Objective
To compare leukocyte accumulation and expression of the chemokine receptor/ligand pair CXCR4/CXCL12 in magnetic resonance imaging–defined regions of interest (ROIs) in brains from patients with chronic multiple sclerosis. We studied the following ROIs: normal-appearing white matter (NAWM); regions abnormal only on T2-weighted images (T2 only); and regions abnormal on T2- and T1-weighted images with an abnormal magnetization transfer ratio (T2/T1/MTR).
Design
Case-control study.
Setting
Cleveland Clinic.
Patients
Brain tissue was acquired from 5 patients with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis (MS) and 5 nonneurological controls.
Intervention
Magnetic resonance imaging pathological correlations were performed on the 5 cases. Based on imaging characteristics, 30 ROIs were excised.
Main Outcome Measure
Using immunohistochemical analysis, we evaluated myelin status, leukocyte accumulation, and CXCR4/CXCL12 expression in the MS ROIs and white matter regions from the 5 nonneurological controls.
Results
Eight of 10 T2/T1/MTR regions were chronic active or chronic inactive demyelinated lesions, whereas only 2 of 10 T2-only regions were demyelinated and characterized as active or chronic active lesions. Equivalent numbers of CD68+ leukocytes (the predominant cell type) were present in myelinated T2-only regions as compared with NAWM. Parenchymal T cells were significantly increased in T2/T1/MTR ROIs as compared with T2-only regions and NAWM. Expression of CXCR4 and phospho-CXCR4 were found on reactive microglia and macrophages in T2-only and T2/T1/MTR lesions. CXCL12 immunoreactivity was detected in astrocytes, astrocytic processes, and vascular elements in inflamed MS lesions.
Conclusions
Inflammatory leukocyte accumulation was not increased in myelinated MS ROIs with abnormal T2 signal as compared with NAWM. Robust expression of CXCR4/CXCL12 on inflammatory elements in MS lesions highlights a role of this chemokine/receptor pair in central nervous system inflammation.
Conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is frequently used to confirm clinical diagnosis of multiple sclerosis (MS), monitor disease evolution, and assess response to treatment. Conventional MRI evaluations show several advantages over clinical assessments, including their more objective nature and increased sensitivity to MS-related changes.1,2 However, there are only weak or modest correlations between the clinical manifestations of the disease and conventional MRI measures of the disease burden especially in progressive MS.3-5 T2-weighted sequences depict a wide spectrum of pathological changes in brain tissue and therefore lack specificity. Moreover, T2-weighted images do not show tissue damage occurring in normal-appearing white matter (NAWM) and gray matter, which are known to be extensively injured in the late stages of MS.6 More pathologically specific brain imaging methods include magnetic resonance spectroscopy, T1-weighted MRI, diffusion transfer imaging, and magnetization transfer ratio (MTR). Hypointense lesions on T1-weighted MRI (“black holes”) correspond to areas of more significant demyelination, axonal loss, and axonal pathological features in MS tissue.7-10 The pathological substrates of magnetic resonance–related changes are currently of high interest, in the effort to understand the pathogenesis of disability in patients with MS. Our recent MRI pathological study of MS brain tissue showed that areas abnormal on T2-weighted and T1-weighted MRI with an abnormal MTR (T2/T1/MTR) often correspond to demyelinated lesions with significantly fewer axons but increased axonal swelling and loss of axonal sodium/potassium adenosine triphosphatase.7,11 Areas abnormal on T2-weighted MRI but with a normal MTR and normal T1-weighted imaging results were associated with less severe tissue damage, less axonal loss, and much less axonal swelling and the presence of axonal sodium/potassium adenosine triphosphatase. The majority of regions abnormal only on T2-weighted imaging (T2 only) featured local microglial activation and were characterized as active or chronic active lesions. T2/T1/MTR regions, which had the most axonal degeneration, were principally chronic inactive lesions. The current study was undertaken to extend these findings, first by detailed analysis of inflammatory elements in the lesions and second by characterizing the CXCR4/CXCL12 system.
Focal areas of myelin destruction observed in MS often occur on a background of inflammation dominated by T lymphocytes, hematogenous macrophages, microglial activation, and the presence of few B lymphocytes and plasma cells.12-14 In vitro studies have shown that microglial activation leads to upregulation of CXCR4.15,16 CXCR4 and its ligand CXCL12 are also associated with migration, proliferation, survival, and effector functions and can be present on astrocytes, microglia, oligodendroglia, and subsets of NG2-positive glia, representing oligodendrocyte progenitor cells.17 However, little is known about what roles the CXCR4/CXCL12 system plays during the inflammatory reaction in MS. The CXCL12 level is elevated in the cerebrospinal fluid from patients with MS and other inflammatory neurological disorders.18,19 In active MS lesions, CXCL12 is upregulated on astrocytes throughout lesion areas and on some monocytes/macrophages within perivascular cuffs.19,20 It has been recently shown that alteration of the pattern of CXCL12 expression at the blood-brain barrier, including CXCL12 redistribution toward vessel lumina, was associated with CXCR4 activation (indicated by the presence of phosphorylated epitopes) on infiltrating leukocytes and demyelination and inflammation in MS tissue sections.21
In the current study, we evaluated myelin status, inflammatory leukocyte accumulation, and expression of CXCR4 and CXCL12 in MS T2/T1/MTR brain regions compared with T2-only regions and NAWM. Postmortem material was acquired according to an established protocol that has supported our previous reports. Brains from patients with MS were imaged in situ before autopsy and image-to-tissue coregistration was applied to enable MRI pathological correlations.
Tissue and tissue acquisition
Collection and use of human tissue was approved by the Cleveland Clinic institutional review board. Magnetic resonance imaging pathological correlations were performed on brain tissue from 5 cases with secondary progressive MS as previously described.11 The demographic and clinical details on these cases are shown in Table 1. Control tissues were obtained from autopsies of patients without neurological disease performed at Cleveland Clinic (Table 2). These tissues were not subjected to postmortem MRI but were otherwise processed identically to MS tissue.
For the current study, a total of 30 regions of interest (ROIs) were selected and isolated from postmortem MRIs of 5 cases with MS. These ROIs included (1) T2/T1/MTR areas, (2) T2-only areas, and (3) NAWM, which was normal appearing on all images. These patients represent a subset of those previously reported,11 but tissue ROIs reported herein are distinct from those characterized previously.
Samples of subcortical and periventricular white matter were dissected from each of 5 nonneurological control cases (10 tissue blocks total). The ROIs from MS brains (MRI defined and mapped onto coregistered tissue slice images) and nonneurological control brains were subsequently sectioned and immunostained to evaluate the myelin status, inflammatory activity, and CXCR4/CXCL12 immunoreactivity.
Mri acquisition and analysis
Magnetic resonance imaging was performed on a 1.5-T magnetic resonance scanner (Siemens, Erlangen, Germany), as described previously.11 Maps of MS ROIs were generated for each tissue slice from the corresponding MRI planes. A 10-mm grid was overlaid on the image planes to provide a frame of reference. The outlines of ROIs that corresponded to each region type (T2/T1/MTR and T2-only) and NAWM were transferred to the region maps (Figure 1). These maps were then used to guide tissue sampling for the histological analysis.
Immunohistochemical analysis
Using MRI region maps, ROIs were identified and isolated from MS brains and nonneurological control tissue. Tissue blocks were cryoprotected overnight in 20% glycerol, embedded in 30% sucrose, and sectioned 30 μm thick on a freezing sliding microtome. These sections were used for immunoperoxidase histochemical evaluation and double-labeled immunofluorescence.
Sections were pretreated as described previously,22 incubated with primary antibodies for 5 days at 4°C, then incubated with appropriate secondary antibodies and immunostained by the avidin-biotin complex (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, California). Diaminobenzidine (Sigma-Aldrich, St Louis, Missouri) was used as chromogen. Sections for confocal microscopy were incubated with 2 primary antibodies and non–cross-reacting secondary antibodies conjugated to Alexa Fluor 488 and Alexa Fluor 594 (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, California). The specificity of immunohistochemical procedures was tested using antibodies with well-characterized and different immunoreactivity.
Primary antibodies used for immunostaining in the present study are summarized in Table 3.
Double-labeled MS brain sections were imaged and analyzed on an SP5 confocal microscope (Leica Application Suite, version 1.6.3; Leica Microsystems, Wetzlar, Germany). The entire thickness of the sections (30 μm) was scanned. Fluorescence was collected in the green, red, and autofluorescence channels. Images presented in this study consisted of 30 to 60 optical serial sections combined to form a “through-focus” image.
Multiple micrographs of each ROI, including NAWM, and nonneurological control brains stained with anti-CD68, anti-CXCR4, anti-CD3, and anti-CD20 antibodies were digitized using 20 × objective (Leica DM 4000B and QCapture Pro, version 5.1.1.14; Leica Microsystems), transferred to a workstation, and manually quantified (Adobe Photoshop CS2; Adobe, San Jose, California), applying corrections for image size and resolution. These microphotographs were taken from 9 nonoverlapping microscopical fields of each MS ROI (5 micrographs were taken from the middle parts and 4 at the borders of ROIs) and 5 nonoverlapping fields from the white matter of each nonneurological control section. Cell densities were calculated as previously described23 as a ratio of cell number to area of interest in millimeters squared. Quantitative analysis was performed in a blinded fashion by 2 independent investigators (N.M.M. and A.M.R.).
Mixed-model analysis in SAS (SAS Institute Inc, Cary, North Carolina) was applied to determine the statistical significance of the data and compensate for multiple comparisons between varied regions from individual MS brains; P < .05 was considered statistically significant. Results are given as mean (SD). Pearson correlation coefficients (r) were calculated to determine the relation between CD68 and CXCR4+ cells in MS ROIs.
T2/t1/mtr areas primarily represent demyelinating ms lesions, whereas t2-only areas are variably demyelinated
We found that 80% of T2/T1/MTR areas (8 of 10) were demyelinated while only 20% of T2-only areas (2 of 10) were demyelinated (Table 4). Areas of NAWM and nonneurological control white matter areas were always myelinated. Some T2/T1/MTR and T2-only areas retaining myelin showed characteristics of intense inflammation on consecutive class II major histocompatibility complex (MHCII)– and CD68-stained sections and were designated myelinated/inflamed (Table 5 and Table 6).
MONONUCLEAR PHAGOCYTE ACCUMULATION AT THE BORDERS OF CHRONICALLY INFLAMED T2-ONLY AND T2/T1/MTR ROIs
Initial characterization of inflammation was performed by establishing number and distribution of mononuclear phagocytes, the most consistent feature of the MS ROIs. Demyelinated T2/T1/MTR regions exhibited distinctive borders of mononuclear phagocytes (MHCII positive, CD68+), indicating a long-lasting pathological process. On the other hand, T2-only regions were histopathologically diverse, ranging from highly inflamed lesions to myelinated areas with normal density of MHCII-positive and CD68+ cells.
Based on the distribution of MHCII and CD68 immunoreactivity, several patterns of inflammatory activity were observed in T2/T1/MTR as compared with T2-only areas (Figure 2). Some ROIs were composed of MHCII-positive and CD68+ cells that were increased at the lesion border and also showed normal or decreased density in the core (Figure 2A and B). Morphologically, the majority of the cells at the lesion borders resembled activated microglia and macrophages, showing enlarged round cell bodies and short processes. This pattern was observed in 4 of 8 T2/T1/MTR areas and 1 of 2 T2-only demyelinating lesions (Table 4). In this sample, mononuclear phagocyte distribution and number in the T2-only chronic active lesions were similar to those in the 4 chronic active lesions, which corresponded to T2/T1/MTR regions. Other ROIs (3 of 8 T2/T1/MTR lesions) were associated with hypocellular, “burnt-out” areas with significant reduction in MHCII-positive and CD68+ cell density (Figure 2C). This pattern included only T2/T1/MTR areas that were seen as demyelinated areas sharply demarcated from the adjacent myelinated white matter. A subset of the ROIs with abnormal MRI results that retained myelin contained activated inflammatory cells uniformly distributed throughout the areas of interest (Figure 2D and E). Other ROIs showed evenly distributed MHCII-positive and CD68+ cells that revealed features of process-bearing resting microglia. These were myelinated areas that mostly consisted of NAWM and T2-only areas (Figure 2F).
CD68+ cells were quantitated in all ROIs and confirmed these descriptive categories. The density of CD68+ microglia and macrophages was significantly higher at the border of T2/T1/MTR areas (P = .002) and T2-only areas (P = .01) than in NAWM from MS and nonneurological control brains (Table 5). On the other hand, numbers of CD68+ leukocytes did not vary significantly in the interior portions of T2/T1/MTR and T2-only regions and NAWM. Numbers of mononuclear phagocytes did not vary significantly in myelinated T2-only regions (n = 8) as compared with NAWM (n = 10) (P = .06) (Table 5). We were not able to compare quantitatively CD68+ cell number in demyelinated T2/T1/MTR and T2-only regions because the number of T2-only demyelinated lesions was too low (Table 5).
Cd3+ and cd20+ cells are increased in both parenchymal and perivascular compartments in t2/t1/mtr areas
CD3 and CD20 immunoreactivity was studied in ROIs of MS and control tissue. We found that CD3+ lymphocytes were preferentially located in perivascular areas of the MS ROIs (Figure 3A). The mean (SD) density of CD3+ cells in perivascular cuffs did not vary significantly among T2/T1/MTR areas (2065.3 [899.0] cells/mm2), T2-only areas (1906.1 [935.7] cells/mm2), and NAWM (1450.7 [880.6] cells/mm2). Additionally, the mean (SD) number of CD3+ cuffs was not significantly different among T2/T1/MTR areas (27.2 [15.7] cuffs/mm2), T2-only areas (23.1 [14.1] cuffs/mm2), and NAWM (13.3 [10.8] cuffs/mm2). Nonneurological control brains only showed infrequent scattered cuffs. Parenchymal CD3+ cells were increased (P < .05) in T2/T1/MTR areas (mean [SD], 30.1 [14.5] cells/mm2) in comparison with T2-only (mean [SD], 16.3 [5.6] cells/mm2) areas and NAWM (mean [SD], 12.3 [4.5] cells/mm2). CD20+ cells were distributed in perivascular spaces in MS tissue (Figure 3B). CD20+ cuffs were present in 3 of 5 MS brains. We did not find any difference in the CD20+ cuff presence in T2-only regions as compared with T2/T1/MTR areas. Where present in cuffs, CD20 cells composed 11% to 16% of lymphocytes, as judged by dual-label immunostaining with anti-CD3 and anti-CD20 antibodies.
Cxcr4 is highly expressed on reactive mhcii-positive microglia in ms lesions
We defined the distribution of the chemokine/receptor pair CXCR4/CXCL12 in these brain regions. The CXCR4/CXCL12 system was chosen because of its remarkably broad biology and potential for expression on hematopoietic cells (CD3, CD20, CD68) as well as glia, including microglia, astrocytes, and NG2-positive glia, and vascular elements.
CXCR4-positive cell density was significantly increased at the borders of T2/T1/MTR (P = .003) and T2-only (P = .003) areas compared with the central portions of these areas (Table 6). CXCR4 cell density was also significantly higher at the borders of ROIs with abnormal MRI results (P ≤ .01) as compared with NAWM. Nonneurological control tissue contained only individual randomly distributed CXCR4-positive cells. The distribution and morphology of CXCR4-positive cells in ROIs with abnormal MRI results resembled those of CD68+ and MHCII-positive microglia and macrophages (Figure 4A and B). There was a strong correlation between CXCR4-positive and CD68+ cells at the borders of ROIs with abnormal MRI results (r = 0.91 in T2/T1/MTR areas and r = 0.88 in T2-only areas; P < .05) but a modest correlation in the central portions (r = 0.30 in T2/T1/MTR areas and r = 0.52 in T2-only areas; P > .05). The decreased correlation in the interior was due to the presence of CD68+ cells that were CXCR4 negative. Dual-label immunohistochemical analysis and confocal microscopy confirmed that the majority of CD68+ and MHCII-positive microglia and macrophages expressed CXCR4 molecules at the borders of ROIs (Figure 4C and F). MHCII-positive/CXCR4-positive cells in these areas showed an appearance typical for activated microglial cells, with enlarged rounded cell bodies and short, thick processes. Although CXCR4 was mainly expressed on activated microglial cells in MS lesions, isolated cortical neurons and astrocytes also expressed this chemokine receptor (data not shown).
Phospho-cxcr4–positive cells are increased in number in inflamed ms lesions and characterize a functionally active pool of microglia and macrophages
Phospho-CXCR4 antibodies recognize an epitope including phosphoserine 339 on the intracellular portion of CXCR4, which is phosphorylated in response to ligand and therefore indicates the presence of recently ligated CXCR4 receptors.24 Phospho-CXCR4–positive cells represented a subset of CXCR4-positive cells mainly at the borders of chronic active lesions in MS ROIs (Figure 5A and B). There were increased numbers of phospho-CXCR4 cells at the periphery of T2/T1/MTR and T2-only areas compared with the central parts of these areas. The phospho-CXCR4–positive immunostaining was preferentially intracellular, different from membranous and intracellular CXCR4 staining, indicating that the ligated receptor was internalized. Using confocal microscopy, the phospho-CXCR4 marker was colocalized with cells expressing MHCII (data not shown).
Cxcl12 is upregulated on astrocytes and endothelium of blood vessels in ms chronic lesions
The presence of phospho-CXCR4 implies the proximity of the ligand CXCL12. CXCL12 immunoreactivity was found in astrocytes and astrocytic processes in inflamed MS lesions. CXCL12-positive astrocytic processes extending toward blood vessels appeared thickened and prominent (Figure 5C). Scattered CXCL12-positive astrocytes were also identified in NAWM regions.
Double-label immunostaining for von Willebrand factor and CXCL12 revealed abundant CXCL12 immunoreactivity associated with vascular elements. CXCL12-positive blood vessels were numerous in T2/T1/MTR and T2-only areas. Constitutive expression of CXCL12 was also identified in blood vessel walls in NAWM in MS and nonneurological control tissues.
The present study extends our characterization of imaging pathological correlates in chronic lesions of MS.7,11 This research uses additional MRI sequences, such as T1-weighted imaging and MTR, along with histopathological examination, to probe the T2 lesion heterogeneity underlying poor correlations between T2-weighted imaging and clinical outcome. For this reason, we compare the extremes of the spectrum evaluating T2-only lesions with T2/T1/MTR lesions.
The current data were obtained by analyzing tissues from a subset of cases previously reported.11 These studies used a different series of tissues and were evaluated in independent immunostaining experiments. The immunohistochemical and data analysis were conducted by bench scientists (N.M.M., M.B.C., B.H.T., and A.M.R.) who did not participate in the prior study. Therefore, the present results confirmed at a technical level previous observations that T2/T1/MTR regions represent areas of severe tissue destruction and principally correspond to chronic active or chronic inactive demyelinating lesions, whereas T2-only areas delineate regions with less severe damage.
Because imaging results might be affected by increasing postmortem time and as a result of tissue fixation, we endeavored to minimize the impact of these factors on MRI in our study. Patients were rapidly transported to the imaging facility for in situ MRI immediately followed by autopsy (mean postmortem time, about 5 hours). One cerebral hemisphere was immediately fixed for at least 4 weeks. Even though tissue fixation affects MRI, an adequate postmortem MRI has been reported after 20 years of formalin fixation.25
We found that 80% of T2/T1/MTR regions were demyelinated and were either chronic active or chronic inactive lesions. Only 2 of 10 T2-only regions (20%) in this study corresponded to demyelinated lesions, highlighting heterogeneity of T2-only regions. The smaller proportion of demyelinated T2-only regions in the current study as compared with previously published data might be explained by sampling variability. The majority of T2-only regions revealed microglial activation and were myelinated. One region showed intense microglial activation without increased CD68+ cell number and was designated myelinated/inflamed. No T2-only area was associated with chronic inactive lesional pathological features. Where active or chronic active T2-only and T2/T1/MTR lesions could be directly compared, they appeared similar in regard to mononuclear phagocyte number and distribution (Table 5). Therefore, we tentatively propose that axonal pathological features and demyelination provide the main pathological discriminators between T2-only and T2/T1/MTR lesions.
Parenchymal T cells were significantly increased in T2/T1/MTR areas as compared with T2-only areas and NAWM, suggestive of greater blood-brain barrier impairment in T2/T1/MTR areas. Consistent with this proposal, serum protein levels in central nervous system (CNS) tissue were previously described in our MRI pathological studies,11 with a higher proportion of intracellular proteins in T2/T1/MTR areas as compared with T2-only areas. Study of early MRI changes in experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) demonstrated that immunoglobulin deposition correlated with MRI signal intensities in lesions with reduced signal intensity on both T1-weighted and T2-weighted imaging and lesions with slightly reduced signal intensity on T1-weighted imaging and increased signal intensity on T2-weighted imaging.26 B cell–containing cuffs in our material were associated with a subset of demyelinated areas in 3 of 5 MS brains, suggesting regional and interindividual variability in the pathogenic cascade that underlies tissue injury in MS.
Reactive microglia and macrophages in areas corresponding to active or chronic active MS lesions expressed CXCR4, and the presence of phospho-CXCR4 epitopes indicated the ligated receptor. The regulatory cytokine transforming growth factor β1 upregulates CXCR4 expression in primary human monocyte-derived macrophages and enhances CXCL12-stimulated extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 phosphorylation in these cells.27 In EAE, increased levels of CXCR4 were observed in CNS parenchymal cells.28,29 These findings were extended by McCandless and colleagues,21 who showed that inhibiting CXCR4 activation during EAE induction leads to loss of the typical intense perivascular cuffs, which are replaced by widespread leukocyte infiltration and worsened EAE severity.
We found that expression of CXCL12 correlated with increased inflammatory activity in MS lesions. CXCL12 immunostaining was found in cells exhibiting astrocytic morphology and associated with vascular elements in MS tissue. Previously, CXCL12 expression was reported in blood vessels and astrocytes in active and inactive MS lesions and occasionally on a few cells in perivascular infiltrates.19,20 In “silent” MS lesions, CXCL12 immunoreactivity was less than that observed in active MS lesions. Previous studies demonstrated CXCL12 immunoreactivity on both parenchymal and luminal sides of CD31+ endothelial cells in active MS lesions, whereas in NAWM and in non-MS tissues CXCL12 expression was only localized to the parenchymal side of the endothelium.21 This redistribution of CXCL12 was correlated with extent of inflammation, demyelination, and macrophage infiltration in MS lesions. In the current study, CXCR4/CXCL12 distribution was tightly associated with the presence of activated microglia and macrophages but did not correlate with MRI indicators of tissue injury.
CXCR4 and its ligand CXCL12 are currently of high interest as therapeutic targets in different pathological conditions, including cancers, AIDS, and systemic autoimmune and neuroinflammatory disorders (MS, stroke, Alzheimer disease) as well as stem cell biology. Further, given the significant role that the CXCR4/CXCL12 system plays in hematopoiesis, including hematopoietic cell maturation and survival as well as homing of hematopoietic progenitors to the bone marrow and regulation of neuronal progenitor cell migration in the CNS,17,30 it remains to be determined whether functions of this chemokine/receptor pair could be pharmacologically manipulated to treat inflammation in the CNS.
The current study represents a cross-sectional analysis of the CXCR4/CXCL12 system in MS brain tissue. Prospective studies of this chemokine-receptor pair in the cerebrospinal fluid and blood, in correlations with MRI and clinical course, might be of potential interest as future routes of this research.
Correspondence: Richard M. Ransohoff, MD, Neuroinflammation Research Center, NC-30, Cleveland Clinic, 9500 Euclid Ave, Cleveland, OH 44195 (ransohr@ccf.org).
Accepted for Publication: August 29, 2008.
Author Contributions:Study concept and design: Moll, Cossoy, Tucky, Trapp, and Ransohoff. Acquisition of data: Moll, Cossoy, Fisher, Staugaitis, Tucky, Chang, Rietsch, and Fox. Analysis and interpretation of data: Moll, Fisher, Rietsch, and Ransohoff. Drafting of the manuscript: Moll, Rietsch, and Ransohoff. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Moll, Cossoy, Fisher, Staugaitis, Tucky, Chang, Fox, Trapp, and Ransohoff. Statistical analysis: Moll. Obtained funding: Ransohoff. Administrative, technical, and material support: Moll, Cossoy, Fisher, Tucky, Chang, Rietsch, Fox, Trapp, and Ransohoff. Study supervision: Fisher and Ransohoff.
Financial Disclosure: None reported.
Funding/Support: This study was supported by National Institutes of Health grant P50 NS38667 (Dr Ransohoff).
Additional Contributions: Jar-Chi Lee, MS, Quantitative Health Sciences, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio, assisted with statistical analysis of the research data.
1.Charil
AFilippi
M Inflammatory demyelination and neurodegeneration in early multiple sclerosis.
J Neurol Sci 2007;259
(1-2)
7- 15
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 3.Rovaris
MBozzali
MSantuccio
G
et al. In vivo assessment of the brain and cervical cord pathology of patients with primary progressive multiple sclerosis.
Brain 2001;124
(pt 12)
2540- 2549
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 4.Kutzelnigg
ALucchinetti
CFStadelmann
C
et al. Cortical demyelination and diffuse white matter injury in multiple sclerosis.
Brain 2005;128
(pt 11)
2705- 2712
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 5.Filippi
MRocca
MA MRI evidence for multiple sclerosis as a diffuse disease of the central nervous system.
J Neurol 2005;252
((suppl 5))
v16- v24
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 6.Lassmann
HBruck
WLucchinetti
CF The immunopathology of multiple sclerosis: an overview.
Brain Pathol 2007;17
(2)
210- 218
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 7.Young
EAFowler
CDKidd
GJ
et al. Imaging correlates of decreased axonal Na+/K+ ATPase in chronic multiple sclerosis lesions.
Ann Neurol 2008;63
(4)
428- 435
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 8.van Waesberghe
JHKamphorst
WDe Groot
CJ
et al. Axonal loss in multiple sclerosis lesions: magnetic resonance imaging insights into substrates of disability.
Ann Neurol 1999;46
(5)
747- 754
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 9.Schmierer
KScaravilli
FAltmann
DRBarker
GJMiller
DH Magnetization transfer ratio and myelin in postmortem multiple sclerosis brain.
Ann Neurol 2004;56
(3)
407- 415
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 10.Truyen
Lvan Waesberghe
JHvan Walderveen
MA
et al. Accumulation of hypointense lesions (“black holes”) on T1 spin-echo MRI correlates with disease progression in multiple sclerosis.
Neurology 1996;47
(6)
1469- 1476
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 11.Fisher
EChang
AFox
RJ
et al. Imaging correlates of axonal swelling in chronic multiple sclerosis brains.
Ann Neurol 2007;62
(3)
219- 228
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 13.Ludwin
SK The pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis: relating human pathology to experimental studies.
J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 2006;65
(4)
305- 318
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 14.Brück
W The pathology of multiple sclerosis is the result of focal inflammatory demyelination with axonal damage.
J Neurol 2005;252
((suppl 5))
v3- v9
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 15.Flynn
GMaru
SLoughlin
JRomero
IAMale
D Regulation of chemokine receptor expression in human microglia and astrocytes.
J Neuroimmunol 2003;136
(1-2)
84- 93
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 16.Ohtani
YMinami
MKawaguchi
N
et al. Expression of stromal cell-derived factor-1 and CXCR4 chemokine receptor mRNAs in cultured rat glial and neuronal cells.
Neurosci Lett 1998;249
(2-3)
163- 166
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 17.Li
MRansohoff
RM Multiple roles of chemokine CXCL12 in the central nervous system: a migration from immunology to neurobiology.
Prog Neurobiol 2008;84
(2)
116- 131
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 18.Pashenkov
MSoderstrom
MLink
H Secondary lymphoid organ chemokines are elevated in the cerebrospinal fluid during central nervous system inflammation.
J Neuroimmunol 2003;135
(1-2)
154- 160
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 19.Krumbholz
MTheil
DCepok
S
et al. Chemokines in multiple sclerosis: CXCL12 and CXCL13 up-regulation is differentially linked to CNS immune cell recruitment.
Brain 2006;129
(pt 1)
200- 211
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 20.Calderon
TMEugenin
EALopez
L
et al. A role for CXCL12 (SDF-1alpha) in the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis: regulation of CXCL12 expression in astrocytes by soluble myelin basic protein.
J Neuroimmunol 2006;177
(1-2)
27- 39
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 21. McCandless
EEPiccio
LWoerner
BM
et al. Pathological expression of CXCL12 at the blood-brain barrier correlates with severity of multiple sclerosis [published online ahead of print February 14, 2008].
Am J Pathol 2008;172
(3)
799- 808
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 22.Trapp
BDPeterson
JRansohoff
RMRudick
RMork
SBo
L Axonal transection in the lesions of multiple sclerosis.
N Engl J Med 1998;338
(5)
278- 285
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 23.Moll
NMRietsch
AMRansohoff
AJ
et al. Cortical demyelination in PML and MS: similarities and differences.
Neurology 2008;70
(5)
336- 343
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 24.Woerner
BMWarrington
NMKung
ALPerry
ARubin
JB Widespread CXCR4 activation in astrocytomas revealed by phospho-CXCR4-specific antibodies.
Cancer Res 2005;65
(24)
11392- 11399
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 25.Boyko
OBAlston
SRFuller
GNHulette
CMJohnson
GABurger
PC Utility of postmortem magnetic resonance imaging in clinical neuropathology.
Arch Pathol Lab Med 1994;118
(3)
219- 225
PubMedGoogle Scholar 26.Nessler
SBoretius
SStadelmann
C
et al. Early MRI changes in a mouse model of multiple sclerosis are predictive of severe inflammatory tissue damage.
Brain 2007;130
(pt 8)
2186- 2198
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 27.Chen
STuttle
DLOshier
JT
et al. Transforming growth factor-beta1 increases CXCR4 expression, stromal-derived factor-1alpha-stimulated signalling and human immunodeficiency virus-1 entry in human monocyte-derived macrophages.
Immunology 2005;114
(4)
565- 574
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 28.Jiang
YSalafranca
MNAdhikari
S
et al. Chemokine receptor expression in cultured glia and rat experimental allergic encephalomyelitis.
J Neuroimmunol 1998;86
(1)
1- 12
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 29.Glabinski
ARO'Bryant
SSelmaj
KRansohoff
RM CXC chemokine receptors expression during chronic relapsing experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis.
Ann N Y Acad Sci 2000;917135- 144
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref 30.Klein
RSRubin
JB Immune and nervous system CXCL12 and CXCR4: parallel roles in patterning and plasticity.
Trends Immunol 2004;25
(6)
306- 314
PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref