[Skip to Content]
[Skip to Content Landing]
Views 259
Citations 0
Comment & Response
January 2018

Validity of Surrogate End Points for Prostate Cancer

Author Affiliations
  • 1Division of Cancer Prevention, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, Maryland
JAMA Oncol. 2018;4(1):129-130. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.0334

To the Editor A valid surrogate end point is a substitute for a true end point that allows conclusions about the effect of treatment on the true end point to be drawn sooner than with a true end point. Royce et al1 argued that a prostate-specific antigen nadir value greater than 0.5 ng/mL is a good surrogate end point for all-cause mortality in men with prostate cancer. They base their claim on the proportion of treatment effect explained (PTE) of 103.86%. However, PTE is not a reliable measure of surrogacy. First, the confidence intervals, which were not reported, are typically too large to be useful,2 particularly if the effect of treatment on the true end point (not adjusted for the surrogate end point) is small.3 Second, PTE is based on an assumption, which may not hold, that treatment and surrogate end point have an additive effect, with no interaction, on the hazard function for all-cause mortality.3

First Page Preview View Large
First page PDF preview
First page PDF preview
×