Is age associated with survival in the US Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) beneficiary population with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) who undergo allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT)?
In this prospective observational study that included 1280 patients with MDS undergoing HCT, age alone was not associated with survival.
Based on these findings, we would recommend coverage of HCT for MDS by the CMS.
In 2010, the US Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) indicated that data regarding efficacy of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HCT) in the CMS beneficiary population with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) were currently insufficient, but that coverage would be provided for patients enrolled in a clinical study that met its criteria for Coverage with Evidence Development (CED).
The Center for International Bone Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) submitted a study concept comparing the outcomes of patients aged 55 to 64 years vs aged 65 years or older who met those criteria, effectively providing coverage by CMS for HCT for MDS.
Design, Setting, and Participants
Data on patients aged 65 years or older were prospectively collected and their outcomes compared with patients aged 55 to 64 years. Patients were enrolled in the study from December 15, 2010, to May 14, 2014. The results reported herein were analyzed as of September 4, 2017, with a median follow-up of 47 months. The study was conducted by the CIBMTR. It comprises a voluntary working group of more than 420 centers worldwide that contribute detailed data on allogeneic and autologous HCT and cellular therapies.
Patients with MDS received HCT according to institutional guidelines and preferences.
Main Outcomes and Measures
The primary outcome was overall survival (OS); secondary outcomes included nonrelapse mortality (NRM), relapse-free survival, and acute and chronic graft vs host disease.
During the study period, 688 patients aged 65 years or older underwent HCT for MDS and were compared with 592 patients aged 55 to 64 years. Other than age, there were no differences in patient and disease characteristics between the groups. On univariate analysis, the 3-year NRM rate was 28% vs 25% for the 65 years or older group vs those aged 55 to 64 years, respectively. The 3-year OS was 37% vs 42% for the 65 years or older group vs the 55 to 64 years age group, respectively. On multivariable analysis after adjusting for excess risk of mortality in the older group, age group had no significant association with OS (HR, 1.09; 95% CI, 0.94-1.27; P = .23) or NRM (HR, 1.19; 95% CI, 0.93-1.52; P = .16).
Conclusions and Relevance
Older patients with MDS undergoing HCT have similar OS compared with younger patients. Based on current data, we would recommend coverage of HCT for MDS by the CMS.
ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01166009
Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.
Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.
Err on the side of full disclosure.
If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.
Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.
Atallah E, Logan B, Chen M, et al. Comparison of Patient Age Groups in Transplantation for Myelodysplastic Syndrome: The Medicare Coverage With Evidence Development Study. JAMA Oncol. 2020;6(4):486–493. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.5140
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: