[Skip to Content]
Sign In
Individual Sign In
Create an Account
Institutional Sign In
OpenAthens Shibboleth
[Skip to Content Landing]
Figure 1.
Flowchart Showing the Inclusion and Exclusion Results of the Parkinson Disease (PD) Cohort and the Non-PD Reference Cohort Used in the Present Study of the Association Between PD and Cancer
Flowchart Showing the Inclusion and Exclusion Results of the Parkinson Disease (PD) Cohort and the Non-PD Reference Cohort Used in the Present Study of the Association Between PD and Cancer
Figure 2.
Comparisons of Incidence Density of Cancers Between the Parkinson Disease (PD) Group and Non-PD Group
Comparisons of Incidence Density of Cancers Between the Parkinson Disease (PD) Group and Non-PD Group

HR indicates hazard ratio (bold HRs indicate statistical significances; P < .05); ICD-9-CM, International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification.

aAdjusted for sex and age.

Table 1.  
Comparisons of Incidence Density of Liver Cancer and Malignant Brain Tumors Between PD Group and Non-PD Group By Characteristics
Comparisons of Incidence Density of Liver Cancer and Malignant Brain Tumors Between PD Group and Non-PD Group By Characteristics
Table 2.  
Comparisons of Incidence Density of Lung Cancer Between the PD Group and Non-PD Group by Characteristics
Comparisons of Incidence Density of Lung Cancer Between the PD Group and Non-PD Group by Characteristics
Table 3.  
Comparisons of Risk of Hormone-Related Cancers in Women Between PD Group and Non-PD Group, Adjusted for Age
Comparisons of Risk of Hormone-Related Cancers in Women Between PD Group and Non-PD Group, Adjusted for Age
Table 4.  
Comparisons of Risk of Hormone-Related Cancers in Men Between PD Group and Non-PD Group, Adjusted for Age
Comparisons of Risk of Hormone-Related Cancers in Men Between PD Group and Non-PD Group, Adjusted for Age
1.
Samii  A, Nutt  JG, Ransom  BR.  Parkinson’s disease.  Lancet. 2004;363(9423):1783-1793.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
2.
Thomas  B, Beal  MF.  Parkinson’s disease.  Hum Mol Genet. 2007;16 Spec No. 2(Spec No 2):R183-R194.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
3.
Klein  C, Westenberger  A.  Genetics of Parkinson’s disease.  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2012;2(1):a008888.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
4.
Pan  T, Zhu  J, Hwu  WJ, Jankovic  J.  The role of alpha-synuclein in melanin synthesis in melanoma and dopaminergic neuronal cells.  PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e45183.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
5.
Bethge  N, Lothe  RA, Honne  H,  et al.  Colorectal cancer DNA methylation marker panel validated with high performance in non-Hodgkin lymphoma.  Epigenetics. 2014;9(3):428-436.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
6.
Veeriah  S, Taylor  BS, Meng  S,  et al.  Somatic mutations of the Parkinson’s disease-associated gene PARK2 in glioblastoma and other human malignancies.  Nat Genet. 2010;42(1):77-82.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
7.
Fujiwara  M, Marusawa  H, Wang  HQ,  et al.  Parkin as a tumor suppressor gene for hepatocellular carcinoma.  Oncogene. 2008;27(46):6002-6011.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
8.
Gong  Y, Zack  TI, Morris  LG,  et al.  Pan-cancer genetic analysis identifies PARK2 as a master regulator of G1/S cyclins.  Nat Genet. 2014;46(6):588-594.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
9.
Xiong  D, Wang  Y, Kupert  E,  et al.  A recurrent mutation in PARK2 is associated with familial lung cancer.  Am J Hum Genet. 2015;96(2):301-308.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
10.
Martin  SA, Hewish  M, Sims  D, Lord  CJ, Ashworth  A.  Parallel high-throughput RNA interference screens identify PINK1 as a potential therapeutic target for the treatment of DNA mismatch repair-deficient cancers.  Cancer Res. 2011;71(5):1836-1848.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
11.
O’Flanagan  CH, Morais  VA, Wurst  W, De Strooper  B, O’Neill  C.  The Parkinson’s gene PINK1 regulates cell cycle progression and promotes cancer-associated phenotypes.  Oncogene. 2015;34(11):1363-1374.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
12.
Tsuchiya  B, Iwaya  K, Kohno  N,  et al.  Clinical significance of DJ-1 as a secretory molecule: retrospective study of DJ-1 expression at mRNA and protein levels in ductal carcinoma of the breast.  Histopathology. 2012;61(1):69-77.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
13.
Ismail  IA, Kang  HS, Lee  HJ, Kim  JK, Hong  SH.  DJ-1 upregulates breast cancer cell invasion by repressing KLF17 expression.  Br J Cancer. 2014;110(5):1298-1306.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
14.
Looyenga  BD, Furge  KA, Dykema  KJ,  et al.  Chromosomal amplification of leucine-rich repeat kinase-2 (LRRK2) is required for oncogenic MET signaling in papillary renal and thyroid carcinomas.  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(4):1439-1444.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
15.
Lewis  PA, Manzoni  C.  LRRK2 and human disease: a complicated question or a question of complexes?  Sci Signal. 2012;5(207):pe2.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
16.
Agalliu  I, San Luciano  M, Mirelman  A,  et al.  Higher frequency of certain cancers in LRRK2 G2019S mutation carriers with Parkinson disease: a pooled analysis.  JAMA Neurol. 2015;72(1):58-65.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
17.
Laman  H, Funes  JM, Ye  H,  et al.  Transforming activity of Fbxo7 is mediated specifically through regulation of cyclin D/cdk6.  EMBO J. 2005;24(17):3104-3116.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
18.
Wirdefeldt  K, Adami  HO, Cole  P, Trichopoulos  D, Mandel  J.  Epidemiology and etiology of Parkinson’s disease: a review of the evidence.  Eur J Epidemiol. 2011;26(suppl 1):S1-S58.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
19.
Bajaj  A, Driver  JA, Schernhammer  ES.  Parkinson’s disease and cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis.  Cancer Causes Control. 2010;21(5):697-707.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
20.
Driver  JA.  Inverse association between cancer and neurodegenerative disease: review of the epidemiologic and biological evidence.  Biogerontology. 2014;15(6):547-557.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
21.
Wirdefeldt  K, Weibull  CE, Chen  H,  et al.  Parkinson’s disease and cancer: A register-based family study.  Am J Epidemiol. 2014;179(1):85-94.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
22.
Olsen  JH, Friis  S, Frederiksen  K, McLaughlin  JK, Mellemkjaer  L, Møller  H.  Atypical cancer pattern in patients with Parkinson’s disease.  Br J Cancer. 2005;92(1):201-205.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
23.
Kareus  SA, Figueroa  KP, Cannon-Albright  LA, Pulst  SM.  Shared predispositions of parkinsonism and cancer: a population-based pedigree-linked study.  Arch Neurol. 2012;69(12):1572-1577.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
24.
Ong  EL, Goldacre  R, Goldacre  M.  Differential risks of cancer types in people with Parkinson’s disease: a national record-linkage study.  Eur J Cancer. 2014;50(14):2456-2462.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
25.
Roberts  SA, Gordenin  DA.  Hypermutation in human cancer genomes: footprints and mechanisms.  Nat Rev Cancer. 2014;14(12):786-800.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
26.
Eifert  C, Powers  RS.  From cancer genomes to oncogenic drivers, tumour dependencies and therapeutic targets.  Nat Rev Cancer. 2012;12(8):572-578.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
27.
Maris  JM, Knudson  AG.  Revisiting tissue specificity of germline cancer predisposing mutations.  Nat Rev Cancer. 2015;15(2):65-66.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
28.
Lesage  S, Dürr  A, Tazir  M,  et al; French Parkinson’s Disease Genetics Study Group.  LRRK2 G2019S as a cause of Parkinson’s disease in North African Arabs.  N Engl J Med. 2006;354(4):422-423.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
29.
Ozelius  LJ, Senthil  G, Saunders-Pullman  R,  et al.  LRRK2 G2019S as a cause of Parkinson’s disease in Ashkenazi Jews.  N Engl J Med. 2006;354(4):424-425.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
30.
Clark  LN, Wang  Y, Karlins  E,  et al.  Frequency of LRRK2 mutations in early- and late-onset Parkinson disease.  Neurology. 2006;67(10):1786-1791.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
31.
Zabetian  CP, Hutter  CM, Yearout  D,  et al.  LRRK2 G2019S in families with Parkinson disease who originated from Europe and the Middle East: evidence of two distinct founding events beginning two millennia ago.  Am J Hum Genet. 2006;79(4):752-758.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
32.
Paez  JG, Jänne  PA, Lee  JC,  et al.  EGFR mutations in lung cancer: correlation with clinical response to gefitinib therapy.  Science. 2004;304(5676):1497-1500.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
33.
Shan  Y, Eastwood  MP, Zhang  X,  et al.  Oncogenic mutations counteract intrinsic disorder in the EGFR kinase and promote receptor dimerization.  Cell. 2012;149(4):860-870.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
34.
Red Brewer  M, Yun  CH, Lai  D, Lemmon  MA, Eck  MJ, Pao  W.  Mechanism for activation of mutated epidermal growth factor receptors in lung cancer.  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110(38):E3595-E3604.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
35.
Mok  TS, Wu  YL, Thongprasert  S,  et al.  Gefitinib or carboplatin-paclitaxel in pulmonary adenocarcinoma.  N Engl J Med. 2009;361(10):947-957.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
36.
Fukuoka  M, Yano  S, Giaccone  G,  et al.  Multi-institutional randomized phase II trial of gefitinib for previously treated patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (The IDEAL 1 Trial) [corrected].  J Clin Oncol. 2003;21(12):2237-2246.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
37.
Abdulla  MA, Ahmed  I, Assawamakin  A,  et al; HUGO Pan-Asian SNP Consortium; Indian Genome Variation Consortium.  Mapping human genetic diversity in Asia.  Science. 2009;326(5959):1541-1545.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
38.
Lin  CH, Sheu  WHH.  Hypoglycaemic episodes and risk of dementia in diabetes mellitus: 7-year follow-up study.  J Intern Med. 2013;273(1):102-110.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
39.
 Taiwan National Cancer Registry Database.http://tcr.cph.ntu.edu.tw/main.php?Page=N1. Accessed May 17, 2015.
40.
Constantinescu  R, Romer  M, Kieburtz  K; DATATOP Investigators of the Parkinson Study Group.  Malignant melanoma in early Parkinson’s disease: the DATATOP trial.  Mov Disord. 2007;22(5):720-722.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
41.
Schwid  SR, Bausch  J, Oakes  D,  et al; PSG PRECEPT Investigators.  Cancer incidence in a trial of an antiapoptotic agent for Parkinson’s disease.  Mov Disord. 2010;25(12):1801-1808.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
42.
Constantinescu  R, Elm  J, Auinger  P,  et al; NET-PD Investigators.  Malignant melanoma in early-treated Parkinson’s disease: the NET-PD trial.  Mov Disord. 2014;29(2):263-265.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
43.
Tanaka  H, Tsukuma  H, Tomita  S,  et al.  Time trends of incidence for cutaneous melanoma among the Japanese population: an analysis of Osaka Cancer Registry data, 1964-95.  J Epidemiol. 1999;9(6)(suppl):S129-S135.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
44.
Paisán-Ruiz  C, Houlden  H.  Common pathogenic pathways in melanoma and Parkinson disease.  Neurology. 2010;75(18):1653-1655.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
45.
Gao  X, Simon  KC, Han  J, Schwarzschild  MA, Ascherio  A.  Family history of melanoma and Parkinson disease risk.  Neurology. 2009;73(16):1286-1291.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
46.
 Annual Report of Health Promotion Administration. Taiwan: Ministry of Health and Welfare; 2014.
47.
Frigerio  R, Sanft  KR, Grossardt  BR,  et al.  Chemical exposures and Parkinson’s disease: a population-based case-control study.  Mov Disord. 2006;21(10):1688-1692.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
48.
Barnhill  LM, Bronstein  JM.  Pesticides and Parkinson’s disease: is it in your genes?  Neurodegener Dis Manag. 2014;4(3):197-200.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
49.
Rustgi  AK, El-Serag  HB.  Esophageal carcinoma.  N Engl J Med. 2014;371(26):2499-2509.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
50.
Wu  IC, Wu  CC, Lu  CY,  et al.  Substance use (alcohol, areca nut and cigarette) is associated with poor prognosis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.  PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e55834.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
51.
Teng  YH, Tan  WJ, Thike  AA,  et al.  Mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene in triple negative breast cancer: possible implications for targeted therapy.  Breast Cancer Res. 2011;13(2):R35.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
52.
Jacot  W, Lopez-Crapez  E, Thezenas  S,  et al.  Lack of EGFR-activating mutations in European patients with triple-negative breast cancer could emphasise geographic and ethnic variations in breast cancer mutation profiles.  Breast Cancer Res. 2011;13(6):R133.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
53.
Secq  V, Villeret  J, Fina  F,  et al.  Triple negative breast carcinoma EGFR amplification is not associated with EGFR, Kras or ALK mutations.  Br J Cancer. 2014;110(4):1045-1052.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
54.
Fallon  L, Bélanger  CM, Corera  AT,  et al.  A regulated interaction with the UIM protein Eps15 implicates parkin in EGF receptor trafficking and PI(3)K-Akt signalling.  Nat Cell Biol. 2006;8(8):834-842.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
55.
Gómez-Suaga  P, Rivero-Ríos  P, Fdez  E,  et al.  LRRK2 delays degradative receptor trafficking by impeding late endosomal budding through decreasing Rab7 activity.  Hum Mol Genet. 2014;23(25):6779-6796.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
56.
Hinkle  DA, Mullett  SJ, Gabris  BE, Hamilton  RL.  DJ-1 expression in glioblastomas shows positive correlation with p53 expression and negative correlation with epidermal growth factor receptor amplification.  Neuropathology. 2011;31(1):29-37.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
57.
Catalá-López  F, Suárez-Pinilla  M, Suárez-Pinilla  P,  et al.  Inverse and direct cancer comorbidity in people with central nervous system disorders: a meta-analysis of cancer incidence in 577,013 participants of 50 observational studies.  Psychother Psychosom. 2014;83(2):89-105.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
58.
Benito-León  J, Bermejo-Pareja  F, Morales-González  JM,  et al; Neurological Disorders in Central Spain (NEDICES) Study Group.  Incidence of Parkinson disease and parkinsonism in three elderly populations of central Spain.  Neurology. 2004;62(5):734-741.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Original Investigation
August 2015

