Movement disorders usually do not require emergent intervention; nevertheless, there are acute/subacute clinical settings in which the neurologist is consulted. It is in these circumstances that the neurologist must be prepared to accurately diagnose and properly treat the patient. We have reviewed the literature regarding movement disorder emergencies and divided them into hypokinetic (part 1) and hyperkinetic (part 2) presentations. In part 1, drug-induced syndromes including neuroleptic malignant syndrome, parkinsonism hyperpyrexia syndrome, and serotonin syndrome will be discussed. Emergency complications related to the management of Parkinson disease, including falling, motor fluctuations, and psychiatric issues, will also be reviewed.
Movement disorders often have an insidious onset and slow progression and are not often associated with emergency situations. However, neurologists may be called on to diagnose and treat evolving movement disorders or acute complications of existing diseases in the emergency department or intensive care unit. Such situations meet the working definition of an “emergency,” a rapidly evolving disorder (hours to days) in which the failure to diagnose and treat may lead to significant morbidity or mortality.1 This review is divided into 2 parts based on phenomenology, hypokinetic and hyperkinetic disorders, and it discusses rapidly evolving situations that require emergency intervention. A number of the disorders discussed are rare. Data regarding prevalence and incidence have not been evaluated. In part 1, we review hypokinetic disorders including the drug-induced movement disorder emergencies neuroleptic malignant syndrome (NMS), parkinsonism-hyperpyrexia syndrome (PHS), and serotonin syndrome (SS) as well as emergent complications of Parkinson disease (PD).
Drug-induced movement disorder emergencies
Neuroleptic Malignant Syndrome
Neuroleptic malignant syndrome, first described in 1960,2 is an iatrogenic disorder resulting from exposure to drugs that block dopamine receptors. While most cases are caused by neuroleptics (both typical and atypical, even clozapine),3-6 other medications such as prochlorperazine, metoclopramide hydrochloride, droperidol, and promethazine hydrochloride are also implicated.7 Diagnostic criteria integrating clinical and laboratory features (Table 1) have been developed.8 Because the incidence of NMS is low, 0.2%,9 a high index of suspicion is necessary to make the appropriate diagnosis. Neuroleptic malignant syndrome is important to consider in any patient with acute-onset parkinsonism and fever because it is life threatening (mortality rate of 5%-20%). Young and middle-aged men appear to be at higher risk.10
Neuroleptic malignant syndrome is a clinical syndrome comprising fever, rigidity, mental status change, autonomic dysfunction, and other movement disorders (tremor, dystonia, and myoclonus) (Figure 1). Key laboratory abnormalities include leukocytosis and elevated creatine kinase level. Additionally, acute-phase reactants, including albumin and serum iron levels, are decreased.11 Symptoms often begin after initiation or an increase in neuroleptic dose.5 Neuroleptic malignant syndrome increases in severity over 48 to 72 hours and lasts 7 to 14 days. Medical complications can be chronic and irreversible including renal failure from rhabdomyolysis, respiratory failure from decreased chest wall compliance, aspiration pneumonia, and other complications of immobility such as deep venous thrombosis and pressure ulcers. Pulmonary embolism, pneumonia, or renal failure may result in death.
No prospective randomized trials exist in NMS. Key steps in treatment include withdrawal of the causative agent and treatment with dopaminergic agents. Bromocriptine mesylate has been used most often and is considered the drug of choice12; however, other dopaminergic agents are equally effective. Dantrolene sodium, a nonspecific muscle relaxant, reduces muscular rigidity and minimizes rhabdomyolysis if the dopaminergic agent does not reverse the symptoms.13 Combination therapy has been found to be safe and effective,12 and treatment should continue for 7 to 10 days depending on the half-life of the causative agent. One-third of patients may relapse if neuroleptic treatment is restarted too early, so waiting at least 2 weeks after NMS has cleared is good practice.14 In patients who require immediate treatment of psychosis, electroconvulsive therapy has been successful.15
Parkinsonism-Hyperpyrexia Syndrome
Parkinsonism-hyperpyrexia syndrome may be indistinguishable from NMS except that it occurs in patients with preexisting parkinsonism. Parkinsonism-hyperpyrexia syndrome occurs in patients with PD who abruptly withdraw or reduce dopaminergic medications. It was first reported in the context of abrupt discontinuation of antiparkinsonian medications during “levodopa holidays” in the 1980s.16,17 While levodopa holidays are no longer recommended, patient noncompliance or abrupt changes in medication replicate that scenario. Aggressive medication adjustments are not uncommon, particularly after deep brain stimulation surgery in PD. Clinicians must realize that PHS is a potential complication and that deep brain stimulation surgery does not protect the patient from PHS.18 Dehydration and metabolic disturbances may also precipitate it.19 Treatment involves supportive measures and reinstituting dopaminergic therapy. Bromocriptine and dantrolene may be added as additional therapy. High-dose intravenous methylprednisolone has been proposed as adjunctive therapy, and it appears to be effective based on 1 small randomized trial.20 Despite treatment, permanent worsening of PD and fatalities have been reported.21
Any drug that enhances serotonergic transmission can precipitate SS, which has the core clinical features of fever, myoclonus, and altered mental status.22 Serotonin syndrome was first described in 1960 in patients receiving monoamine oxidase inhibitor monotherapy23 but is now encountered in patients taking 2 or more drugs with serotonergic actions (tricyclic antidepressants or selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in combination with nonselective monoamine oxidase inhibitors)24 (Table 2). Many of the clinical features overlap with NMS (Table 3); however, SS may have additional clinical features such as myoclonus, hyperreflexia, seizures, and mood alteration (restlessness, elevated mood).26 This overlap may relate to the impact elevated serotonin levels have on lowering dopamine levels. Treatment consists of discontinuation of the causative agent, supportive therapy, and cyproheptadine hydrochloride for severe cases. Cyproheptadine, an antihistamine and serotonin antagonist, is given in divided doses up to a maximum dose of 32 mg/d.27 Serotonin syndrome may resolve quickly25 or is potentially fatal. Like NMS and PHS, the rarity and seriousness of SS precludes large randomized trials.
Emergency Department Admissions in PD
Parkinson disease is a neurodegenerative disorder characterized by tremor, rigidity, bradykinesia, and postural instability. Three recent studies28-30 examined why patients with PD present to emergency departments, and each found similar results. The most common reasons were not disease specific (infectious disease, 21%-32%; cardiovascular/cerebrovascular, 12%-26%; gastrointestinal, 8%-11%; and metabolic, 2%-6%). Of disease-specific problems, the most common were trauma/falls (13%-27%), motor fluctuations/dyskinesia (8%), and psychiatric disturbances (8%).
As PD progresses, falls become increasingly common, with up to 70% of patients with advanced PD reporting at least 1 fall per year.31 Postural instability or freezing of gait result in up to 80% of falls.32 There is a 3-month fall rate of 46%, with the best predictor of falling being a history of 2 or more falls in the previous year.33 Injuries occur from approximately 25% of falls, with hip fractures a common result. Postural instability is not levodopa responsive, making treatment a challenge. Physical therapy and assistive devices may be preventive.
Motor Fluctuations and Dyskinesia
Motor fluctuations are common in advanced PD, seen in 40% of patients by 4 to 6 years, with an increasing frequency of 10% per year.34 Generally not dangerous, motor fluctuations are one of the more common disease-specific reasons that patients seek emergency treatment. During “off” periods, prominent rigidity, bradykinesia, and postural instability may develop, making it impossible for patients to care for themselves or to walk. Psychiatric features may become pronounced, including depressed mood, anxiety, and panic. Dysautonomia, including tachycardia, diaphoresis, and variations in blood pressure, may occur.35 While off periods do not usually result in a visit to the emergency department, some situations lead to emergency evaluation. Patients with suddenly worsening off periods associated with new symptoms (eg, freezing, unpredictable or prolonged off periods) are more likely to seek urgent evaluation.35 In these situations, investigation should search for a potential cause of the abrupt change. A careful medication history may be necessary to ensure that no changes have been made to the antiparkinsonian regimen. Patients should also be questioned about the addition of medications to their regimen, particularly dopamine receptor blockers (antipsychotics and antiemetics). Concurrent infection (urinary tract infection, pneumonia) or metabolic derangement should be considered. In a patient with falls and abruptly worsening PD, subdural hematoma should be considered.36
Dyskinesia is usually not dangerous and is most often managed in the outpatient setting. However, severe dyskinesia may lead to rhabdomyolysis and dehydration.35 Generalized dyskinesias may be complicated by involvement of respiratory muscles, with patients reporting symptoms of dyspnea, tachypnea, chest wall discomfort, and involuntary grunting.37 Failure to recognize respiratory dyskinesia may lead to unnecessary testing. Greater emphasis on medical and medication history may improve the diagnosis of respiratory dyskinesia in the emergency setting. Treatment of dyskinesia should include lowering (or holding) levodopa dosage. Benzodiazepines may be useful to treat concomitant anxiety. Neuroleptics should not be used. Long-term management for chronic dyskinesia may involve the addition of amantadine hydrochloride or deep brain stimulation surgery.38
Psychosis in PD is a common reason for inpatient admission and a strong predictor of nursing home placement.39 It is more commonly encountered in PD with dementia, occurring in 45% to 64% of patients.40,41 Visual hallucinations are more common than auditory hallucinations and usually consist of complex, formed visual images, often of unknown but nonthreatening people.42 Paranoid delusions may accompany hallucinations and constitute a greater threat. Hallucinations and mild delusions may be treated at home; paranoia may become extreme and require hospitalization. Parkinson disease psychosis may be precipitated by metabolic derangements, infections (urinary tract infection, pneumonia), and changes in drug therapy including addition of any dopaminergics or anticholinergics.
Emergency treatment of psychosis requires a multifaceted approach. The patient's living conditions need to be assessed to determine if hospitalization is required. A thorough workup for metabolic or infectious disorders is indicated. Nonessential psychoactive medications should be discontinued. Dopaminergic drugs that are least potent with respect to motor function should be reduced (anticholinergics, amantadine, dopamine agonists, monoamine oxidase B inhibitors, catechol- O-methyl transferase inhibitors).43 The daily levodopa dose may also need to be lowered. Antipsychotic medication treatment can be started and is often necessary to resolve psychosis. Useful antipsychotics include clozapine and quetiapine. Clozapine has the most robust evidence base.44 Despite the lack of compelling evidence for quetiapine fumarate,44 it is often prescribed because of clozapine's risk of agranulocytosis and the need for monitoring complete blood cell count on a frequent basis. Other antipsychotics, typical and atypical, may cause unacceptable worsening of motor function and should not be used for treatment of psychosis in PD.43,44
Acute or subacute onset of parkinsonism has a broad differential diagnosis (Table 4). Parkinsonism as part of a primary neurodegenerative disease is insidious in onset and slowly progressive. However, when parkinsonism develops over a period of days to weeks, a secondary cause should be considered. In this situation, a review of the medication list, investigation for a structural lesion, and examination for pathognomonic findings are most important (Figure 2 and Figure 3).
The diagnosis and management of parkinsonism encountered in the emergency setting can be difficult because neurologists do not often associate this syndrome with consultations in the emergency department or intensive care unit. In acute or worsening parkinsonism, drug or toxic exposures (Table 2 and Table 4), infection, or changes in treatment regimen (especially in PD) should be considered. Subacute dramatic changes in the motor or cognitive status of patients with PD are often precipitated by non–disease-specific etiologies (infectious disease, 21%-32%; cardiovascular/cerebrovascular, 12%-26%; gastrointestinal, 8%-11%; and metabolic, 2%-6%). In NMS, PHS, and SS, an accurate medication history is essential. Part 2, hyperkinetic movement disorder emergencies, will examine chorea, myoclonus, tics, and dystonia.
Correspondence: Bradley J. Robottom, MD, Department of Neurology, University of Maryland School of Medicine, 110 S Paca St, Room 3-S-128, Baltimore, MD 21201 (brobottom@som.umaryland.edu).
Accepted for Publication: April 27, 2010.
Author Contributions:Study concept and design: Robottom, Weiner, and Factor. Analysis and interpretation of data: Weiner. Drafting of the manuscript: Robottom, Weiner, and Factor. Administrative, technical, and material support: Robottom, Weiner, and Factor. Study supervision: Weiner.
Financial Disclosure: Dr Robottom has received clinical research support from Chelsea Therapeutics and Solvay Pharmaceuticals and served as an investigator for clinical trials sponsored by the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke, Westat, Elan Pharmaceuticals, and Medivation. Dr Weiner reports receiving research support from Santhera, Boehringer Ingelheim, and the National Institutes of Health and has served in advisory or consulting roles for Santhera, Novartis, GlaxoSmithKline, and Boehringer Ingelheim. Dr Factor reports receiving grant support from Teva, Ipsen, and Schering-Plough and has served as a consultant to UCB, Allergan, Lundbeck, and Boehringer Ingelheim.
1.Frucht
SJFahn
S Movement Disorder Emergencies: Diagnosis and Treatment. Totowa, NJ Humana Press2005;
2.Delay
JPichot
PLemperiere
TElissalde
BPeigne
F A non-phenothiazine and non-reserpine major neuroleptic, haloperidol, in the treatment of psychoses [in French].
Ann Med Psychol (Paris) 1960;118
(1)
145- 152
PubMedGoogle Scholar 3.Shalev
AMunitz
H The neuroleptic malignant syndrome: agent and host interaction.
Acta Psychiatr Scand 1986;73
(4)
337- 347
PubMedGoogle Scholar 4.Caroff
SNMann
SC Neuroleptic malignant syndrome.
Psychopharmacol Bull 1988;24
(1)
25- 29
PubMedGoogle Scholar 5.Shalev
AHermesh
HMunitz
H Mortality from neuroleptic malignant syndrome.
J Clin Psychiatry 1989;50
(1)
18- 25
PubMedGoogle Scholar 6.Hasan
SBuckley
P Novel antipsychotics and the neuroleptic malignant syndrome: a review and critique.
Am J Psychiatry 1998;155
(8)
1113- 1116
PubMedGoogle Scholar 7.Caroff
SNMann
SCCampbell
EC Neuroleptic malignant syndrome.
Adverse Drug React Bull 2001;
(209)
799- 80210.1097/00012995-200108000-00001
Google Scholar 10.Kipps
CMFung
VSCGrattan-Smith
Pde Moore
GMMorris
JGL Movement disorder emergencies.
Mov Disord 2005;20
(3)
322- 334
PubMedGoogle Scholar 11.Rosebush
PIAnglin
RERichards
CMazurek
MF Neuroleptic malignant syndrome and the acute phase response.
J Clin Psychopharmacol 2008;28
(4)
459- 461
PubMedGoogle Scholar 12.Rosenberg
MRGreen
M Neuroleptic malignant syndrome: review of response to therapy.
Arch Intern Med 1989;149
(9)
1927- 1931
PubMedGoogle Scholar 13.Adnet
PLestavel
PKrivosic-Horber
R Neuroleptic malignant syndrome.
Br J Anaesth 2000;85
(1)
129- 135
PubMedGoogle Scholar 14.Rosebush
PIStewart
TDGelenberg
AJ Twenty neuroleptic rechallenges after neuroleptic malignant syndrome in 15 patients.
J Clin Psychiatry 1989;50
(8)
295- 298
PubMedGoogle Scholar 15.Caroff
SNMann
SCKeck
PE
Jr Specific treatment of the neuroleptic malignant syndrome.
Biol Psychiatry 1998;44
(6)
378- 381
PubMedGoogle Scholar 16.Sechi
GPTanda
FMutani
R Fatal hyperpyrexia after withdrawal of levodopa.
Neurology 1984;34
(2)
249- 251
PubMedGoogle Scholar 17.Friedman
JHFeinberg
SSFeldman
RG A neuroleptic malignantlike syndrome due to levodopa therapy withdrawal.
JAMA 1985;254
(19)
2792- 2795
PubMedGoogle Scholar 18.Factor
SA Fatal Parkinsonism-hyperpyrexia syndrome in a Parkinson's disease patient while actively treated with deep brain stimulation.
Mov Disord 2007;22
(1)
148- 149
PubMedGoogle Scholar 19.Kuno
SMizuta
EYamasaki
S Neuroleptic malignant syndrome in parkinsonian patients: risk factors.
Eur Neurol 1997;38
((suppl 2))
56- 59
PubMedGoogle Scholar 20.Sato
YAsoh
TMetoki
NSatoh
K Efficacy of methylprednisolone pulse therapy on neuroleptic malignant syndrome in Parkinson's disease.
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2003;74
(5)
574- 576
PubMedGoogle Scholar 21.Factor
SAWeiner
WJ Movement disorders emergencies: adults and children. Paper presented at: 61st Annual Meeting of the American Academy of Neurology April 25, 2009 Seattle, WA
23.Oates
JASjoerdsma
A Neurologic effects of tryptophan in patients receiving a monoamine oxidase inhibitor.
Neurology 1960;101076- 1078
PubMedGoogle Scholar 24.Mason
PJMorris
VABalcezak
TJ Serotonin syndrome: presentation of 2 cases and review of the literature.
Medicine (Baltimore) 2000;79
(4)
201- 209
PubMedGoogle Scholar 26.Radomski
JWDursun
SMReveley
MAKutcher
SP An exploratory approach to the serotonin syndrome: an update of clinical phenomenology and revised diagnostic criteria.
Med Hypotheses 2000;55
(3)
218- 224
PubMedGoogle Scholar 27.Hall
MBuckley
N Serotonin syndrome.
Australian Prescriber 2003;26
(3)
62- 63
Google Scholar 28.Woodford
HWalker
R Emergency hospital admissions in idiopathic Parkinson's disease.
Mov Disord 2005;20
(9)
1104- 1108
PubMedGoogle Scholar 29.Temlett
JAThompson
PD Reasons for admission to hospital for Parkinson's disease.
Intern Med J 2006;36
(8)
524- 526
PubMedGoogle Scholar 30.Guneysel
OOnultan
OOnur
O Parkinson's disease and the frequent reasons for emergency admission.
Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat 2008;4
(4)
711- 714
PubMedGoogle Scholar 31.Wood
BHBilclough
JABowron
AWalker
RW Incidence and prediction of falls in Parkinson's disease: a prospective multidisciplinary study.
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2002;72
(6)
721- 725
PubMedGoogle Scholar 32.Michałowska
MFiszer
UKrygowska-Wajs
AOwczarek
K Falls in Parkinson's disease: causes and impact on patients' quality of life.
Funct Neurol 2005;20
(4)
163- 168
PubMedGoogle Scholar 33.Pickering
RMGrimbergen
YAMRigney
U
et al. A meta-analysis of six prospective studies of falling in Parkinson's disease.
Mov Disord 2007;22
(13)
1892- 1900
PubMedGoogle Scholar 34.Ahlskog
JEMuenter
MD Frequency of levodopa-related dyskinesias and motor fluctuations as estimated from the cumulative literature.
Mov Disord 2001;16
(3)
448- 458
PubMedGoogle Scholar 35.Factor
SAMolho
ES Emergency department presentations of patients with Parkinson's disease.
Am J Emerg Med 2000;18
(2)
209- 215
PubMedGoogle Scholar 36.Chou
SMGutmann
L Deteriorating parkinsonism and subdural hematomas.
Neurology 2001;57
(7)
1295
PubMedGoogle Scholar 37.Weiner
WJGoetz
CGNausieda
PAKlawans
HL Respiratory dyskinesias: extrapyramidal dysfunction and dyspnea.
Ann Intern Med 1978;88
(3)
327- 331
PubMedGoogle Scholar 38.Pahwa
RFactor
SALyons
KE
et al. Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology, Practice parameter: treatment of Parkinson disease with motor fluctuations and dyskinesia (an evidence-based review). Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology.
Neurology 2006;66
(7)
983- 995
PubMedGoogle Scholar 39.Aarsland
DLarsen
JPTandberg
ELaake
K Predictors of nursing home placement in Parkinson's disease: a population-based, prospective study.
J Am Geriatr Soc 2000;48
(8)
938- 942
PubMedGoogle Scholar 40.Robottom
BJWeiner
WJ Parkinson's disease dementia.
Curr Psychiatry Rev 2009;5
(3)
218- 22510.2174/157340009788971128
Google Scholar 41.Giladi
NTreves
TAPaleacu
D
et al. Risk factors for dementia, depression and psychosis in long-standing Parkinson's disease.
J Neural Transm 2000;107
(1)
59- 71
PubMedGoogle Scholar 42.Mosimann
UPRowan
ENPartington
CE
et al. Characteristics of visual hallucinations in Parkinson disease dementia and dementia with Lewy bodies.
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 2006;14
(2)
153- 160
PubMedGoogle Scholar 43.Friedman
JHFactor
SA Atypical antipsychotics in the treatment of drug-induced psychosis in Parkinson's disease.
Mov Disord 2000;15
(2)
201- 211
PubMedGoogle Scholar 44.Miyasaki
JMShannon
KVoon
V
et al. Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology, Practice parameter: evaluation and treatment of depression, psychosis, and dementia in Parkinson disease (an evidence-based review). Report of the Quality Standards Subcommittee of the American Academy of Neurology.
Neurology 2006;66
(7)
996- 1002
PubMedGoogle Scholar