Customize your JAMA Network experience by selecting one or more topics from the list below.
Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.
Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.
Err on the side of full disclosure.
If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.
Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.
Siegel DA, Fedewa SA, Henley SJ, Pollack LA, Jemal A. Proportion of Never Smokers Among Men and Women With Lung Cancer in 7 US States. JAMA Oncol. 2021;7(2):302–304. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.6362
Previous studies reported increases in the proportion of patients in the US and UK with lung cancer who never smoked cigarettes,1,2 but these were based on small sample sizes from hospital data rather than population-based cancer registries. Beginning in 2011, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) National Program of Cancer Registries supported a comparative effectiveness research project to abstract cigarette smoking history from the medical records of patients.3 Using these population-based data, we examined cigarette smoking patterns by demographic and clinical characteristics among patients with lung cancer.
We included patients 20 years or older who received a diagnosis from January 2011 to December 2016 of microscopically confirmed malignant lung and bronchus cancer as defined by anatomic site codes (C340-C349).4 Cigarette use at diagnosis was determined by medical record abstraction and was coded as never, current, former, and unknown.3 Data were only included for states and years in which less than 15% of cases had cigarette use status coded as unknown (Alaska, Colorado, Florida, Idaho, Louisiana, North Carolina, and Rhode Island). The cancer registries collected information for all patients with cancer; however, 13 496 patients in the included states and years with unknown cigarette use were excluded from the analysis. We calculated the proportion (prevalence) of cigarette smoking status stratified by sex, age, race/ethnicity, and histology and female-to-male prevalence ratios with their 95% CI. Analyses were conducted using SEER*Stat, version 8.3.6 (National Cancer Institute) and SAS, version 9.4 (SAS Institute). This research project was approved by the CDC institutional review board, which determined that patient consent was not needed for this study because the submitted data were deidentified before they were received by the CDC.
Of 129 309 patients with lung cancer, 47 495 (36.7%), 65 665 (50.8%), and 16 149 (12.5%) were current, former, and never smokers, respectively. The proportion of never-smoking patients with lung cancer was higher in women than in men overall (15.7% vs 9.6%; prevalence ratio, 1.63; 95% CI, 1.58-1.68) and across all age, race/ethnicity, and histology categories (Table 13 and Table 23). By age, the never smoking proportion was highest among individuals aged 20 to 49 years (609 of 2198 women [27.7%] and 387 of 2077 men [18.6%]) and lowest among individuals aged 50 to 64 years (2250 of 17 673 women [12.7%] and 1628 of 19 809 men [8.2%]) (Table 1). By race/ethnicity, the proportions of never smoking among women and men with lung cancer were 13.4% (6757/50 407) and 9.0% (4794/53 300) for White patients, 19.0% (1124/5 905) and 8.6% (705/8173) for Black patients, and 32.6% (1289/3952) and 16.0% (836/5225) for Hispanic patients, respectively. By histology, 6% to 8% of men and women with small cell or squamous cell carcinomas were never smokers compared with 5968 of 30 504 women (19.6%) and 3339 of 28 382 men (11.8%) with adenocarcinoma.
The proportion of current smoking among patients aged 20 to 64 years with lung cancer was 49.8% (1094/2198) for women age 20 to 49 years and 50.8% (8983/17 673) for women age 50 to 64 years and 54.8% (1139/2077) to 56.6% (11 204/19 809) for men age 20 to 49 years and 50 to 64 years, respectively. Among patients aged 65 to 79 years, 33.1% (10 347/31 249) of women and 33.3% (11 630/34 878) of men were current smokers and 86.2% (26 986/31 294) of women and 91.2% (31 798/34 878) of men were ever smokers. For all ages combined, the proportions of current smokers were higher for Black than White or Hispanic patients.
More than 84% of women and 90% of men with a new diagnosis of lung cancer had ever smoked, with about half of patients aged 20 to 64 years being current smokers. A higher proportion of never smokers occurred among women with lung cancer compared with men across all age groups, race/ethnicities, and most histologies. Patients with adenocarcinoma had a higher proportion of never smoking, which was consistent with past literature.5
While generalizability may be limited because of a non-national sample, our results are based on large, population-based, and geographically diverse data and may be more generalizable than those from smaller and local hospital-based data sets. Our findings reinforce the need to strengthen and increase cigarette cessation and lung cancer screening uptake among high-risk current and former smokers. Research focusing on never smokers may inform the assessment of lung cancer risk factors, such as secondhand smoke exposure, occupational exposures, radon, air pollution, and genetic factors.6
Accepted for Publication: October 1, 2020.
Published Online: December 3, 2020. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.6362
Corresponding Author: David A. Siegel, MD, MPH, Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 4770 Buford Hwy NE, MS-76, Atlanta, GA 30341 (email@example.com).
Author Contributions: Dr Siegel had full access to all the data in the study and takes responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
Concept and design: Siegel, Pollack, Jemal.
Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: All authors.
Drafting of the manuscript: Siegel, Henley, Pollack, Jemal.
Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: All authors.
Statistical analysis: Siegel, Fedewa, Henley.
Administrative, technical, or material support: Siegel.
Supervision: Pollack, Jemal.
Conflict of Interest Disclosures: Drs Jemal and Fedewa are employed by the American Cancer Society, which receives grants from private and corporate foundations, including foundations associated with companies in the health sector for research outside of the submitted work. These authors are not funded by or key personnel for any of these grants and their salary is solely funded through American Cancer Society funds. No other disclosures were reported.
Funding/Support: This work was supported in part under US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) cooperative agreements of the National Program of Cancer Registries (NPCR; U58/DP000792) in conjunction with the participating states and a CDC comparative effectiveness research contract to ICF (200-200827957). This report was created through staff support from CDC and the American Cancer Society.
Role of the Funder/Sponsor: CDC staff had a role in the design and conduct of the project and collection and management of data in this project as part of the funding support and technical assistance given to state central cancer registries that participate in NPCR. The analysis and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication was the sole responsibility of the authors.
Disclaimer: The findings and conclusions are those of the authors and do not necessarily represent the official position of their affiliations or the CDC.
Additional Contributions: We acknowledge the participating central cancer registries who supported the collection of the data to enhance the NPCR for Comparative Effectiveness Research: Alaska Cancer Registry; Cancer Registry of Greater California; Colorado Central Cancer Registry; Cancer Data Registry of Idaho; Florida Cancer Data System; Louisiana Tumor Registry and Epidemiology Program; Rhode Island Cancer Registry; New Hampshire State Cancer Registry; North Carolina Cancer Registry; and Texas Cancer Registry.