[Skip to Navigation]
Sign In
Editorial
May 20, 2021

Continuation of Screening Endoscopy for Colorectal Cancer in Older Adults

Author Affiliations
  • 1Centre for Epidemiology and Evidence-Based Practice, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Universiti Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
  • 2Ministry of Health Malaysia, Menara Prisma, Persiaran Perdana, Putrajaya, 10 Wilayah Persekutuan Putrajaya, Malaysia
JAMA Oncol. 2021;7(7):973-975. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.1119

Colorectal cancer is not only one of the most common, but also one of the most preventable cancers globally. Screening for colorectal cancer has been associated with reduced disease-specific mortality through detection of cancer at earlier stages, as well as through detection and removal of its precursor lesions.

While most professional guidelines recommend routine screening of asymptomatic adults older than 50 years for colorectal cancer, there is disagreement on the age to stop screening. For example, the US Preventive Services Task Force(USPSTF) and the American College of Gastroenterology recommend screening until age 75 years, followed by individualized decision-making for people older than 75 years.1,2 In contrast, the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health does not recommend screening adults 75 years and older for colorectal cancer.3 Likewise, the Asia Pacific Colorectal Cancer Working Group recommends 75 years as a reasonable age limit to stop screening.4 Nonetheless, these recommendations were largely made based on evidence from modeling studies5 and indirect evidence, such as reduced life expectancy in older individuals, and disparate inclusion of older adults in colorectal cancer screening trials.3

Add or change institution
Limit 200 characters
Limit 25 characters
Conflicts of Interest Disclosure

Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.

Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.

Err on the side of full disclosure.

If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.

Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.

Limit 140 characters
Limit 3600 characters or approximately 600 words
    ×