Background
The basis of heterogeneity in the clinical presentation and rate of progression of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS) is poorly understood.
Objectives
To use diffusion tensor imaging as a measure of axonal pathologic features in vivo in ALS and to compare a homogeneous form of familial ALS (homozygous D90A SOD1 [superoxide dismutase 1]) with sporadic ALS.
Design
Cross-sectional diffusion tensor imaging study.
Setting
Tertiary referral neurology clinic.
Patients
Twenty patients with sporadic ALS, 6 patients with homozygous D90A SOD1 ALS, and 21 healthy control subjects.
Main Outcome Measure
Fractional anisotropy in cerebral white matter.
Results
Patients with homozygous D90A SOD1 ALS showed less extensive pathologic white matter in motor and extramotor pathways compared with patients with sporadic ALS, despite similar disease severity assessed clinically using a standard functional rating scale. Fractional anisotropy correlated with clinical measures of severity and upper motor neuron involvement.
Conclusion
In vivo diffusion tensor imaging measures demonstrate differences in white matter degeneration between sporadic ALS and a unique familial form of the disease, indicating that genotype influences the distribution of cerebral pathologic features in ALS.
There is considerable variation in the clinical presentation and rate of progression of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), but the basis of this heterogeneity is poorly understood. About 10% of ALS cases are inherited in a mendelian fashion, with mutations in the superoxide dismutase 1 (SOD1) gene (GenBank AY450286) being responsible for 20% of these.1 The D90A SOD1 mutation is commonly inherited as a recessive trait with high penetrance in homozygotes.2 Homozygous D90A SOD1 cases are genetically homogeneous, sharing a common founder about 60 generations ago.3The resulting clinical phenotype is stereotyped as a spastic paraparesis progressing to upper limb and bulbar involvement.4 The disease is slowly progressive, with a much longer survival than with sporadic ALS (mean, 14 vs 3 years, respectively). Groups of patients with genetic forms of ALS that are clinically homogeneous provide a unique opportunity to study the pathologic basis of the relationship between genotype and phenotype in ALS.
Neuroimaging techniques have been used in ALS in an attempt to improve diagnosis and to measure disease progression,5 as well as to provide a quantitative method of studying the pathophysiologic function of the disease in vivo. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) is a magnetic resonance (MR) imaging technique in which the signal is sensitized to the diffusion of water within brain tissue6 (which is restricted by barriers such as cell membranes and occurs preferentially along the direction of white matter tracts). Fractional anisotropy (FA) is a measure of the directionality of diffusion in a voxel (from 0 [complete lack of directionality of diffusion] to 1 [complete anisotropy]) and is reduced when white matter tracts are disrupted.7
Previous studies8,9 using region-of-interest approaches to analyze DTI data in ALS have shown reduced FA in the corticospinal tract, consistent with the known pathologic features of the disease. Voxel-based approaches to analysis have demonstrated evidence of white matter damage in extramotor pathways.10,11 Some correlations between clinical measures and diffusion variables have been reported, but results have been inconsistent.12,13 Diffusion changes have been reported in asymptomatic patients with SOD1 mutations, suggesting that the technique is sensitive to early pathophysiologic changes.14 Diffusion tensor imaging has demonstrated distinct patterns of reduced FA in primary lateral sclerosis compared with ALS.15
We used whole-brain analysis of DTI data to test the hypothesis that FA changes in a clinically and genetically homogeneous form of ALS (homozygous D90A SOD1 variant) can be distinguished from those in sporadic ALS. Specifically, we hypothesized that extramotor involvement would be less marked in homozygous D90A SOD1 ALS cases, as recent evidence suggests that cognitive changes are lacking or less marked in ALS with SOD1 mutations16 and that immunoreactive inclusions of TAR DNA-binding protein of 43 kDa are absent or scarce in SOD1 compared with sporadic cases.17 In addition, we explored correlations between FA and clinical measures in ALS. We hypothesized that greater disease severity, more extensive clinical upper motor neuron (UMN) involvement, and longer disease duration would correlate with lower FA.
The study included 20 patients with sporadic ALS, 6 patients with homozygous D90A SOD1 ALS, and 21 healthy control subjects. All subjects were right handed and had no history of hypertension, cerebrovascular disease, or diabetes mellitus. The study was approved by the Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London (London, England) local research ethics committee and was performed in accord with the ethical standards of the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki. All subjects gave written informed consent before their inclusion in the study.
All suitable patients with sporadic ALS attending the motor disorders clinic at King's College Hospital were invited to participate in the study. Patients with ALS were diagnosed following clinical examination by a consultant neurologist. Other conditions were excluded by appropriate blood tests, neurophysiologic testing, and neuroimaging.18 Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis was categorized according to the revised El Escorial criteria19: 4 patients had definite ALS, 11 had probable ALS, and 5 had possible ALS. Patients with homozygous D90A SOD1 ALS were recruited from Umeå University Hospital (Umeå, Sweden) and traveled to London to take part in the study. Healthy controls without a history of neurologic disorder were recruited among the spouses and friends of patients and among members of a local volunteer organization.
All subjects underwent a clinical assessment, including full neurologic examination. Patients with ALS were assessed using the ALS Functional Rating Scale–Revised (ALSFRS-R).20 In addition, a UMN “burden” score was calculated to quantify the degree of UMN involvement in each patient.21 This score is the total number of pathologically brisk reflexes (including extensor plantar responses, brisk facial and jaw jerks, and biceps, supinator, triceps, finger, knee, and ankle reflexes), with a maximum possible score of 16.
Diffusion tensor imaging data were acquired using a 1.5-T MR imaging scanner (GE Signa NV/i; General Electric, Milwaukee, Wisconsin) with actively shielded magnetic field gradients (maximum amplitude, 40 mT/m) and a standard quadrature transmit-and-receive birdcage head coil. All images were acquired from the whole brain, with sections parallel to the anterior commissure–posterior commissure line.
Using a multisection, peripherally gated echoplanar imaging pulse sequence, each DTI volume was acquired from 60 contiguous 2.5-mm-thick sections with a field of view of 240 × 240 mm and an acquisition matrix size of 96 × 96 pixels (zero filled to 128 × 128 pixels), giving an in-plane voxel size of 1.875 × 1.875 mm2. Echo time was 107 milliseconds. Effective repetition time was 15 R-R intervals. At each location, 7 images were acquired without diffusion weighting, together with 64 images with a weighting of 1300 s/mm−2 applied along directions uniformly distributed in space.22 Data acquisition from patients and controls was interleaved to ensure that a shift in scanner performance would not lead to spurious results. The quality of echoplanar imaging data was assessed using an automated analysis technique.23
Diffusion-weighted images were initially corrected for eddy-current distortion using in-house software that included a mutual information–based registration.24 Brain data were masked from the background using a semiautomated thresholding procedure. The diffusion tensor was then calculated for each brain voxel using multivariate linear regression analysis after logarithmic transformation of the signal intensities.6 The tensor matrix at each voxel was subsequently diagonalized to compute the eigen values and the corresponding eigen vectors. Fractional anisotropy maps were then constructed.
Preprocessing was performed using Statistical Parametric Mapping software (SPM2; Wellcome Department of Imaging Neurosciences, University College London, London). The FA maps for each subject were registered to a customized study-specific FA template. Images were then segmented, and a binary mask of white matter was created for each subject. The registered images were smoothed with a gaussian kernel of 4-mm full width at half maximum. Finally, the white matter masks were applied to the smoothed images.
A nonparametric approach was used for the voxel-based statistical analysis. This allows a test statistic incorporating spatial information (3-dimensional cluster mass, which has no parametric distribution) to be used and reduces the need for extensive smoothing to ensure that the residuals of the model tested follow a gaussian distribution (which may not be true for DTI data25). Between-group differences in diffusion variables were estimated by fitting an analysis of variance model at each intracerebral voxel. Permutation-based testing (http://www.brainmap.it26) was used to assess statistical significance at voxel and cluster levels. Voxels of interest were initially selected using a lenient P value (P < .05) to reduce the subsequent search volume. We then searched for spatial clusters among these and tested the “mass” of each cluster (the sum of suprathreshold voxel statistics it comprises) for significance. The threshold level for statistical significance was set for each analysis at which less than 1 false-positive cluster would be expected per whole-brain map. In addition, a similar voxel-based analysis was performed to examine correlations between FA, disease duration, the UMN score, and the ALSFRS-R score within the sporadic ALS group.
Identification of clusters
Significant clusters were identified. Identification was based on the knowledge of white matter anatomy by one of us (M.C.) in conjunction with the use of a published atlas.27
The demographic and clinical data for the 3 study groups are given in the Table. The 3 groups were similar in age, but the proportion of women was higher in the homozygous D90A SOD1 ALS group. The 2 patient groups were well matched for disease severity as assessed by the ALSFRS-R score (t24 = 0.475, P =.64), and the degree of UMN involvement in the 2 groups was similar (t24 = −0.770, P =.45) (independent samples t test for both). Disease duration was not significantly shorter among the sporadic ALS group (t24 = −1.368, P =.18), although the means were 28 and 46 months for the sporadic ALS and homozygous D90A SOD1 ALS groups, respectively.
Within the sporadic ALS group, disease duration, the UMN score, and the ALSFRS-R score were assessed. None of these variables significantly correlated with each other.
Patients with sporadic ALS showed lower FA than controls in the body of the corpus callosum (particularly the region linking the precentral and postcentral gyri) and the corona radiata bilaterally (P < .003) (Figure 1). These significant clusters extended dorsally into the subcortical U-shaped short fibers and longitudinal association tracts. Patients with homozygous D90A SOD1 ALS showed higher FA than patients with sporadic ALS in these regions and in occipitotemporal and occipitoparietal white matter (P < .003) (Figure 2).
Correlation in patients with sporadic als
The ALSFRS-R score positively correlated with FA (ie, more disability equals lower FA) in motor and extramotor pathways (P =.005) (Figure 3). Significant correlations were found throughout the corticospinal tract, including the corona radiata, internal capsule, cerebral peduncles, and pons. In addition, the ALSFRS-R score positively correlated with FA in the middle and superior cerebellar peduncles, occipitotemporal fibers, occipitoparietal fibers, orbitofrontal fibers, and arcuate fasciculus.
The UMN score negatively correlated with FA in motor and extramotor pathways (P =.008) (Figure 4). Significant correlations were found throughout the corticospinal tract, including the subcortical white matter, corona radiata, internal capsule, cerebral peduncles, and pons. In addition, the UMN score positively correlated with FA in the body and splenium of the corpus callosum and in occipitotemporal fibers.
Disease duration negatively correlated with FA in a few small clusters. These clusters involved the subcortical white matter, internal capsule, cerebral peduncles, and orbitofrontal fibers (P =.008).
We applied DTI in patients with homozygous D90A SOD1 ALS, patients with sporadic ALS, and healthy controls to explore the nature of the interaction of genotype and phenotype. Despite the few patients in the homozygous D90A SOD1 ALS group, the power to detect between-group differences remains good because of their homogeneity. Although the sex distribution of the patient groups was not balanced, FA did not differ significantly between men and women in the sporadic ALS group. We showed that patients with homozygous D90A SOD1 ALS have less extensive reductions in FA than patients with sporadic disease, despite similar UMN involvement and clinical scores. Extramotor pathways seem to be less involved in homozygous D90A SOD1 ALS cases. In addition, our results confirm the sensitivity of DTI to detect motor and extramotor pathologic white matter in ALS and demonstrate that diffusion variables correlate with clinical manifestations of the disease.
Our finding of less extensive cerebral pathologic white matter in the homozygous D90A SOD1 form of ALS is consistent with previously reported positron emission tomographic, volumetric MR imaging, and neurophysiologic data. Using flumazenil C 11 positron emission tomography as a marker of cortical neuronal loss or dysfunction, Turner et al28 noted a less extensive pattern of reduced binding among patients with homozygous D90A SOD1 ALS compared with patients with sporadic ALS of similar disability. Subsequent investigation using voxel-based morphometric measurements supported these findings.29 Neurophysiologic evidence suggests that intracortical inhibition may be preserved in patients with homozygous D90A SOD1 ALS, in contrast to the increased cortical excitability seen in patients with sporadic ALS.30 Our findings are compatible with the notion that distinctive phenotypes, in this case determined by a unique and homogeneous genotype, may be identifiable using DTI.
It is now accepted that neurodegeneration in ALS extends outside of the motor system31 and that ALS overlaps with frontotemporal dementia.32 Whole-brain analysis of DTI data can characterize the distribution of pathologic white matter outside of motor pathways in ALS. Our data show involvement of the corpus callosum and more widespread degeneration of association tracts, in keeping with the findings of others showing reduced FA in several extramotor regions, particularly in the frontal lobes.10,11
The correlations between FA and clinical measures highlight the potential of DTI as an objective way to assess cerebral involvement in ALS in vivo and as a potential source of disease biomarkers for use in therapeutic monitoring. Previous studies8,12,33 have reported that FA correlates with disease severity, but results have been inconsistent.13 We find strong evidence that reduced FA correlates with increasing disease severity (ALSFRS-R score), greater UMN involvement as assessed clinically, and longer disease duration. Longitudinal studies are needed to confirm the potential of FA as a biomarker, although the use of longitudinal MR imaging may be limited by patients' ability to tolerate imaging as their disease progresses.9
Correspondence: P. Nigel Leigh, FMedSci, Medical Research Council Centre for Neurodegeneration Research and Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Institute of Psychiatry, King's College London, PO Box 41, De Crespigny Park, London SE5 8AF, England (n.leigh@iop.kcl.ac.uk).
Accepted for Publication: June 25, 2008.
Author Contributions: Dr Leigh had full access to all of the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Study concept and design: Turner, V. C. Williams, S. C. R. Williams, Leigh, Andersen, and Simmons. Acquisition of data: Turner, V. C. Williams, S. C. R. Williams, Andersen, and Simmons. Analysis and interpretation of data: Stanton, Shinhmar, Turner, Blain, Giampietro, Catani, Leigh, and Simmons. Drafting of the manuscript: Stanton and Turner. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Stanton, Shinhmar, Turner, V. C. Williams, S. C. R. Williams, Blain, Giampietro, Catani, Leigh, Andersen, and Simmons. Statistical analysis: Giampietro and Simmons. Obtained funding: Turner, S. C. R. Williams, Leigh, Andersen, and Simmons. Administrative, technical, and material support: Turner, S. C. R. Williams, Giampietro, Andersen, and Simmons. Study supervision: Turner, S. C. R. Williams, Leigh, and Simmons.
Financial Disclosure: None reported.
Funding/Support: This study was supported by the Medical Research Council (Dr Stanton). Dr Turner was a Wellcome Trust Clinical Training Fellow. Dr V. C. Williams received a fellowship from the Motor Neurone Disease Association.
Additional Contributions: We thank the volunteers who kindly took part in this research.
1.Rosen
DRSiddique
TPatterson
D
et al. Mutations in Cu/Zn superoxide dismutase gene are associated with familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. [published correction appears in
Nature. 1993;364(6435):362].
Nature 1993;362
(6415)
59- 62
PubMedGoogle Scholar 2.Andersen
PMNilsson
PKeränen
ML
et al. Phenotypic heterogeneity in motor neuron disease patients with CuZn–superoxide dismutase mutations in Scandinavia.
Brain 1997;120
(pt 10)
1723- 1737
PubMedGoogle Scholar 3.Parton
MJBroom
WAndersen
PM
et al. D90A
SOD1 ALS Consortium, D90A-
SOD1 mediated amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: a single founder for all cases with evidence for a
cis-acting disease modifier in the recessive haplotype.
Hum Mutat 2002;20
(6)
473
PubMedGoogle Scholar 4.Andersen
PMForsgren
LBinzer
M
et al. Autosomal recessive adult-onset amyotrophic lateral sclerosis associated with homozygosity for Asp90Ala CuZn–superoxide dismutase mutation: a clinical and genealogical study of 36 patients [published correction appears in
Brain. 1998;121(pt 1):187].
Brain 1996;119
(pt 4)
1153- 1172
PubMedGoogle Scholar 5.Wang
SMelhem
ER Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and primary lateral sclerosis: the role of diffusion tensor imaging and other advanced MR-based techniques as objective upper motor neuron markers.
Ann N Y Acad Sci 2005;106461- 77
PubMedGoogle Scholar 6.Basser
PJMattiello
JLeBihan
D Estimation of the effective self-diffusion tensor from the NMR spin echo.
J Magn Reson B 1994;103
(3)
247- 254
PubMedGoogle Scholar 7.Song
SKSun
SWJu
WKLin
SJCross
AHNeufeld
AH Diffusion tensor imaging detects and differentiates axon and myelin degeneration in mouse optic nerve after retinal ischemia.
Neuroimage 2003;20
(3)
1714- 1722
PubMedGoogle Scholar 8.Ellis
CMSimmons
AJones
DK
et al. Diffusion tensor MRI assesses corticospinal tract damage in ALS.
Neurology 1999;53
(5)
1051- 1058
PubMedGoogle Scholar 9.Blain
CRWilliams
VCJohnston
C
et al. A longitudinal study of diffusion tensor MRI in ALS.
Amyotroph Lateral Scler 2007;8
(6)
348- 355
PubMedGoogle Scholar 10.Sach
MWinkler
GGlauche
V
et al. Diffusion tensor MRI of early upper motor neuron involvement in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.
Brain 2004;127
(pt 2)
340- 350
PubMedGoogle Scholar 11.Sage
CAPeeters
RRGörner
ARobberecht
WSunaert
S Quantitative diffusion tensor imaging in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.
Neuroimage 2007;34
(2)
486- 499
PubMedGoogle Scholar 12.Cosottini
MGiannelli
MSiciliano
G
et al. Diffusion-tensor MR imaging of corticospinal tract in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and progressive muscular atrophy.
Radiology 2005;237
(1)
258- 264
PubMedGoogle Scholar 13.Hong
YHLee
KWSung
JJChang
KHSong
IC Diffusion tensor MRI as a diagnostic tool of upper motor neuron involvement in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.
J Neurol Sci 2004;227
(1)
73- 78
PubMedGoogle Scholar 14.Ng
MCHo
JTHo
SL
et al. Abnormal diffusion tensor in nonsymptomatic familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis with a causative superoxide dismutase 1 mutation.
J Magn Reson Imaging 2008;27
(1)
8- 13
PubMedGoogle Scholar 15.Ciccarelli
OBehrens
TEJohansen-Berg
HTalbot
KOrrell
RWHoward
RSNunes
RGMiller
DHMatthews
PMThompson
AJSmith
SM Investigation of white matter pathology in ALS and PLS using tract-based spatial statistics.
Hum Brain Mapp 10.1002/hbm.205272008; Jan2 [Epub ahead of print]
PubMedGoogle Scholar 16.Wicks
PAbrahams
SPapps
BLeigh
PNGoldstein
LH Cognitive vulnerability in subgroups of MND [abstract].
Amyotroph Lateral Scler Other Motor Neuron Disord 2005;6
((suppl 1))
46- 4810.1080/17434470510045203
Google Scholar 17.Mackenzie
IRBigio
EHInce
PG
et al. Pathological TDP-43 distinguishes sporadic amyotrophic lateral sclerosis from amyotrophic lateral sclerosis with
SOD1 mutations.
Ann Neurol 2007;61
(5)
427- 434
PubMedGoogle Scholar 18.Leigh
PNAbrahams
SAl-Chalabi
A
et al. King's MND Care and Research Team, The management of motor neurone disease.
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2003;74
((suppl 4))
iv32- iv47
PubMedGoogle Scholar 19.Brooks
BRMiller
RGSwash
MMunsat
TLWorld Federation of Neurology Research Group on Motor Neuron Diseases, El Escorial revisited: revised criteria for the diagnosis of amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.
Amyotroph Lateral Scler Other Motor Neuron Disord 2000;1
(5)
293- 299
PubMedGoogle Scholar 20.Cedarbaum
JMStambler
NMalta
E
et al. BDNF ALS Study Group (Phase III), The ALSFRS-R: a revised ALS functional rating scale that incorporates assessments of respiratory function.
J Neurol Sci 1999;169
(1-2)
13- 21
PubMedGoogle Scholar 21.Turner
MRCagnin
ATurkheimer
FE
et al. Evidence of widespread cerebral microglial activation in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: an [
11C](R)-PK11195 positron emission tomography study.
Neurobiol Dis 2004;15
(3)
601- 609
PubMedGoogle Scholar 22.Jones
DKWilliams
SCGasston
DHorsfield
MASimmons
AHoward
R Isotropic resolution diffusion tensor imaging with whole brain acquisition in a clinically acceptable time.
Hum Brain Mapp 2002;15
(4)
216- 230
PubMedGoogle Scholar 23.Simmons
AMoore
EWilliams
SC Quality control for functional magnetic resonance imaging using automated data analysis and Shewhart charting.
Magn Reson Med 1999;41
(6)
1274- 1278
PubMedGoogle Scholar 24.Catani
MHoward
RJPajevic
SJones
DK Virtual in vivo interactive dissection of white matter fasciculi in the human brain.
Neuroimage 2002;17
(1)
77- 94
PubMedGoogle Scholar 25.Jones
DKSymms
MRCercignani
MHoward
RJ The effect of filter size on VBM analyses of DT-MRI data.
Neuroimage 2005;26
(2)
546- 554
PubMedGoogle Scholar 26.Brammer
MJBullmore
ETSimmons
A
et al. Generic brain activation mapping in functional magnetic resonance imaging: a nonparametric approach.
Magn Reson Imaging 1997;15
(7)
763- 770
PubMedGoogle Scholar 27.Mori
SWakana
SNagae-Poetscher
LMvan Zijl
PC MRI Atlas of Human White Matter. Amsterdam, the Netherlands Elsevier Science Publishers2005;
28.Turner
MRHammers
AAl-Chalabi
A
et al. Distinct cerebral lesions in sporadic and “D90A”
SOD1 ALS: studies with [
11C]flumazenil PET.
Brain 2005;128
(pt 6)
1323- 1329
PubMedGoogle Scholar 29.Turner
MRHammers
AAllsop
J
et al. Volumetric cortical loss in sporadic and familial amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.
Amyotroph Lateral Scler 2007;8
(6)
343- 347
PubMedGoogle Scholar 30.Turner
MROsei-Lah
ADHammers
A
et al. Abnormal cortical excitability in sporadic but not homozygous D90A
SOD1 ALS.
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2005;76
(9)
1279- 1285
PubMedGoogle Scholar 31.Maekawa
SAl-Sarraj
SKibble
M
et al. Cortical selective vulnerability in motor neuron disease: a morphometric study.
Brain 2004;127
(pt 6)
1237- 1251
PubMedGoogle Scholar 32.Neumann
MSampathu
DMKwong
LK
et al. Ubiquitinated TDP-43 in frontotemporal lobar degeneration and amyotrophic lateral sclerosis.
Science 2006;314
(5796)
130- 133
PubMedGoogle Scholar 33.Wang
SPoptani
HWoo
JH
et al. Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: diffusion-tensor and chemical shift MR imaging at 3.0 T.
Radiology 2006;239
(3)
831- 838
PubMedGoogle Scholar