Association Between Parkinson Disease and Risk of Cancer in Taiwan

Author Affiliations
  • 1Taiwan International Graduate Program in Molecular Medicine, Academia Sinica and National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan
  • 2Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan
  • 3Institute of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan
  • 4Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital and National Taiwan University Medical College, Taipei, Taiwan
  • 5Department of Medical Research, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
  • 6PhD Program for Cancer Biology and Drug Discovery, China Medical University, Taichung, Taiwan
 

Copyright 2015 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved. Applicable FARS/DFARS Restrictions Apply to Government Use.

JAMA Oncol. 2015;1(5):633-640. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.1752
Abstract

Importance  Parkinson disease (PD) has been reported to be associated with a general reduced risk of cancer. These studies were mainly carried out in Western populations and little was known about associations in East Asians.

Objective  To analyze the association between PD and risk of cancer.

Design, Setting, and Participants  In this cohort study, the data were obtained from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database, which contained information on approximately 24.7 million insured individuals. The cohort included individuals with newly diagnosed as having PD between 2004 and 2010. An age- and sex-matched systematic random-sampling method was used for subject selection in the reference non-PD cohort. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was used to determine the effects of PD on the risks of cancer, as shown by hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% CIs.

Main Outcomes and Measures  The Taiwan Population Census and National Cancer Registry Databases were used to identify patients with cancer. The last follow-up date was December 31, 2012.

Results  In 62 023 patients with PD, the HR for all subsequent cancers combined was 1.58 (95% CI, 1.50-1.65). Of the 19 types of cancer, Parkinson disease was not associated with breast, ovarian, or thyroid cancers. Increased HRs were found in the remaining 16 cancers, including malignant brain tumors (HR, 3.42; 95% CI, 1.84-6.38), gastrointestinal tract cancers (esophageal [HR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.28-2.57], stomach [HR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.30-1.94], colorectal [HR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.31-1.65], liver [HR, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.67-2.14]; gallbladder [HR, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.16-2.57], and pancreas [HR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.09-2.02]) (P < .05 for all comparisons), lung cancers (HR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.38-1.76), some hormone-related cancers (uterine [HR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.12-3.01], cervical [HR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.05-1.76], and prostate [HR, 1.80; 95% CI, 1.52-2.13; P < .05 for all comparisons), urinary tract cancers (kidney and bladder cancers; HRs, 1.59 and 1.99, respectively; P < .001 for both comparisons), lymphoma and/or leukemia (HR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.31-2.01), melanoma (HR, 2.75; 95% CI, 1.35-5.59), and other skin cancers (HR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.46-2.23). For hepatocellular carcinoma, the highest HR resided in the 50- to 59-year-old group (HR, 2.57; 95% CI, 1.7-3.89).

Conclusions and Relevance  Our study concludes that PD is is associated with most cancers in Taiwan. Further studies are needed to clarify whether our findings can be applied to other East Asian populations. The differences between our study and most previous cohorts suggest the importance of ethnicity and environmental exposures in disease pathogenesis.

Introduction

Parkinson disease (PD) is the most common neurodegenerative movement disorder and is caused by premature death of dopamine-containing neurons in the substantia nigra. It affects 1% of the population older than 60 years.1 Although most PD cases are sporadic forms that result from a combination of polygenic inheritance and gene-environment interactions, a familial history of PD can be disclosed in approximately 10% of the cases.2 Studies in families with PD led to the identification of 15 PD loci (PARK1-15).3 Several of these PARK genes, such as SNCA,4,5PARKIN,6-9PINK1,10,11DJ-1,12,13LRRK2,14-16 and FBOX7,17 were found to play roles in both PD and cancers.

During the past 50 years, more than 25 epidemiological studies were done on the association between PD and cancers.18 On the one hand, most of these studies showed that people with PD had a decreased risk of cancer compared with those without.19,20 The exception was a Swedish cohort21 including 11 786 patients with PD (hereinafter, PD patients) from 1954 to 2009 that showed a marginally increased risk of cancer in PD patients vs PD-free individuals. On the other hand, PD was variably disclosed to be associated with high rates of certain cancers in recent studies, although the results have been inconsistent to date. These cancers included melanoma, brain, breast, uterus, kidney, and prostate cancers.16,21-24 Moreover, these studies were mostly done in Western populations, and little was known about associations in East Asians.

It is becoming clear that genetic backgrounds play important roles in a diverse array of disease pathogenesis.3,25-27 Parkinson disease and lung cancer are 2 examples that demonstrate the importance of ethnicity in disease pathogenesis. LRRK2 G2019S mutation causes typical PD. The mutation occurs in approximately 40% of Arab Berbers with PD,28 20% of Ashkenazi Jewish patients,29 but only 1% to 7% of PD patients who are of European origin.30,31EGFR tyrosine kinase domain–activating mutations convert it into a driver oncogene in lung adenocarcinoma.32-34 The percentage of EGFR-activating mutations approaches 50% in East Asian patients with lung adenocarcinoma but only 10% in white patients.35,36 We therefore aimed to investigate whether the association between PD and cancers differs between East Asians and those of European origin. Because East Asians share similar genetic backgrounds,37 we conducted the study using the Taiwan National Health Insurance (NHI) Research Database (NHIRD). This nationwide population-based follow-up cohort study examined whether PD is a risk or a protective factor among different cancer types.

Box Section Ref ID

At a Glance

  • Parkinson disease (PD) has been reported to be associated with a reduced risk of cancer but has not been studied in East Asian populations.

  • A total of 62 023 East Asian patients with PD diagnosed from 2004 to 2010 were studied.

  • A diagnosis of PD was not associated with an increased risk of breast, ovarian, or thyroid cancers.

  • Increased hazard ratios (HRs) were found in many other cancers.

  • Parkinson disease was associated with an increased risk of malignant brain tumor (HR, 3.42; 95% CI, 1.84-6.38).

Methods
Data Source

The NHI is a single-payer universal health insurance program that has been operating since 1995, and more than 99% of the population are enrolled. The National Health Research Institute compiles all medical claims in the NHI program and releases the database for research purpose. Data for our cohort study were obtained from the NHIRD, which comprises comprehensive information of clinical visits for each insurant, such as demographic data, date of visits, diagnostic codes according to the International Classification of Disease, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM), and prescriptions. The details of the NHIRD were described in the previous studies.38 This study was approved by the ethical review board of the Taichung Veterans General Hospital.

Study Cohort

The cohort included 133 322 individuals with PD newly diagnosed (ICD-9-CM code 332) between 2004 and 2010. The date of initial diagnosis was set as the index date for each person. A total of 66 385 patients with secondary parkinsonism (ICD-9-CM code 332.1), 350 with missing information on sex and age, and 4564 with malignant neoplasms before the index date were excluded. For the reference non-PD cohort, 2 subjects were selected using a systematic random-sampling method for each corresponding PD patient. The individuals in the PD and non-PD cohorts were matched for age, sex, and index year under the same exclusion criteria. Finally, a total of 62 023 PD patients and 124 046 without PD were included in this study (Figure 1).

Outcome Measurement

We used the Taiwan Population Census and National Cancer Registry Databases39 to identify patients with cancer in this study. The National Cancer Registry Database recorded information of cancer diagnostic date and histological types. Each study patient was followed until a diagnosis of malignant disease (ICD-9-CM code 140-208) was made, or until the patient was censored for death, lost to follow-up, withdrew from the database, or until the date of December 31, 2012, whichever came first.

Statistical Analysis

The follow-up in person-years for an event was used for estimating the incidence density of cancer. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression models were used to determine the effects of PD on the risk of cancer, as shown by hazard ratio (HR) with 95% CIs. Furthermore, this study also estimated the effects of PD on the risk of specific cancer type and histological type. All analyses were performed using SAS statistical software (version 9.3; SAS Institute Inc), and results were considered statistically significant for 2-tailed P < .05.

Results

Figure 2 shows the comparison of incidence density of cancers between the PD cohort and the non-PD reference cohort. The HR comparing the PD and the non-PD cohorts in association with all cancer outcomes combined was 1.58 (95% CI, 1.50-1.65; P < .001). The data showed that PD was not significantly associated with 3 of 19 cancers studied, including breast cancer (HR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.90-1.37; P = .33), ovarian cancer (HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.37-1.44; P = .36), and thyroid cancer (HR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.63-1.91; P = .75). For the other 16 cancers studied, PD was associated with an increased cancer incidence density. These included malignant brain tumors (HR, 3.42; 95% CI, 1.84-6.38; P < .001), gastrointestinal tract cancers (esophageal [HR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.28-2.57], stomach [HR, 1.59; 95% CI, 1.30-1.94], colorectal [HR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.31-1.65], liver [HR, 1.89; 95% CI, 1.67-2.14]; gallbladder [HR, 1.73; 95% CI, 1.16-2.57], and pancreas [HR, 1.48; 95% CI, 1.09-2.02]); P < .05 for all comparisons), lung cancers (HR, 1.56; 95% CI, 1.38-1.76; P < .001), hormone-related cancers (uterine [HR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.12-3.01], cervical [HR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.05-1.76], and prostate [HR, 1.80; 95% CI, 1.52-2.13]); P < .05 for all comparisons), urinary tract (kidney and bladder cancers; HR, 1.59 and 1.99, respectively; P < .001 for both comparisons), lymphoma and/or leukemia (HR, 1.62; 95% CI, 1.31-2.01; P < .001), melanoma (HR, 2.75; 95% CI, 1.35-5.59; P = .005) and other skin cancers (HR, 1.81; 95% CI, 1.46-2.23; P < .001).

We further analyzed liver cancers and malignant brain tumors by sex and age stratifications (Table 1). In both men and women, PD was a significant risk factor for liver cancers (HR, 1.97 and 1.85, respectively; P < .001 for both comparisons). When stratified by age, the highest HR resided in the group aged 50 to 59 years (HR, 2.57; 95% CI, 1.7-3.89; P < .001). Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) comprised most liver cancers in our study population, and the association between PD and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma was not significant (HR, 1.34; 95% CI, 0.82-2.18; P = .24). As to the malignant brain tumors, we showed that PD was a risk factor in both women and men (HR, 3.75 and 3.32, respectively; P = .02 and .002) and in both glioblastoma (HR, 3.07; 95% CI, 1.36-6.93; P = .007) and nonglioblastoma brain malignant neoplasms (HR, 4.34; 95% CI, 1.62-11.6; P = .003). When stratified by age, PD was associated with an increased risk only in patients 70 years or older (HR, 4.71; 95% CI, 1.93-11.5; P < .001).

To investigate the association between PD and lung cancers of different cell types, we further stratified lung cancers by sex, age, and histologic characteristics (Table 2). We showed that PD was a significant risk factor for lung cancers in both sexes (HR, 1.56 and P < .001 for both comparisons). The risk could not be observed in patients younger than 60 years, and the HRs increased with aging. The HR was 1.02 (95% CI, 0.24-4.29; P = .98) in the group younger than 50 years, 1.09 (95% CI, 0.63-1.91; P = .75) in the group aged 50 to 59 years, 1.44 (95% CI, 1.08-1.92; P = .01) in the group aged 60 to 69 years, and 1.47 (95% CI, 1.28-1.68; P < .001) in the group that was 70 years or older. When analyzing different histological types, PD was a risk factor for adenocarcinoma (HR, 1.61; 95% CI, 1.35-1.92; P < .001) and small cell carcinoma (HR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.17-2.74; P = .007), but not squamous cell carcinoma (HR, 1.30; 95% CI, 0.99-1.72; P = .06) or other types of non–small cell lung cancers (HR, 1.10; 95% CI, 0.68-1.77; P = .71).

To determine if the factor of age contributed to the nonsignificant results between PD and breast cancers, PD and ovarian cancers, and PD and thyroid cancers, we further examined the hormone-related cancers by age stratification. As shown in Table 3 and Table 4, PD remained an insignificant factor with regard to thyroid cancers in both sexes and in each individual age group. Similarly, PD was not associated with the risk of breast or ovarian cancers in each individual age group. For uterine cancers, the risk effect of PD (overall HR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.12-3.01; P = .02) was not observed when patients were stratified by age. For cervical cancers, the risk effect of PD (overall HR, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.05-1.76; P = .002) remained only in the patients who were 70 years or older (HR, 1.50; 95% CI, 1.03-2.20; P = .04). For prostate cancers, PD was associated with an increased cancer risk in all patients (HR, 1.80; 95% CI, 1.52-2.13; P < .001) and in patients 70 years or older (HR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.42-2.05; P < .001).

Discussion

To our knowledge, this is the first nationwide large-scale study that has investigated the association between PD and cancers in East Asians. Our study concludes that PD is overall a risk factor for cancer in Taiwan. There were only 3 types of cancers that were not associated with PD in our cohort: breast, ovarian, and thyroid cancers. Increased melanoma risk in PD patients was consistently reported in previous trials.40-42 In line with these findings, our study also revealed an increase of melanoma risk in the PD cohort despite the fact that melanoma incidence was relatively low among Asians.43 The excess melanoma risk might be the result of shared biosynthetic pathways between tyrosine and L-dopa.44 Family members of PD patients were more likely to develop melanoma, and patients with melanoma and their family had an increased risk of PD.45 Increased incidences of malignant brain tumors, prostate, uterine, and renal cancers in PD patients were variably reported in the previous studies, and these results were validated in our cohort.23,24

Previous studies in Western populations described a reduced risk of smoking-related cancers in the PD patients.21,22,24 In contrast, our study disclosed that PD was associated with increased cancer risks in 16 out of 19 cancers studied, including those categorized as smoking-related: esophageal, lung, and bladder cancers. In addition, PD was not associated with breast cancer risk in our cohort, whereas it was reported to be associated with increased breast cancer risks in a Danish cohort,22 an English cohort,24 and a pooled analysis16 done in LRRK2-mutated PD patients (patients’ ethnicities included Ashkenazi and Sephardic Jews and whites). These discrepancies could be attributed to a combination of different genetic backgrounds and habitual and/or environmental exposures.

Smoking was the most discussed habitual exposure related to both PD and cancers. In Taiwan, the smoking percentage was 16.4% in the overall adult population, 29.2% in men, and 3.5% in women.46 Despite the differences in smoking percentage between men and women, PD remained a risk factor for most cancers examined in our study with or without sex stratification.

Pesticide exposure was reported to be one of the etiologies of PD. The diverse associations between pesticide exposures and PD onset in different geographic areas were attributed to gene-environment interactions in several studies.47,48 Although precise data on the differences of pesticide exposures between Taiwan and Western countries were unavailable, it was reasonable to speculate that this discrepancy contributed partly to the nearly opposite results between our study and the previous cohorts in view of PD and risk of cancer.

Esophageal cancers demonstrate how different habitual and/or environmental exposures lead to diverse processes of carcinogenesis. Adenocarcinoma is currently the most predominant cell type of esophageal cancers in several Western countries,49 whereas most esophageal cancers in our cohort remain squamous cell carcinoma. Use of the combination of tobacco, alcohol, and areca nuts leads to a multiplicative carcinogenic effects for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.50 A high percentage of patients in Taiwan are users of this combination.50 This may partly explain the disparate cancer types observed and the distinct associations between PD and risk of esophageal cancers found in different geographic areas.

Lung adenocarcinoma is a well-understood model that illustrates the importance of ethnicity in disease pathogenesis. The percentage of EGFR-activating mutations is unexpectedly high among East Asians with lung adenocarcinoma.35,36 Similar stories were surprisingly found in triple-negative breast cancers (TNBCs). It was reported that EGFR-activating mutations were found in 11.4% of TNBCs in a Chinese cohort, whereas none were found in white cohorts.51-53 No direct evidence to date links EGFR mutations to cancer risk in PD patients. Nevertheless, the opposite associations between lung and/or breast cancers and PD in our cohort vs white cohorts and the strikingly different EGFR-activating mutation rates between East Asians and whites provide a hint of possible linkage. Indeed, EGFR was reported to interact with several PARK genes, such as PARK2, LRRK2, and DJ-1.54-56PARK2 mutation has been shown to be associated with familial lung cancer,9 and DJ-1 has been reported to play roles in breast cancer.12,13 Further studies are needed to elucidate the role of EGFR in respect of cancer development among PD patients.

We also showed in our study an increased risk of HCC in the PD cohort, with the highest HR resided in the group aged 50 to 59 years. It is not clear why the highest risk occurs in the fifth decade, but the possible contribution by genetic alteration is worth considering. The association between PARK2 mutation and early-onset PD has been well established.3 Furthermore, somatic mutations of PARK2 were associated with multiple types of cancers.6 It has been revealed that HCC developed spontaneously in a Park2 knockout mouse model, and PARK2 has been suggested to be a tumor suppressor for HCC.7 There is a diverse heterogeneity in the rate of progression from a steady hepatitis carrier state to HCC development. The HCC risk distribution pattern among our PD cohort suggests a possible association between PARK genes and HCC. The results provide a new way of thinking in regard to the variable HCC onset age.

Our study revealed PD as a risk factor for most cancers examined. In breast, ovarian, and thyroid cancers, no association with PD was found. We could not identify PD’s protective role in any single cancer in our study. The finding was nearly opposite of those in most cohort studies or meta-analyses derived from Western populations.57 There were, however, nationwide Swedish21 and English24 cohort studies that partly supported our findings. In other words, the associations between PD and cancers were still nonconclusive, and the results derived from Western populations could not be applied to East Asians. Our findings suggested that different genetic backgrounds and habitual and/or environmental exposures combined resulted in the disparate outcomes. It is, therefore, reasonable to speculate that different alterations of PARK genes may contribute to distinct interactions with specific tumor-associated genes that end up in a diverse outcome of cancer development in different ethnic groups. The study highlights the fact that ethnicity matters in disease pathogenesis.

The study has a number of strengths. First, this cohort study was conducted from a nationwide population-based database containing more than 24 million subjects that allowed an accurate evaluation of the associations between specific diseases (eg, PD and cancers), age, and sex. Second, a cohort study would be the method of choice in the exploration of the association between PD and cancers. Randomized clinical trials were not feasible in this regard, and survival effects were considerable in case-control studies in that if PD-related mortalities developed before the onset of cancer, exposures to cancer would be underestimated in the case group. Finally, the health insurance program in Taiwan has a coverage rate exceeding 99% of the entire population, including patients with cancers, and all the medical records could be accurately traced in the NHIRD. Therefore, PD patients with or without cancers could hardly be lost to follow-up under our NHIRD program, and vice versa. In addition, the reference cohort was matched by the most important confounding factors—age and sex.

However, there were still limitations in this study. First of all, PD was defined according to the medical records in our study, and underascertainment of PD cases in the reference cohort was very likely. Either service-based studies or studies by record linkage system underestimated the incidence of PD because they exclude patients who do not seek medical advice.58 This would make the HRs underestimated, indicating that PD patients would have an even higher risk for cancer than the current measurement. Second, smoking status was not available in the NHIRD record and was thus not included in our analysis. Third, although we selected the reference cohort by matching the most important confounding factors, age and sex, and the robust estimation of HRs was obtained by multivariate analyses, there were still others not considered. Finally, the hypothesis of this study was generated from a genetic point of view. Nevertheless, we have not yet investigated the PARK gene alterations of the PD patients who developed subsequent cancers in our cohort. Further studies are needed to elucidate the possible genetic correlations between these 2 disease entities.

Conclusions

Based on this nationwide study on the association between PD and cancer risk, we conclude that PD is a risk factor for most cancers in Taiwan. In our cohort, only breast, ovarian, and thyroid cancers show no association with PD. Further studies are needed to clarify whether our findings can be applied to other East Asian populations. The striking differences between our study and the previous studies in Western cohorts suggest the importance of ethnicity and environmental exposures in disease pathogenesis.

Back to top
Article Information

Corresponding Author: Pan-Chyr Yang, MD, PhD, Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University College of Medicine, No. 1, Sec. 4, Roosevelt Road, Taipei 1061, Taiwan (pcyang@ntu.edu.tw).

Accepted for Publication: May 1, 2015.

Published Online: June 18, 2015. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.1752.

Author Contributions: Drs Yang and C.-H. Lin had full access to all of the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis. Drs P.-C. Yang and C.-H. Lin contributed equally to this work.

Study concept and design: P.-Y. Lin, C.-H. Lin, Yang.

Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: P.-Y. Lin, Chang, Hsiao, Huang, C.-H. Lin.

Drafting of the manuscript: P.-Y. Lin.

Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: P.-Y. Lin, Chang, Hsiao, Huang, C.-H. Lin, Yang.

Statistical analysis: Chang, C.-H. Lin.

Obtained funding: C.-H. Lin, Yang.

Administrative, technical, or material support: P.-Y. Lin, Hsiao, C.-H. Lin, Yang.

Study supervision: C.-H. Lin, Yang.

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.

Funding/Support: This study was supported by grants from the National Science Council (NSC103-2923-B-002-003) and from Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taiwan (TCVGH-NHRI10405).

Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The National Science Council and Taichung Veterans General Hospital had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Additional Contributions: We thank The Collaboration Center of Health Information Application, Ministry of Health and Welfare and the Healthcare Service Research Center (HSRC) of Taichung Veterans General Hospital for statistical support.

References
1.
Samii  A, Nutt  JG, Ransom  BR.  Parkinson’s disease.  Lancet. 2004;363(9423):1783-1793.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
2.
Thomas  B, Beal  MF.  Parkinson’s disease.  Hum Mol Genet. 2007;16 Spec No. 2(Spec No 2):R183-R194.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
3.
Klein  C, Westenberger  A.  Genetics of Parkinson’s disease.  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2012;2(1):a008888.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
4.
Pan  T, Zhu  J, Hwu  WJ, Jankovic  J.  The role of alpha-synuclein in melanin synthesis in melanoma and dopaminergic neuronal cells.  PLoS One. 2012;7(9):e45183.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
5.
Bethge  N, Lothe  RA, Honne  H,  et al.  Colorectal cancer DNA methylation marker panel validated with high performance in non-Hodgkin lymphoma.  Epigenetics. 2014;9(3):428-436.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
6.
Veeriah  S, Taylor  BS, Meng  S,  et al.  Somatic mutations of the Parkinson’s disease-associated gene PARK2 in glioblastoma and other human malignancies.  Nat Genet. 2010;42(1):77-82.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
7.
Fujiwara  M, Marusawa  H, Wang  HQ,  et al.  Parkin as a tumor suppressor gene for hepatocellular carcinoma.  Oncogene. 2008;27(46):6002-6011.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
8.
Gong  Y, Zack  TI, Morris  LG,  et al.  Pan-cancer genetic analysis identifies PARK2 as a master regulator of G1/S cyclins.  Nat Genet. 2014;46(6):588-594.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
9.
Xiong  D, Wang  Y, Kupert  E,  et al.  A recurrent mutation in PARK2 is associated with familial lung cancer.  Am J Hum Genet. 2015;96(2):301-308.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
10.
Martin  SA, Hewish  M, Sims  D, Lord  CJ, Ashworth  A.  Parallel high-throughput RNA interference screens identify PINK1 as a potential therapeutic target for the treatment of DNA mismatch repair-deficient cancers.  Cancer Res. 2011;71(5):1836-1848.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
11.
O’Flanagan  CH, Morais  VA, Wurst  W, De Strooper  B, O’Neill  C.  The Parkinson’s gene PINK1 regulates cell cycle progression and promotes cancer-associated phenotypes.  Oncogene. 2015;34(11):1363-1374.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
12.
Tsuchiya  B, Iwaya  K, Kohno  N,  et al.  Clinical significance of DJ-1 as a secretory molecule: retrospective study of DJ-1 expression at mRNA and protein levels in ductal carcinoma of the breast.  Histopathology. 2012;61(1):69-77.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
13.
Ismail  IA, Kang  HS, Lee  HJ, Kim  JK, Hong  SH.  DJ-1 upregulates breast cancer cell invasion by repressing KLF17 expression.  Br J Cancer. 2014;110(5):1298-1306.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
14.
Looyenga  BD, Furge  KA, Dykema  KJ,  et al.  Chromosomal amplification of leucine-rich repeat kinase-2 (LRRK2) is required for oncogenic MET signaling in papillary renal and thyroid carcinomas.  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(4):1439-1444.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
15.
Lewis  PA, Manzoni  C.  LRRK2 and human disease: a complicated question or a question of complexes?  Sci Signal. 2012;5(207):pe2.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
16.
Agalliu  I, San Luciano  M, Mirelman  A,  et al.  Higher frequency of certain cancers in LRRK2 G2019S mutation carriers with Parkinson disease: a pooled analysis.  JAMA Neurol. 2015;72(1):58-65.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
17.
Laman  H, Funes  JM, Ye  H,  et al.  Transforming activity of Fbxo7 is mediated specifically through regulation of cyclin D/cdk6.  EMBO J. 2005;24(17):3104-3116.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
18.
Wirdefeldt  K, Adami  HO, Cole  P, Trichopoulos  D, Mandel  J.  Epidemiology and etiology of Parkinson’s disease: a review of the evidence.  Eur J Epidemiol. 2011;26(suppl 1):S1-S58.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
19.
Bajaj  A, Driver  JA, Schernhammer  ES.  Parkinson’s disease and cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis.  Cancer Causes Control. 2010;21(5):697-707.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
20.
Driver  JA.  Inverse association between cancer and neurodegenerative disease: review of the epidemiologic and biological evidence.  Biogerontology. 2014;15(6):547-557.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
21.
Wirdefeldt  K, Weibull  CE, Chen  H,  et al.  Parkinson’s disease and cancer: A register-based family study.  Am J Epidemiol. 2014;179(1):85-94.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
22.
Olsen  JH, Friis  S, Frederiksen  K, McLaughlin  JK, Mellemkjaer  L, Møller  H.  Atypical cancer pattern in patients with Parkinson’s disease.  Br J Cancer. 2005;92(1):201-205.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
23.
Kareus  SA, Figueroa  KP, Cannon-Albright  LA, Pulst  SM.  Shared predispositions of parkinsonism and cancer: a population-based pedigree-linked study.  Arch Neurol. 2012;69(12):1572-1577.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
24.
Ong  EL, Goldacre  R, Goldacre  M.  Differential risks of cancer types in people with Parkinson’s disease: a national record-linkage study.  Eur J Cancer. 2014;50(14):2456-2462.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
25.
Roberts  SA, Gordenin  DA.  Hypermutation in human cancer genomes: footprints and mechanisms.  Nat Rev Cancer. 2014;14(12):786-800.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
26.
Eifert  C, Powers  RS.  From cancer genomes to oncogenic drivers, tumour dependencies and therapeutic targets.  Nat Rev Cancer. 2012;12(8):572-578.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
27.
Maris  JM, Knudson  AG.  Revisiting tissue specificity of germline cancer predisposing mutations.  Nat Rev Cancer. 2015;15(2):65-66.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
28.
Lesage  S, Dürr  A, Tazir  M,  et al; French Parkinson’s Disease Genetics Study Group.  LRRK2 G2019S as a cause of Parkinson’s disease in North African Arabs.  N Engl J Med. 2006;354(4):422-423.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
29.
Ozelius  LJ, Senthil  G, Saunders-Pullman  R,  et al.  LRRK2 G2019S as a cause of Parkinson’s disease in Ashkenazi Jews.  N Engl J Med. 2006;354(4):424-425.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
30.
Clark  LN, Wang  Y, Karlins  E,  et al.  Frequency of LRRK2 mutations in early- and late-onset Parkinson disease.  Neurology. 2006;67(10):1786-1791.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
31.
Zabetian  CP, Hutter  CM, Yearout  D,  et al.  LRRK2 G2019S in families with Parkinson disease who originated from Europe and the Middle East: evidence of two distinct founding events beginning two millennia ago.  Am J Hum Genet. 2006;79(4):752-758.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
32.
Paez  JG, Jänne  PA, Lee  JC,  et al.  EGFR mutations in lung cancer: correlation with clinical response to gefitinib therapy.  Science. 2004;304(5676):1497-1500.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
33.
Shan  Y, Eastwood  MP, Zhang  X,  et al.  Oncogenic mutations counteract intrinsic disorder in the EGFR kinase and promote receptor dimerization.  Cell. 2012;149(4):860-870.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
34.
Red Brewer  M, Yun  CH, Lai  D, Lemmon  MA, Eck  MJ, Pao  W.  Mechanism for activation of mutated epidermal growth factor receptors in lung cancer.  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110(38):E3595-E3604.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
35.
Mok  TS, Wu  YL, Thongprasert  S,  et al.  Gefitinib or carboplatin-paclitaxel in pulmonary adenocarcinoma.  N Engl J Med. 2009;361(10):947-957.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
36.
Fukuoka  M, Yano  S, Giaccone  G,  et al.  Multi-institutional randomized phase II trial of gefitinib for previously treated patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (The IDEAL 1 Trial) [corrected].  J Clin Oncol. 2003;21(12):2237-2246.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
37.
Abdulla  MA, Ahmed  I, Assawamakin  A,  et al; HUGO Pan-Asian SNP Consortium; Indian Genome Variation Consortium.  Mapping human genetic diversity in Asia.  Science. 2009;326(5959):1541-1545.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
38.
Lin  CH, Sheu  WHH.  Hypoglycaemic episodes and risk of dementia in diabetes mellitus: 7-year follow-up study.  J Intern Med. 2013;273(1):102-110.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
39.
 Taiwan National Cancer Registry Database.http://tcr.cph.ntu.edu.tw/main.php?Page=N1. Accessed May 17, 2015.
40.
Constantinescu  R, Romer  M, Kieburtz  K; DATATOP Investigators of the Parkinson Study Group.  Malignant melanoma in early Parkinson’s disease: the DATATOP trial.  Mov Disord. 2007;22(5):720-722.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
41.
Schwid  SR, Bausch  J, Oakes  D,  et al; PSG PRECEPT Investigators.  Cancer incidence in a trial of an antiapoptotic agent for Parkinson’s disease.  Mov Disord. 2010;25(12):1801-1808.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
42.
Constantinescu  R, Elm  J, Auinger  P,  et al; NET-PD Investigators.  Malignant melanoma in early-treated Parkinson’s disease: the NET-PD trial.  Mov Disord. 2014;29(2):263-265.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
43.
Tanaka  H, Tsukuma  H, Tomita  S,  et al.  Time trends of incidence for cutaneous melanoma among the Japanese population: an analysis of Osaka Cancer Registry data, 1964-95.  J Epidemiol. 1999;9(6)(suppl):S129-S135.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
44.
Paisán-Ruiz  C, Houlden  H.  Common pathogenic pathways in melanoma and Parkinson disease.  Neurology. 2010;75(18):1653-1655.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
45.
Gao  X, Simon  KC, Han  J, Schwarzschild  MA, Ascherio  A.  Family history of melanoma and Parkinson disease risk.  Neurology. 2009;73(16):1286-1291.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
46.
 Annual Report of Health Promotion Administration. Taiwan: Ministry of Health and Welfare; 2014.
47.
Frigerio  R, Sanft  KR, Grossardt  BR,  et al.  Chemical exposures and Parkinson’s disease: a population-based case-control study.  Mov Disord. 2006;21(10):1688-1692.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
48.
Barnhill  LM, Bronstein  JM.  Pesticides and Parkinson’s disease: is it in your genes?  Neurodegener Dis Manag. 2014;4(3):197-200.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
49.
Rustgi  AK, El-Serag  HB.  Esophageal carcinoma.  N Engl J Med. 2014;371(26):2499-2509.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
50.
Wu  IC, Wu  CC, Lu  CY,  et al.  Substance use (alcohol, areca nut and cigarette) is associated with poor prognosis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.  PLoS One. 2013;8(2):e55834.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
51.
Teng  YH, Tan  WJ, Thike  AA,  et al.  Mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene in triple negative breast cancer: possible implications for targeted therapy.  Breast Cancer Res. 2011;13(2):R35.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
52.
Jacot  W, Lopez-Crapez  E, Thezenas  S,  et al.  Lack of EGFR-activating mutations in European patients with triple-negative breast cancer could emphasise geographic and ethnic variations in breast cancer mutation profiles.  Breast Cancer Res. 2011;13(6):R133.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
53.
Secq  V, Villeret  J, Fina  F,  et al.  Triple negative breast carcinoma EGFR amplification is not associated with EGFR, Kras or ALK mutations.  Br J Cancer. 2014;110(4):1045-1052.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
54.
Fallon  L, Bélanger  CM, Corera  AT,  et al.  A regulated interaction with the UIM protein Eps15 implicates parkin in EGF receptor trafficking and PI(3)K-Akt signalling.  Nat Cell Biol. 2006;8(8):834-842.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
55.
Gómez-Suaga  P, Rivero-Ríos  P, Fdez  E,  et al.  LRRK2 delays degradative receptor trafficking by impeding late endosomal budding through decreasing Rab7 activity.  Hum Mol Genet. 2014;23(25):6779-6796.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
56.
Hinkle  DA, Mullett  SJ, Gabris  BE, Hamilton  RL.  DJ-1 expression in glioblastomas shows positive correlation with p53 expression and negative correlation with epidermal growth factor receptor amplification.  Neuropathology. 2011;31(1):29-37.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
57.
Catalá-López  F, Suárez-Pinilla  M, Suárez-Pinilla  P,  et al.  Inverse and direct cancer comorbidity in people with central nervous system disorders: a meta-analysis of cancer incidence in 577,013 participants of 50 observational studies.  Psychother Psychosom. 2014;83(2):89-105.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
58.
Benito-León  J, Bermejo-Pareja  F, Morales-González  JM,  et al; Neurological Disorders in Central Spain (NEDICES) Study Group.  Incidence of Parkinson disease and parkinsonism in three elderly populations of central Spain.  Neurology. 2004;62(5):734-741.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
×