[Skip to Content]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
[Skip to Content Landing]
Invited Commentary
January 2016

Critically Ill Patients’ Preferences Regarding Aggressive Medical Interventions: Can We Hear the Patient’s Voice?

Author Affiliations
  • 1Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois

Copyright 2016 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved. Applicable FARS/DFARS Restrictions Apply to Government Use.

JAMA Oncol. 2016;2(1):83-84. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.3613

We are not very good at predicting the future, yet clinicians are often called on by colleagues, as well as patients and families, to estimate survival and the expected outcomes of particular interventions. Even for a practitioner with an extensive fund of knowledge and deep experience, this is a difficult request. The inability to do this creates anxiety for everyone involved, perhaps nowhere more acutely than in an intensive care unit (ICU). Determining the appropriate level or aggressiveness of treatment for critically ill patients with cancer is complex, emotionally charged, and value laden.