Preventable Incidence and Mortality of Carcinoma Associated With Lifestyle Factors Among White Adults in the United States | Cancer Screening, Prevention, Control | JAMA Oncology | JAMA Network
[Skip to Navigation]
Access to paid content on this site is currently suspended due to excessive activity being detected from your IP address 18.207.129.82. Please contact the publisher to request reinstatement.
1.
Siegel  RL, Miller  KD, Jemal  A.  Cancer statistics, 2016.  CA Cancer J Clin. 2016;66(1):7-30.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
2.
Ma  J, Ward  EM, Siegel  RL, Jemal  A.  Temporal trends in mortality in the United States, 1969-2013.  JAMA. 2015;314(16):1731-1739.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
3.
World Cancer Research Fund/American Institute for Cancer Research.  Food, Nutrition, Physical Activity, and the Prevention of Cancer: a Global Perspective. Washington, DC: American Institute for Cancer Research; 2007.
4.
Tomasetti  C, Vogelstein  B.  Cancer etiology: variation in cancer risk among tissues can be explained by the number of stem cell divisions.  Science. 2015;347(6217):78-81.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
5.
Wild  C, Brennan  P, Plummer  M, Bray  F, Straif  K, Zavadil  J.  Cancer risk: role of chance overstated.  Science. 2015;347(6223):728.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
6.
Potter  JD, Prentice  RL.  Cancer risk: tumors excluded.  Science. 2015;347(6223):727.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
7.
Gotay  C, Dummer  T, Spinelli  J.  Cancer risk: prevention is crucial.  Science. 2015;347(6223):728.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
8.
Song  M, Giovannucci  EL.  Cancer risk: many factors contribute.  Science. 2015;347(6223):728-729.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
9.
O’Callaghan  M.  Cancer risk: accuracy of literature.  Science. 2015;347(6223):729.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
10.
Rozhok  AI, Wahl  GM, DeGregori  J.  A critical examination of the “bad luck” explanation of cancer risk.  Cancer Prev Res (Phila). 2015;8(9):762-764.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
11.
Giovannucci  EL.  Are most cancers caused by specific risk factors acting on tissues with high underlying stem cell divisions?  J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015;108(3):djv343.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
12.
Wu  S, Powers  S, Zhu  W, Hannun  YA.  Substantial contribution of extrinsic risk factors to cancer development.  Nature. 2016;529(7584):43-47.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
13.
Ashford  NA, Bauman  P, Brown  HS,  et al.  Cancer risk: role of environment.  Science. 2015;347(6223):727.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
14.
Colditz  GA, Manson  JE, Hankinson  SE.  The Nurses’ Health Study: 20-year contribution to the understanding of health among women.  J Womens Health. 1997;6(1):49-62.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
15.
Rimm  EB, Giovannucci  EL, Willett  WC,  et al.  Prospective study of alcohol consumption and risk of coronary disease in men.  Lancet. 1991;338(8765):464-468.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
16.
Giovannucci  E, Colditz  G, Stampfer  MJ,  et al.  The assessment of alcohol consumption by a simple self-administered questionnaire.  Am J Epidemiol. 1991;133(8):810-817.PubMedGoogle Scholar
17.
U.S. Department of Agriculture and U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.  Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2010. 7th ed. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 2010.
18.
Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee.  Physical Activity Guidelines Advisory Committee Report, 2008. Washington, DC: US Dept of Health and Human Services; 2008.
19.
Arem  H, Moore  SC, Patel  A,  et al.  Leisure time physical activity and mortality: a detailed pooled analysis of the dose-response relationship.  JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175(6):959-967.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
20.
Chasan-Taber  S, Rimm  EB, Stampfer  MJ,  et al.  Reproducibility and validity of a self-administered physical activity questionnaire for male health professionals.  Epidemiology. 1996;7(1):81-86.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
21.
Mukamal  KJ, Chiuve  SE, Rimm  EB.  Alcohol consumption and risk for coronary heart disease in men with healthy lifestyles.  Arch Intern Med. 2006;166(19):2145-2150.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
22.
McCullough  ML, Feskanich  D, Stampfer  MJ,  et al.  Diet quality and major chronic disease risk in men and women: moving toward improved dietary guidance.  Am J Clin Nutr. 2002;76(6):1261-1271.PubMedGoogle Scholar
23.
Etzioni  R, Penson  DF, Legler  JM,  et al.  Overdiagnosis due to prostate-specific antigen screening: lessons from U.S. prostate cancer incidence trends.  J Natl Cancer Inst. 2002;94(13):981-990.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
24.
Stampfer  MJ, Willett  WC, Speizer  FE,  et al.  Test of the National Death Index.  Am J Epidemiol. 1984;119(5):837-839.PubMedGoogle Scholar
25.
Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program. SEER*Stat Database: Incidence—SEER 9 Regs Research Data, Nov 2014 Sub (1973-2012) <Katrina/Rita Population Adjustment>—Linked To County Attributes—Total U.S., 1969-2013 Counties, National Cancer Institute, DCCPS, Surveillance Research Program, Surveillance Systems Branch, released April 2015, based on the November 2014 submission. http://seer.cancer.gov. Accessed November 11, 2015.
26.
Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Program. SEER*Stat Database: Mortality—All COD, Aggregated Total U.S. (1969-2011) <Katrina/Rita Population Adjustment>, National Cancer Institute, DCCPS, Surveillance Research Program, Surveillance Systems Branch, released July 2014. Underlying mortality data provided by NCHS. http://seer.cancer.gov. Accessed November 11, 2015.
27.
Surveillance Research Program NCI.  SEER*Stat Software. Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; 2014.
28.
Siegel  RL, Jacobs  EJ, Newton  CC,  et al.  Deaths due to cigarette smoking for 12 smoking-related cancers in the United States.  JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175(9):1574-1576.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
29.
IARC Working Group on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans.  Alcohol consumption and ethyl carbamate.  IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum. 2010;96:3-1383.PubMedGoogle Scholar
30.
Schottenfeld  D, Beebe-Dimmer  JL, Buffler  PA, Omenn  GS.  Current perspective on the global and United States cancer burden attributable to lifestyle and environmental risk factors.  Annu Rev Public Health. 2013;34:97-117.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
31.
Bray  F, Jemal  A, Grey  N, Ferlay  J, Forman  D.  Global cancer transitions according to the Human Development Index (2008-2030): a population-based study.  Lancet Oncol. 2012;13(8):790-801.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
32.
Parkin  DM, Boyd  L, Walker  LC.  16. The fraction of cancer attributable to lifestyle and environmental factors in the UK in 2010.  Br J Cancer. 2011;105(suppl 2):S77-S81.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
33.
World Health Organization.  Attributable Causes of Cancer in France in the Year 2000. Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer; 2007.
34.
Inoue  M, Sawada  N, Matsuda  T,  et al.  Attributable causes of cancer in Japan in 2005—systematic assessment to estimate current burden of cancer attributable to known preventable risk factors in Japan.  Ann Oncol. 2012;23(5):1362-1369.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
35.
Rockhill  B, Newman  B, Weinberg  C.  Use and misuse of population attributable fractions.  Am J Public Health. 1998;88(1):15-19.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
36.
Ezzati  M, Hoorn  SV, Rodgers  A, Lopez  AD, Mathers  CD, Murray  CJ; Comparative Risk Assessment Collaborating Group.  Estimates of global and regional potential health gains from reducing multiple major risk factors.  Lancet. 2003;362(9380):271-280.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
37.
Doll  R, Peto  R.  The causes of cancer: quantitative estimates of avoidable risks of cancer in the United States today.  J Natl Cancer Inst. 1981;66(6):1191-1308.PubMedGoogle Scholar
38.
Blot  WJ, Tarone  RE.  Doll and Peto’s quantitative estimates of cancer risks: holding generally true for 35 years.  J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015;107(4):djv044.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
39.
Song  M, Giovannucci  EL.  RE: Doll and Peto’s quantitative estimates of cancer risks: holding generally true for 35 years.  J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015;107(10):djv240.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
40.
Miller  JW, King  JB, Joseph  DA, Richardson  LC; Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).  Breast cancer screening among adult women—Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, United States, 2010.  MMWR Suppl. 2012;61(2):46-50.PubMedGoogle Scholar
41.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).  Vital signs: Colorectal cancer screening, incidence, and mortality—United States, 2002-2010.  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2011;60(26):884-889.PubMedGoogle Scholar
42.
Myers  ER, Moorman  P, Gierisch  JM,  et al.  Benefits and harms of breast cancer screening: a systematic review.  JAMA. 2015;314(15):1615-1634.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
43.
Ewertz  M, Jensen  MB, Gunnarsdóttir  KA,  et al.  Effect of obesity on prognosis after early-stage breast cancer.  J Clin Oncol. 2011;29(1):25-31.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
44.
Litton  JK, Gonzalez-Angulo  AM, Warneke  CL,  et al.  Relationship between obesity and pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy among women with operable breast cancer.  J Clin Oncol. 2008;26(25):4072-4077.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
45.
Friedenreich  CM, Gregory  J, Kopciuk  KA, Mackey  JR, Courneya  KS.  Prospective cohort study of lifetime physical activity and breast cancer survival.  Int J Cancer. 2009;124(8):1954-1962.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
46.
Schmitz  KH, Neuhouser  ML, Agurs-Collins  T,  et al.  Impact of obesity on cancer survivorship and the potential relevance of race and ethnicity.  J Natl Cancer Inst. 2013;105(18):1344-1354.PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
Limit 200 characters
Limit 25 characters
Conflicts of Interest Disclosure

Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.

Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.

Err on the side of full disclosure.

If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.

Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.

Limit 140 characters
Limit 3600 characters or approximately 600 words
    1 Comment for this article
    EXPAND ALL
    &bsol;&quot;Lifestyle&bsol;&quot; May Be a Misnomer
    Stephen B. Strum, MD, FACP | Medical Oncologist Specializing in Prostate Cancer
    This is such an important contribution by Song & Giovannucci. It is especially true in the context of the epidemic of obesity. sedentary behavior, media obsession with alcohol consumption and cigarette smoking, and the interaction that the legalization of marijuana will have on many of these \"lifestyle factors\". But doesn't the term lifestyle miss the boat? Are not these four factors more appropriately identified as biological milieu− what we immerse or expose our unique biological organism to? All four factors have many thousands of peer-reviewed publications relating to their impact on our biology, as it relates to cancer and other crucial systems.

    Individuals who attend to all four factors− who listen to their biology− probably do the same with other milieu factors e.g. lipid status, omega 3 versus 6 fatty acid intake, vitamin D intake, carbohydrate restriction, vitamin and supplement intake, etc. All of these issues and more impact cancer growth and relate to the energy metabolism of cancer i.e. cancer fuels.

    The focus of all physicians should indeed be on prevention; the patient medical record should index these factors and others. I refer to this approach as SAIN medicine: Systems Analysis and Integrity Networking. The landmark article by Song & Giovannucci should evolve our focus and perspective about how we can reduce the incidence and mortality from most types of cancer. Their findings are staggering given that the data presented show that only 18.4% of women and 25.31% of men follow a healthy \"lifestyle\". We, so-called sentient beings, do not listen to our biology!
    CONFLICT OF INTEREST: None Reported
    READ MORE
    Original Investigation
    September 2016

    Preventable Incidence and Mortality of Carcinoma Associated With Lifestyle Factors Among White Adults in the United States

    Author Affiliations
    • 1Clinical and Translational Epidemiology Unit and Division of Gastroenterology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
    • 2Departments of Nutrition and Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
    • 3Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
    JAMA Oncol. 2016;2(9):1154-1161. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2016.0843
    Abstract

    Importance  Lifestyle factors are important for cancer development. However, a recent study has been interpreted to suggest that random mutations during stem cell divisions are the major contributor to human cancer.

    Objective  To estimate the proportion of cases and deaths of carcinoma (all cancers except skin, brain, lymphatic, hematologic, and nonfatal prostate malignancies) among whites in the United States that can be potentially prevented by lifestyle modification.

    Design, Setting, and Participants  This prospective cohort study analyzes cancer and lifestyle data from the Nurses’ Health Study, the Health Professionals Follow-up Study, and US national cancer statistics to evaluate associations between lifestyle and cancer incidence and mortality.

    Exposures  A healthy lifestyle pattern was defined as never or past smoking (pack-years <5), no or moderate alcohol drinking (≤1 drink/d for women, ≤2 drinks/d for men), BMI of at least 18.5 but lower than 27.5, and weekly aerobic physical activity of at least 75 vigorous-intensity or 150 moderate-intensity minutes. Participants meeting all 4 of these criteria made up the low-risk group; all others, the high-risk group.

    Main Outcomes and Measures  We calculated the population-attributable risk (PAR) by comparing incidence and mortality of total and major individual carcinomas between the low- and high-risk groups. We further assessed the PAR at the national scale by comparing the low-risk group with the US population.

    Results  A total of 89 571 women and 46 339 men from 2 cohorts were included in the study: 16 531 women and 11 731 men had a healthy lifestyle pattern (low-risk group), and the remaining 73 040 women and 34 608 men made up the high-risk group. Within the 2 cohorts, the PARs for incidence and mortality of total carcinoma were 25% and 48% in women, and 33% and 44% in men, respectively. For individual cancers, the respective PARs in women and men were 82% and 78% for lung, 29% and 20% for colon and rectum, 30% and 29% for pancreas, and 36% and 44% for bladder. Similar estimates were obtained for mortality. The PARs were 4% and 12% for breast cancer incidence and mortality, and 21% for fatal prostate cancer. Substantially higher PARs were obtained when the low-risk group was compared with the US population. For example, the PARs in women and men were 41% and 63% for incidence of total carcinoma, and 60% and 59% for colorectal cancer, respectively.

    Conclusions and Relevance  A substantial cancer burden may be prevented through lifestyle modification. Primary prevention should remain a priority for cancer control.

    ×