[Skip to Navigation]
Sign In
Review
October 20, 2022

Practical Considerations for the Use of Circulating Tumor DNA in the Treatment of Patients With Cancer: A Narrative Review

Author Affiliations
  • 1Division of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester and The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
  • 2Department of Public Health, University Federico II of Naples, Naples, Italy
  • 3Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
  • 4University Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
  • 5West German Cancer Center, Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
  • 6Garvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia
  • 7Hadassah Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel
  • 8National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan
  • 9Center for Thoracic Oncology, The Tisch Cancer Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
JAMA Oncol. 2022;8(12):1830-1839. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.4457
Abstract

Importance  Personalized medicine based on tumor profiling and identification of actionable genomic alterations is pivotal in cancer management. Although tissue biopsy is still preferred for diagnosis, liquid biopsy of blood-based tumor analytes, such as circulating tumor DNA, is a rapidly emerging technology for tumor profiling.

Observations  This review presents a practical overview for clinicians and allied health care professionals for selection of the most appropriate liquid biopsy assay, specifically focusing on circulating tumor DNA and how it may affect patient treatment and case management across multiple tumor types. Multiple factors influence the analytical validity, clinical validity, and clinical utility of testing. This review provides recommendations and practical guidance for best practice. Current methodologies include polymerase chain reaction-based approaches and those that use next-generation sequencing (eg, capture-based profiling, whole exome, or genome sequencing). Factors that may influence utility include sensitivity and specificity, quantity of circulating tumor DNA, detection of a small vs a large panel of genes, and clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential. Currently, liquid biopsy appears useful in patients unable to undergo biopsy or where mutations detected may be more representative of the predominant tumor burden than for tissue-based assays. Other potential applications may include screening, primary diagnosis, residual disease, local recurrence, therapy selection, or early therapy response and resistance monitoring.

Conclusions and Relevance  This review found that liquid biopsy is increasingly being used clinically in advanced lung cancer, and ongoing research is identifying applications of circulating tumor DNA-based testing that complement tissue analysis across a broad range of clinical settings. Circulating tumor DNA technologies are advancing quickly and are demonstrating potential benefits for patients, health care practitioners, health care systems, and researchers, at many stages of the patient oncologic journey.

Add or change institution
×