[Skip to Navigation]
Sign In
Figure 1. 
Map of significant clusters of reduced fractional anisotropy in patients with sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis compared with control subjects. Significant clusters are seen in the corona radiata (orange arrow), corpus callosum (green arrow), and subcortical white matter (yellow arrow).

Map of significant clusters of reduced fractional anisotropy in patients with sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis compared with control subjects. Significant clusters are seen in the corona radiata (orange arrow), corpus callosum (green arrow), and subcortical white matter (yellow arrow).

Figure 2. 
Map of significant clusters of increased fractional anisotropy in homozygous D90A SOD1 amyotrophic lateral sclerosis compared with sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Significant clusters are seen in the corona radiata (orange arrow), corpus callosum (green arrow), subcortical white matter (yellow arrow), occipitotemporal fibers (gray arrow), and occipitoparietal fibers (blue arrows).

Map of significant clusters of increased fractional anisotropy in homozygous D90A SOD1 amyotrophic lateral sclerosis compared with sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Significant clusters are seen in the corona radiata (orange arrow), corpus callosum (green arrow), subcortical white matter (yellow arrow), occipitotemporal fibers (gray arrow), and occipitoparietal fibers (blue arrows).

Figure 3. 
Map of significant clusters of voxels showing a positive correlation between fractional anisotropy and the Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale–Revised score. Significant clusters are seen in the cerebellar peduncles (lime green arrows), corticospinal tracts in the brainstem (purple arrow), orbitofrontal fibers (turquoise arrow), cerebral peduncles (red arrow), internal capsule (white arrow), occipitotemporal fibers (gray arrow), corona radiata (orange arrow), corpus callosum (green arrow), occipitoparietal fibers (blue arrow), and subcortical white matter (yellow arrow).

Map of significant clusters of voxels showing a positive correlation between fractional anisotropy and the Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Functional Rating Scale–Revised score. Significant clusters are seen in the cerebellar peduncles (lime green arrows), corticospinal tracts in the brainstem (purple arrow), orbitofrontal fibers (turquoise arrow), cerebral peduncles (red arrow), internal capsule (white arrow), occipitotemporal fibers (gray arrow), corona radiata (orange arrow), corpus callosum (green arrow), occipitoparietal fibers (blue arrow), and subcortical white matter (yellow arrow).

Figure 4. 
Map of significant clusters of voxels showing a negative correlation between fractional anisotropy and the Upper Motor Neuron score. Significant clusters are seen in the cerebellar peduncles (lime green arrow), corticospinal tracts in the brainstem (purple arrow), cerebral peduncles (red arrow), internal capsule (white arrow), occipitotemporal fibers (gray arrow), corpus callosum (green arrows), corona radiata (orange arrow), and subcortical white matter (yellow arrow).

Map of significant clusters of voxels showing a negative correlation between fractional anisotropy and the Upper Motor Neuron score. Significant clusters are seen in the cerebellar peduncles (lime green arrow), corticospinal tracts in the brainstem (purple arrow), cerebral peduncles (red arrow), internal capsule (white arrow), occipitotemporal fibers (gray arrow), corpus callosum (green arrows), corona radiata (orange arrow), and subcortical white matter (yellow arrow).

Table. 
Demographic and Clinical Characteristics of Patients and Healthy Control Subjects
Demographic and Clinical Characteristics of Patients and Healthy Control Subjects
1.
Rosen  DRSiddique  TPatterson  D  et al.  Mutations in Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase gene are associated with familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. [published correction appears in Nature. 1993;364(6435):362].  Nature 1993;362 (6415) 59- 62PubMedGoogle Scholar
2.
Andersen  PMNilsson  PKeränen  ML  et al.  Phenotypic heterogeneity in motor neuron disease patients with CuZn–superoxide dismutase mutations in Scandinavia.  Brain 1997;120 (pt 10) 1723- 1737PubMedGoogle Scholar
3.
Parton  MJBroom  WAndersen  PM  et al. D90A SOD1 ALS Consortium, D90A-SOD1 mediated amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a single founder for all cases with evidence for a cis-acting disease modifier in the recessive haplotype.  Hum Mutat 2002;20 (6) 473PubMedGoogle Scholar
4.
Andersen  PMForsgren  LBinzer  M  et al.  Autosomal recessive adult-onset amyotrophic lateral sclerosis associated with homozygosity for Asp90Ala CuZn–superoxide dismutase mutation: a clinical and genealogical study of 36 patients [published correction appears in Brain. 1998;121(pt 1):187].  Brain 1996;119 (pt 4) 1153- 1172PubMedGoogle Scholar
5.
Wang  SMelhem  ER Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and primary lateral sclerosis: the role of diffusion tensor imaging and other advanced MR-based techniques as objective upper motor neuron markers.  Ann N Y Acad Sci 2005;106461- 77PubMedGoogle Scholar
6.
Basser  PJMattiello  JLeBihan  D Estimation of the effective self-diffusion tensor from the NMR spin echo.  J Magn Reson B 1994;103 (3) 247- 254PubMedGoogle Scholar
7.
Song  SKSun  SWJu  WKLin  SJCross  AHNeufeld  AH Diffusion tensor imaging detects and differentiates axon and myelin degeneration in mouse optic nerve after retinal ischemia.  Neuroimage 2003;20 (3) 1714- 1722PubMedGoogle Scholar
8.
Ellis  CMSimmons  AJones  DK  et al.  Diffusion tensor MRI assesses corticospinal tract damage in ALS.  Neurology 1999;53 (5) 1051- 1058PubMedGoogle Scholar
9.
Blain  CRWilliams  VCJohnston  C  et al.  A longitudinal study of diffusion tensor MRI in ALS.  Amyotroph Lateral Scler 2007;8 (6) 348- 355PubMedGoogle Scholar
10.
Sach  MWinkler  GGlauche  V  et al.  Diffusion tensor MRI of early upper motor neuron involvement in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.  Brain 2004;127 (pt 2) 340- 350PubMedGoogle Scholar
11.
Sage  CAPeeters  RRGörner  ARobberecht  WSunaert  S Quantitative diffusion tensor imaging in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.  Neuroimage 2007;34 (2) 486- 499PubMedGoogle Scholar
12.
Cosottini  MGiannelli  MSiciliano  G  et al.  Diffusion-tensor MR imaging of corticospinal tract in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and progressive muscular atrophy.  Radiology 2005;237 (1) 258- 264PubMedGoogle Scholar
13.
Hong  YHLee  KWSung  JJChang  KHSong  IC Diffusion tensor MRI as a diagnostic tool of upper motor neuron involvement in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.  J Neurol Sci 2004;227 (1) 73- 78PubMedGoogle Scholar
14.
Ng  MCHo  JTHo  SL  et al.  Abnormal diffusion tensor in nonsymptomatic familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis with a causative superoxide dismutase 1 mutation.  J Magn Reson Imaging 2008;27 (1) 8- 13PubMedGoogle Scholar
15.
Ciccarelli  OBehrens  TEJohansen-Berg  HTalbot  KOrrell  RWHoward  RSNunes  RGMiller  DHMatthews  PMThompson  AJSmith  SM Investigation of white matter pathology in ALS and PLS using tract-based spatial statistics.  Hum Brain Mapp 10.1002/hbm.205272008; Jan2 [Epub ahead of print]PubMedGoogle Scholar
16.
Wicks  PAbrahams  SPapps  BLeigh  PNGoldstein  LH Cognitive vulnerability in subgroups of MND [abstract].  Amyotroph Lateral Scler Other Motor Neuron Disord 2005;6 ((suppl 1)) 46- 4810.1080/17434470510045203Google Scholar
17.
Mackenzie  IRBigio  EHInce  PG  et al.  Pathological TDP-43 distinguishes sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis from amyotrophic lateral sclerosis with SOD1 mutations.  Ann Neurol 2007;61 (5) 427- 434PubMedGoogle Scholar
18.
Leigh  PNAbrahams  SAl-Chalabi  A  et al. King's MND Care and Research Team, The management of motor neurone disease.  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2003;74 ((suppl 4)) iv32- iv47PubMedGoogle Scholar
19.
Brooks  BRMiller  RGSwash  MMunsat  TLWorld Federation of Neurology Research Group on Motor Neuron Diseases, El Escorial revisited: revised criteria for the diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.  Amyotroph Lateral Scler Other Motor Neuron Disord 2000;1 (5) 293- 299PubMedGoogle Scholar
20.
Cedarbaum  JMStambler  NMalta  E  et al. BDNF ALS Study Group (Phase III), The ALSFRS-R: a revised ALS functional rating scale that incorporates assessments of respiratory function.  J Neurol Sci 1999;169 (1-2) 13- 21PubMedGoogle Scholar
21.
Turner  MRCagnin  ATurkheimer  FE  et al.  Evidence of widespread cerebral microglial activation in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: an [11C](R)-PK11195 positron emission tomography study.  Neurobiol Dis 2004;15 (3) 601- 609PubMedGoogle Scholar
22.
Jones  DKWilliams  SCGasston  DHorsfield  MASimmons  AHoward  R Isotropic resolution diffusion tensor imaging with whole brain acquisition in a clinically acceptable time.  Hum Brain Mapp 2002;15 (4) 216- 230PubMedGoogle Scholar
23.
Simmons  AMoore  EWilliams  SC Quality control for functional magnetic resonance imaging using automated data analysis and Shewhart charting.  Magn Reson Med 1999;41 (6) 1274- 1278PubMedGoogle Scholar
24.
Catani  MHoward  RJPajevic  SJones  DK Virtual in vivo interactive dissection of white matter fasciculi in the human brain.  Neuroimage 2002;17 (1) 77- 94PubMedGoogle Scholar
25.
Jones  DKSymms  MRCercignani  MHoward  RJ The effect of filter size on VBM analyses of DT-MRI data.  Neuroimage 2005;26 (2) 546- 554PubMedGoogle Scholar
26.
Brammer  MJBullmore  ETSimmons  A  et al.  Generic brain activation mapping in functional magnetic resonance imaging: a nonparametric approach.  Magn Reson Imaging 1997;15 (7) 763- 770PubMedGoogle Scholar
27.
Mori  SWakana  SNagae-Poetscher  LMvan Zijl  PC MRI Atlas of Human White Matter.  Amsterdam, the Netherlands Elsevier Science Publishers2005;
28.
Turner  MRHammers  AAl-Chalabi  A  et al.  Distinct cerebral lesions in sporadic and “D90A” SOD1 ALS: studies with [11C]flumazenil PET.  Brain 2005;128 (pt 6) 1323- 1329PubMedGoogle Scholar
29.
Turner  MRHammers  AAllsop  J  et al.  Volumetric cortical loss in sporadic and familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.  Amyotroph Lateral Scler 2007;8 (6) 343- 347PubMedGoogle Scholar
30.
Turner  MROsei-Lah  ADHammers  A  et al.  Abnormal cortical excitability in sporadic but not homozygous D90A SOD1 ALS.  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2005;76 (9) 1279- 1285PubMedGoogle Scholar
31.
Maekawa  SAl-Sarraj  SKibble  M  et al.  Cortical selective vulnerability in motor neuron disease: a morphometric study.  Brain 2004;127 (pt 6) 1237- 1251PubMedGoogle Scholar
32.
Neumann  MSampathu  DMKwong  LK  et al.  Ubiquitinated TDP-43 in frontotemporal lobar degeneration and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.  Science 2006;314 (5796) 130- 133PubMedGoogle Scholar
33.
Wang  SPoptani  HWoo  JH  et al.  Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: diffusion-tensor and chemical shift MR imaging at 3.0 T.  Radiology 2006;239 (3) 831- 838PubMedGoogle Scholar
Original Contribution
January 2009

Diffusion Tensor Imaging in Sporadic and Familial (D90A SOD1) Forms of Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis

Author Affiliations

Author Affiliations: Medical Research Council Centre for Neurodegeneration Research and Department of Clinical Neuroscience (Drs Stanton, Turner, V. C. Williams, S. C. R. Williams, Blain, Leigh, and Simmons), Centre for Neuroimaging Sciences (Ms Shinhmar and Drs S. C. R. Williams and Simmons), National Institute for Health Research Biomedical Research Centre for Mental Health (Drs S. C. R. Williams and Simmons), Brain Image Analysis Unit, Department of Biostatistics and Computing (Dr Giampietro), and Division of Psychological Medicine and Psychiatry (Dr Catani), Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, London, and Department of Neurology, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford (Dr Turner), England; and Department of Neurology, Umeå University Hospital, Umeå, Sweden (Dr Andersen).

Arch Neurol. 2009;66(1):109-115. doi:10.1001/archneurol.2008.527
Abstract

Background  The basis of heterogeneity in the clinical presentation and rate of progression of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is poorly understood.

Objectives  To use diffusion tensor imaging as a measure of axonal pathologic features in vivo in ALS and to compare a homogeneous form of familial ALS (homozygous D90A SOD1 [superoxide dismutase 1]) with sporadic ALS.

Design  Cross-sectional diffusion tensor imaging study.

Setting  Tertiary referral neurology clinic.

Patients  Twenty patients with sporadic ALS, 6 patients with homozygous D90A SOD1 ALS, and 21 healthy control subjects.

Main Outcome Measure  Fractional anisotropy in cerebral white matter.

Results  Patients with homozygous D90A SOD1 ALS showed less extensive pathologic white matter in motor and extramotor pathways compared with patients with sporadic ALS, despite similar disease severity assessed clinically using a standard functional rating scale. Fractional anisotropy correlated with clinical measures of severity and upper motor neuron involvement.

Conclusion  In vivo diffusion tensor imaging measures demonstrate differences in white matter degeneration between sporadic ALS and a unique familial form of the disease, indicating that genotype influences the distribution of cerebral pathologic features in ALS.

There is considerable variation in the clinical presentation and rate of progression of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), but the basis of this heterogeneity is poorly understood. About 10% of ALS cases are inherited in a mendelian fashion, with mutations in the superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1) gene (GenBank AY450286) being responsible for 20% of these.1 The D90A SOD1 mutation is commonly inherited as a recessive trait with high penetrance in homozygotes.2 Homozygous D90A SOD1 cases are genetically homogeneous, sharing a common founder about 60 generations ago.3The resulting clinical phenotype is stereotyped as a spastic paraparesis progressing to upper limb and bulbar involvement.4 The disease is slowly progressive, with a much longer survival than with sporadic ALS (mean, 14 vs 3 years, respectively). Groups of patients with genetic forms of ALS that are clinically homogeneous provide a unique opportunity to study the pathologic basis of the relationship between genotype and phenotype in ALS.

Neuroimaging techniques have been used in ALS in an attempt to improve diagnosis and to measure disease progression,5 as well as to provide a quantitative method of studying the pathophysiologic function of the disease in vivo. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) is a magnetic resonance (MR) imaging technique in which the signal is sensitized to the diffusion of water within brain tissue6 (which is restricted by barriers such as cell membranes and occurs preferentially along the direction of white matter tracts). Fractional anisotropy (FA) is a measure of the directionality of diffusion in a voxel (from 0 [complete lack of directionality of diffusion] to 1 [complete anisotropy]) and is reduced when white matter tracts are disrupted.7

Previous studies8,9 using region-of-interest approaches to analyze DTI data in ALS have shown reduced FA in the corticospinal tract, consistent with the known pathologic features of the disease. Voxel-based approaches to analysis have demonstrated evidence of white matter damage in extramotor pathways.10,11 Some correlations between clinical measures and diffusion variables have been reported, but results have been inconsistent.12,13 Diffusion changes have been reported in asymptomatic patients with SOD1 mutations, suggesting that the technique is sensitive to early pathophysiologic changes.14 Diffusion tensor imaging has demonstrated distinct patterns of reduced FA in primary lateral sclerosis compared with ALS.15

We used whole-brain analysis of DTI data to test the hypothesis that FA changes in a clinically and genetically homogeneous form of ALS (homozygous D90A SOD1 variant) can be distinguished from those in sporadic ALS. Specifically, we hypothesized that extramotor involvement would be less marked in homozygous D90A SOD1 ALS cases, as recent evidence suggests that cognitive changes are lacking or less marked in ALS with SOD1 mutations16 and that immunoreactive inclusions of TAR DNA-binding protein of 43 kDa are absent or scarce in SOD1 compared with sporadic cases.17 In addition, we explored correlations between FA and clinical measures in ALS. We hypothesized that greater disease severity, more extensive clinical upper motor neuron (UMN) involvement, and longer disease duration would correlate with lower FA.

Methods
Patients

The study included 20 patients with sporadic ALS, 6 patients with homozygous D90A SOD1 ALS, and 21 healthy control subjects. All subjects were right handed and had no history of hypertension, cerebrovascular disease, or diabetes mellitus. The study was approved by the Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London (London, England) local research ethics committee and was performed in accord with the ethical standards of the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki. All subjects gave written informed consent before their inclusion in the study.

All suitable patients with sporadic ALS attending the motor disorders clinic at King's College Hospital were invited to participate in the study. Patients with ALS were diagnosed following clinical examination by a consultant neurologist. Other conditions were excluded by appropriate blood tests, neurophysiologic testing, and neuroimaging.18 Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis was categorized according to the revised El Escorial criteria19: 4 patients had definite ALS, 11 had probable ALS, and 5 had possible ALS. Patients with homozygous D90A SOD1 ALS were recruited from Umeå University Hospital (Umeå, Sweden) and traveled to London to take part in the study. Healthy controls without a history of neurologic disorder were recruited among the spouses and friends of patients and among members of a local volunteer organization.

All subjects underwent a clinical assessment, including full neurologic examination. Patients with ALS were assessed using the ALS Functional Rating Scale–Revised (ALSFRS-R).20 In addition, a UMN “burden” score was calculated to quantify the degree of UMN involvement in each patient.21 This score is the total number of pathologically brisk reflexes (including extensor plantar responses, brisk facial and jaw jerks, and biceps, supinator, triceps, finger, knee, and ankle reflexes), with a maximum possible score of 16.

Data acquisition

Diffusion tensor imaging data were acquired using a 1.5-T MR imaging scanner (GE Signa NV/i; General Electric, Milwaukee, Wisconsin) with actively shielded magnetic field gradients (maximum amplitude, 40 mT/m) and a standard quadrature transmit-and-receive birdcage head coil. All images were acquired from the whole brain, with sections parallel to the anterior commissure–posterior commissure line.

Using a multisection, peripherally gated echoplanar imaging pulse sequence, each DTI volume was acquired from 60 contiguous 2.5-mm-thick sections with a field of view of 240 × 240 mm and an acquisition matrix size of 96 × 96 pixels (zero filled to 128 × 128 pixels), giving an in-plane voxel size of 1.875 × 1.875 mm2. Echo time was 107 milliseconds. Effective repetition time was 15 R-R intervals. At each location, 7 images were acquired without diffusion weighting, together with 64 images with a weighting of 1300 s/mm−2 applied along directions uniformly distributed in space.22 Data acquisition from patients and controls was interleaved to ensure that a shift in scanner performance would not lead to spurious results. The quality of echoplanar imaging data was assessed using an automated analysis technique.23

Data analysis

Diffusion-weighted images were initially corrected for eddy-current distortion using in-house software that included a mutual information–based registration.24 Brain data were masked from the background using a semiautomated thresholding procedure. The diffusion tensor was then calculated for each brain voxel using multivariate linear regression analysis after logarithmic transformation of the signal intensities.6 The tensor matrix at each voxel was subsequently diagonalized to compute the eigen values and the corresponding eigen vectors. Fractional anisotropy maps were then constructed.

Image preprocessing

Preprocessing was performed using Statistical Parametric Mapping software (SPM2; Wellcome Department of Imaging Neurosciences, University College London, London). The FA maps for each subject were registered to a customized study-specific FA template. Images were then segmented, and a binary mask of white matter was created for each subject. The registered images were smoothed with a gaussian kernel of 4-mm full width at half maximum. Finally, the white matter masks were applied to the smoothed images.

Statistical analysis

A nonparametric approach was used for the voxel-based statistical analysis. This allows a test statistic incorporating spatial information (3-dimensional cluster mass, which has no parametric distribution) to be used and reduces the need for extensive smoothing to ensure that the residuals of the model tested follow a gaussian distribution (which may not be true for DTI data25). Between-group differences in diffusion variables were estimated by fitting an analysis of variance model at each intracerebral voxel. Permutation-based testing (http://www.brainmap.it26) was used to assess statistical significance at voxel and cluster levels. Voxels of interest were initially selected using a lenient P value (P < .05) to reduce the subsequent search volume. We then searched for spatial clusters among these and tested the “mass” of each cluster (the sum of suprathreshold voxel statistics it comprises) for significance. The threshold level for statistical significance was set for each analysis at which less than 1 false-positive cluster would be expected per whole-brain map. In addition, a similar voxel-based analysis was performed to examine correlations between FA, disease duration, the UMN score, and the ALSFRS-R score within the sporadic ALS group.

Identification of clusters

Significant clusters were identified. Identification was based on the knowledge of white matter anatomy by one of us (M.C.) in conjunction with the use of a published atlas.27

Results
Patient characteristics

The demographic and clinical data for the 3 study groups are given in the Table. The 3 groups were similar in age, but the proportion of women was higher in the homozygous D90A SOD1 ALS group. The 2 patient groups were well matched for disease severity as assessed by the ALSFRS-R score (t24 = 0.475, P =.64), and the degree of UMN involvement in the 2 groups was similar (t24 = −0.770, P =.45) (independent samples t test for both). Disease duration was not significantly shorter among the sporadic ALS group (t24 = −1.368, P =.18), although the means were 28 and 46 months for the sporadic ALS and homozygous D90A SOD1 ALS groups, respectively.

Within the sporadic ALS group, disease duration, the UMN score, and the ALSFRS-R score were assessed. None of these variables significantly correlated with each other.

Group comparison

Patients with sporadic ALS showed lower FA than controls in the body of the corpus callosum (particularly the region linking the precentral and postcentral gyri) and the corona radiata bilaterally (P < .003) (Figure 1). These significant clusters extended dorsally into the subcortical U-shaped short fibers and longitudinal association tracts. Patients with homozygous D90A SOD1 ALS showed higher FA than patients with sporadic ALS in these regions and in occipitotemporal and occipitoparietal white matter (P < .003) (Figure 2).

Correlation in patients with sporadic als
ALSFRS-R Score

The ALSFRS-R score positively correlated with FA (ie, more disability equals lower FA) in motor and extramotor pathways (P =.005) (Figure 3). Significant correlations were found throughout the corticospinal tract, including the corona radiata, internal capsule, cerebral peduncles, and pons. In addition, the ALSFRS-R score positively correlated with FA in the middle and superior cerebellar peduncles, occipitotemporal fibers, occipitoparietal fibers, orbitofrontal fibers, and arcuate fasciculus.

UMN Score

The UMN score negatively correlated with FA in motor and extramotor pathways (P =.008) (Figure 4). Significant correlations were found throughout the corticospinal tract, including the subcortical white matter, corona radiata, internal capsule, cerebral peduncles, and pons. In addition, the UMN score positively correlated with FA in the body and splenium of the corpus callosum and in occipitotemporal fibers.

Disease Duration

Disease duration negatively correlated with FA in a few small clusters. These clusters involved the subcortical white matter, internal capsule, cerebral peduncles, and orbitofrontal fibers (P =.008).

Comment

We applied DTI in patients with homozygous D90A SOD1 ALS, patients with sporadic ALS, and healthy controls to explore the nature of the interaction of genotype and phenotype. Despite the few patients in the homozygous D90A SOD1 ALS group, the power to detect between-group differences remains good because of their homogeneity. Although the sex distribution of the patient groups was not balanced, FA did not differ significantly between men and women in the sporadic ALS group. We showed that patients with homozygous D90A SOD1 ALS have less extensive reductions in FA than patients with sporadic disease, despite similar UMN involvement and clinical scores. Extramotor pathways seem to be less involved in homozygous D90A SOD1 ALS cases. In addition, our results confirm the sensitivity of DTI to detect motor and extramotor pathologic white matter in ALS and demonstrate that diffusion variables correlate with clinical manifestations of the disease.

Our finding of less extensive cerebral pathologic white matter in the homozygous D90A SOD1 form of ALS is consistent with previously reported positron emission tomographic, volumetric MR imaging, and neurophysiologic data. Using flumazenil C 11 positron emission tomography as a marker of cortical neuronal loss or dysfunction, Turner et al28 noted a less extensive pattern of reduced binding among patients with homozygous D90A SOD1 ALS compared with patients with sporadic ALS of similar disability. Subsequent investigation using voxel-based morphometric measurements supported these findings.29 Neurophysiologic evidence suggests that intracortical inhibition may be preserved in patients with homozygous D90A SOD1 ALS, in contrast to the increased cortical excitability seen in patients with sporadic ALS.30 Our findings are compatible with the notion that distinctive phenotypes, in this case determined by a unique and homogeneous genotype, may be identifiable using DTI.

It is now accepted that neurodegeneration in ALS extends outside of the motor system31 and that ALS overlaps with frontotemporal dementia.32 Whole-brain analysis of DTI data can characterize the distribution of pathologic white matter outside of motor pathways in ALS. Our data show involvement of the corpus callosum and more widespread degeneration of association tracts, in keeping with the findings of others showing reduced FA in several extramotor regions, particularly in the frontal lobes.10,11

The correlations between FA and clinical measures highlight the potential of DTI as an objective way to assess cerebral involvement in ALS in vivo and as a potential source of disease biomarkers for use in therapeutic monitoring. Previous studies8,12,33 have reported that FA correlates with disease severity, but results have been inconsistent.13 We find strong evidence that reduced FA correlates with increasing disease severity (ALSFRS-R score), greater UMN involvement as assessed clinically, and longer disease duration. Longitudinal studies are needed to confirm the potential of FA as a biomarker, although the use of longitudinal MR imaging may be limited by patients' ability to tolerate imaging as their disease progresses.9

Correspondence: P. Nigel Leigh, FMedSci, Medical Research Council Centre for Neurodegeneration Research and Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, PO Box 41, De Crespigny Park, London SE5 8AF, England (n.leigh@iop.kcl.ac.uk).

Accepted for Publication: June 25, 2008.

Author Contributions: Dr Leigh had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Study concept and design: Turner, V. C. Williams, S. C. R. Williams, Leigh, Andersen, and Simmons. Acquisition of data: Turner, V. C. Williams, S. C. R. Williams, Andersen, and Simmons. Analysis and interpretation of data: Stanton, Shinhmar, Turner, Blain, Giampietro, Catani, Leigh, and Simmons. Drafting of the manuscript: Stanton and Turner. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Stanton, Shinhmar, Turner, V. C. Williams, S. C. R. Williams, Blain, Giampietro, Catani, Leigh, Andersen, and Simmons. Statistical analysis: Giampietro and Simmons. Obtained funding: Turner, S. C. R. Williams, Leigh, Andersen, and Simmons. Administrative, technical, and material support: Turner, S. C. R. Williams, Giampietro, Andersen, and Simmons. Study supervision: Turner, S. C. R. Williams, Leigh, and Simmons.

Financial Disclosure: None reported.

Funding/Support: This study was supported by the Medical Research Council (Dr Stanton). Dr Turner was a Wellcome Trust Clinical Training Fellow. Dr V. C. Williams received a fellowship from the Motor Neurone Disease Association.

Additional Contributions: We thank the volunteers who kindly took part in this research.

References
1.
Rosen  DRSiddique  TPatterson  D  et al.  Mutations in Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase gene are associated with familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. [published correction appears in Nature. 1993;364(6435):362].  Nature 1993;362 (6415) 59- 62PubMedGoogle Scholar
2.
Andersen  PMNilsson  PKeränen  ML  et al.  Phenotypic heterogeneity in motor neuron disease patients with CuZn–superoxide dismutase mutations in Scandinavia.  Brain 1997;120 (pt 10) 1723- 1737PubMedGoogle Scholar
3.
Parton  MJBroom  WAndersen  PM  et al. D90A SOD1 ALS Consortium, D90A-SOD1 mediated amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a single founder for all cases with evidence for a cis-acting disease modifier in the recessive haplotype.  Hum Mutat 2002;20 (6) 473PubMedGoogle Scholar
4.
Andersen  PMForsgren  LBinzer  M  et al.  Autosomal recessive adult-onset amyotrophic lateral sclerosis associated with homozygosity for Asp90Ala CuZn–superoxide dismutase mutation: a clinical and genealogical study of 36 patients [published correction appears in Brain. 1998;121(pt 1):187].  Brain 1996;119 (pt 4) 1153- 1172PubMedGoogle Scholar
5.
Wang  SMelhem  ER Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and primary lateral sclerosis: the role of diffusion tensor imaging and other advanced MR-based techniques as objective upper motor neuron markers.  Ann N Y Acad Sci 2005;106461- 77PubMedGoogle Scholar
6.
Basser  PJMattiello  JLeBihan  D Estimation of the effective self-diffusion tensor from the NMR spin echo.  J Magn Reson B 1994;103 (3) 247- 254PubMedGoogle Scholar
7.
Song  SKSun  SWJu  WKLin  SJCross  AHNeufeld  AH Diffusion tensor imaging detects and differentiates axon and myelin degeneration in mouse optic nerve after retinal ischemia.  Neuroimage 2003;20 (3) 1714- 1722PubMedGoogle Scholar
8.
Ellis  CMSimmons  AJones  DK  et al.  Diffusion tensor MRI assesses corticospinal tract damage in ALS.  Neurology 1999;53 (5) 1051- 1058PubMedGoogle Scholar
9.
Blain  CRWilliams  VCJohnston  C  et al.  A longitudinal study of diffusion tensor MRI in ALS.  Amyotroph Lateral Scler 2007;8 (6) 348- 355PubMedGoogle Scholar
10.
Sach  MWinkler  GGlauche  V  et al.  Diffusion tensor MRI of early upper motor neuron involvement in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.  Brain 2004;127 (pt 2) 340- 350PubMedGoogle Scholar
11.
Sage  CAPeeters  RRGörner  ARobberecht  WSunaert  S Quantitative diffusion tensor imaging in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.  Neuroimage 2007;34 (2) 486- 499PubMedGoogle Scholar
12.
Cosottini  MGiannelli  MSiciliano  G  et al.  Diffusion-tensor MR imaging of corticospinal tract in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and progressive muscular atrophy.  Radiology 2005;237 (1) 258- 264PubMedGoogle Scholar
13.
Hong  YHLee  KWSung  JJChang  KHSong  IC Diffusion tensor MRI as a diagnostic tool of upper motor neuron involvement in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.  J Neurol Sci 2004;227 (1) 73- 78PubMedGoogle Scholar
14.
Ng  MCHo  JTHo  SL  et al.  Abnormal diffusion tensor in nonsymptomatic familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis with a causative superoxide dismutase 1 mutation.  J Magn Reson Imaging 2008;27 (1) 8- 13PubMedGoogle Scholar
15.
Ciccarelli  OBehrens  TEJohansen-Berg  HTalbot  KOrrell  RWHoward  RSNunes  RGMiller  DHMatthews  PMThompson  AJSmith  SM Investigation of white matter pathology in ALS and PLS using tract-based spatial statistics.  Hum Brain Mapp 10.1002/hbm.205272008; Jan2 [Epub ahead of print]PubMedGoogle Scholar
16.
Wicks  PAbrahams  SPapps  BLeigh  PNGoldstein  LH Cognitive vulnerability in subgroups of MND [abstract].  Amyotroph Lateral Scler Other Motor Neuron Disord 2005;6 ((suppl 1)) 46- 4810.1080/17434470510045203Google Scholar
17.
Mackenzie  IRBigio  EHInce  PG  et al.  Pathological TDP-43 distinguishes sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis from amyotrophic lateral sclerosis with SOD1 mutations.  Ann Neurol 2007;61 (5) 427- 434PubMedGoogle Scholar
18.
Leigh  PNAbrahams  SAl-Chalabi  A  et al. King's MND Care and Research Team, The management of motor neurone disease.  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2003;74 ((suppl 4)) iv32- iv47PubMedGoogle Scholar
19.
Brooks  BRMiller  RGSwash  MMunsat  TLWorld Federation of Neurology Research Group on Motor Neuron Diseases, El Escorial revisited: revised criteria for the diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.  Amyotroph Lateral Scler Other Motor Neuron Disord 2000;1 (5) 293- 299PubMedGoogle Scholar
20.
Cedarbaum  JMStambler  NMalta  E  et al. BDNF ALS Study Group (Phase III), The ALSFRS-R: a revised ALS functional rating scale that incorporates assessments of respiratory function.  J Neurol Sci 1999;169 (1-2) 13- 21PubMedGoogle Scholar
21.
Turner  MRCagnin  ATurkheimer  FE  et al.  Evidence of widespread cerebral microglial activation in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: an [11C](R)-PK11195 positron emission tomography study.  Neurobiol Dis 2004;15 (3) 601- 609PubMedGoogle Scholar
22.
Jones  DKWilliams  SCGasston  DHorsfield  MASimmons  AHoward  R Isotropic resolution diffusion tensor imaging with whole brain acquisition in a clinically acceptable time.  Hum Brain Mapp 2002;15 (4) 216- 230PubMedGoogle Scholar
23.
Simmons  AMoore  EWilliams  SC Quality control for functional magnetic resonance imaging using automated data analysis and Shewhart charting.  Magn Reson Med 1999;41 (6) 1274- 1278PubMedGoogle Scholar
24.
Catani  MHoward  RJPajevic  SJones  DK Virtual in vivo interactive dissection of white matter fasciculi in the human brain.  Neuroimage 2002;17 (1) 77- 94PubMedGoogle Scholar
25.
Jones  DKSymms  MRCercignani  MHoward  RJ The effect of filter size on VBM analyses of DT-MRI data.  Neuroimage 2005;26 (2) 546- 554PubMedGoogle Scholar
26.
Brammer  MJBullmore  ETSimmons  A  et al.  Generic brain activation mapping in functional magnetic resonance imaging: a nonparametric approach.  Magn Reson Imaging 1997;15 (7) 763- 770PubMedGoogle Scholar
27.
Mori  SWakana  SNagae-Poetscher  LMvan Zijl  PC MRI Atlas of Human White Matter.  Amsterdam, the Netherlands Elsevier Science Publishers2005;
28.
Turner  MRHammers  AAl-Chalabi  A  et al.  Distinct cerebral lesions in sporadic and “D90A” SOD1 ALS: studies with [11C]flumazenil PET.  Brain 2005;128 (pt 6) 1323- 1329PubMedGoogle Scholar
29.
Turner  MRHammers  AAllsop  J  et al.  Volumetric cortical loss in sporadic and familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.  Amyotroph Lateral Scler 2007;8 (6) 343- 347PubMedGoogle Scholar
30.
Turner  MROsei-Lah  ADHammers  A  et al.  Abnormal cortical excitability in sporadic but not homozygous D90A SOD1 ALS.  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2005;76 (9) 1279- 1285PubMedGoogle Scholar
31.
Maekawa  SAl-Sarraj  SKibble  M  et al.  Cortical selective vulnerability in motor neuron disease: a morphometric study.  Brain 2004;127 (pt 6) 1237- 1251PubMedGoogle Scholar
32.
Neumann  MSampathu  DMKwong  LK  et al.  Ubiquitinated TDP-43 in frontotemporal lobar degeneration and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.  Science 2006;314 (5796) 130- 133PubMedGoogle Scholar
33.
Wang  SPoptani  HWoo  JH  et al.  Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: diffusion-tensor and chemical shift MR imaging at 3.0 T.  Radiology 2006;239 (3) 831- 838PubMedGoogle Scholar
×