Objective
To evaluate the effects of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (allo-HSCT) on the brains of persons with and without multiple sclerosis (MS) by means of postmortem histopathological examination.
Design
Postmortem histopathology, case studies, and case-control studies.
Patients
Four patients with MS who died at a median of 4.5 months (range, 3-9 months) after allo-HSCT for a concomitant hematologic malignant neoplasm; 5 patients without MS who died at a median of 10.0 months (1-29 months) after allo-HSCT; and 5 control subjects without MS who did not undergo allo-HSCT.
Setting
Referral centers.
Intervention
Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.
Main Outcome Measures
Morphological features and immunohistochemical features, including the quantitative measures of chronic inflammatory cells.
Results
Demyelinating and inflammatory activities of MS persisted after allo-HSCT in all of the patients with MS. Active and chronic active MS lesions exhibited significantly higher numbers of CD3+ T cells and CD8+ cytotoxic T cells and significantly higher scores of CD68+ microglia/macrophages than did chronic inactive lesions or normal-appearing white matter. The normal-appearing brains of allo-HSCT recipients who did not have MS were found to have significantly higher numbers of CD3+ T cells and CD8+ cytotoxic T cells and higher scores of CD68+ microglia/macrophages compared with the controls; however, no demyelination was identified in these non-MS samples.
Conclusion
Allo-HSCT fails to halt the demyelination and inflammation of MS.
The pathologic processes of multiple sclerosis (MS) are thought to be contributed to by T and B cells that invade the central nervous system (CNS) to cause oligodendrocyte damage, demyelination, and axonal loss.1-3 Current therapies for MS consist of immunomodulating agents such as interferon beta and glatiramer acetate and anti-inflammatory and immunosuppressive drugs such as glucocorticoids and mitoxantrone hydrochloride. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) is a form of therapy in which immune suppression is maximized to the point of transient immune ablation.4 Selected patients with MS, after preparation for the transplant by means of a potent immunosuppressive regimen, undergo autologous HSCT or allogeneic HSCT (allo-HSCT) to restore the host immune system.5 An increasing number of studies have assessed autologous HSCT as a potential new therapeutic strategy in severe forms of MS. Based on the published studies, autologous HSCT produces a broad range of patients with survival free of MS progression (36%-95%) and MS activity (33%-64%).1,6 The only published histopathological study of autologous HSCT in MS indicated a failure to arrest demyelination and neurodegeneration in 5 patients who died within 1.5 years after the transplantation.7
Allo-HSCT is inspired by case reports of MS patients who have undergone allo-HSCT for a concomitant hematologic malignant neoplasm and subsequently has been supported by animal models of MS. Because allo-HSCT is designed to furnish a new immune system in primary lymphoid tissues, it represents an approach different from autologous HSCT for the eradication of autoimmune disease.6,8 This has not been explored in prospective studies, however, because treatment-related morbidity in allo-HSCT is substantially higher than that in autologous HSCT, mostly owing to graft-vs-host (GVH) disease and conditioning-related toxic effects.6,9,10
To date, allo-HSCT has not been performed with the intention of treating MS.6 Reports of 5 MS patients who underwent allo-HSCT because of coincidental hematological cancer demonstrated variable effects of allo-HSCT on the course of MS.11-15 Of these reports, 3 patients showed clinical improvement or stabilization.11-13 Two patients exhibited clinical and radiological evidence of persistent MS activities with follow-up times of 24 and 4 months after allo-HSCT.14,15 To our knowledge, our recent case report15 was the only study with postmortem histopathological examination that demonstrated persistent inflammatory and demyelinating activities of MS 4 months after allo-HSCT.
The present study examined the histopathological findings of MS in 4 patients who received allo-HSCT. Our recently reported case15 was extended in the present study (case 1 in Table 1) for the purpose of quantitative analyses. To assess whether allo-HSCT in the absence of MS could be associated with CNS inflammation, we further examined a group of non-MS allo-HSCT recipients and a group of non-MS, non–allo-HSCT control subjects.
This study was approved by local research ethics boards and performed on archival autopsy tissues from 4 MS (Table 1) and 10 non-MS (Table 2) cases that were obtained from the departments of pathology of the University of Calgary and the University of Alberta. A prior diagnosis of MS was made clinically16 in 3 of these MS patients, but a diagnosis of MS was not noted in the hospital records of the fourth patient. Postmortem neuropathological examination in all the MS patients revealed multiple lesions diagnostic of MS. The MS patients received allo-HSCT for treatment of their concurrent hematological diseases, including chronic myelogenous leukemia in case 1 and acute myelogenous leukemia in cases 2 through 4 (Table 1). Their lengths of time to death after allo-HSCT ranged from 3 to 9 months (median, 4.5 months).
Five non-MS patients from the Calgary archives (cases 1-5 in Table 2) who were described as having a normal brain and spinal cord on macroscopic and routine histopathological examination were included to investigate the effect of allo-HSCT on normal-appearing brains. Their lengths of time to death after allo-HSCT ranged from 1 to 29 months (median, 10.0 months). Five neuropathologically normal subjects who did not undergo allo-HSCT (cases 6-10 in Table 2) served as the controls in the present study. All the non-MS patients who did or did not undergo allo-HSCT were free of neurological symptoms and abnormal radiologic findings of the CNS.
Although complete chimerism of circulating leukocytes were achieved by allo-HSCT in all the cases (data not shown), the protocols for allo-HSCT differed by individual in the present study (Tables 1 and 2).
Histopathological and immunohistochemistry studies
The postmortem delay was less than 24 hours in all cases. All brain tissue was fixed in 10% formalin for at least 1 week. Neuropathological examination was performed on sections of the cerebral hemispheres, brainstem, and cerebrum ranging from 0.5 to 1.0 cm in thickness. The tissue blocks containing MS lesions and control areas were sampled from various brain regions. In the non-MS cases, 3 sampling blocks were taken from the frontal lobe, brainstem, and temporal lobe (or basal ganglia, depending on the availability) in the present study. The tissue samples were embedded in paraffin, cut into 6-μm-thick tissue sections, deparaffinized, and stained with hematoxylin-eosin and Luxol fast blue to locate the lesions.
The primary antibodies used were mouse antihuman CD68 (macrophages/microglia; DAKO Denmark A/S, Glostrup, Denmark), anti-CD3 (T cells; Thermo Scientific, Rockford, Illinois), anti-CD4 (helper T cells; Cell Marque Corporation, Rocklin, California), anti-CD8 (cytotoxic T cells; DAKO Denmark A/S), anti-CD20 (B cells; DAKO Denmark A/S), anti-CD138 (plasma cells; Thermo Scientific), anti-CD21 (professional antigen-presenting cells; DAKO Denmark A/S), anti-CD1a (professional antigen-presenting cells; Immunotech, Marseilles, France), anti–myelin basic protein (a myelin marker; Novocastra, New Castle Upon Tyne, England), and mouse anti-β amyloid precursor protein (a marker of axonal injury; Millipore, Billerica, Massachusetts). Double immunofluorescence staining was performed with primary antibodies against myelin basic protein and CD68 to detect myelin degradation products in macrophages.
The MS lesions were histopathologically classified using a modification of the Bö-Trapp staging system17,18 into active, chronic active, and chronic inactive lesions.
Quantitative and semiquantitative analyses of inflammatory activity
To assess inflammatory activity, the numbers of CD3+ and CD8+ T cells were counted in a high-power field (original magnification ×200, defined as 0.79 mm2), with separate counting in the perivascular and parenchymal areas. The frequency of CD68+ microglia/macrophages was scored as follows: 0 indicates none; 1, rare; 2, scattered; and 3, frequent per high-power field. For counting or scoring in the perivascular areas, the fields containing the vessels larger than 300 μm were excluded. The values represent sums of 10 consecutive high-power microscopic fields.
We used the Mann-Whitney test to assess the difference in various measures of inflammation between groups. P < .05 was regarded as significant.
The clinical features of the MS patients who underwent allo-HSCT are summarized in Table 1. After allo-HSCT, MS in 1 patient progressed clinically (represented by a change in the Expanded Disability Status Scale score from 2.0 to 3.0)15; 2 MS patients did not have information of assessments specifically for MS in their medical records; and the last patient had no clinical documentation of MS as a concurrent condition (MS was an incidental neuropathological finding). Besides the MS lesions, histopathological examinations revealed no other abnormality in case 1, disclosed multiple acute and chronic infarcts in cases 2 and 3, and found a focus of leukoencephalopathy in case 4. The non-MS patients who underwent allo-HSCT and the controls died of various causes (Table 2), but the routine neuropathological examination exhibited normal brain and spinal cord.
Demyelinating activity in ms patients who underwent allo-hsct
All 4 MS patients showed varying degrees of demyelinating activity, that is, with active lesions (case 1 in Table 1) and/or chronic active lesions (cases 1-4 in Table 1). Active lesions exhibited demyelinating activity throughout the lesions, containing abundant macrophages/microglia (Figure 1A and B) and frequent T cells.15 Chronic active lesions were hypocellular in their cores but inflammatory and demyelinating at their edges, with frequent macrophages/microglia and T cells (Figure 1D and Figure 2). The demyelinating activity7,19 was demonstrated by diminishing intensity of Luxol fast blue staining (Figures 1A and 2A) and macrophages phagocytosing myelin debris (Figure 1A) and was confirmed by colocalization of myelin basic protein with the CD68-immunoreactive macrophages on double immunofluorescence staining (Figures 1B and 2F). Focal remyelination was suggested in some of the chronic active lesions (Figure 1D). Relatively mild axonal injury was associated with the demyelinating activity and shown by immunoreactivity for amyloid precursor protein (Figures 1C and 2E).
Inflammatory activity in ms patients with allo-hsct
Inflammatory activity was identified throughout the active lesions (Figure 1A and B)15 and in chronic active lesions predominantly at their edges (Figures 1D and 2). Inflammatory cells were mainly macrophages/microglia immunoreactive for CD68 (Figures 1A and B and 2B and F); T cells (lymphocytes) were variably immunoreactive for CD3, CD4, and CD815 (Figure 2C and D). These lesions had rare CD138+ plasma cells but no CD20+ B cells. The markers for professional antigen-presenting cells, CD1a and CD21, yielded negative results.
The analysis of 13 lesions (active or chronic active) with inflammatory/demyelinating activities disclosed that the lesions with the activities had significantly higher numbers of CD3+ T cells and CD8+ cytotoxic T cells, as well as significantly higher scores of CD68+ microglia/macrophages than chronic inactive lesions (n = 13) or normal-appearing white matter (n = 14) from the same patients (P < .001; Table 3).
One MS patient (case 4 in Table 1) had focal leukoencephalopathy mainly in the posterior cerebral hemispheres, which was presumably owing to immunosuppressant treatment with methotrexate sodium and/or cyclosporine.20,21 This additional leukoencephalopathy was characteristically necrotic and distinct from the MS lesions. In this case, 4 MS lesions (1 chronic active lesion and 3 chronic inactive lesions) apart from the foci of leukoencephalopathy were included in the present analysis; the other lesions abutting the focus of leukoencephalopathy were excluded.
Inflammation in non-ms patients who underwent allo-hsct
Because persistent inflammatory/demyelinating activities of MS were present after allo-HSCT, further investigation was focused on whether inflammation/demyelination can result from allo-HSCT in the absence of MS. Five neuropathologically normal non-MS allo-HSCT recipients were examined (Figure 3A-C, E, and G) and compared with 5 neuropathologically normal subjects who did not receive allo-HSCT (Figure 3D, F, and H). The analysis of 3 brain regions in each subject demonstrated that the patients who underwent allo-HSCT had significantly higher numbers of CD3+ (Figure 3C) and CD8+ (Figure 3E) cytotoxic T cells and higher scores of CD68+ microglia/macrophages (Figure 3G) compared with the controls (Figure 3D, F, and H, respectively; P < .05) in both the parenchyma and perivascular areas (except for CD8+ cytotoxic T cells in perivascular areas; Table 4). However, no obvious demyelination was identified by the Luxol fast blue stain (Figure 3B) or by double immunostains of myelin basic protein/CD68 in these non-MS brains that did not undergo allo-HSCT (not shown).
The present study is, to our knowledge, the first to examine CNS histopathological findings in MS patients after allo-HSCT. Despite the procedure, active demyelination and inflammation persisted, indicating the failure of allo-HSCT to halt the MS disease activity, at least during the follow-up period in these patients. This failure may be attributed to several possibilities.
First, the persistence of recipient immune cells in the brain may fuel the MS activities. This possibility is supported by our previous finding in which fluorescent in situ hybridization analysis of sex chromosomes of cells in a female MS patient who received allo-HSCT from a male donor (case 1 in Table 1) revealed that, although only donor blood cells were present in the peripheral circulation, most CD45+ and CD68+ cells within the brain were still of the female recipient's origin.15 Although complete chimerism of circulating leukocytes can be optimally achieved by allo-HSCT, the conditioning immunosuppressive treatment may have much less effect on the cells trapped or resident within the CNS.22-24 In support, Mondria et al25 examined 2 markers indicative of lymphocyte activation in the cerebrospinal fluid, sCD27, and oligoclonal IgG bands, and found that these were still evident 6 to 9 months after whole-body immune ablation in MS subjects. The authors concluded that complete eradication of activated lymphocytes from the CNS had not been achieved despite intense immunoablation.
Second, GVH reaction could theoretically induce alloimmune damage to the brain9,10,25 and may complicate the pathologic processes of MS after allo-HSCT.26,27 In the present study, all the patients (including the MS patients and non-MS patients with normal-appearing brains) developed histopathologically confirmed GVH disease after allo-HSCT, involving the skin, gut, or liver. Graft-vs-host disease is associated with a cytokine storm and T-cell activation, which induces the complex immune reactions that interact with the pathological processes of MS.27,28 The present study demonstrated increased diffuse infiltration of T cells and macrophages/microglia within the normal-appearing brains of non-MS patients after allo-HSCT, which would be consistent with the GVH reaction after allo-HSCT. Nevertheless, the contribution of GVH disease to the demyelinating activity of MS may be minor in the present study because (1) at least 1 patient (case 1 in Table 1) showed clinical evidence of MS progression before the development of GVH disease15; (2) there was no obvious demyelination in the non-MS allo-HSCT recipients, although their brains showed mild and diffuse inflammation; and (3) demyelination and neurodegeneration were active even with marked suppression of the inflammatory activity in MS patients who received autologous HSCT.7
Third, the failure to arrest MS progression has been often attributed to studying patients in whom MS has progressed into advanced stages.7,29,30 This possibility is unlikely in the present study because one of our patients (case 1 in Table 1) had a pretransplantation Expanded Disability Status Scale score of 2.0 and another patient (case 4 in Table 1) was asymptomatic before allo-HSCT. Therefore, the failure of allo-HSCT may occur even in less advanced MS.
Fourth, although the CNS showed no evidence of infection, a systemic viral infection after allo-HSCT in some of the patients could trigger the relapse of MS and contribute to the progression of MS.31-33 This possibility cannot be excluded in the present study, although at least 1 of the patients (case 1 in Table 1) exhibited increased lesion burden in magnetic resonance images and clinical progression of MS several weeks before the occurrence of viral infection.15
Finally, the beneficial effect of allo-HSCT may take a longer time to manifest in the CNS. Studies on the intermitotic life span of lymphocytes have yielded widely disparate results. The reason for the discrepancy in these estimates is unclear. Most of the studies have demonstrated an average life span of months or years for T cells and of several weeks or months for B cells.34-36 In the present study, the longest survival after allo-HSCT was 9 months (with a median survival of 4.5 months). It is possible that allo-HSCT may not yet exhibit optimal effects on the brains by the time of histopathological examination. Nevertheless, the fatal outcome after allo-HSCT in these MS patients implies that the complications of allo-HSCT (along with its conditioning regimen) and potential progression of MS dominate the prognosis of allo-HSCT.
In comparison with autologous HSCT, which has been reported to suppress the inflammatory activity of MS,7 allo-HSCT in our patients failed to halt the demyelinating and inflammatory activities of MS. Because the conditioning treatment of allo-HSCT is similar to that of autologous HSCT, the difference in the effect on MS inflammatory activity between the 2 kinds of transplantation presumably lies in the nature (autologous vs allogeneic) of the cells transplanted into the patients. This presumption is compatible with the possibility (discussed in the preceding paragraphs) that the persistence of inflammation after allo-HSCT is likely to result from complications of allo-HSCT, especially of GVH reaction. We cannot completely exclude other possibilities, however, such as the difference in the selection of MS patients between the present study and the only histopathological study on autologous HSCT.7
Although the non-MS brains that underwent allo-HSCT contained diffuse but mild inflammation, no obvious demyelination was identified in the present study. The hypotheses for the preservation of myelin sheaths in these brains are the following: (1) possible dissociation of inflammation with demyelination after HSCT,7 (2) insufficient severity of inflammatory activity to produce demyelination, (3) individual vulnerabilities including genetic predisposition,37,38 or (4) different antigen specificities of the T cells in the MS vs non-MS cohorts. As well, the CNS milieu of non-MS subjects is likely different from that of MS subjects, as evident by increase in the levels of chemokines, cytokines, free radicals, proteases, and other molecules in the MS brains, and may not be able to promote the activation and pathogenic potential of infiltrating T cells. Finally, although we did not look for this, the increased cell content in the normal brain after transplant without evidence of damage to histological structures may be related to increased regulatory T-cell content, which could prevent alloreactivity to brain tissues. In transplant models, protection of organs from alloreactive immune cells is associated with an increased regulatory T-cell content in that organ.39,40
In conclusion, the demyelinating and inflammatory activities of MS persist after allo-HSCT. The demyelinating activity is presumably due to the persistence of recipient immune cells in the MS brain, whereas the inflammatory activity is more likely the result of GVH reaction after allo-HSCT. The findings of the present small series of MS patients indicate that allo-HSCT fails to stop the demyelination and inflammation of MS.
Correspondence: V. Wee Yong, PhD, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, University of Calgary, 3330 Hospital Dr, Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2N 4N1 (vyong@ucalgary.ca).
Accepted for Publication: January 11, 2010.
Author Contributions:Study concept and design: Lu, Nash, Storek, and Yong. Acquisition of data: Lu, Stevens, Clark, Johnson, and Yong. Analysis and interpretation of data: Lu, Joseph, Nash, Stevens, Metz, Clark, Johnson, and Yong. Drafting of the manuscript: Lu, Joseph, Nash, Stevens, and Yong. Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Joseph, Nash, Storek, Stevens, Metz, Clark, Johnson, and Yong. Statistical analysis: Lu. Obtained funding: Yong. Administrative, technical, and material support: Joseph, Johnson, and Yong. Study supervision: Joseph, Nash, Storek, Clark, and Yong.
Financial Disclosure: None reported.
Funding/Support: This study was supported by an operating grant from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research (Dr Yong) and in part by grant PP1251 from the National Multiple Sclerosis Society (Dr Nash). Dr Yong is a Canada Research Chair (tier 1) in neuroimmunology and an Alberta Heritage Foundation for Medical Research (AHFMR) scientist. Dr Storek is a Canada Research Chair (tier 2) in transplant immunology and an AHFMR clinical investigator.
1.Mancardi
GSaccardi
R Autologous haematopoietic stem-cell transplantation in multiple sclerosis.
Lancet Neurol 2008;7
(7)
626- 636
PubMedGoogle Scholar 2.Weiner
HL A shift from adaptive to innate immunity: a potential mechanism of disease progression in multiple sclerosis.
J Neurol 2008;255
((suppl 1))
3- 11
PubMedGoogle Scholar 3.Frohman
EMRacke
MKRaine
CS Multiple sclerosis: the plaque and its pathogenesis.
N Engl J Med 2006;354
(9)
942- 955
PubMedGoogle Scholar 4.Burt
RKCohen
BRose
J
et al. Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for multiple sclerosis.
Arch Neurol 2005;62
(6)
860- 864
PubMedGoogle Scholar 5.Sykes
MNikolic
B Treatment of severe autoimmune disease by stem-cell transplantation.
Nature 2005;435
(7042)
620- 627
PubMedGoogle Scholar 6.Van Wijmeersch
BSprangers
BDubois
BWaer
MBilliau
AD Autologous and allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for multiple sclerosis: perspective on mechanisms of action.
J Neuroimmunol 2008;197
(2)
89- 98
PubMedGoogle Scholar 7.Metz
ILucchinetti
CFOpenshaw
H
et al. Autologous haematopoietic stem cell transplantation fails to stop demyelination and neurodegeneration in multiple sclerosis.
Brain 2007;130
(pt 5)
1254- 1262
PubMedGoogle Scholar 8.Griffith
LMPavletic
SZTyndall
A
et al. Workshop participants, Feasibility of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for autoimmune disease.
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2005;11
(11)
862- 870
PubMedGoogle Scholar 9.Padovan
CSGerbitz
ASostak
P
et al. Cerebral involvement in graft-versus-host disease after murine bone marrow transplantation.
Neurology 2001;56
(8)
1106- 1108
PubMedGoogle Scholar 10.Siegal
DKeller
AXu
W
et al. Central nervous system complications after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: incidence, manifestations, and clinical significance.
Biol Blood Marrow Transplant 2007;13
(11)
1369- 1379
PubMedGoogle Scholar 11. McAllister
LDBeatty
PGRose
J Allogeneic bone marrow transplant for chronic myelogenous leukemia in a patient with multiple sclerosis.
Bone Marrow Transplant 1997;19
(4)
395- 397
PubMedGoogle Scholar 12.Mandalfino
PRice
GSmith
AKlein
JLRystedt
LEbers
GC Bone marrow transplantation in multiple sclerosis.
J Neurol 2000;247
(9)
691- 695
PubMedGoogle Scholar 13.La Nasa
GLittera
RCocco
EBattistini
LMarrosu
MGContu
L Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation in a patient affected by large granular lymphocyte leukemia and multiple sclerosis.
Ann Hematol 2004;83
(6)
403- 405
PubMedGoogle Scholar 14.Jeffery
DR Failure of allogeneic bone marrow transplantation to arrest disease activity in multiple sclerosis.
Mult Scler 2007;13
(8)
1071- 1075
PubMedGoogle Scholar 15.Lu
JQStorek
JMetz
L
et al. Continued disease activity in a patient with multiple sclerosis after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation.
Arch Neurol 2009;66
(1)
116- 120
PubMedGoogle Scholar 16. McDonald
WICompston
AEdan
G
et al. Recommended diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis.
Ann Neurol 2001;50
(1)
121- 127
PubMedGoogle Scholar 17.Trapp
BDPeterson
JRansohoff
RMRudick
RMork
SBo
L Axonal transection in the lesions of multiple sclerosis.
N Engl J Med 1998;338
(5)
278- 285
PubMedGoogle Scholar 18.van der Valk
PDe Groot
CJ Staging of multiple sclerosis (MS) lesions: pathology of the time frame of MS.
Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol 2000;26
(1)
2- 10
PubMedGoogle Scholar 19.Brück
WPorada
PPoser
S
et al. Monocyte/macrophage differentiation in early multiple sclerosis lesions.
Ann Neurol 1995;38
(5)
788- 796
PubMedGoogle Scholar 20.Rzeski
WPruskil
SMacke
A
et al. Anticancer agents are potent neurotoxins in vitro and in vivo.
Ann Neurol 2004;56
(3)
351- 360
PubMedGoogle Scholar 21.Erbetta
ASalmaggi
ASghirlanzoni
A
et al. Clinical and radiological features of brain neurotoxicity caused by antitumor and immunosuppressant treatments.
Neurol Sci 2008;29
(3)
131- 137
PubMedGoogle Scholar 22.Motl
SZhuang
YWaters
CMStewart
CF Pharmacokinetic considerations in the treatment of CNS tumours.
Clin Pharmacokinet 2006;45
(9)
871- 903
PubMedGoogle Scholar 23.Coisne
CLyck
REngelhardt
B Therapeutic targeting of leukocyte trafficking across the blood-brain barrier.
Inflamm Allergy Drug Targets 2007;6
(4)
210- 222
PubMedGoogle Scholar 24.Ma
MBarnes
GPulliam
JJezek
DBaumann
RJBerger
JR CNS angiitis in graft vs host disease.
Neurology 2002;59
(12)
1994- 1997
PubMedGoogle Scholar 25.Mondria
TLamers
CHte Boekhorst
PAGratama
JWHintzen
RQ Bone-marrow transplantation fails to halt intrathecal lymphocyte activation in multiple sclerosis.
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2008;79
(9)
1013- 1015
PubMedGoogle Scholar 26.Welniak
LABlazar
BRMurphy
WJ Immunobiology of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.
Annu Rev Immunol 2007;25139- 170
PubMedGoogle Scholar 27.Duran-Struuck
RReddy
P Biological advances in acute graft-versus-host disease after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.
Transplantation 2008;85
(3)
303- 308
PubMedGoogle Scholar 28.Openshaw
HStuve
OAntel
JP
et al. Multiple sclerosis flares associated with recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor.
Neurology 2000;54
(11)
2147- 2150
PubMedGoogle Scholar 29.Nash
RAStuve
OBowen
JD
et al. Autologous HSCT for advanced MS.
Brain 2008;131
(pt 2)
e89
PubMed10.1093/brain/awm180
Google Scholar 30.Metz
ILucchinetti
CFOpenshaw
H
et al. Autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.
Brain 2008;131
(pt 2)
e9010.1093/brain/awm181
Google Scholar 31.Andersen
OLygner
PEBergstrom
TAndersson
MVahlne
A Viral infections trigger multiple sclerosis relapses.
J Neurol 1993;240
(7)
417- 422
PubMedGoogle Scholar 32.Monteyne
PBureau
JFBrahic
M Viruses and multiple sclerosis.
Curr Opin Neurol 1998;11
(4)
287- 291
PubMedGoogle Scholar 33.Steiner
INisipianu
PWirguin
I Infection and the etiology and pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis.
Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep 2001;1
(3)
271- 276
PubMedGoogle Scholar 34.Mackay
CRMarston
WLDudler
L Naive and memory T cells show distinct pathways of lymphocyte recirculation.
J Exp Med 1990;171
(3)
801- 817
PubMedGoogle Scholar 35.von Boehmer
HHafen
K The life span of naive alpha/beta T cells in secondary lymphoid organs.
J Exp Med 1993;177
(4)
891- 896
PubMedGoogle Scholar 37.Oksenberg
JRBaranzini
SESawcer
SHauser
SL The genetics of multiple sclerosis: SNPs to pathways to pathogenesis.
Nat Rev Genet 2008;9
(7)
516- 526
PubMedGoogle Scholar 38.Ramagopalan
SVKnight
JCEbers
GC Multiple sclerosis and the major histocompatibility complex.
Curr Opin Neurol 2009;22
(3)
219- 225
PubMedGoogle Scholar 39.Graca
LCobbold
SPWaldmann
H Identification of regulatory T cells in tolerated allografts.
J Exp Med 2002;195
(12)
1641- 1646
PubMedGoogle Scholar 40.Bloom
DDChang
ZFechner
JH
et al. CD4
+CD25
+FOXP3
+ regulatory T cells increase de novo in kidney transplant patients after immunodepletion with campath-1H.
Am J Transplant 2008;8
(4)
793- 802
PubMedGoogle Scholar