Calculations are based on Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results data from 2010 to 2014. The sample is restricted to first-time cancer diagnoses for adults aged 19 to 64 years. The 2014 expansion states in the SEER database are California, Connecticut, Hawaii, Iowa, Kentucky, Michigan, New Mexico, New Jersey, and Washington. The nonexpansion states are Alaska, Georgia, Louisiana, and Utah. The difference-in-differences estimate for Medicaid expansion was −2.38 (95% CI, −3.97 to −0.79; P = .007). Standard errors were clustered at the state level. The model adjusted for patient’s age, marital status, sex, race/ethnicity, state of residence, year of diagnosis, county unemployment rate, and county median income. Trends in coverage did not differ significantly based on expansion status before 2014 (β = −0.15, 95% CI, −0.42 to 0.13; P = .26).
Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Soni A, Sabik LM, Simon K, Sommers BD. Changes in Insurance Coverage Among Cancer Patients Under the Affordable Care Act. JAMA Oncol. 2018;4(1):122–124. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.3176
The Affordable Care Act (ACA) has reduced the number of uninsured persons in the United States to a historic low. Debate continues about potential changes to the law that could affect coverage for millions, particularly those with preexisting conditions. Meanwhile, cancer is the leading cause of death among Americans aged 19 to 64 years.1 Treatment is often unaffordable for uninsured patients,2 and some studies suggest that expanding insurance coverage could improve cancer-related outcomes.3 Our objective was to quantify changes in health insurance coverage under the ACA among patients newly diagnosed with cancer.
Data came from the National Cancer Institute’s Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program, 2010 through 2014.4 The program is a coordinated registry of all patients with cancer in participating areas in the United States, covering 28% of the population and representative of national demographics. Our sample included adults aged 19 to 64 years with a first-time cancer diagnosis. Indiana University’s institutional review board deemed this study to be nonhuman subjects research that did not require their approval or patient informed consent.
The outcome was the percentage of adults uninsured at diagnosis. We analyzed unadjusted changes in 2014, when the ACA health insurance exchanges and Medicaid expansion went into effect, compared with pre-ACA years 2010-2013. We repeated this analysis stratifying by (1) tumor location for the 5 most common types of nonskin cancer, (2) cancer stage, (3) race/ethnicity, and (4) county poverty rate. We used difference-in-differences regression to assess whether changes in coverage were greater in states with Medicaid expansion than in nonexpansion states, with robust SEs clustered at the state level and adjusting for patient and county characteristics. All analysis was conducted using Stata software, version 14 (StataCorp). P values are 2-sided, and P < .05 indicates statistical significance.
Data were obtained from the SEER Program for 858 193 nonelderly adults with new cancer diagnoses. Of these, 468 131 (54.55%) were women, and the mean (SD) age was 52.44 (9.66) years. The Table shows unadjusted changes in the uninsured rate. Before 2014, 5.73% of these persons were uninsured vs 3.81% in 2014, a 1.92 percentage point decrease (95% CI, −2.02 to −1.81; P < .001) or 33.51% relative decline. Significant declines were present across all stages and sites we assessed. The largest absolute declines were for distant disease (−3.03 percentage points [95% CI, −3.32 to −2.74]) and lung and bronchial cancer (−2.95 percentage points [95% CI, −3.44 to −2.46]), but these represented relative declines similar to those in the full sample (−33.26% for distant disease, −32.67% for lung and bronchial cancer, and −33.51% for the full sample). By demographic features, changes in uninsurance were greatest for persons of Hispanic ethnicity and other race (relative changes of −39.87% for Hispanic and −46.19% for individuals of other race)5 and residents of wealthier counties (relative change of −36.12% for residents of counties that had an above-median poverty rate).
The Figure shows changes based on Medicaid expansion status. The uninsured rate was flat in states without expansion before and after 2014, but it declined sharply in 2014 in expansion states. The Medicaid expansion difference-in-differences estimate was −2.4 percentage points (95% CI, −4.0 to −0.8; P = .007).
Uninsurance among patients with newly diagnosed cancer fell by one-third in the ACA’s first year. Coverage gains were significant across numerous common cancers, multiple demographic groups, and early-stage and late-stage disease. Large gains among Hispanic individuals were consistent with findings of other ACA studies6 and may indicate narrowing disparities. Medicaid expansion states experienced significantly greater gains in coverage. These findings suggest that the general increase in coverage seen in national ACA analyses7 extends to this high-risk population.
Limitations of our analysis include the availability of data from 13 states and 1 year of post-ACA data. Our results are descriptive, and our quasi-experimental Medicaid analysis is subject to potential time-varying confounders. Furthermore, other research indicates that uninsured patients are less likely to be diagnosed with cancer and more likely to be diagnosed at late stages.3 Our finding that uninsurance was greater among those with distant disease in the pre-ACA and post-ACA periods is in line with research suggesting that uninsured patients may not seek care until their cancer has progressed. Although we provide novel evidence that fewer patients newly diagnosed with cancer were uninsured in the post-ACA period, our analysis did not separate the effects of gains in coverage among patients who would have been diagnosed in the absence of the ACA from changes in the number of diagnoses resulting from increased coverage. Future research should examine effects of coverage on cancer diagnoses, treatment, and outcomes. Policy changes that reduce Medicaid funding or weaken protections for individuals with preexisting conditions could be particularly harmful for patients with cancer.
Corresponding Author: Aparna Soni, MA, Department of Business Economics and Public Policy, Kelley School of Business, 1309 E 10th St, Bloomington, IN 47405 (firstname.lastname@example.org).
Accepted for Publication: July 31, 2017.
Published Online: October 19, 2017. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.3176
Author Contributions: Ms Soni had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
Study concept and design: All authors.
Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: All authors.
Drafting of the manuscript: All authors.
Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: All authors.
Statistical analysis: Soni, Sommers.
Obtained funding: Sabik, Sommers.
Administrative, technical, or material support: Simon.
Study supervision: Sabik, Simon.
Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.
Funding/Support: This project was supported by grant R01CA178980, cofunded by the National Cancer Institute and the Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research (Dr Sabik), and by grant K02HS021291 from the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (Dr Sommers).
Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The funding institutions had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
Create a personal account or sign in to: