The Role of Temozolomide in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Wild-Type IDH, Unmethylated MGMTp Glioblastoma During the COVID-19 Pandemic | Neuro-oncology | JAMA Oncology | JAMA Network
[Skip to Navigation]
Sign In
Viewpoint
January 21, 2021

The Role of Temozolomide in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Wild-Type IDH, Unmethylated MGMTp Glioblastoma During the COVID-19 Pandemic

Author Affiliations
  • 1The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, Maryland
JAMA Oncol. 2021;7(5):675-676. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.6732

Since 2005, the standard of care for newly diagnosed glioblastoma has been concurrent radiation and temozolomide that is followed by 6 months of adjuvant temozolomide.1,2 During the past 15 years, studies have repeatedly demonstrated that it is the 45% to 55% of patients with glioblastoma with at least partial methylation of the O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase promoter (MGMTp) who benefit from the addition of temozolomide to their treatment regimen.1,3 Several studies have documented that the survival of patients with MGMTp unmethylated glioblastomas is not substantially affected when temozolomide is not administered. Although little appears to be gained by prescribing temozolomide to this patient population, it remains standard practice in the US to advise patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma to undergo concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide regardless of their MGMTp methylation status, as evidenced in the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines.2,4 The current coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic provides unique opportunities to reevaluate treatment recommendations for patients with MGMTp unmethylated disease, as temozolomide-associated immunosuppression might substantially increase mortality from the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) viral infection. Withholding temozolomide in this patient group could also accelerate clinical trials that use novel experimental agents or approaches combined with standard radiation once the pandemic is addressed and research is reprioritized.

The routine use of temozolomide in patients with MGMTp unmethylated glioblastoma has been justified by a modest tail on the survival curves from randomized studies that demonstrate that a few patients with MGMTp unmethylated tumors have prolonged survival if they receive temozolomide.1,5 As clinicians have been unable to identify which of these patients might do unexpectedly well, temozolomide is prescribed to most of those with unmethylated MGMTp tumors in the US.2

However, new evidence has emerged since 2005 that illuminates the unusually long survival of the few patients with MGMTp unmethylated glioblastoma who receive temozolomide. First, large-scale validation studies of quantitative methylation-specific polymerase chain reaction suggest that the prior method of classifying tumors in a binary fashion as either methylated or unmethylated is overly simplistic.6 An alternate approach identifies 3 clinically distinct groups of MGMTp methylation scores that are strongly associated with survival outcomes in patients who receive temozolomide. Patients with methylation scores in the highest range (highly methylated) experienced the maximum clinical benefit from the addition of temozolomide. Those in the intermediate range (partially methylated or gray zone) had partial benefit, while those in the low (truly unmethylated) range derived no survival benefit from the addition of temozolomide.3 Because many glioblastomas with partially methylated MGMTp were classified as unmethylated using the binary classification system, their response to temozolomide likely contributed to the tail of the survival curve in the previously mentioned trials.

Furthermore, the crucial role of isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 or 2 (IDH1/2) mutations in predicting responses to temozolomide has been elucidated over the past decade, and testing for mutant IDH has become routine after its inclusion in the 2016 World Health Organization classification of central nervous system tumors. It is now known that (1) IDH1/2 mutations are present in 5% to 10% of all adult World Health Organization grade IV astrocytomas, (2) patients with IDH-mutant tumors benefit from temozolomide added to their treatment regimen, and (3) a smaller, yet substantial proportion of patients with these sequence variants may be MGMTp unmethylated. Consequently, this IDH-mutant subpopulation is also likely to contribute to a set of long-term survivors in IDH agnostic trials, such as the EORTC-NCIC that established the role of temozolomide in adults with glioblastoma.1 These observations are supported by recent results from the CATNON trial, which failed to demonstrate a survival advantage in IDH–wild-type anaplastic astrocytoma (grade III) when concurrent or adjuvant temozolomide was used with radiation, which was similar to observations with glioblastoma (grade IV astrocytoma).7 In summary, it appears that survival in patients with IDH–wild-type and truly MGMTp unmethylated high-grade astrocytomas, including glioblastoma, is not enhanced by the addition of temozolomide administered concurrently with radiation or in the adjuvant setting.

The administration of more than 8 months of temozolomide during and following radiation is generally well tolerated. However, it does cause nausea, fatigue, and hematologic toxicity. In particular, it contributes to the grade 3/4 lymphopenia that is seen in 40% of patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma that persists for more than 1 year and is associated with shorter survival.6 During the COVID-19 pandemic, the added immunosuppression and more frequent visits to health care facilities for blood tests and adverse effect management may increase the likelihood of acquiring this viral illness, and could also contribute to poorer outcomes, as emerging data suggest that higher COVID-19 mortality rates are associated with severe lymphopenia. These added risks, in a setting where temozolomide has minimal to no therapeutic benefit, are not in the best interests of patients with an incurable illness and a median survival of about 1 year.

Thus, the COVID-19 pandemic provides a unique opportunity for clinicians to reevaluate the standard approach to treating patients with truly unmethylated, IDH–wild-type glioblastomas. Important points to consider are listed below and practical approaches to their implementation are described in the Figure.

Figure.  Treatment Recommendations for Glioblastoma Based on O6-Methylguanine-DNA Methyltransferase Promoter (MGMTp) and Isocitrate Dehydrogenase (IDH) Status During the COVID-19 Pandemic
Treatment Recommendations for Glioblastoma Based on O6-Methylguanine-DNA Methyltransferase Promoter (MGMTp) and Isocitrate Dehydrogenase (IDH) Status During the COVID-19 Pandemic

A practical approach is necessary, as MGMTp testing and next-generation sequencing (NGS) may not be available for weeks after surgery. Patients could be counseled that temozolomide will be administered concurrently with radiation but that there will be further discussion after the final IDH and MGMTp results are reported. If quantitative or semiquantitative MGMTp methylation data are unavailable, patients should be considered to have MGMTp methylated status to ensure that they are not undertreated. An IDH–wild-type status should be established based on NGS if immunohistochemistry screening results are negative for mutant IDH. Ultimately, decisions about the use of temozolomide should also consider patient preferences, demographic characteristics, performance status, and the local prevalence of COVID-19.

  1. Recent studies of the reproducibility and reporting of MGMTp methylation assays and the recently appreciated prognostic and predictive importance of IDH1/2 mutations are critical to understanding the minor tail on the survival curve of MGMTp unmethylated glioblastoma treated with temozolomide. These results would be expected if only a few patients who had partial methylation or IDH1/2 sequence variants participated in these large, randomized studies. However, patients who have unequivocally MGMTp unmethylated and IDH1/2–wild-type glioblastomas are unlikely to derive significant benefit from the administration of concurrent and/or adjuvant temozolomide.

  2. An MGMTp status should be reported as highly methylated, partially methylated, or truly unmethylated using a standard quantitative or semiquantitative assay that has been validated by overall survival data to support clinical decision-making. Reported inconsistencies between institutions and assays are most relevant to the partially MGMTp methylated (gray zone) population.

  3. Although immunohistochemistry can identify canonical IDH1, a full study of IDH1/2 requires next-generation sequencing methods. These are critical, as patients with either mutant IDH1 or IDH2 would likely benefit from the addition of temozolomide to their treatment regimen.

  4. Omission of concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide should be routinely discussed in newly diagnosed unequivocally MGMTp unmethylated and IDH1/2–wild-type glioblastoma.

Back to top
Article Information

Corresponding Author: Stuart A. Grossman, MD, The Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins University, 201 North Broadway, Viragh Building, Room 9178, Mailbox #3, Baltimore, MD 21287 (grossman@jhmi.edu).

Published Online: January 21, 2021. doi:10.1001/jamaoncol.2020.6732

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.

References
1.
Stupp  R, Hegi  ME, Mason  WP,  et al; European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Brain Tumour and Radiation Oncology Groups; National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group.  Effects of radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide versus radiotherapy alone on survival in glioblastoma in a randomised phase III study: 5-year analysis of the EORTC-NCIC trial.   Lancet Oncol. 2009;10(5):459-466. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70025-7 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
2.
Nabors  LB, Portnow  J, Ahluwalia  M,  et al. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology—central nervous system cancers, version 1. Accessed April 23, 2020. https://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/cns.pdf
3.
Hegi  ME, Genbrugge  E, Gorlia  T,  et al.  MGMT promoter methylation cutoff with safety margin for selecting glioblastoma patients into trials omitting temozolomide: a pooled analysis of four clinical trials.   Clin Cancer Res. 2019;25(6):1809-1816. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-3181 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
4.
Hegi  ME, Stupp  R.  Withholding temozolomide in glioblastoma patients with unmethylated MGMT promoter--still a dilemma?   Neuro Oncol. 2015;17(11):1425-1427. doi:10.1093/neuonc/nov198 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
5.
Perry  JR, Laperriere  N, O’Callaghan  CJ,  et al; Trial Investigators.  Short-course radiation plus temozolomide in elderly patients with glioblastoma.   N Engl J Med. 2017;376(11):1027-1037. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1611977 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
6.
Grossman  SA, Ye  X, Lesser  G,  et al; NABTT CNS Consortium.  Immunosuppression in patients with high-grade gliomas treated with radiation and temozolomide.   Clin Cancer Res. 2011;17(16):5473-5480. doi:10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-11-0774 PubMedGoogle ScholarCrossref
7.
Van Den Bent  MJ, Erridge  S, Vogelbaum  MA,  et al  Second interim and first molecular analysis of the EORTC randomized phase III intergroup CATNON trial on concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide in anaplastic glioma without 1p/19q codeletion.   J Clin Oncol. 2019;37(suppl 15):2000-2000. doi:10.1200/JCO.2019.37.15_suppl.2000Google ScholarCrossref
Limit 200 characters
Limit 25 characters
Conflicts of Interest Disclosure

Identify all potential conflicts of interest that might be relevant to your comment.

Conflicts of interest comprise financial interests, activities, and relationships within the past 3 years including but not limited to employment, affiliation, grants or funding, consultancies, honoraria or payment, speaker's bureaus, stock ownership or options, expert testimony, royalties, donation of medical equipment, or patents planned, pending, or issued.

Err on the side of full disclosure.

If you have no conflicts of interest, check "No potential conflicts of interest" in the box below. The information will be posted with your response.

Not all submitted comments are published. Please see our commenting policy for details.

Limit 140 characters
Limit 3600 characters or approximately 600 words
    1 Comment for this article
    Stupp vs Perry?
    valeria interno', Medical Oncologist, MD | Division of Medical Oncology, A.O.U. Consorziale Policlinico di Bari and Department of Biomedical Sciences and Human Oncology, University of Bari ‘A. Moro’, Bari, Italy
    In our experience, many Italian centers, instead of deciding to do not prescribe concomitant and adjuvant Temozolomide in unmethylated GBM patients, identified more patients amenable to undergo a hypofractioned course of adjuvant Radiotherapy ("Perry regimen") thus reducing the afflux of frail patients at hospital and the consecutive risk of Sars-Cov-2 contagious.
    CONFLICT OF INTEREST: None Reported
    ×