pain and anhidrosis that is characterized by severe autonomic and peripheral nervous system dysfunction,11 suggesting the importance of Trk-mediated intracellular signaling in the maintenance of the autonomic and peripheral nervous systems. The present patient showed sensory axonopathy with autonomic dysfunction. These clinical pictures seem to fit the spectrum of Trk-dependent neuronal systems well.

The patient’s serum can provoke the functional disturbance of the Trk-mediated signaling cascade in PCtrk cells. Moreover, it can recognize Trk whereas the patient’s serum that was precleared with L-agarose protein (data not shown) cannot, suggesting the presence of an autoantibody to Trk. Therefore, it seems reasonable to assume that this autoantibody might cause the development of sensory axonal neuropathy. This assumption was supported by the fact that intravenous immunoglobulin treatment resulted in clinical and neurophysiologic improvement and, concomitantly, a marked reduction of his serum in the capacity of immunoprecipitating Trk, although it is not clear why he developed an abnormal production of an autoantibody to Trk.

Thus, although this article deals with a single case, the results of the present patient strongly suggest the presence of a new type of sensory neuropathy associated with an anti-Trk autoantibody.

Back to top
Article Information

Correspondence: Tatsuro Mutoh, MD, PhD, Department of Neurology, Fujita Health University School of Medicine, 1-98 Dengakugakubo, Kutsukake-cho, Toyoake, Aichi 470-1192, Japan (tmutoh@fujita-hu.ac.jp).

Accepted for Publication: November 17, 2004.

Author Contributions:Study concept and design: Mutoh. Acquisition of data: Mutoh. Analysis and interpretation of data: Mutoh, Tachi, Yano, Mihara, and Yamamoto. Drafting of the manuscript: Mutoh. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Mutoh, Tachi, Yano, Mihara, and Yamamoto. Administrative, technical, and material support: Tachi, Yano, Mihara, and Yamamoto.

Funding/Support: This work was partly supported by grants-in-aid for the Center of Excellence program, 17046021 for the Scientific Research on Priority Area (functional glycomics), and High-Tech Research Center from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology of Japan, Tokyo (Dr Mutoh).

References
1.
Levi-Montalcini  R The nerve growth factor 35 years later.  Science 1987;2371154- 1162PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
2.
Kaplan  DRMartin-Zanca  DParada  LF Tyrosine phosphorylation and tyrosine kinase activity of the trk proto-oncogene product induced by NGF.  Nature 1991;350158- 160PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
3.
Sillevis Smitt  PAEManley  GTPosner  JB Immunization with the paraneoplastic encephalomyelitis antigen HuD does not cause neurologic disease in mice.  Neurology 1995;451873- 1878PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
4.
Hammack  JKotanides  HRosenblum  MKPosner  JB Paraneoplastic cerebellar degeneration, II: clinical and immunologic findings in 21 patients with Hodgkin’s disease.  Neurology 1992;421938- 1943PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
5.
Albert  MLDarnell  JCBender  AFrancisco  LMBhardwaj  NDarnell  RB Tumor-specific killer cells in paraneoplastic cerebellar degeneration.  Nat Med 1998;41321- 1324PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
6.
Mutoh  TTokuda  AMiyadai  THamaguchi  MFujiki  N Ganglioside GM1 binds to the Trk protein and regulates receptor function.  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1995;925087- 5091PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
7.
Mutoh  TTokuda  AHamano  TKuriyama  M Unglycosylated Trk protein does not co-localize nor associate with ganglioside GM1 in a stable clone of PC12 cells overexpressing Trk (PCtrk cells).  Glycoconj J 2000;17233- 237PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
8.
Bradford  MM A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding.  Anal Biochem 1976;72248- 254PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
9.
Lindsay  R Role of neurotrophins and trk receptors in the development and maintenance of sensory neurons: an overview.  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 1996;351365- 373PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
10.
Pinon  LGPMinichiello  LKlein  RDavies  AM Timing of neuronal death in trkA, trkB and trkC mutant embryos reveals developmental changes in sensory neuron dependence on Trk signaling.  Development 1996;1223255- 3261PubMedGoogle Scholar
11.
Indo  YTsuruta  MHashida  Y  et al.  Mutations in the TrkA/NGF receptor gene in patients with congenital insensitivity to pain with anhidrosis.  Nat Genet 1996;13485- 488PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
×