Background
The G2019S mutation is the most common pathogenic substitution in the leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 (LRRK2) gene, which has recently been identified in familial and sporadic Parkinson disease (PD).
Objectives
To report the clinical characteristics of PD patients with homozygous LRRK2 6055G>A (G2019S) mutations and to compare them with previously published descriptions of heterozygous patients.
Design
Descriptive clinical report from an international consortium of studies.
Subjects
Patients with familial PD and homozygous LRRK2 mutations included 23 Tunisians, 2 Algerians, 2 US patients, 1 Canadian, and 1 Moroccan.
Results
There were no observable differences between the homozygote and heterozygote phenotypes.
Conclusions
Parkinson disease related to LRRK2 is characterized by typical clinical features, and the similarities between patients with homozygous and heterozygous mutations do not support a gene dosage effect.
Six PARK genes explaining familial Parkinson disease (PD) have been identified, with much interest in the most recently identified leucine-rich repeat kinase 2 gene (LRRK2). Parkinson disease associated with LRRK2 has an autosomal dominant pattern of inheritance; however, many patients with LRRK2 G2019S substitutions do not have a family history of PD. The clinical and neuropathological features appear to be indistinguishable from those of sporadic PD.1,2 Twenty pathogenic or putative pathogenic mutations have been identified in familial and sporadic parkinsonism, and 6055G>A (G2019S) is the most common.3-6 The G2019S mutation has been found in various populations across the world, but homozygous substitutions appear to be very rare.4,5,7-16 This report presents the clinical features of homozygotes and compares them with the clinical phenotype of LRRK2 G2019S heterozygotes in published literature.8
We recruited patients with PD (hereafter referred to as PD patients) from the following sites: the Institut National de Neurologie in Tunis, Tunisia; Groupe Hôpital de la Pitié-Salpêtrière in Paris, France; the Service de Neurologie at the Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Mustapha in Algiers; the Departments of Neurology and Neurosciences at the Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Fla; 59 Parkinson Study Group centers in the United States and Canada, including Indiana University, Indianapolis; and the Department of Neurology at University of Washington School of Medicine and collaborating medical centers in Kirkland and Seattle.
Parkinson disease was diagnosed using United Kingdom PD Society Brain Bank criteria.17 Family history and demographic information were collected and neurological examinations were completed for all family members. Results of the Mini-Mental State Examination and clinical examination were used to assess cognitive function. In Tunisia, owing to a high prevalence of illiteracy, the Mini-Mental State Examination may not be a valid measure; therefore, the presence of cognitive impairment was judged only by neurologist assessment.18
The study sites obtained local ethics committee or investigational review board approval before beginning subject recruitment. Subjects were informed of all aspects pertaining to their participation in the study, and they gave written or proxy consent.
After the first G2019S-homozygous patient was described, this international consortium was formed by one of us (Z.K.W.).
Genotyping of all subjects for LRRK2 6055G>A (G2019S) was performed by means of direct sequencing of exon 41 of the LRRK2 gene (in France16 and Washington7) and a modification of the single base chain extension assay previously described.19 Details of all subjects undergoing screening are presented in Table 1.
The homozygous LRRK2 6055G>A mutation was identified in 26 PD patients from the following 5 studies: 20 Tunisians (11 women and 9 men in 15 families), 2 Algerians (1 man and 1 woman in 2 families),16 2 US men (2 families), 1 Canadian man, and 1 Moroccan woman. Demographic and clinical characteristics are presented in Table 2 and Table 3, respectively. One of the US patients was of Ukrainian and Polish descent, and the other was of Ashkenazi Jewish descent. The ethnicity of all Tunisian, Algerian, and Moroccan patients was Arab Berber.
Three Tunisian clinically unaffected individuals (1 man and 2 women) were homozygous for the mutation. Their ages at examination were 42, 45, and 70 years, and their neurological findings were normal.
Patient medical history was available for most cases. None had a history of encephalitis or meningitis. A head injury was reported only by the Canadian patient; however, this information was not specifically requested in the Tunisian questionnaire. Hypertension was reported by US patient 24 and Tunisian patients 3, 4, and 6. Diabetes was reported by French patient 23, US patient 25, and 16 patients from Tunisia. Patients were asked whether they had any additional neurological disorders, and only US patient 25 reported peripheral neuropathy.
Family history of PD was reported by all patients except French patients 22 and 23, with missing information. Few patients reported other neurological diseases in their families. French patient 23 had a sister with multiple sclerosis. Both parents of US patient 25 had dementia. The US patient 24 had one son with epilepsy and another with schizophrenia and autism. Tunisian patients 15, 17, and 18 had relatives with essential tremor.
The clinical characteristics of PD appeared to be similar among the cases from different study populations (Table 3). The mean age at onset was 56 years, ranging from 30 to 82 years, with both extreme values in Tunisian patients. All individuals reported the presence of bradykinesia and rigidity, and all except for 4 Tunisian patients, US patient 24, and Canadian patient 26 reported resting tremor. Of 24 patients reporting their initial PD symptoms, 16 reported tremor or tremor and another symptom. The second most common presenting symptom was a change in gait, reported by 7 patients. Tunisian patients 4, 16, and 18 and US patient 25 reported postural tremor. All patients showed asymmetry of symptoms, but the predominant side was divided almost equally among the 24 responses (11 right and 13 left). Of those patients for whom the information was available, all reported a positive response to levodopa therapy.
Cognitive and psychiatric data were collected from clinical observations and by using the Mini-Mental State Examination. French patient 22 and Canadian patient 26 had Mini-Mental State Examination scores within the reference range. In general, there were no indications of cognitive impairment, depression, anxiety, or psychiatric abnormalities in any of the homozygous patients, with the exception of “mild memory difficulty” in US patient 24.
Imaging data were available from 15 patients. French patient 21 and US patient 24 had normal findings on computed tomographic scans, and 13 Tunisian patients had normal magnetic resonance imaging results. As of the last follow-up, pathological evaluations were not available for any patients.
Herein we report the clinical characteristics for individuals with homozygous LRRK2 G2019S substitutions. The patients were identified from various international studies, but the characteristics appear to be relatively consistent across studies, despite ethnic differences. The large number of patients with the homozygous mutation in Tunisia is likely owing to the high proportion of consanguineous marriages. Eleven (T1-T4, T6-T10, T14, and T15) of 15 Tunisian families and French patients 22 and 23 had consanguinity. The US patient 25 was of Ashkenazi Jewish descent, which is believed to have a higher prevalence of this substitution.20
The homozygous clinical phenotype is similar to that of sporadic PD and PD with heterozygous G2019S substitutions. Asymmetry is a key element in the diagnosis of PD. All patients had asymmetric onset of various presenting symptoms, but most often tremor. We found no obvious male or female preponderance. Of the main cardinal signs of PD, rigidity and bradykinesia were present in all patients, and rest tremor was present in most of the patients. These characteristics of homozygous patients were comparable with those of the heterozygous patients in various populations who presented most often with asymmetric tremor and also bradykinesia, gait disturbance, rigidity, or micrographia.4,7,8,10-12,14,15,21-30 Patients with heterozygous substitutions reported the presence of bradykinesia, resting tremor, and rigidity in all or most cases.
The age at onset in homozygous patients ranged from 30 to 82 years, with both extremes in the Tunisian population. The age at onset in heterozygous patients ranged from 28 to 86 years, and encompassed a similarly wide range of values.8,10-12,14,15,21-31 With the exception of 1 patient for whom the information was not available, all of the homozygous patients reported positive responses to levodopa, and most of the heterozygous patients in the literature also reported positive or unknown responses, with the exception of 13 patients from 2 studies.14,26
One difference that has been noted is the presence of dementia or cognitive decline in a number of the heterozygous patients, but not in the homozygous patients.4,8,12,15,22,27 This difference may be owing to the small number of patients with homozygous mutations compared with heterozygous mutations.
Overall, we did not find any major clinical differences between PD patients with homozygous and those with heterozygous LRRK2 G2019S substitutions. This finding does not support a gene dosage effect.
Correspondence: Lianna Ishihara, MPhil, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, Forvie Site, Robinson Way, Cambridge CB2 2SR, England (L.Ishihara.01@cantab.net).
Accepted for Publication: March 2, 2006.
Author Contributions:Study concept and design: Ishihara, Warren, Gibson, Amouri, Wszolek, Hattori, Watts, Farrer, Middleton, and Hentati. Acquisition of data: Gibson, Amouri, Lesage, Dürr, Tazir, Wszolek, Uitti, Nichols, Griffith, Watts, Zabetian, Foroud, Brice, and Hentati. Analysis and interpretation of data: Ishihara, Warren, Gibson, Lesage, Dürr, Wszolek, Uitti, Leppert, Watts, Zabetian, Farrer, and Brice. Drafting of the manuscript: Ishihara, Gibson, Hattori, Leppert, and Watts. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Ishihara, Warren, Gibson, Amouri, Lesage, Dürr, Tazir, Wszolek, Uitti, Nichols, Griffith, Watts, Zabetian, Foroud, Farrer, Brice, Middleton, and Hentati. Statistical analysis: Ishihara and Warren. Obtained funding: Gibson, Dürr, Watts, Zabetian, Brice, and Middleton. Administrative, technical, and material support: Ishihara, Warren, Gibson, Lesage, Tazir, Wszolek, Griffith, Hattori, Watts, Zabetian, Foroud, and Farrer. Study supervision: Gibson, Wszolek, Uitti, Nichols, Hattori, Leppert, Watts, Zabetian, and Brice.
Financial Disclosure: Ms Ishihara has received a graduate stipend from GlaxoSmithKline. Drs Wszolek and Farrer have a patent pending for the discovery of the G2019S LRRK2 mutation.
Funding/Support: The Tunisian PD study was supported by GlaxoSmithKline (Ms Ishihara and Drs Warren, Gibson, Amouri, Leppert, Watts, Middleton, and Hentati). The French Parkinson's Disease Genetics Study Group was supported by contract 4CH03G from Cohortes et Collections 2001 Institut National de la Santé et de la Récherche Médicale and the French Ministry of Research and Technology, European Union Contract LSHM-CT-2003-503330/APOPIS from the European commission; grant NS41723-01A1 from the Association France-Parkinson and the National Institutes of Health, and ANR-05-NEUR-019 from the Agence Nationale de la Recherche (Drs Lesage, Dürr, Tazir, and Brice). The Mayo Clinic Jacksonville study was also supported by the National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke, and M. K. Udall Parkinson's Disease Center of Excellence grant P50NS 40256-2 (Drs Wszolek, Uitti, and Farrer); by grant R01 NS037167 for the Parkinson's Research: the Organized Genetics Initiative study (Drs Foroud and Nichols); and by grant K08-NS044138 from the National Institutes of Health, American Parkinson Disease Association, and a merit review award from the Department of Veterans Affairs (Dr Zabetian).
Acknowledgment: We thank all of the patients and families and the supporting staff at each site.
Additional Information: A summary table of studies used to characterize patients with PD and heterozygous G2019S substitutions is available at http://www.iph.cam.ac.uk/~lsi20/hetero_table.doc or by contacting the corresponding author.
1.Zimprich
ABiskup
SLeitner
P
et al. Mutations in
LRRK2 cause autosomal-dominant parkinsonism with pleomorphic pathology.
Neuron 2004;44601- 607
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 3.Berg
DSchweitzer
KLeitner
P
et al. Type and frequency of mutations in the
LRRK2 gene in familial and sporadic Parkinson's disease.
Brain 2005;1283000- 3011
PubMedGoogle Scholar 4.Di Fonzo
ARohe
CFFerreira
J
et al. A frequent
LRRK2 gene mutation associated with autosomal dominant Parkinson's disease.
Lancet 2005;365412- 415
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 5.Mata
IFTaylor
JPKachergus
J
et al.
LRRK2 R1441G in Spanish patients with Parkinson's disease.
Neurosci Lett 2005;382309- 311
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 7.Zabetian
CPSamii
AMosley
AD
et al. A clinic-based study of the
LRRK2 gene in Parkinson disease yields new mutations.
Neurology 2005;65741- 744
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 8.Aasly
JOToft
MFernandez-Mata
I
et al. Clinical features of
LRRK2-associated Parkinson's disease in central Norway.
Ann Neurol 2005;57762- 765
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 9.Biskup
SMueller
JCSharma
M
et al. Common variants of
LRRK2 are not associated with sporadic Parkinson's disease.
Ann Neurol 2005;58905- 908
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 10.Lesage
SIbanez
PLohmann
E
et al. G2019S
LRRK2 mutation in French and North African families with Parkinson's disease.
Ann Neurol 2005;58784- 787
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 11.Deng
HLe
WGuo
Y
et al. Genetic and clinical identification of Parkinson's disease patients with
LRRK2 G2019S mutation.
Ann Neurol 2005;57933- 934
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 12.Infante
JRodriguez
ECombarros
O
et al.
LRRK2 G2019S is a common mutation in Spanish patients with late-onset Parkinson's disease.
Neurosci Lett 2006;395224- 226
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 13.Funayama
MHasegawa
KOhta
E
et al. An
LRRK2 mutation as a cause for the parkinsonism in the original PARK8 family.
Ann Neurol 2005;57918- 921
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 14.Nichols
WCPankratz
NHernandez
D
et al. Genetic screening for a single com-mon
LRRK2 mutation in familial Parkinson's disease.
Lancet 2005;365410- 412
PubMedGoogle Scholar 15.Kay
DMZabetian
CPFactor
SA
et al. Parkinson's disease and
LRRK2: frequency of a common mutation in US movement disorder clinics.
Mov Disord 2006;21519- 523
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 16.Lesage
SDurr
ATazir
M
et al.
LRRK2 G2019S as a cause of Parkinson's disease in North African Arabs.
N Engl J Med 2006;354422- 423
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 17.Hughes
AJBen-Shlomo
YDaniel
SELees
AJ What features improve the accuracy of clinical diagnosis in Parkinson's disease: a clinicopathologic study.
Neurology19924211421146
[published correction appears in
Neurology. 1992;42:1436]
PubMedGoogle Scholar 18.Kabir
ZNHerlitz
A The Bangla adaptation of Mini-Mental State Examination (BAMSE): an instrument to assess cognitive function in illiterate and literate individuals.
Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2000;15441- 450
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 19.Taylor
JDBriley
DNguyen
Q
et al. Flow cytometric platform for high-throughput single nucleotide polymorphism analysis.
Biotechniques 2001;30661- 669
PubMedGoogle Scholar 20.Ozelius
LJSenthil
GSaunders-Pullman
R
et al.
LRRK2 G2019S as a cause of Parkinson's disease in Ashkenazi Jews.
N Engl J Med 2006;354424- 425
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 22.Goldwurm
SDiFonzo
ASimons
EJ
et al. The G6055A (G2019S) mutation in
LRRK2 is frequent in both early and late onset Parkinson's disease and originates from a common ancestor.doi:10.1136/jmg.2005.035568.Accessed January 31, 2006
J Med Genet 2005;42e65
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 23.Hernandez
DGPaisan-Ruiz
CInerney-Leo
A
et al. Clinical and positron emission tomography of Parkinson's disease caused by
LRRK2.
Ann Neurol 2005;57453- 456
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 24.Gosal
DRoss
OAWiley
J
et al. Clinical traits of
LRRK2-associated Parkinson's disease in Ireland: a link between familial and idiopathic PD.
Parkinsonism Relat Disord 2005;11349- 352
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 25.Khan
NLJain
SLynch
JM
et al. Mutations in the gene
LRRK2 encoding dardarin (PARK8) cause familial Parkinson's disease: clinical, pathological, olfactory and functional imaging and genetic data.
Brain 2005;1282786- 2796
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 26.Paisan-Ruiz
CLang
AEKawarai
T
et al.
LRRK2 gene in Parkinson disease: mutation analysis and case control association study.
Neurology 2005;65696- 700
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 27.Bras
JMGuerreiro
RJRibeiro
MH
et al. G2019S dardarin substitution is a common cause of Parkinson's disease in a Portuguese cohort.
Mov Disord 2005;201653- 1655
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 28.Gilks
WPAbou-Sleiman
PMGandhi
S
et al. A common LRRK2 mutation in idiopathic Parkinson's disease.
Lancet 2005;365415- 416
PubMedGoogle Scholar 29.Kachergus
JMata
IFHulihan
M
et al. Identification of a novel
LRRK2 mutation linked to autosomal dominant parkinsonism: evidence of a common founder across European populations.
Am J Hum Genet 2005;76672- 680
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref