[Skip to Navigation]
Sign In
Original Investigation
May 2, 2024

Longer Interval Between First Colonoscopy With Negative Findings for Colorectal Cancer and Repeat Colonoscopy

Author Affiliations
  • 1Division of Preventive Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
  • 2Medical Faculty Heidelberg, Heidelberg University, Heidelberg, Germany
  • 3Department of Disease Control and Environmental Health, School of Public Health, College of Health Sciences, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda
  • 4Center for Primary Health Care Research, Lund University, Malmö, Sweden
  • 5Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York
  • 6Center for Community-based Healthcare Research and Education, Department of Functional Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Shimane University, Izumo, Japan
  • 7Division of Clinical Epidemiology and Aging Research, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
  • 8German Cancer Consortium, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
  • 9Institute of Primary Health Care, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
  • 10Department of Global Public Health and Primary Care, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
JAMA Oncol. Published online May 2, 2024. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.0827
Key Points

Question  When should a second colonoscopy be performed after a first colonoscopy with findings negative for colorectal adenoma, carcinoma in situ, or colorectal cancer (CRC)?

Findings  In this cohort study of 110 074 individuals with no family history of CRC and negative findings on their first screening colonoscopy (exposed group) and 1 981 332 matched individuals (control group), risks of CRC and CRC-specific death were lower for 15 years in the exposed group, suggesting that extending the screening interval from 10 to 15 years would miss only 2 CRC cases and 1 CRC-related death per 1000 individuals.

Meaning  Findings of this study suggest that the 10-year interval between colonoscopy screenings for CRC could be extended to 15 years in patients with no family history of CRC and negative findings on their first colonoscopy.

Abstract

Importance  For individuals without a family history of colorectal cancer (CRC), colonoscopy screening every 10 years is recommended to reduce CRC incidence and mortality. However, debate exists about whether and for how long this 10-year interval could be safely expanded.

Objective  To assess how many years after a first colonoscopy with findings negative for CRC a second colonoscopy can be performed.

Design, Setting, and Participants  This cohort study leveraged Swedish nationwide register-based data to examine CRC diagnoses and CRC-specific mortality among individuals without a family history of CRC. The exposed group included individuals who had a first colonoscopy with findings negative for CRC at age 45 to 69 years between 1990 and 2016. The control group included individuals matched by sex, birth year, and baseline age (ie, the age of their matched exposed individual when the exposed individual’s first colonoscopy with findings negative for CRC was performed). Individuals in the control group either did not have a colonoscopy during the follow-up or underwent colonoscopy that resulted in a CRC diagnosis. Up to 18 controls were matched with each exposed individual. Individuals were followed up from 1990 to 2018, and data were analyzed from November 2022 to November 2023.

Exposure  A first colonoscopy with findings negative for CRC, defined as a first colonoscopy without a diagnosis of colorectal polyp, adenoma, carcinoma in situ, or CRC before or within 6 months after screening.

Main Outcomes and Measures  The primary outcomes were CRC diagnosis and CRC-specific death. The 10-year standardized incidence ratio and standardized mortality ratio were calculated to compare risks of CRC and CRC-specific death in the exposed and control groups based on different follow-up screening intervals.

Results  The sample included 110 074 individuals (65 147 females [59.2%]) in the exposed group and 1 981 332 (1 172 646 females [59.2%]) in the control group. The median (IQR) age for individuals in both groups was 59 (52-64) years. During up to 29 years of follow-up of individuals with a first colonoscopy with findings negative for CRC, 484 incident CRCs and 112 CRC-specific deaths occurred. After a first colonoscopy with findings negative for CRC, the risks of CRC and CRC-specific death in the exposed group were significantly lower than those in their matched controls for 15 years. At 15 years after a first colonoscopy with findings negative for CRC, the 10-year standardized incidence ratio was 0.72 (95% CI, 0.54-0.94) and the 10-year standardized mortality ratio was 0.55 (95% CI, 0.29-0.94). In other words, the 10-year cumulative risk of CRC in year 15 in the exposed group was 72% that of the 10-year cumulative risk of CRC in the control group. Extending the colonoscopy screening interval from 10 to 15 years in individuals with a first colonoscopy with findings negative for CRC could miss the early detection of only 2 CRC cases and the prevention of 1 CRC-specific death per 1000 individuals, while potentially avoiding 1000 colonoscopies.

Conclusions and Relevance  This cohort study found that for the population without a family history of CRC, the 10-year interval between colonoscopy screenings for individuals with a first colonoscopy with findings negative for CRC could potentially be extended to 15 years. A longer interval between colonoscopy screenings could be beneficial in avoiding unnecessary invasive examinations.

Add or change institution
×