[Skip to Content]
Sign In
Individual Sign In
Create an Account
Institutional Sign In
OpenAthens Shibboleth
[Skip to Content Landing]
Views 738
Citations 0
Correction
April 2016

Incorrect Sentence in the Abstract

Author Affiliations
 

Copyright 2016 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved. Applicable FARS/DFARS Restrictions Apply to Government Use.

JAMA Oncol. 2016;2(4):549. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.0571

In the Original Investigation entitled “Effectiveness of Digital Breast Tomosynthesis Compared With Digital Mammography: Outcomes Analysis From 3 Years of Breast Cancer Screening” published online February 18, 2106, and to be published in the June print issue of JAMA Oncology,1 an error occurred in the Results portion of the Abstract. The last sentence, which read, “Interval cancer rates, determined using available follow-up data, decreased from 0.7 per 100 women screened with the use of DM to 0.5 per 1000 screened with the use of DBT1.” should be replaced with “Interval cancer rates, determined using available follow-up data, decreased from 0.7 per 1000 women screened with the use of DM to 0.5 per 1000 screened with the use of DBT1.” This article was corrected online and will be correct in the print issue.

References
1.
McDonald  ES, Oustimov  A, Weinstein  SP, Synnestvedt  MB, Schnall  M, Conant  EF.  Effectiveness of digital breast tomosynthesis compared with digital mammography: outcomes analysis from 3 years of breast cancer screening [published online February 18, 2016].  JAMA Oncol. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2015.5536.Google Scholar
×