In May 2018, the Right to Try (RTT) Act1 was signed into law, and it aims to increase access to investigational drugs for people with life-threatening illnesses. Although compassion is widely viewed as the motivating logic of the RTT Act, there are also indisputable economic and political motivations. These motivations reflect the mindset that the development and delivery of cures is being impeded primarily by risk-averse scientists and regulators, when what is required is a bold commitment to save dying people, unencumbered by timid procedural hurdles. Considerable attention has been paid to how this legislation differs from the US Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA’s) existing Expanded Access regulations.2 However, during the bill’s progress through Congress, some of the concerns raised about the potential for unintended negative consequences of the law have been missing from the discussion. Herein, we consider one of these concerns: the Act’s potential to undermine palliative care for children with cancer.
Lanzel AF, Lavery JV. Unintended Consequences of the Right to Try Act for Palliative Care in Pediatric Oncology. JAMA Oncol. Published online March 07, 20195(5):603–604. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.7201
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: