Deaths per 100 000 in the general population (blue) and in those with cancer as a contributing cause (orange). The solid lines are the data points, and the dashed lines are the best-fit lines for which the equations are listed and the R2 is calculated.
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.
Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.
Err on the side of full disclosure.
If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.
Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.
Chino F, Kamal A, Chino J. Incidence of Opioid-Associated Deaths in Cancer Survivors in the United States, 2006-2016: A Population Study of the Opioid Epidemic. JAMA Oncol. 2020;6(7):1100–1102. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.0799
More than 40 000 people in the US died owing to opioids in 2016; the epidemic tops public health concerns. Opioids are commonly used for cancer-associated pain, and there has been a call for oncologists to become more aware of opioid-related risks and benefits.1 It is unknown, however, if opioid-related deaths in cancer survivors are rising at the same rate as in the general population.
Death certificate data were obtained from the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS). Death certificates contain 1 underlying cause of death, up to 20 contributing causes, and demographic data. All deaths owing to opioids were included from 2006 through 2016; if present, cancer was noted as a contributing cause. Opioid-related death incidence was calculated from the US population and estimated cancer survivor population,2 both via NCHS data. To assess for differences, χ2 and R2 tests were used. Statistical significance was defined as α < .05 on a 2-sided significance level. All statistical analyses were performed with SPSS, version 21 (IBM). The Duke University Medical Center Institutional Review Board provided a waiver (Pro00045337) for this study, given that it is publicly available deidentified data. Informed consent is waived for publicly available, deidentified databases. Data were collected from May through August 2018, and analysis was completed in September 2019.
From 2006 through 2016, there were 193 500 deaths owing to opioids in the general population and 895 in the cancer population. The number of opioid-related deaths increased from 5.33 to 8.97 per 100 000 people in the general population (P < .001; R2 = 0.99) and from 0.52 to 0.66 per 100 000 (P < .001; R2 = 0.24) in the cancer population (Figure).
Demographic characteristics of cancer survivors with opioid-related deaths differed from those in the general population including higher education (12.7% vs 6.9% with at least a college degree), more women (38.5% vs 29.2%), fewer white individuals (82.3% vs 84.2%), more non-Hispanic individuals (94.5% vs 90.7%), and fewer single patients (24.2% vs 48.1%) (all P < .001; except race, P = .03) (Table). Cancer survivors also were older (median age, 57 years vs 42 years). The underlying primary cancer for those with opioid-related deaths was lung (22.3%), gastrointestinal (20.9%), head and neck (11.7%), and hematologic (11.3%), among others (Table).
Death from opioids as the primary cause as documented in death certificates is 10 times less likely to occur in cancer survivors vs the general population. In the past decade, there was a slight increase in opioid-related deaths in cancer survivors; however, it was not the sharp growth seen in the general population. These findings confirm prior research showing that opioid-related hospitalizations among patients with cancer are rare but slowly increasing over time.3 This may be because of increased survivorship rates with commensurately higher rates of chronic pain or increased abuse of opioid medications.
Cancer survivors at risk for opioid overdose may be different from people in the general population, including being older with higher educational attainment; these differences may, in part, reflect the diagnosed cancer population. Additionally, some diagnoses may carry higher proportional risk; patients with head and neck cancer represent 12% of opioid-related deaths but less than 4% of new cancer diagnoses (Table).
One-third of patients experience cancer-related pain after curative treatment,4 and prescribing restrictions tied to the opioid epidemic may be reducing access for both long-term survivors and those on active treatment. One study of patients referred to palliative care found that opioid doses decreased by almost half from 2010 to 2015,5 another found that the number of patients with cancer and survivors with opioid prescriptions decreased by more than half from 2016 to 2018, with almost half told that their treatment options were limited by laws, guidelines, or insurance coverage.6
Our study is limited by its dependence on accurate documentation of cancer as a contributing cause when present. It may underestimate the number of opioid-related deaths in those on active cancer treatment if clinicians assume all deaths are owing to cancer as underlying cause; it may also underestimate survivor risk if cancer was a distant diagnosis and not noted at the time of an opioid-related death.
In summary, opioid-related deaths in the cancer population are much rarer than in the general population. Continued care should be taken when treating cancer-related pain.
Accepted for Publication: February 21, 2020.
Corresponding Author: Fumiko Chino, MD, Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Ave, PO Box 33, New York City, NY (email@example.com).
Published Online: May 7, 2020. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.0799
Author Contributions: Dr F. Chino had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
Study concept and design: All authors.
Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: F. Chino, J. Chino.
Drafting of the manuscript: All authors.
Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: All authors.
Statistical analysis: J. Chino.
Administrative, technical, or material support: Kamal, J. Chino.
Study supervision: J. Chino.
Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Dr F. Chino reported receiving grants from Varian and the Chanel Endowment for Survivorship Research outside the submitted work. No other disclosures were reported.
Meeting Presentation: Previously presented as a podium presentation at the ASCO Quality Care Symposium 2018 in Phoenix, Arizona.