In Reply We thank Fabrizio and colleagues for their comments on our Invited Commentary on the role of tumor mutational burden in selecting patients with lung cancer for first-line immunotherapy.1 The Checkmate 227 study was amended to add a co–primary end point of progression-free survival (PFS) by tissue TMB, with the TMB cutoff prespecified as 10 mutations per megabase (mut/Mb), based on data from the phase 2 CheckMate 568 study (NCT02659059).2 The relationship between plasma TMB and outcome in the MYSTIC study was an exploratory end point only, with the optimal blood TMB cutoff of 20 mut/Mb being retrospectively determined, rather than prospectively defined as in CheckMate 227.2,3 Both studies used the FoundationOne CDx assay for tumor TMB testing on archival/fresh tumor tissue collected prior to study enrollment, with valid TMB data available for only 57.7% and 41.1% of randomized patients from the CheckMate 227 and MYSTIC studies, respectively.
Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.
Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.
Err on the side of full disclosure.
If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.
Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.
Waqar SN, Govindan R. Demystifying the Role of Tumor Mutational Burden for Immunotherapy Selection—Reply. JAMA Oncol. Published online September 03, 2020. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.3397
Coronavirus Resource Center
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Create a personal account or sign in to: