Background
Interleukin (IL) 23, a newly identified heterodimeric proinflammatory cytokine and a novel IL-12 family member comprising the p40 subunit of IL-12 but a different p19 subunit, has been reported to preferentially act on memory T cells and play an important role during cellular immune responses. Recent evidence suggests that IL-23 rather than IL-12 is critically involved in the pathogenesis of various immune-mediated disorders.
Objective
To determine the role of IL-23p19 during the course of acute immune-mediated demyelinating diseases of the peripheral nervous system.
Design
The sequential RNA expression of IL-23p19 in sciatic nerves from rats with experimental autoimmune neuritis, an animal model of the human Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), was analyzed by semiquantitative reverse transcriptase–polymerase chain reaction. Expression and distribution patterns of IL-23p19 protein were studied in sural nerve biopsies and cerebrospinal fluid samples from 5 patients with classical Guillain-Barré syndrome and 5 controls with noninflammatory neuropathies using immunohistochemistry and immunoblotting, respectively.
Results
We found IL-23p19 RNA to be up-regulated prior to the onset of first clinical symptoms with peak expression levels preceding maximum disease severity during experimental autoimmune neuritis. In patients, IL-23p19 protein was detectable in cerebrospinal fluid samples from patients with Guillain-Barré syndrome, and endoneurial macrophages were identified as the cellular source of IL-23p19 in sural nerve biopsies.
Conclusion
Our present data indicate that IL-23 may play an important role during the early effector phase in immune-mediated demyelination of the peripheral nerve.
Interleukin (IL) 12 is a heterodimeric proinflammatory cytokine that is produced by activated antigen-presenting cells, such as monocytes/macrophages and dendritic cells. It induces the production of interferon (IFN) γ and forms a link between innate resistance and adaptive immunity.1-3 Interleukin 23 is a newly identified cytokine that shares the p40 subunit with IL-12 but is distinguished from the latter by the IL-12p35–related subunit p19. Interleukin 23 does differ from IL-12 in the T-cell subsets that it targets4: whereas IL-12 acts on naive T lymphocytes, IL-23 preferentially acts on memory T cells.5-7 Interleukin 12, critical in determining the differentiation and generation of T helper-1 cells, was thought to be essential for T-cell–dependent immune and inflammatory responses8-10 and was reported to be required for the induction of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE), an animal model of autoimmune-mediated inflammation of the central nervous system.11-13 However, recent evidence indicates that IL-12 is not essential in the development of EAE or a number of other inflammatory disorders.14-16 Perplexity as to the role of IL-12 in inflammation arose because the previously unknown cytokine IL-23 contains the same p40 subunit as IL-12.16,17
Experimental autoimmune neuritis (EAN) serves as an animal model for the human Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), an acute immune-mediated disease of the peripheral nervous system (PNS).18-20 It is characterized by multifocal demyelination and mononuclear cellular infiltration of the peripheral nerve.21,22 Interleukin 12 was reported to be required for the initiation, enhancement, and perpetuation of pathogenic events during the clinical course of EAN. However, these insights are based on the investigation of the IL-12p40 subunit.23 The sharing of the p40 subunit between IL-12 and IL-23 raises the question whether the effects previously ascribed to IL-12 may be the sum effect of both cytokines or, in part, related to IL-23 only. Thus, a reassessment of the individual cytokines may be warranted. To distinguish the pathogenetic contribution between members of the IL-12 family in the inflamed PNS, the present study focused on the expression of IL-23 by studying its p19 subunit to gain further insights into the immunopathogenesis of immune-mediated demyelination of the PNS.
Induction of ean and clinical assessment
All experiments were conducted according to the local regulations for animal experimentation and approved by the responsible authorities. We used female Lewis rats aged 7 to 8 weeks old and weighing 145 to 160 g (Charles Rivers, Sulzfeld, Germany). Experimental autoimmune neuritis was induced by injection of 4.5 mg of myelin per animal as described before.24 Rats injected with adjuvant served as controls. Animals were weighed and clinically scored daily on a 10-point score as described before.25 After 11, 13, 15, 17, and 29 days postimmunization (PI), groups of 5 animals each were killed and 1-cm-long segments of the sciatic nerves just proximal to the sciatic notch were dissected, flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen, and stored at −80°C.
Sural nerve biopsies were obtained with informed consent from patients as published before.26 Two groups of patients were studied. The first (n = 5) was diagnosed as classical GBS (acute inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy) according to the criteria of Asbury and Cornblath.27 The second group (n = 5) served as controls and included noninflammatory neuropathies. None of the patients studied had received any immunomodulatory or immunosuppressive treatment within 3 months before biopsy.
Cerebrospinal fluid samples
To detect the expression of IL-23p19 protein in cerebrospinal fluid (CSF), matched samples were obtained with informed consent from patients diagnosed with GBS (n = 5) at the Düsseldorf Department of Neurology. All samples were obtained within 5 days of the onset of first clinical symptoms, and none of the patients had received any immunomodulatory therapy before sampling. Cerebrospinal fluid from patients with noninflammatory neurological disorders (n = 5) served as a control. After lumbar puncture, CSF samples (10-15 mL per patient) were immediately centrifuged at 3000 g for 10 minutes; supernatants were aliquoted and stored at −80 ºC.
The following antibodies were used for immunohistochemistry: antihuman IL-23p19 as published before,28 antihuman IL-23p19 (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, Minn), antihuman CD3, antihuman CD68 (DAKO, Hamburg, Germany), antihuman CD3 phycoerythrin (Beckman Coulter, Fullerton, Calif), antihuman CD68 phycoerythrin (BD Biosciences, San Jose, Calif), and swine antirabbit IgG fluorescein isothiocyanate (DAKO). For Western blot analysis, the following antibodies were applied: antihuman IL-23p19 (R&D Systems) and biotinylated antigoat IgG (Vector Laboratories, Peterborough, England). Further details are given in the Table.
Semiquantitative reverse transcriptase–polymerase chain reaction
The presence of IL-23p19 RNA in sciatic nerves from the inflamed PNS during the clinical course of EAN was determined using a semiquantitative reverse transcriptase–polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The sequences of the synthetic oligonucleotide primers for rat IL-23p19 were sense, 5′-GCACACTAGCCTGGAGTGCA-3′, and antisense, 5′-TGTCCGAGTCCAGTAGGTGCT-3′; and for rat GAPDH, serving as a housekeeping gene, sense, 5′-CCACCCATGGCAAATTCCATGGCA-3′, and antisense, 5′-TCTAGAGGGCAGGTCAGGTCCACC-3′. All primers were synthesized by Gibco/Invitrogen (Karlsruhe, Germany). Total cellular RNA was extracted from frozen nerves according to standard protocols29 and used as a template for complementary DNA synthesis using a TaqMan reverse transcriptase kit (Applied Biosystems, Branchburg, NJ). Polymerase chain reaction was performed in 50 μL reactions containing 1.5 mM magnesium chloride, 50 mmol potassium chloride, 10 mM Tris hydrochloride pH 9.0, and 0.1% Triton X-100 in the presence of 200 μmol deoxynucleoside triphosphate (Pharmacia, Freiburg, Germany), 50 pmol sense and antisense primers, 1 U Taq DNA polymerase (Perkin Elmer, Branchburg). Amplification was carried out using 35 cycles (94°C, 60 seconds; 53°C, 60 seconds; 72°C, 120 seconds) in a Perkin Elmer 9700 thermal cycler. Ten μL of the reaction products were electrophoresed on a 6% polyacrylamide gel and were stained by SYBR Gold nucleic acid gel stain (Molecular Probes, Goettingen, Germany). Gels were read, analyzed, and quantitated (with the software TINA, version 2.09g; Raytest Isotopenmessgeräte, Straubenhardt, Germany). Results were expressed by correlating the amount of signal intensity to the housekeeping gene GAPDH to normalize complementary DNA loading.
Formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded sural nerve biopsy specimens were cut at 10 μm; sections were deparaffinized in xylenes, dehydrated through graded ethanol, and pretreated with protease XXIV (Sigma Chemical Co, St Louis, Mo). All primary antibodies were incubated at 4°C overnight after blocking the sections with 10% bovine serum albumin for 30 minutes. Endogenous peroxidase was blocked with 30% hydrogen peroxide in methanol. Biotinylated secondary antibodies and avidin-biotin-horseradish peroxidase complex (DAKO) were applied with 3,3′-diaminobenzidine as peroxidase substrate according to the manufacturer's instructions (DAKO). After development with 3,3′-diaminobenzidine substrate, sections were counterstained with hematoxylin (Sigma Chemical Co) and mounted in Entellan (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany).
For immunofluorescence, antibodies were diluted in a specific antibody diluent (DAKO) to reduce background staining. Primary and secondary antibodies were incubated for 1 hour at room temperature. Immunoreactivity and immunofluorescence were evaluated across an entire transverse section of each biopsy using an Axioplan 2 microscope (Carl Zeiss, Jena, Germany).
Human CSF samples were subjected to electrophoresis on sodium dodecyl sulfate–polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis under nonreducing conditions. Samples were then electroblotted onto nitrocellulose (Schleicher and Schuell, Darmstadt) at 100 mA constant power using a semidry blotter (Bio Rad, Hercules, Calif). Thereafter, nitrocellulose was saturated with 2.5% dry milk, washed, and incubated with a goat antihuman IL-23p19 antibody (R&D Systems) overnight at room temperature. Biotinylated antigoat IgG was used as secondary antibody. Afterwards, a streptavidin/biotin complex was used according to the instructions of the manufacturer and the reaction was developed with 3,3′-diaminobenzidine substrate. For preabsorbance of the antihuman IL-23p19 antibody, recombinant human IL-23 (R&D Systems) was used.
Weight loss and first clinical signs of the disease were noted 13 days after the injection of myelin. Clinical disease severity peaked at day 15 with an average score of 7.7, clinically presenting as severe paraparesis. At day 17 PI, the first signs of clinical improvement became apparent (Figure 1A). Control rats injected with adjuvant exhibited no signs of disease throughout the experiment.
IL-23p19 RNA EXPRESSION DURING EAN
At defined points during the clinical course of EAN, IL-23p19 expression was monitored at the RNA level by semiquantitative RT-PCR. An up-regulation of RNA was noticed at day 11 PI with peak expression levels at day 13 PI, just prior to peak clinical disease severity. Afterwards, RNA levels declined by day 15 PI and persisted at lower levels up to day 17 PI. Interleukin 23p19 RNA was not discernable at day 29 PI (Figure 1B). In contrast, no IL-23p19 RNA expression could be detected in the control group at any given point studied.
Expression of inflammatory infiltrates in human sural nerve
Inflammatory infiltrates were observed in sural nerve biopsies from patients with GBS. Increased numbers of CD68-positive cells, indicative of macrophages, could primarily be detected in the endoneurium and in perivascular cuffs in the epineurium. We could localize CD3-positive T lymphocytes to perivascular infiltrates in the epineurium and perineurium while they were diffusely distributed within the endoneurium (Figure 2A and B). In the noninflammatory neuropathies control group, however, only a few macrophages and T cells could be detected in the epineurium and endoneurium (Figure 2D and E).
EXPRESSION AND CELLULAR LOCALIZATION OF IL-23p19 IN THE HUMAN PNS
In GBS, IL-23p19 immunoreactivity was localized to mononuclear cells and was found to be highly expressed within the endoneurium (Figure 2C). The distribution of the positive IL-23p19 immunoreactivity was similar to the pattern obtained with the macrophage marker anti-CD68. Double immunofluorescence localized IL-23p19 immunoreactivity to CD68-positive macrophages (Figure 2F-H), whereas the staining pattern for CD3, indicative of T lymphocytes, did not match with the pattern for IL-23p19 (Figure 2I). In the noninflammatory neuropathies control group, no positive stain for IL-23p19 was observable.
IL-23p19 PROTEIN EXPRESSION IN CSF OF AFFECTED PATIENTS
To examine whether increased expression of IL-23p19 in the inflamed PNS is mirrored in the CSF of affected patients, we studied the protein expression of this cytokine in CSF samples from patients with GBS and noninflammatory controls by immunoblotting. In CSF from all GBS samples investigated (5 of 5), a positive signal for the IL-23p19 protein was observable, whereas in the control group, immunoreactivity was absent in all of the CSF samples studied (Figure 3). Control experiments after omission of the primary antibody revealed only background staining. Preabsorbance of the antihuman IL-23p19 antibody with recombinant human IL-23 sufficiently blocked the staining pattern.
In the present study, we investigated the expression of IL-23 during the course of clinical disease in active EAN by exploring the presence of its unique p19 subunit. We found a striking up-regulation of IL-23p19 RNA prior to the onset of clinical symptoms at day 11 PI with peak expression levels at day 13 PI preceding maximum clinical disease severity. This differential expression pattern of IL-23p19 on the messenger level strongly points to a potential biological role of this cytokine in the early phase of the disease, suggesting an initiating role rather than a perpetuating role in the disease process in EAN. Our observation is in line with previous studies in the inflamed central nervous system. In EAE, IL-23p19 RNA was found to be dramatically induced prior to the peak of clinical disease activity and to decline thereafter,30 underlining the potential pathogenetic relevance of IL-23 in the early phases of immune-mediated demyelination of the nervous system. Moreover, IL-23–deficient mice were reported to be resistant to EAE.16 Thus, in EAN the expression pattern of IL-23 differs dramatically from the one reported for IL-12, the latter found to be predominantly up-regulated in the late effector phase of the disease.31
Interleukin 23, which comprises the p40 subunit of IL-12 but a different p19 subunit,4 has been proposed to exhibit similar but not overlapping functions with IL-12, such as inducing the production of IFN-γ and T helper-1 cell differentiation.2,3 Unlike IL-12, which is preferentially affecting naive T lymphocytes, IL-23 selectively induces the proliferation of memory T cells32 and their production of IFN-γ,5,33 a cytokine exhibiting multiple proinflammatory effects in the process of immune-mediated demyelination of the inflamed peripheral nerve.22,34 The temporospatial expression patterns of IFN-γ and IL-12 RNAs have been substantially examined in EAN using semiquantitative RT-PCR.31 Whereas IL-12 RNA was found to be up-regulated during the recovery phase of EAN, IFN-γ RNA levels did not parallel the expression of IL-12 with maximum levels being observed during the onset and the acute phase of clinical disease in EAN.31 Furthermore, immunohistochemistry revealed abundant IFN-γ–positive T cells to be present in active EAN before overt clinical signs and demyelination and to disappear at later stages when most of the axons were demyelinated.35 Thus, IFN-γ induction in early EAN seems to occur in the absence of active IL-12. However, this discrepant expression of IFN-γ and IL-12 may be explained by our finding that IL-23 is up-regulated during the onset and the acute phase of clinical disease activity in EAN, paralleling the reported appearance of IFN-γ. We believe that, at least partly, IL-23 may induce the expression of IFN-γ during the early phase of EAN. On the other hand, no early up-regulation of the p40 subunit has been reported so far. This may be due to a lack of sensitivity or other technical restraints. Recent data suggest that IL-23 induces a specific cytokine pattern, distinct from IL-12, in activated human naive T lymphocytes. Interleukin 23 could induce IFN-γ production in resting naive T cells within short time.36 These results strengthen the concept of a critical role of IL-23 during the early phase of the disease, where naive T cells are likely to be more abundant than memory cells. A different study suggested that IL-23 promotes a T-cell population characterized by the production of IL-17, tumor necrosis factor α, and IL-6 and that this IL-23–dependent T-cell subset invades and promotes the development of organ-specific autoimmune inflammation.37 This pathway appears independent of IFN-γ, and the authors proposed an interplay between IL-23 and IL-17, potentially regulated via an IL-12–induced IFN-γ pathway.38 It is obvious that further studies are needed to address this issue in greater detail and to elucidate the functional interaction between IFN-γ and IL-23.
Experimental autoimmune neuritis is an acute inflammatory demyelinating disease of the PNS. The close clinical, histopathological, and electrophysiological similarities between EAN and human GBS make this disorder a suitable model to offer insights into the pathophysiologic features of an acute demyelinating disease in humans.34 To see whether our observations in the model disease also pertain to the human disorder, we further investigated the protein expression of IL-23p19 in sural nerve biopsy specimens obtained from patients diagnosed with GBS. Using immunohistochemistry, we were able to detect positive staining of IL-23p19 in the acute inflamed PNS and localize it to macrophages, primarily discerned within the endoneurium by immunofluorescence. As such, macrophages appear as the main cellular source producing IL-23p19 during acute inflammatory demyelination of the PNS. Our observation finds support in recent studies demonstrating that IL-23 is produced by microglia and macrophages in the inflamed central nervous system as shown in EAE.16,30 Macrophages within the PNS may be derived from circulating monocytes that invade the PNS, or they may already reside in the PNS as resident endoneurial macrophages, which might be critical in triggering an autoimmune process.39 Because we observed an up-regulation of IL-23p19 during the initial phase of EAN, when resident endoneurial macrophages represent the predominant group in the PNS, it appears most likely that tissue resident rather than invading macrophages are mainly responsible for the expression of IL-23 in the acute inflamed PNS. Because of technical limitations, we were not able to localize IL-23p19 protein within the PNS during EAN. Nevertheless, our present findings underline the common concept that macrophages propagate the immune response within the inflamed peripheral nerve by secreting various proinflammatory cytokines,34 such as IL-1, IL-6, and tumor necrosis factor α.39 Based on our findings, IL-23 could be added to this list.
By Western blotting, IL-23p19 protein could be detected in all CSF samples studied. Because all samples from patients with GBS were obtained within days after clinical disease onset, this observation strengthens our findings in the animal model where IL-23 was up-regulated early in the course of the disease as well. To which extent IL-23 could be a useful biomarker for GBS cannot be judged by our observation and needs further evaluation in a larger number of patients.
Our present data suggest that the new member of the cytokines, IL-23, primarily expressed by macrophages, plays an important role during the early effector phase of EAN and therefore appears to be critically involved in the initiation of an immune response in acute immune-mediated demyelination of the peripheral nerve. Because the perpetuation of a local immune response by proinflammatory cytokines is considered to be of paramount importance in the pathogenesis of autoimmune inflammatory demyelination, such an action would assign IL-23 a strategic role in this process. It is hoped that further knowledge will help design specific inhibitors, which may enlarge our therapeutic armamentarium for neuroinflammatory diseases.
Correspondence: Bernd C. Kieseier, MD, Department of Neurology, Heinrich-Heine-University, Moorenstrasse 5, 40225 Düsseldorf, Germany (bernd.kieseier@uni-duesseldorf.de).
Accepted for Publication: December 30, 2005.
Author Contributions:Study concept and design: Kieseier. Acquisition of data: Hu, Dehmel, Pirhonen, and Kieseier. Analysis and interpretation of data: Hu, Hartung, and Kieseier. Drafting of the manuscript: Hu, Dehmel, and Kieseier. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Hu, Pirhonen, Hartung, and Kieseier. Statistical analysis: Hu and Kieseier. Obtained funding: Kieseier. Administrative, technical, and material support: Hu, Dehmel, Pirhonen, and Kieseier. Study supervision: Kieseier.
Acknowledgment: The technical assistance of Marijana Suzani is gratefully acknowledged. We also thank our patients for their support.
1.Agnello
DLankford
CSBream
J
et al. Cytokines and transcription factors that regulate T helper cell differentiation: new players and new insights.
J Clin Immunol 2003;23147- 161
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 2.Trinchieri
G Interleukin-12 and the regulation of innate resistance and adaptive immunity.
Nat Rev Immunol 2003;3133- 146
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 3.Trinchieri
GPflanz
SKastelein
RA The IL-12 family of heterodimeric cytokines: new players in the regulation of T cell responses.
Immunity 2003;19641- 644
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 4.Oppmann
BLesley
RBlom
B
et al. Novel p19 protein engages IL-12p40 to form a cytokine, IL-23, with biological activities similar as well as distinct from IL-12.
Immunity 2000;13715- 725
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 6.Puccetti
PBelladonna
MLGrohmann
U Effects of IL-12 and IL-23 on antigen-presenting cells at the interface between innate and adaptive immunity.
Crit Rev Immunol 2002;22373- 390
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 7.Ghilardi
NKljavin
NChen
Q
et al. Compromised humoral and delayed-type hypersensitivity responses in IL-23-deficient mice.
J Immunol 2004;1722827- 2833
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 8.Brombacher
FKastelein
RAAlber
G Novel IL-12 family members shed light on the orchestration of Th1 responses.
Trends Immunol 2003;24207- 212
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 9.Watford
WTMoriguchi
MMorinobu
A
et al. The biology of IL-12: coordinating innate and adaptive immune responses.
Cytokine Growth Factor Rev 2003;14361- 368
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 10.Bastos
KRMarinho
CRBarboza
R
et al. What kind of message does IL-12/IL-23 bring to macrophages and dendritic cells?
Microbes Infect 2004;6630- 636
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 11.Leonard
JPWaldburger
KEGoldman
SJ Prevention of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis by antibodies against interleukin 12.
J Exp Med 1995;181381- 386
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 12.Smith
THewson
AKKingsley
CI
et al. Interleukin-12 induces relapse in experimental allergic encephalomyelitis in the Lewis rat.
Am J Pathol 1997;1501909- 1917
PubMedGoogle Scholar 13.Segal
BMDwyer
BKShevach
EM An interleukin (IL)-10/IL-12 immunoregulatory circuit controls susceptibility to autoimmune disease.
J Exp Med 1998;187537- 546
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 14.Becher
BDurell
BGNoelle
RJ Experimental autoimmune encephalitis and inflammation in the absence of interleukin-12.
J Clin Invest 2002;110493- 497
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 15.Gran
BZhang
GXYu
S
et al. IL-12p35-deficient mice are susceptible to experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis: evidence for redundancy in the IL-12 system in the induction of central nervous system autoimmune demyelination.
J Immunol 2002;1697104- 7110
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 16.Cua
DJSherlock
JChen
Y
et al. Interleukin-23 rather than interleukin-12 is the critical cytokine for autoimmune inflammation of the brain.
Nature 2003;421744- 748
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 17.Becher
BDurell
BGNoelle
RJ IL-23 produced by CNS-resident cells controls T cell encephalitogenicity during the effector phase of experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis.
J Clin Invest 2003;1121186- 1191
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 18.Waksman
BHAdams
RD Allergic neuritis: an experimental disease in rabbits induced by the injection of peripheral nervous tissue and adjuvant.
J Exp Med 1955;102213- 225
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 19.Hartung
HPPollard
JDHarvey
GK
et al. Invited review: immunopathogenesis and treatment of the Guillain-Barre syndrome, part II.
Muscle Nerve 1995;18154- 164
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 21.Arnason
BGWSoliven
B Acute inflammatory demyelinating neuropathy.
In:Dyck
PJ, Thomas
PK, eds.
Peripheral Neuropathy. Philadelphia, Pa: Saunders; 1993:1437-1497
Google Scholar 22.Schmidt
BToyka
KVKiefer
R
et al. Inflammatory infiltrates in sural nerve biopsies in Guillain-Barre syndrome and chronic inflammatory demyelinating neuropathy.
Muscle Nerve 1996;19474- 487
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 23.Bao
LLindgren
JUvan der Meide
P
et al. The critical role of IL-12p40 in initiating, enhancing, and perpetuating pathogenic events in murine experimental autoimmune neuritis.
Brain Pathol 2002;12420- 429
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 24.Jung
SToyka
KVHartung
HP Soluble complement receptor type 1 inhibits experimental autoimmune neuritis in Lewis rats.
Neurosci Lett 1995;200167- 170
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 25.Kieseier
BCClements
JMPischel
HB
et al. Matrix metalloproteinases MMP-9 and MMP-7 are expressed in experimental autoimmune neuritis and the Guillain-Barre syndrome.
Ann Neurol 1998;43427- 434
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 26.Hu
WMathey
EHartung
HP
et al. Cyclo-oxygenases and prostaglandins in acute inflammatory demyelination of the peripheral nerve.
Neurology 2003;611774- 1779
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 28.Pirhonen
JMatikainen
SJulkunen
I Regulation of virus-induced IL-12 and IL-23 expression in human macrophages.
J Immunol 2002;1695673- 5678
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 29.Chomczynski
PSacchi
N Single-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction.
Anal Biochem 1987;162156- 159
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 30.Li
JGran
BZhang
GX
et al. Differential expression and regulation of IL-23 and IL-12 subunits and receptors in adult mouse microglia.
J Neurol Sci 2003;21595- 103
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 31.Gillen
CJander
SStoll
G Sequential expression of mRNA for proinflammatory cytokines and interleukin-10 in the rat peripheral nervous system: comparison between immune-mediated demyelination and Wallerian degeneration.
J Neurosci Res 1998;51489- 496
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 33.Frucht
DMFukao
TBogdan
C
et al. IFN-gamma production by antigen-presenting cells: mechanisms emerge.
Trends Immunol 2001;22556- 560
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 34.Kieseier
BCKiefer
RGold
R
et al. Advances in understanding and treatment of immune-mediated disorders of the peripheral nervous system.
Muscle Nerve 2004;30131- 156
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 35.Schmidt
BStoll
Gvan der Meide
P
et al. Transient cellular expression of gamma-interferon in myelin-induced and T-cell line-mediated experimental autoimmune neuritis.
Brain 1992;1151633- 1646
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 36.Vanden Eijnden
SGoriely
SDe Wit
DWillems
FGoldman
M IL-23 up-regulates IL-10 and induces IL-17 synthesis by polyclonally activated naive T cells in human.
Eur J Immunol 2005;35469- 475
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 37.Langrish
CLChen
YBlumenschein
WM
et al. IL-23 drives a pathogenic T cell population that induces autoimmune inflammation.
J Exp Med 2005;201233- 240
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 38.Murphy
CALangrish
CLChen
Y
et al. Divergent pro- and antiinflammatory roles for IL-23 and IL-12 in joint autoimmune inflammation.
J Exp Med 2003;1981951- 1957
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 39.Kiefer
RKieseier
BCStoll
G
et al. The role of macrophages in immune-mediated damage to the peripheral nervous system.
Prog Neurobiol 2001;64109- 127
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref